Cardiovascular Diabetology

, 18:143 | Cite as

Luseogliflozin attenuates neointimal hyperplasia after wire injury in high-fat diet-fed mice via inhibition of perivascular adipose tissue remodeling

  • Yusaku MoriEmail author
  • Michishige Terasaki
  • Munenori Hiromura
  • Tomomi Saito
  • Hideki Kushima
  • Masakazu Koshibu
  • Naoya Osaka
  • Makoto Ohara
  • Tomoyasu Fukui
  • Hirokazu Ohtaki
  • Hirano Tsutomu
  • Sho-ichi Yamagishi
Open Access
Original investigation



Excess fat deposition could induce phenotypic changes of perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT remodeling), which may promote the progression of atherosclerosis via modulation of adipocytokine secretion. However, it remains unclear whether and how suppression of PVAT remodeling could attenuate vascular injury. In this study, we examined the effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, luseogliflozin on PVAT remodeling and neointima formation after wire injury in mice.


Wilt-type mice fed with low-fat diet (LFD) or high-fat diet (HFD) received oral administration of luseogliflozin (18 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. Mice underwent bilateral femoral artery wire injury followed by unilateral removal of surrounding PVAT. After 25 days, injured femoral arteries and surrounding PVAT were analyzed.


In LFD-fed lean mice, neither luseogliflozin treatment or PVAT removal attenuated the intima-to-media (I/M) ratio of injured arteries. However, in HFD-fed mice, luseogliflozin or PVAT removal reduced the I/M ratio, whereas their combination showed no additive reduction. In PVAT surrounding injured femoral arteries of HFD-fed mice, luseogliflozin treatment decreased the adipocyte sizes. Furthermore, luseogliflozin reduced accumulation of macrophages expressing platelet-derived growth factor-B (PDGF-B) and increased adiponectin gene expression. Gene expression levels of Pdgf-b in PVAT were correlated with the I/M ratio.


Our present study suggests that luseogliflozin could attenuate neointimal hyperplasia after wire injury in HFD-fed mice partly via suppression of macrophage PDGF-B expression in PVAT. Inhibition of PVAT remodeling by luseogliflozin may be a novel therapeutic target for vascular remodeling after angioplasty.


Arterial remodeling Obesity Perivascular adipose tissue SGLT2 inhibitor 



cardiovascular disease


glycated hemoglobin


high-density lipoprotein


hematoxylin and eosin


high-fat diet






low-fat diet


monocyte chemoattractant protein


platelet-derived growth factor


perivascular adipose tissue


reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction


sodium-glucose cotransporter


tumor necrosis factor


visceral adipose tissue


vascular smooth muscle cell


Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death in many countries [1]. Obesity is one of the representative risk factors for CVD, and phenotypic change of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), known as VAT remodeling, is a causal factor that could link visceral obesity to CVD [2, 3]. In response to various metabolic derangements, VAT secrets numerous kinds of adipokines, which can exert cardiovascular actions, thereby being involved in CVD [4, 5, 6]. Indeed, excess fat deposition in VAT further promotes the metabolic derangements by altering adipokine profiles, which results in the development and progression of CVD [5, 6].

Recently, perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) has gained attention as a potential modifiable risk factor for CVD [7, 8]. PVAT have traditionally been regarded as tissues merely providing mechanical support for the vasculature. However, accumulating evidence has shown that PVAT actively secrets various adipokines, and ectopic fat deposition in PVAT could stimulate the remodeling of this tissues and cause the alteration of adipokine secretions as is the case in VAT [9, 10]. Furthermore, a couple of papers have suggested the involvement of PVAT remodeling in atherosclerosis in rodent models [11, 12]. However, the underlying mechanisms are not fully elucidated. In addition, it remains also unclear whether suppression of PVAT remodeling could attenuate the vascular injury and progression of atherosclerosis in mice.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) is an apical membrane-bound transporter, which is selectively expressed at S1 segment of renal proximal tubular epithelial cells, being involved in urinary glucose reabsorption [13, 14]. SGLT2 inhibitors are one of the widely used oral hypoglycemic agents because inhibition of SGLT2 attenuates hyperglycemia by increasing urinary glucose excretion, which is associated with reduction of blood pressure, body weight, waist circumstance, and VAT [15, 16, 17]. Furthermore, several papers have shown that SGLT2 inhibitors could also reduce ectopic fat deposition in the other VATs, such as hepatic and pericardial adipose tissues [18, 19, 20, 21]. The findings led us to speculate that inhibition of SGLT2 may become a therapeutic approach to attenuate the remodeling of PVAT.

