Systemic inflammatory response to inhaled endotoxin does not correlate with airway response
Endotoxin is a component of particulate matter linked to respiratory disease. Our group has shown that experimental endotoxin inhalation challenge reproducibly triggers neutrophilic inflammation in the airways and in peripheral blood. Sputum induction is currently the only available method for assessing airway neutrophilia but is laborious and time-consuming. This analysis examined the correlation between systemic and airway inflammatory responses to endotoxin to determine if peripheral blood could serve as a surrogate marker for neutrophilic airway inflammation.
We conducted a retrospective study of 124 inhaled endotoxin challenges conducted at our center using 20,000 endotoxin units (EU) of Clinical Center Reference Endotoxin (CCRE). Venipuncture and induced sputum samples were obtained at baseline and 6 hours after completion of endotoxin challenge. The relationship between change in sputum neutrophils (post-challenge – baseline) and change in peripheral blood neutrophils (post-challenge – baseline) was assessed using Spearman’s correlation analyses.
Inhaled endotoxin induced a significant increase in mean sputum percent neutrophils and peripheral blood absolute neutrophil counts in healthy adults with or without mild asthma, but no significant correlation was found between airway and systemic neutrophilia (r = 0.13, p = 0.18). Stratification by degree of airway neutrophil response and by atopic or asthmatic status did not change the results.
Inhalation challenge with endotoxin safely and effectively induces airway neutrophilic inflammation in most individuals. Increases in endotoxin-induced peripheral blood neutrophils do not correlate well with airway responses and should not be used as a surrogate marker of airway inflammation.
KeywordsEndotoxin Neutrophils Airway inflammation Systemic inflammation
Absolute Neutrophil Count
Clinical Center Reference Endotoxin
Endotoxin, a component of gram negative bacteria, is found ubiquitously in the environment in both domestic and occupational settings as well as in ambient air particulate matter . Exposure to endotoxin has been linked to respiratory disease, including occupational lung disease  and asthma . Endotoxin is a strong activator of the innate immune response through its binding to Toll-like receptor 4 on the surface of airway macrophages, inducing a potent pro-inflammatory cytokine response with subsequent recruitment of granulocytes . As both we [3, 4] and others  have demonstrated, endotoxin inhalation has both airway and systemic inflammatory effects, with increased neutrophils in induced sputum as well as increased peripheral blood neutrophils. Whether systemic neutrophilia results from airway “spillover” of neutrophils into peripheral blood versus neutrophil recruitment to the blood by systemically release inflammatory cytokines remains unclear.
Our group has long utilized inhaled endotoxin challenge as a model of neutrophilic airway disease and for studies of novel anti-inflammatory treatments. Treatment efficacy is best assessed through the examination of the airway inflammatory cellular milieu via induced sputum sampling before and after inhaled endotoxin challenge. However, in our experience over the last three decades, healthy volunteers are only able to provide adequate sputum samples about two thirds of the time and those with underlying respiratory disease even less so. This highlights the need for a more readily attainable biomarker of endotoxin-induced airway inflammation. We examined the correlation between systemic and airway inflammatory responses to endotoxin to determine if peripheral blood neutrophilia could serve as a surrogate marker for airway inflammation.
We conducted a retrospective study of 124 inhaled endotoxin challenges conducted at our center using 20,000 endotoxin units (EU) of Clinical Center Reference Endotoxin (CCRE) obtained from the National Institutes of Health. All doses were prepared by the Investigational Drug Service and inhaled by subjects as a nebulized preparation using a DeVilbiss Ultraneb 99 ultrasonic nebulizer (DeVilbiss, Port Washington, NY). Venipuncture and induced sputum samples were obtained at baseline and 6 hours after completion of the challenge. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for post-challenge versus pre-challenge comparisons of sputum percent neutrophils (%PMNs) and of blood absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and blood %PMNs. Spearman’s correlation analysis was then performed to assess the relationship between the change in sputum PMNs (post-challenge – pre-challenge) and the change in peripheral blood PMNs (post-challenge – pre-challenge). Because of the substantial inter-subject variability in sputum absolute cellular counts, we focused our analysis on %PMNs in sputum as the primary measure of endotoxin-induced airway inflammation.
Demographic Characteristics (n = 124)
Age (years), median (range)
81 female/43 male
31 African American
BMI (kg/m2), median (range)
Atopic, N (%)
Asthmatic, N (%)
Spearman correlation analyses stratified by asthma and atopic status
(N = 31)
(N = 83)
(N = 33)
(N = 81)
Blood ANC vs Sputum %PMN
Blood %PMN vs Sputum %PMN
We have shown that endotoxin-induced systemic inflammation does not correlate well with airway inflammation in healthy and mild asthmatic volunteers, suggesting that peripheral blood neutrophilia is not an adequate surrogate marker of endotoxin-induced airway inflammation. Other groups have similarly reported reduced accuracy of peripheral blood eosinophils as a surrogate marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthma . With the paucity of readily obtainable non-invasive biomarkers for neutrophilic airway disease, induced sputum remains the best sampling method to accurately detect neutrophilic inflammation in the lung. Similar to use of exhaled nitric oxide for detection of eosinophilic airway inflammation, the search is underway for sensitive biomarkers of neutrophilic airway inflammation in exhaled breath. Esther et al. found that purine concentration in exhaled breath condensate was significantly correlated with lung function in children with cystic fibrosis (a neutrophil-predominant pulmonary disease) .
Our study focused on the quantity of neutrophils present before and after endotoxin challenge. A limitation of our approach is that it did not provide information on pollutant-induced neutrophil activation. Future work will include an assessment of markers of neutrophil activation before and after pollutant exposure, such as myeloperoxidase, neutrophil elastase, and neutrophil extracellular traps.
In this study, we have shown that otherwise healthy adults who experience airway inflammation in response to endotoxin may or may not exhibit a commensurate increase in systemic inflammation. These findings suggest that the increase in circulating neutrophils induced by endotoxin is not simply a “spillover” of neutrophils from the airways but may result from other mechanisms such as systemic release of inflammatory cytokines that recruit neutrophils to the peripheral blood. The fact that not all subjects experienced a commensurate increase in peripheral blood neutrophilia suggest that particular biological factors may impact susceptibility to endotoxin-induced systemic inflammation, and this is a focus of ongoing work at our center. Though not the primary objective of this study, this observation provides insight into the mechanism through which endotoxin inhalation leads to systemic inflammation.
Our findings support that peripheral blood sampling should not replace sputum induction for assessment of neutrophilic airway inflammation in endotoxin inhalation challenge. Reliable and accessible biomarkers are needed to decrease the reliance on laborious and invasive sampling methods for assessing neutrophilic airway inflammation.
The authors acknowledge the research coordinators and laboratory staff at the Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology at University of North Carolina for their assistance with participant recruitment, completion of study visits, and processing of biological samples.
AKS, MLH and DBP made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study. AKS, AJB, MLH, NEA, and HBW all contributed significantly to the acquisition of data. AKS, ML, HZ and MLH contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data. AKS and AJB contributed to writing of the manuscript. MLH participated in revision of the manuscript. All authors read, provided input, and gave approval of the final manuscript.
This work was supported by 5T32AI007062–39, 5T32GM086330, NHLBI R01 135235; NIEHS grants R01ES023349, K23-ES021745, R01ES025124, P30ES010126; and Assistance Agreement No. 83578501–0 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to the University of North Carolina. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Environmental Protection Agency. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Approval for all studies was obtained from the University of North Carolina Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was obtained from all study participants prior to enrollment.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.