In this study, we examined the effect of luseogliflozin, a highly selective SGLT2 inhibitor [22] on PVAT remodeling and neointimal formation after wire injury in high-fat or low-fat fed mice in order to address the issues whether and how suppression of PVAT remodeling could protect against vascular injury in animal models.

Materials and methods

Animal studies

The study design was approved by the Animal Care Committee of Showa University School of Medicine (approval numbers: 09059). Animal experiments were conducted under strict adherence to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [23]. All invasive procedures were performed under general anesthesia using isoflurane. C57BL/6J (wild-type) mice were purchased from Sankyo Labo Service (Edogawa, Tokyo, Japan). Mice were maintained on standard rodent chow (Labo MR Stock, NOSAN, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan) with free access to water and housed within a specific pathogen-free facility in the Division of Animal Experimentation of Showa University School of Medicine. The rooms were controlled under a 12-h dark/light cycle, 21 °C, and 40–60% humidity.

Male wild-type mice at the age of 8 weeks were switched to feeding with high-fat diet (HFD) or low-fat diet (LFD), which were composed of 45% or 10% kcal from fat (D12451 and D12450H, Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ, USA), respectively. On Day 60, mice were assigned to treatment with each diet containing vehicle or luseogliflozin (ca. 18 mg/kg/day) [24, 25]. Luseogliflozin was provided by Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Toshima, Tokyo, Japan). On Day 75, mice were subjected to bilateral femoral artery wire injury followed by unilateral removal of surrounding PVAT as described previously with a few modifications [26]. In brief, a straight spring wire [C-SF-15-15; Cook Japan, Nakano, Tokyo, Japan] was inserted in a retrograde manner into the femoral artery via a small cut on the muscle branch, and withdrawn after 1 min. The wire insertion was repeated once, and the muscle branch was ligated proximal to the cut to prevent bleeding. In the left femoral artery, surrounding PVAT was gently removed by fine forceps. After the procedure, the skin incision was sutured. On Day 100, tissue samples were collected for morphological, immunohistochemical and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses. Fat and liver indexes were calculated by dividing epididymal fat pad and liver weights by body weight, respectively.

Measurement of plasma biochemistry

Blood samples were collected after 6 h-fasting at the end of each experiment. Plasma glucose levels were determined using Nipro Statstrip XP2 (Nipro, Osaka, Osaka, Japan). Plasma lipid parameters were assessed using an enzymatic colorimetric assay (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Osaka, Japan). Plasma levels of insulin and glucagon were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Ultra Sensitive “PLUS” Mouse Insulin ELISA Kit, Product ID M1105; Morinaga, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan; Glucagon ELISA Kit, Product ID 292-90001; Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical).

Assessment of blood pressure

Systolic blood pressure and pulse rates were measured using a tail-cuff method at 3 to 5 days prior to the end of each experiment (Model MK-2000ST; Muromachi Kikai, Chuo, Tokyo, Japan) [27]. The measurement was conducted between 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM under conscious conditions. The average value obtained from several consecutive measurements was used as a single data point.

Morphometric analysis

Collected femoral arteries and epididymal adipose tissue were embedded into paraffin blocks, and their cross-sections were stained with Elastica van Gieson or hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). In the assessment of femoral arteries, average values of several serial cross-sections were used as a single data point to minimize the selection bias as described previously [27]. Neointima and media were defined as the areas between the limen and internal elastic lamina and between the internal and external elastic lamina, respectively. The data of following sections were excluded from the present study: sections with large thrombus burden and occlusion, broken vascular wall structure, a branch of another artery, and missing elastic lamina [27]. The histological assessment was conducted by an independent investigator who was blinded to the treatment conditions using ImageJ software [28].

RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from tissues with Isogen reagent (NIPPON GENE, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan) and then reverse-transcribed to cDNA with ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Gene expression was assessed by using the TaqMan gene expression assay and sequence detection system (StepOne Plus; Life Technologies Japan, Minato, Tokyo, Japan) as previously described [27]. The pre-designed TaqMan probe sets used were as follows: Adiponectin, Mm00456425_m1; interleukin-1b (Il-1b), Mm00434228m1; Il-6, Mm00446190_m1; monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (Mcp-1), Mm00441242_m1; platelet-derived growth factor-B (Pdgf-b), Mm00440678_m1; Pdgf receptor-b, Mm00435553_m1, tumor necrosis factor-α (Tnf-α), Mm00443258_m1. The 18S ribosomal RNA probe (18srna, Mm03928990_g1) was used as an internal control.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Cross-sections were obtained from paraffin-embedded femoral arteries and then incubated with anti-F4/80 antibody (Abcam Japan, Chuo, Tokyo, Japan; Ab204467; RRID: AB_2810932; raised in rat; 1: 50) and anti-PDGF-B antibody (Abcam Japan, Ab23914; RRID: AB_2162180, raised in rabbit, 1:50) overnight. The antibodies were diluted with Antibody Diluent (S3022; Dako, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (D1306; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA). The immunofluorescence images were obtained by a confocal microscope (BZ-X710 microscope; Keyence, Osaka, Osaka, Japan).

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical comparisons were performed using an unpaired t test for two groups and one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test for three or more groups. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to test correlations between variables. Statistical calculations were performed using JMP software (version 13; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The significance level was defined as p < 0.05.


Luseogliflozin treatment or PVAT removal decreased neointimal hyperplasia in HFD-fed mice

First, we evaluated the effects of luseogliflozin and PVAT removal on vascular injury in mice fed with HFD or LFD. Anthropometric and biochemical parameters are presented in Table 1. HFD-fed mice showed higher body weights than LFD-fed mice throughout the experimental periods. Fat index, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), plasma glucose, insulin, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, and triglycerides were significantly higher in HFD-fed mice compared with LFD-fed mice. Luseogliflozin significantly attenuated body weigh increase in HFD-fed mice, whereas it increased food and water intake, and plasma total cholesterol levels. On the other hand, in LFD-fed mice, luseogliflozin significantly decreased food intake, while it increased plasma HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides.
Table 1

Clinical parameters of HFD- and LFD-fed mice treated with vehicle or luseogliflozin













Food intake (g/day)

3.2 ± 0.3a

4.1 ± 0.5bc

4.8 ± 0.9

2.9 ± 0.2a

Water intake (g/day)

3.0 ± 0.3ab

6.0 ± 0.7c

7.6 ± 2.5

6.6 ± 0.4

Initial body weight (g)

40.5 ± 2.7ab

43.6 ± 5.1ab

28.7 ± 1.3

27.6 ± 2.3

Final body weight (g)

44.0 ± 2.5ab

45.5 ± 5.7ab

30.2 ± 2.2

28.2 ± 2.0

Body weight increase (g)

3.4 ± 0.9ab

1.8 ± 1.2c

1.5 ± 0.9

0.6 ± 1.0

Liver index (mg/g)

40.3 ± 7.8

38.1 ± 8.0

43.4 ± 4.1

44.1 ± 2.8

Fat index (mg/g)

59.8 ± 5.4ab

57.6 ± 9.8ab

7.5 ± 1.1

9.8 ± 2.1

Pulse (beat/min)

716 ± 70

733 ± 23

746 ± 32

709 ± 45

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

125 ± 6

132 ± 8ab

111 ± 14

112 ± 13

HbA1c (%)

5.1 ± 0.2b

5.0 ± 0.3

5.1 ± 0.1

4.8 ± 0.1

Plasma glucose (mg/dl)

186 ± 33ab

168 ± 20a

87 ± 12

127 ± 19

Plasma insulin (ng/ml)

0.33 ± 0.20ab

0.25 ± 0.17

0.04 ± 0.01

0.07 ± 0.05

Plasma glucagon (pmol/l)

7.5 ± 5.8

7.3 ± 5.0

4.2 ± 2.4

7.5 ± 4.7

Plasma total cholesterol (mg/dl)

177 ± 10ab

199 ± 21abc

78 ± 8

93 ± 7

Plasma HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl)

107 ± 6ab

111 ± 4ab

62 ± 8

75 ± 6a

Plasma triglycerides (mg/dl)

65 ± 10a

72 ± 9a

49 ± 3

68 ± 8a

Plasma free fatty acid (mEq/l)

0.50 ± 0.05

0.51 ± 0.03

0.48 ± 0.12

0.53 ± 0.06

Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation

HbA1c glycated hemoglobin HDL high-density lipoprotein

One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test: ap < 0.05 vs. LFD-Vehicle

bp < 0.05 vs. LFD-Luseogliflozin

cp < 0.05 vs. HFD-Vehicle

Morphometric changes of injured arteries 25 days after arterial wire injury are presented in Figs. 1, 2. Removal of PVAT or luseogliflozin treatment significantly reduced neointimal area and intima-to-media (I/M) ratio in control HFD-fed mice treated with vehicle (Fig. 1). However, the combination therapy of luseogliflozin and PVAT removal showed no additive effects on injured arteries (Fig. 1a–d). In LFD-fed mice, the I/M ratio was significantly smaller than that in HFD-fed mice (p = 0.047), whereas neither PVAT removal or luseogliflozin treatment affected the neointimal, medial area, or I/M ratio in injured arteries (Fig. 1e–h).
Fig. 1

Effects of luseogliflozin and PVAT removal on vascular injury in HFD- or LFD-fed mice. HFD- or LFD-fed mice were treated with vehicle or luseogliflozin, and underwent bilateral femoral artery wire injury followed by unilateral PVAT removal. Femoral arteries were evaluated at 25 days after vascular injury. a, e Representative microscopic images of Elastica van Gieson-stained cross-sections of femoral arteries of mice fed with HFD (a) or LFD (e). Arrows indicate the neointima. Scale bar = 200 μm. b, f Neointimal area. c, g Medial area. d, h I/M ratio. bd HFD and vehicle, N = 12; HFD and Luseogliflozin (Luseo), N = 8. fh LFD and vehicle, N = 5; LFD and Luseo, N = 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Fig. 2

Effect of luseogliflozin on PVAT remodeling and its association with vascular injury in HFD-fed mice. PVAT surrounding the injured femoral arteries and epididymal adipose tissue at 25 days after arterial injury were collected from HFD-fed or LFD-fed mice treated with vehicle or luseogliflozin. a Representative images of H&E-stained cross-sections of femoral PVAT. b Average adipocyte size of PVAT. c–e Gene expression of adiponectin (c) and Pdgf-b (d), Pdgf receptor-b (e) in femoral PVAT of HFD-fed mice. f Correlation between Pdgf-b expression levels in femoral PVAT and I/M ratio of corresponding femoral artery. White dots, vehicle; back dots, luseogliflozin. g Representative images of immunofluorescence staining for F4/80 in femoral PVAT of HFD-fed mice. h Number of F4/80-positive cells in PVAT. i Representative images of immunofluorescence staining for F4/80 and PDGF-B in femoral PVAT of HFD-fed mice. Upper images, vehicle; lower images, luseogliflozin. j Number of cells F4/80- and PDGF-B-positive cells. k Relative gene expression levels of Il-1b, Il-6, Mcp-1, and Tnf-α in femoral PVAT of HFD-fed mice. White dots, vehicle; back dots, luseogliflozin. l Representative images of H&E-stained cross-sections of epididymal adipose tissue. m Average adipocyte size of epididymal adipose tissue. a, g, i, l Scale bar = 200 μm. bf, k, m: HFD and vehicle, N = 12; HFD and Luseogliflozin (Luseo), N = 8; LFD and vehicle, N = 5; LFD and Luseo, N = 5. h, j Vehicle, N = 4; Luseo, N = 4. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

Luseogliflozin attenuated the PVAT remodeling in HFD-fed mice

Next, we investigated the effects of luseogliflozin on remodeling of PVAT surrounding the injured femoral arteries. As shown in Fig. 2a, b, average size of PVAT was significantly larger in HFD-fed mice compared with LFD-fed mice, whereas luseogliflozin treatment significantly reduced the PVAT size in HFD-fed mice, but not LFD-fed mice. Luseogliflozin treatment increased adiponectin and decreased Pdgf-b gene expression in PVAT surrounding the injured femoral arteries of HFD-fed mice (Fig. 2c, d), whereas it did not affect Pdgf receptor-b gene expression (Fig. 2e). Gene expression levels of Pdgf-b were significantly correlated with the I/M ratios of the corresponding femoral arteries (Fig. 2f). Furthermore, immunofluorescence staining revealed that luceogliflozin treatment significantly decreased the number of infiltrated macrophages, evaluated by F4/80 staining, into the femoral PVAT of HFD-fed mice (Fig. 2g, h). In addition, luseogliflozin treatment reduced the number of PDGF-B-coexpressed F4/80-positive cells in the PVAT (Fig. 2i, j). As shown in Fig. 2k, gene expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as Il-1b, Il-6, Mcp-1, and Tnf-α were not affected by luseogliflozin treatment. In contrast to the case in PVAT, luseogliflozin treatment did not affect the average size of epididymal adipose tissue, another VAT (Fig. 2l, m).


Perivascular transplantation of PVAT obtained from obese mice has been shown to promote the neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury in this animal model [10, 29]. However, it remained unclear whether PVAT remodeling under pathological conditions, such as high-fat diet could intrinsically contribute to neointimal hyperplasia after wire injury in mice. To address this issue, we used here HFD-fed and LFD-fed mice, which were subjected to bilateral femoral artery wire injury followed by unilateral removal of surrounding PVAT. In the present study, we found for the first time that removal of the surrounding PVAT significantly suppressed the wire-injured neointimal hyperplasia in corresponding femoral artery of HFD-fed, but not LFD-fed mice. Although balloon angioplasty and endovascular stent implantation are standard clinical practices for the treatment of coronary artery disease, these therapeutic options are far from satisfactory because of higher rate of restenosis or late stent thrombosis [30, 31]. Therefore, our present observations suggest that PVAT could be crucially involved in the progression of neointimal hyperplasia after wire injury, being a novel therapeutic target for reducing the vascular damage after balloon or stent angioplasty.

In this study, we also found that as is the case in PVAT removal, oral administration of luseogliflozin significantly reduced the neointimal hyperplasia after wire injury in HFD-fed, but not LFD-fed mice. Furthermore, the beneficial effects of luseogliflozin were not observed in injured femoral artery without PVAT.

However, we did not find any effect of luseogliflozin on neointimal hyperplasia in the absence of PVAT remodeling such as PVAT-removed femoral arteries of HFD-fed mice and PVAT-intact femoral arteries in LFD-fed mice. These findings suggest that protective effects of luseogliflozin against neointimal formation after wire injury could be ascribed in part to its actions on remodeled PVAT, but not vascular cells or lipid metabolisms.

In this study, we found that luseogliflozin significantly decreased the adipocyte size in PVAT surrounding the injured arteries of HFD-fed mice in association with increased gene expression of adiponectin. Moreover, PDGF-B-expressed macrophage infiltration into the PVAT was suppressed by the treatment with luseogliflozin. Gene expression of Pdgf-b in PVAT was correlated with I/M ratio, and effects of luseogliflozin on anthropometric and metabolic parameters in HFD-fed mice were modest in this study. Therefore, the present findings suggest that luseogliflozin could inhibit the PVAT remodeling and restore adiponectin expression, a marker of matured adipocytes [32, 33], thereby reducing the neointimal formation after wire injury via suppression of Pdgf-b expression. There is accumulating evidence that PDGF-B, a potent mitogen and migratory factor for vascular smooth muscle cells, was highly expressed at the site of balloon-injured arteries, thus being involved in the pathogenesis of neointimal hyperplasia after balloon injury [34, 35, 36, 37]. Furthermore, PDGF-B is produced from macrophages infiltrated into VAT of obese mice [38]. These observations support our concept that suppression of PVAT remodeling and resultant inhibition of PDGF-B-expressed macrophage infiltration by luseogliflozin may play an important role in reducing the neointimal formation after wire injury in HFD-fed mice (Fig. 3). Given the anti-inflammatory effects of adiponectin on macrophage infiltration [39, 40], restoration of adiponectin expression may partly contribute to the suppression of PDGF-B-expressed macrophage infiltration into PVAT. Moreover, since adiponectin has reported to attenuate the action of PDGF-B in smooth muscle cells by inhibiting the association of PDGF-B with its receptor [41], PDGF-B-binding property of adiponectin may also be involved in suppression of neointimal formation.
Fig. 3

Proposed mechanisms for suppression of neointimal formation by luseogliflozin. High-fat diet-induced ectopic fat deposition leads to the PVAT remodeling and infiltration of PDGF-B-expressed macrophages, which may promote the neointimal hyperplasia after wire injury. VSMC vascular smooth muscle cells

In this study, luseogliflozin treatment caused some alterations in plasma lipid parameters; it significantly increased total cholesterol levels in HFD-fed mice and HDL-cholesterol in LFD-fed mice (Table 1), respectively, both of which were consistent with the previous findings in type 2 diabetic patients [42]. Furthermore, in contrast to the case of patients [42], luseogliflozin elevated triglycerides levels in LFD-fed mice.


There are several limitations in the present study. First, luseogliflozin treatment reduced the adipocyte size of PVAT surrounding femoral arteries. However, it did not affect that of epididymal adipose tissue, another type of VAT. VAT is exclusively composed of white adipose tissue, whereas PVAT has characteristic features of both white and brown adipose tissue [7, 8]. This may partly explain the different responses to luseogliflozin between epididymal adipose tissue and PVAT.

Second, luseogliflozin could inhibit vascular injury through various mechanisms; it may also act on smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells [43]. However, in this study, we found that PVAT removal significantly suppressed the neointimal hyperplasia in HFD-fed mice, whose I/M ratio was almost similar to that in LFD-fed mice without PVAT removal (I/M ratio of HFD-fed mice without PVAT, 0.99 ± 0.31; I/M ratio of LFD-fed mice without PVAT removal, 1.07 ± 0.54; p = 0.69). Furthermore, PVAT removal did not affect the neointimal hyperplasia in LFD-fed mice. These findings indicated that HFD-evoked deterioration of neointimal hyperplasia was totally dependent on PVAT. In addition, we also found here that luseogliflozin significantly suppressed the neointimal hyperplasia in HFD-fed mice, whose I/M ratio was almost similar to that in LFD-fed mice without PVAT removal (I/M ratio of luseogliflozin-treated HFD-fed mice, 1.06 ± 0.28; I/M ratio of LFD-fed mice without PVAT removal, 1.07 ± 0.54; p = 0.96). Moreover, luseogliflozin did not affect the neointimal hyperplasia in LFD-fed mice. So, the observations demonstrated that effect of luseogliflozin on neointimal hyperplasia was totally dependent on HFD. Therefore, given that luseogliflozin exerted no additive effects on neointimal hyperplasia in HFD-fed mice with PVAT removal, it is highly probable that luseogliflozin inhibited the neointimal hyperplasia in HFD-fed mice through the action on PVAT.

Third, although in this study, luseogliflozin treatment reduced PDGF-B-expressed macrophage infiltration into in remodeled PVAT, it remains unclear whether luceogliflozin could act on macrophages via SGLT2-dependent or -independent mechanisms [43].

Fourth, as far as we know, there are two reports to show that SGLT2 inhibitors suppressed the neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury in rodent models [44, 45]. One study showed that ipragliflozin, an oral inhibitor of SGLT2 attenuated cuff-induced femoral artery remodeling in western diet-fed mice partly via increase in adipocyte size of abdominal PVAT with reduced secretion of pro-inflammatory factors [44]. On the other hand, ipragliflozin treatment did not show anti-inflammatory effects in thoracic PVAT, which were consistent with our present findings in femoral PVAT [44]. Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on adipocytes may differ among the location of PVAT; howerver, we did not know the exact reason for the discrepant effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on adipocyte size and pro-inflammatory factors among abdominal, thoracic, and femoral PVAT. Furthermore, since the other study suggested the direct growth inhibitory effect of empagliflozin on smooth muscle cells [45], it would be interesting to clarify the effects of luceogliflozin on PDGF-B-induced smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro.

Fifth, in this study, we could not evaluate adiponectin and pdgf-b gene expression in femoral PVAT of LFD-fed mice because PVAT was barely detectable in LFD-fed mice and we were not able to obtain enough PVAT samples for RT-PCR analysis. Furthermore, the aim of this study was to clarify whether and how suppression of PVAT remodeling could protect against vascular injury in animal models. Since we found here that I/M ratio and adipocyte size were significantly smaller in LFD-fed mice compared with HFD-fed mice, PVAT derived from LFD-fed mice may not be suitable samples for analyzing the pathological association of PVAT remodeling with neointimal formation.


Our present study suggests that luseogliflozin could attenuate the neointimal hyperplasia after wire injury in HFD-fed mice partly through the suppression of PVAT remodeling via inhibition of PDGF-B-expressed macrophage infiltration. Inhibition of PAVT remodeling by luseogliflozin may be a novel therapeutic target for vascular remodeling after balloon or stent angioplasty.



Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

YM designed the study, researched and analyzed the data, and drafted, revised, and finalized the manuscript. TM, MH, TS, HK, and MK researched and analyzed the data and contributed to revision of the manuscript. NO, MO, TF, and HO contributed to the data interpretation and revision of the manuscript. SY contributed to the design of the study and the data interpretation and revision of the manuscript. YM is the guarantors of this work and are responsible for its integrity. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


This study was financially supported in part by Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Toshima, Tokyo, Japan).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study design was approved by the Animal Care Committee of Showa University School of Medicine (approval numbers: 09059).

Consent for publication

Not available.

Competing interests

YM and YS have received honoraria such as lecture fees from Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.


  1. 1.
    Nowbar AN, Gitto M, Howard JP, Francis DP, Al-Lamee R. Mortality from ischemic heart disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;12:e005375.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amato MC, Guarnotta V, Giordano C. Body composition assessment for the definition of cardiometabolic risk. J Endocrinol Invest. 2013;36:537–43.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Britton KA, Massaro JM, Murabito JM, Kreger BE, Hoffmann U, Fox CS. Body fat distribution, incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:921–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maenhaut N, Van de Voorde J. Regulation of vascular tone by adipocytes. BMC Med. 2011;9:25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ouchi N, Parker JL, Lugus JJ, Walsh K. Adipokines in inflammation and metabolic disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:85–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alexopoulos N, Katritsis D, Raggi P. Visceral adipose tissue as a source of inflammation and promoter of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2014;233:104–12.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qi XY, Qu SL, Xiong WH, Rom O, Chang L, Jiang ZS. Perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) in atherosclerosis: a double-edged sword. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17:134.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hildebrand S, Stümer J, Pfeifer A. PVAT and its relation to brown, beige, and white adipose tissue in development and function. Front Physiol. 2018;9:70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chatterjee TK, Stoll LL, Denning GM, Harrelson A, Blomkalns AL, Idelman G, et al. Proinflammatory phenotype of perivascular adipocytes: influence of high-fat feeding. Circ Res. 2009;104:541–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Takaoka M, Nagata D, Kihara S, Shimomura I, Kimura Y, Tabata Y, et al. Periadventitial adipose tissue plays a critical role in vascular remodeling. Circ Res. 2009;105:906–11.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Manka D, Chatterjee TK, Stoll LL, Basford JE, Konaniah ES, Srinivasan R, et al. Transplanted perivascular adipose tissue accelerates injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia: role of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:1723–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li C, Wang Z, Wang C, Ma Q, Zhao Y. Perivascular adipose tissue-derived adiponectin inhibits collar-induced carotid atherosclerosis by promoting macrophage autophagy. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0124031.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yamagishi S, Matsui T. Protective role of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibition against vascular complications in diabetes. Rejuvenation Res. 2016;19:107–14.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghezzi C, Loo DDF, Wright EM. Physiology of renal glucose handling via SGLT1, SGLT2 and GLUT2. Diabetologia. 2018;61:2087–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tang H, Cui W, Li D, Wang T, Zhang J, Zhai S, et al. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in addition to insulin therapy for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:142–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomas MC, Cherney DZI. The actions of SGLT2 inhibitors on metabolism, renal function and blood pressure. Diabetologia. 2018;61:2098–107.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zaccardi F, Webb DR, Htike ZZ, Youssef D, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18:783–94.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Komiya C, Tsuchiya K, Shiba K, Miyachi Y, Furuke S, Shimazu N, et al. Ipragliflozin improves hepatic steatosis in obese mice and liver dysfunction in type 2 diabetic patients irrespective of body weight reduction. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0151511.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shibuya T, Fushimi N, Kawai M, Yoshida Y, Hachiya H, Ito S, et al. Luseogliflozin improves liver fat deposition compared to metformin in type 2 diabetes patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective randomized controlled pilot study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:438–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bouchi R, Terashima M, Sasahara Y, Asakawa M, Fukuda T, Takeuchi T, et al. Luseogliflozin reduces epicardial fat accumulation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16:32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sato T, Aizawa Y, Yuasa S, Kishi S, Fuse K, Fujita S, et al. The effect of dapagliflozin treatment on epicardial adipose tissue volume. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17:6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yamamoto K, Uchida S, Kitano K, Fukuhara N, Okumura-Kitajima L, Gunji E, et al. TS-071 is a novel, potent and selective renal sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor with anti-hyperglycaemic activity. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164:181–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    National Research Council Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th ed. New York: National Academies Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tahara A, Takasu T, Yokono M, Imamura M, Kurosaki E. Characterization and comparison of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: Part 2. Antidiabetic effects in type 2 diabetic mice. J Pharmacol Sci. 2016;131:198–208.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Okauchi S, Shimoda M, Obata A, Kimura T, Hirukawa H, Kohara K, et al. Protective effects of SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin on pancreatic β-cells in obese type 2 diabetic db/db mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;470:772–82.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sata M, Maejima Y, Adachi F, Fukino K, Saiura A, Sugiura S, et al. A mouse model of vascular injury that induces rapid onset of medial cell apoptosis followed by reproducible neointimal hyperplasia. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000;32:2097–104.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kushima H, Mori Y, Koshibu M, Hiromura M, Kohashi K, Terasaki M, et al. The role of endothelial nitric oxide in the anti-restenotic effects of liraglutide in a mouse model of restenosis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16:122.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tian Z, Miyata K, Tazume H, Sakaguchi H, Kadomatsu T, Horio E, et al. Perivascular adipose tissue-secreted angiopoietin-like protein 2 (Angptl2) accelerates neointimal hyperplasia after endovascular injury. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;57:1–12.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shlofmitz E, Iantorno M, Waksman R. Restenosis of drug-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e007023.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pesarini G, Dandale R, Rigamonti A, Pighi M, Zivelonghi C, Mugnolo A, et al. Late and very late coronary stent thrombosis: intravascular ultrasound findings and associations with antiplatelet therapy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:1056–65.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yamagishi SI, Matsui T. Pigment epithelium-derived factor: a novel therapeutic target for cardiometabolic diseases and related complications. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25:1480–500.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maeda S, Matsui T, Takeuchi M, Yamagishi S. Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) blocks advanced glycation end products (AGEs)-RAGE-induced suppression of adiponectin mRNA level in adipocytes by inhibiting NADPH oxidase-mediated oxidative stress generation. Int J Cardiol. 2011;152:408–10.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Levitzki A. PDGF receptor kinase inhibitors for the treatment of restenosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;65:581–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Casterella PJ, Teirstein PS. Prevention of coronary restenosis. Cardiol Rev. 1999;7:219–31.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nakamura K, Yamagishi S, Matsui T, Yoshida T, Takenaka K, Jinnouchi Y, et al. Pigment epithelium-derived factor inhibits neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury by blocking NADPH oxidase-mediated reactive oxygen species generation. Am J Pathol. 2007;170:2159–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang C, Liu Y, He D. Diverse effects of platelet-derived growth factor-BB on cell signaling pathways. Cytokine. 2019;113:13–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Onogi Y, Wada T, Kamiya C, Inata K, Matsuzawa T, Inaba Y, et al. PDGFRβ regulates adipose tissue expansion and glucose metabolism via vascular remodeling in diet-induced obesity. Diabetes. 2017;66:1008–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huang H, Park PH, McMullen MR, Nagy LE. Mechanisms for the anti-inflammatory effects of adiponectin in macrophages. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(Suppl 1):S50–3.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Folco EJ, Rocha VZ, López-Ilasaca M, Libby P. Adiponectin inhibits pro-inflammatory signaling in human macrophages independent of interleukin-10. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:25569–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Arita Y, Kihara S, Ouchi N, Maeda K, Kuriyama H, Okamoto Y, et al. Adipocyte-derived plasma protein adiponectin acts as a platelet-derived growth factor-BB-binding protein and regulates growth factor-induced common postreceptor signal in vascular smooth muscle cell. Circulation. 2002;105:2893–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cha SA, Park YM, Yun JS, Lim TS, Song KH, Yoo KD, et al. A comparison of effects of DPP-4 inhibitor and SGLT2 inhibitor on lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lipids Health Dis. 2017;16:58.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Uthman L, Baartscheer A, Schumacher CA, Fiolet JWT, Kuschma MC, Hollmann MW, et al. Direct cardiac actions of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors target pathogenic mechanisms underlying heart failure in diabetic patients. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1575.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mori K, Tsuchiya K, Nakamura S, Miyachi Y, Shiba K, Ogawa Y, et al. Ipragliflozin-induced adipose expansion inhibits cuff-induced vascular remodeling in mice. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18:83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Takahashi H, Nomiyama T, Terawaki Y, Horikawa T, Kawanami T, Hamaguchi Y, et al. Combined treatment with DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin and SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin attenuates neointima formation after vascular injury in diabetic mice. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2019;18:100640.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yusaku Mori
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michishige Terasaki
    • 1
  • Munenori Hiromura
    • 1
  • Tomomi Saito
    • 1
  • Hideki Kushima
    • 1
  • Masakazu Koshibu
    • 1
  • Naoya Osaka
    • 1
  • Makoto Ohara
    • 1
  • Tomoyasu Fukui
    • 1
  • Hirokazu Ohtaki
    • 3
  • Hirano Tsutomu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sho-ichi Yamagishi
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Diabetes, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Department of MedicineShowa University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Diabetes CenterEbina General HospitalKanagawaJapan
  3. 3.Department of AnatomyShowa University School of MedicineTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations