Advertisement

BMC Health Services Research

, 19:884 | Cite as

Opioid use disorder and treatment: challenges and opportunities

  • Kim A. HoffmanEmail author
  • Javier Ponce Terashima
  • Dennis McCarty
Open Access
Review
  • 299 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Health Services Research for Opioid Use Disorders
  2. Organization, structure and delivery of healthcare

Abstract

Background

Addiction health service researchers have focused efforts on opioid use disorder (OUD) and strategies to address the emerging public health threats associated with the epidemics of opioid use and opioid overdose. The increase in OUD is associated with widespread access to prescription opioid analgesics, enhanced purity of heroin, the introduction of potent illicit fentanyl compounds, and a rising tide of opioid overdose fatalities. These deaths have become the face of the opioid epidemic.

Main Text

OUD is a chronic disorder that usually requires both medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and psychosocial treatment and support. Research has found that MOUD with an opioid receptor agonist (methadone), partial agonist (buprenorphine), or opioid antagonist (extended-release naltrexone) can support recovery. Despite compelling evidence that MOUD are effective, they remain underutilized. More research is needed on these therapies to understand the feasibility of implementation in clinic settings.

Conclusion

This special issue focuses on how health services research has emerged as an important contributor to efforts to control the opioid epidemic in North America and Europe.

Abbreviations

MOUD

Medication for opioid use disorder

OUD

Opioid use disorder

TAU

Treatment as usual

XR-NTX

Extended release naltrexone

Background

BMC Health Services Research is pleased to release a special issue focused on health services research addressing opioid use and opioid use disorders. Addiction health services research, an emerging specialization within the broad area of health services research, examines how social factors, financing systems, organizational structures and processes, health technologies, and personal beliefs and behaviors affect access to and utilization of health care, the quality and cost of healthcare, and in the end, our health and well-being. Multidisciplinary addiction health services research draws on tools from epidemiology, biostatistics and public health, theories from social science (e.g., geography, psychology, sociology), medical expertise (e.g., anesthesiology, cardiac surgery, emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, psychiatry), legal and policy expertise, and economic analyses to assess the quality of care and impacts on quality of life. Ultimately, the goals of addiction health services research are to identify the most effective ways to organize, manage, finance and deliver high quality care [1, 2]. In the papers in this special issue, health service researchers report on the opioid epidemic and strategies to address and control it. For example, overdose rescue using naloxone distribution has become an effective community intervention; Papp summarizes the use of naloxone rescue kits in Ohio, a state that has reeled from the impacts of the opioid overdoses. Within community-based opioid treatment programs, Becker assessed user-centered design principles to gather qualitative data on familiarity with contingency management, current clinical practice, and preferences regarding the implementation of contingency management. Priest discusses strategies to initiate opioid agonist therapy among hospitalized patients. Hoffman provides a qualitative assessment of the introduction of extended-release naltrexone in HIV primary care for patients with opioid use disorders and the challenges of using an opioid antagonist therapy. Although we know that medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are effective in treating opioid use disorders (OUD), retention in treatment can be difficult; Beamish et al. describe the planning and implementation of a quality improvement initiative aimed at keeping people in care through changes to workflow and care processes in Vancouver, Canada.

Opioids are natural or synthetic chemicals that bind to opioid receptors in the central nervous system and can reduce feelings of pain. The 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (United Nations) classifies opioids as narcotics and regulates medical use, distribution and access through the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB). Opioids have the potential for misuse and addiction. Worldwide, use of opioid analgesics doubled between 2001 and 2003 and 2011–2013 [3]. There is growing concern about the misuse of opioids in Africa, in particular the access and use of Tramadol [4] but the public health emergency is most apparent in North America and parts of Europe [5]. This increase in misuse is associated with widespread access to prescription opioid analgesics, enhanced purity of heroin, the introduction of potent illicit fentanyl compounds, and a rising tide of opioid overdose fatalities.

In the United States, which leads the world in opioid consumption, prescriptions for hydrocodone and oxycodone greatly increased in the late 1990s [6]. Though mostly used for cancer related pain, opioids are also commonly prescribed as a treatment for chronic and acute non-cancer pain conditions [7] despite controversies about their effectiveness and safety with long-term use [8], adverse effects [9, 10], loss of analgesic effectiveness of the drug with long term use [11], addiction potential [12, 13], and drug diversion [14]. Prescription drug abuse is the fastest growing drug problem in the U.S; up to 1 in 4 people receiving long-term opioid therapy in a primary care setting can struggle with a moderate to severe opioid use disorder [15, 16, 17]. According to the Centers for Disease Control, important factors responsible for the OUD epidemic include patients receiving more than one prescription from multiple providers or taking very high doses of the medication [18]. These trends were seen in other developed countries; for example, between 1992 and 2012, opioid dispensing episodes increased 15-fold in Australia [19] and total prescription opioid analgesic dispensing increased across Canada until 2011 [20].

More than 700,000 individuals died from a drug overdose between 1999 and 2017 in the U.S. [18]. Drug overdose fatalities exceeded 70,000 in 2017 and two-thirds (68%) was attributable to opioids [21]. Synthetic opioids were involved in almost 60% of all opioid-involved overdose deaths; a 45% increase from 2016 to 2017 [21]. Deaths from heroin related overdoses remained relatively stable in 2017 at just over 15,000 deaths [21]. There are increasing concerns about the involvement of synthetic opioids in drug overdoses, in particular, illicit fentanyl sold in the heroin market [22]. Most deaths due to fentanyl originate from illicitly produced fentanyl, not prescribed fentanyl [23].

In 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration raised concerns about the risks of overprescribing long-acting opioid analgesics. Long acting opioid formulations may contain three times the dose of immediate release tablets and can lead to respiratory depression and death when crushed, injected or taken with alcohol [24]. Controversy exists about the risk of abuse with short and long acting formulations. The controlled-release oral formulations are aimed to reduce the abuse liability due to a gradual onset and sustained delivery of medication; however, abuse may develop with these formulations because users may misuse or tamper with the formulation to evade the gradual release feature. Furthermore, sustained release oxycodone product has a bi-phasic release pattern such that its initial speed of delivery begins to approach that of immediate-release oxycodone [25]. Thus, patients may mistakenly believe that extended-release products are safer [26]. A greater risk of abuse and overdose is seen among patients who receive multiple opioid prescriptions, overlapping opioids, overlapping opioids and benzodiazepines and opioids at high dosage levels [27, 28]. Unsafe and high risk prescriptions of opioids may be linked to deficiencies in the management of pain conditions in different populations, including those at risk of addiction, and difficulties adapting guidelines to patients who have multiple pain disorders [29].

The opioid crisis provides opportunity to develop and test new theories to ameliorate the harms of drug use and to invent tools that are applicable to the emergence of new drugs (e.g., methamphetamine and synthetic cannabinoids) and new drug use challenges (e.g., vaping). Addiction health services research tracks and assesses opioid use and misuse around the globe. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime updates its World Drug Report annually tracking use of amphetamine type stimulants, cannabis, cocaine, opioids and other drug use and problems associated with the production, manufacturing and use of illicit substances [30]. Similarly, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction tracks overdoses, mortality and other problems associated with drug and opioid use. Health service investigators are reporting on levels of opioid misuse in Australia [19, 31], Brazil [32] and Southeast Asia [33, 34], which are also are seeing troubling levels of opioid misuse.

Treatment for opioid use disorder

Opioid use disorder is a chronic disorder that often requires both medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and psychosocial treatment and support. Rigorous research has found that MOUDs with an opioid receptor agonist (methadone), partial agonist (buprenorphine), or opioid antagonist (extended-release naltrexone) can facilitate recovery from opioid use disorders [35]. Methadone has been widely used since the 1960s. Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist with a better safety profile, was introduced in France in the 1990s and approved in the US in 2002. MOUDs work by reducing withdrawal symptoms and opioid cravings while decreasing the biological response to future drug use. Individuals receiving MOUDs cease or decrease their use of injection drugs and thus lower their rates of contracting infectious diseases. A recent report by the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine found that individuals undergoing long term treatment with methadone or buprenorphine reduced the risk of death 50% [36]. Two clinical trials found that extended release naltrexone and buprenorphine inhibited return to use when patients initiated medication in inpatient or residential detoxification programs [37, 38].

MOUD treatment is often coupled with counseling and behavioral therapies, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. In the U.S., federal regulations require centers that dispense methadone to provide counseling and federal legislation encourages physicians who prescribe buprenorphine to refer patients for counseling [39]. Despite these requirements, there are no counseling approaches specifically designed for patients with opioid use disorder and therapists are frequently not using evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Participation in individual and group therapy, moreover, can help patients remain engaged in their recovery and inhibit return to use. Although some patients have successfully maintained abstinence using only psychosocial approaches, counseling without support from MOUD is often associated with a return to use [40].

Despite compelling evidence that MOUD is effective, these medications remain underutilized. This is due in part to the need for daily dosing for most of the medications. Recent advances are changing the landscape, however. Extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX), a deep muscle injection that lasts 28 days, eliminates the need for daily dosing. A once-monthly buprenorphine injection, Sublocade®, became FDA approved in 2017 and Probuphine®, an implantable buprenorphine product, was approved in 2016. Both medications can improve treatment retention. However, limited access to these and other MOUDs has hindered efforts to address the opioid addiction epidemic [41]. Only 36% of specialty substance use disorder treatment organizations in the U.S. provided any of the FDA approved MOUDs [42]. Additionally, more research is needed on these therapies to understand the feasibility of implementation in primary care and correctional settings.

Main body

Addiction health services research has emerged as a contributor to efforts to control the opioid epidemic in North America and Europe. Health surveillance systems monitor trends in opioid overdose and the shift in the epidemic from illicit heroin to prescription analgesics to illicitly manufactured fentanyl and its analogues. A Comparison of Canadian and U.S. policies regulating use of opioid agonist therapies suggested that the limits on methadone and buprenorphine in the U.S. are antiquated and that individuals with opioid use disorders can benefit from additional opioid agonist therapies [43]. European [44] and Canadian [45] trials of diacetylmorphine document the value of using pharmaceutical heroin as an opioid agonist therapy for individuals who are non-responsive to methadone or buprenorphine. In the U.S., the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid expansion facilitated access to treatment for opioid use disorders [46, 47, 48, 49].

Policies and guidelines are increasingly proposed and adopted to address the opioid epidemic. Given the mounting burden on the public due to the misuse of opioids, public health institutes such as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention promote the adoption of standards regarding the prescription of opioids. Their prescriber guidelines address three facets: 1) determining when to initiate or continue opioids for chronic pain outside of active cancer treatment, palliative care, and end-of-life care; 2) opioid selection, dosage, duration, follow-up, and discontinuation; and 3) assessing risk and addressing harms of opioid use [7]. The guidelines also include helpful instructions for patients on the limitations and consequences of use including addiction and overdose. A recent commentary on the implementation of these guidelines notes that the guidelines have been an effective tool but providers must also make their individual clinical decisions based on each patient’s unique circumstances [50].

In general, there is a need to find a balance between policies that prevent opioid misuse, abuse, addiction and overdose while at the same time supporting patient needs for appropriate pain medications. Physicians prescribing opioids should advise patients about serious adverse effects of opioids, particularly the development of a potentially serious lifelong opioid use disorder [7]. Providers should be aware of how to screen for OUD and, if a disorder is detected, understand how to treat their patient or refer to a reputable treatment program. In addition to verbal education, policies related to written instruction can be enacted. For example, current labeling of opioids in the U.S. includes detailed instruction that opioids should only be used when other measures to limit pain have been unsuccessful, the risks associated with the use of opioids, the need for monitoring by an expert provider who can discuss regularly when the use of opioids can be stopped, and that the drug should only be dispensed in limited quantities [51].

Another strategy includes requiring opioid manufacturers to fund continuing medical education (CME) to providers at low/no cost. These are voluntary programs. In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration mandates education for all prescribers, although obstacles remain to fully enacting this requirement [51]. Additionally, policy makers can review coverage for non-pharmacological pain management (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy, physical therapy, rehabilitative exercise) and evaluate how current pain management practices and policies (especially concerning complex chronic non-cancer pain) impact patients.

Resources should be invested to ensure that opioid prescriptions are accurately recorded and monitored, so that intervening steps can be taken if problematic patterns are found. Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs can provide prescribers and pharmacies with information that can identify drug seeking, patient safety or patients at risk for opioid use disorder [52]. PDMPs are databases that track controlled substance prescriptions at a regional level (e.g., country, state, province) and can be useful as a public health tool. Health departments can follow the patterns of the epidemic and this can inform programmatic interventions. Data can also be used to generate reports that can identify inappropriate prescribing trends; responses can then be carried out to address “hot spot” areas that are contributing to the epidemic. These areas can also be targeted for systems that address overdose risk reduction interventions and distribution of naloxone, an effective drug for reversing opioid overdoses [53]. Results from overdose response programs are showing some effectiveness in preventing overdose-related deaths [54].

Conclusions

Given developments in the field of OUD prevention and treatment, there is cause for hope in the face of this epidemic. Stable and secure funding is required for evidence-based treatment, evaluation and development of pharmacotherapies to treat drugs of abuse, and assessment of changing policies and policy impacts. Addiction health services research can continue to a) assess the effects of government policies on access to care and access to prescription analgesics, b) monitor changes in the markets for and manufacturing of illicit opioids c) evaluate systems of care for opioid use disorders to enhance treatment access and effectiveness, d) document and monitor the impacts of harm reduction interventions (e.g., syringe exchange and safer injection sites), e) assess prejudice and bias (i.e., stigma) toward people who use drugs and f) measure the economic costs associated with drug use.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all of the authors who contributed to the special issue on opioid use disorder.

Authors’ contributions

KH and DM prepared of an initial draft of the manuscript. JPT contributed to manuscript revisions and reviewed and approved the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Dr. Kim Hoffman is an associated editor for BMC Health Services Research and serves with Dr. Dennis McCarty as managing editor for the special issue on opioid use disorder.

References

  1. 1.
    Compton WM, Stein JB, Robertson EB, Pintello D, Pringle B, Volkow ND. Charting a course for health services research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse. J Subst Abus Treat. 2005;29(3):167–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    United Nations. Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/pdf/convention_1961_en.pdf Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berterame S, Erthal J, Thomas J, Fellner S, Vosse B, Clare P, et al. Use of and barriers to access to opioid analgesics: a worldwide, regional, and national study. Lancet. 2016;387(10028):1644–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salm-Reifferscheidt L. Tramadol: Africa’s opioid crisis. Lancet Lond Engl. 2018;391(10134):1982–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    UNODC-WHO M. International standards for the treatment of drug use disorders; 2017. p. 99.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kolodny A, Courtwright DT, Hwang CS, Kreiner P, Eadie JL, Clark TW, et al. The prescription opioid and heroin crisis: a public health approach to an epidemic of addiction. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36:559–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDc guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—united states. JAMA. 2016, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.1464 [cited 2016 Apr 16].PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalso E, Edwards JE, Moore AR, HJ MQ. Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety. Pain. 2004;112(3):372–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abs R, Verhelst J, Maeyaert J, Van Buyten J-P, Opsomer F, Adriaensen H, et al. Endocrine consequences of long-term Intrathecal Administration of Opioids. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(6):2215–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daniell HW. Opioid Endocrinopathy in women consuming prescribed sustained-action opioids for control of nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2008;9(1):28–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martini L, Whistler JL. The role of mu opioid receptor desensitization and endocytosis in morphine tolerance and dependence. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007;17(5):556–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Højsted J, Sjøgren P. Addiction to opioids in chronic pain patients: a literature review. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(5):490–518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Compton WM, Volkow ND. Major increases in opioid analgesic abuse in the United States: concerns and strategies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;81(2):103–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gilson AM, Ryan KM, Joranson DE, Dahl JL. A reassessment of trends in the medical use and abuse of opioid analgesics and implications for diversion control: 1997–2002. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2004;28(2):176–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Banta-Green CJ, Merrill JO, Doyle SR, Boudreau DM, Calsyn DA. Opioid use behaviors, mental health and pain-development of a typology of chronic pain patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;104(1–2):34–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boscarino JA, Rukstalis M, Hoffman SN, Han JJ, Erlich PM, Gerhard GS, et al. Risk factors for drug dependence among out-patients on opioid therapy in a large US health-care system. Addict Abingdon Engl. 2010;105(10):1776–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fleming MF, Balousek SL, Klessig CL, Mundt MP, Brown DD. Substance use disorders in a primary care sample receiving daily opioid therapy. J Pain Off J Am Pain Soc. 2007;8(7):573–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Understanding the Epidemic | Drug Overdose | CDC Injury Center. 2018; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/epidemic/index.html. [cited 2019 Jun 30]
  19. 19.
    Blanch B, Pearson S-A, Haber PS. An overview of the patterns of prescription opioid use, costs and related harms in Australia. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;78(5):1159–66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fischer B, Jones W, Rehm J. Trends and changes in prescription opioid analgesic dispensing in Canada 2005–2012: an update with a focus on recent interventions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scholl L, Seth P, Kariisa M, Wilson N, Baldwin G. Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths — United States, 2013–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;67 Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm675152e1.htm. [cited 2019 Jun 28].
  22. 22.
    Jones CM, Einstein EB, Compton WM. Changes in synthetic opioid involvement in drug overdose deaths in the United States, 2010-2016. JAMA. 2018;319(17):1819–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Somerville NJ. Characteristics of Fentanyl Overdose — Massachusetts, 2014–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66 Available from: https://www.facebook.com/CDCMMWR. [cited 2019 May 21].PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fletcher J, Tsuyuki R. Don’t tamper with oxycodone. Can Med Assoc J. 2013;185(2):107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zacny J, Bigelow G, Compton P, Foley K, Iguchi M, Sannerud C. College on problems of drug dependence taskforce on prescription opioid non-medical use and abuse: position statement. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;69(3):215–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manchikanti L, Atluri S, Hirsch JA. The effect of abuse-deterrent extended-release oxycodone leads to inappropriate conclusions with over estimation of safety of abuse-deterrent formulations. Pain Physician. 2015;18:445-6.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bohnert ASB, Valenstein M, Bair MJ, Ganoczy D, McCarthy JF, Ilgen MA, et al. Association between opioid prescribing patterns and opioid overdose-related deaths. JAMA. 2011;305(13):1315–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dunn KM, Saunders KW, Rutter CM, Banta-Green CJ, Merrill JO, Sullivan MD, et al. Opioid prescriptions for chronic pain and overdose: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(2):85–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lalonde L, Leroux-Lapointe V, Choinière M, Martin E, Lussier D, Berbiche D, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about chronic noncancer pain in primary care: a Canadian survey of physicians and pharmacists. Pain Res Manag J Can Pain Soc J Société Can Pour Trait Douleur. 2014;19(5):241–50.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. WORLD DRUG REPORT 2019 (SET OF 5 BOOKLETS). S.l.: UNITED NATIONS; 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roxburgh A, Hall WD, Dobbins T, Gisev N, Burns L, Pearson S, et al. Trends in heroin and pharmaceutical opioid overdose deaths in Australia. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;179:291–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krawczyk N, Greene MC, Zorzanelli R, Bastos FI. Rising trends of prescription opioid sales in contemporary Brazil, 2009-2015. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(5):666–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hammett TM, Des Jarlais D, Johnston P, Kling R, Ngu D, Liu W, et al. HIV prevention for injection drug users in China and Vietnam: policy and research considerations. Glob Public Health. 2007;2(2):125–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nguyen TTM, Nguyen LT, Pham MD, Vu HH, Mulvey KP. Methadone maintenance therapy in Vietnam: an overview and scaling-up plan. Adv Prev Med. 2012;2012:732484.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kampman K, Jarvis M. American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) National Practice Guideline for the use of medications in the treatment of addiction involving opioid use. J Addict Med. 2015;9(5):358–67.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    National Academies of Sciences E. Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Save Lives. 2019. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25310/medications-for-opioid-use-disorder-save-lives. [cited 2019 May 21]Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee JD, Nunes EV, Novo P, Bachrach K, Bailey GL, Bhatt S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2018;391(10118):309–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tanum L, Solli KK, Latif Z-E-H, Benth JŠ, Opheim A, Sharma-Haase K, et al. Effectiveness of Injectable Extended-Release Naltrexone vs Daily Buprenorphine-Naloxone for Opioid Dependence: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(12):1197–205.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    McCarty D, Priest KC, Korthuis PT. Treatment and Prevention of Opioid Use Disorder: Challenges and Opportunities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:525–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smyth BP, Barry J, Keenan E, Ducray K. Lapse and relapse following inpatient treatment of opiate dependence. Ir Med J. 2010;103(6):176–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    O’Donnell JK, Halpin J, Mattson CL, Goldberger BA, Gladden RM. Deaths involving fentanyl, fentanyl analogs, and U-47700 - 10 states, July-December 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(43):1197–202.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mojtabai R, Mauro C, Wall MM, Barry CL, Olfson M. Medication treatment for opioid use disorders in substance use treatment facilities. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(1):14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Priest KC, Gorfinkel L, Klimas J, Jones AA, Fairbairn N, McCarty D. Comparing Canadian and United States opioid agonist therapy policies. Int J Drug Policy. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.020. [Epub ahead of print]
  44. 44.
    van den Brink W, Hendriks VM, van Ree JM. Medical co-prescription of heroin to chronic, treatment-resistant methadone patients in the Netherlands. J Drug Issues. 1999;29(3):587–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nosyk B, Guh DP, Bansback NJ, Oviedo-Joekes E, Brissette S, Marsh DC, et al. Cost-effectiveness of diacetylmorphine versus methadone for chronic opioid dependence refractory to treatment. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can. 2012;184(6):E317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Abraham AJ, Andrews CM, Grogan CM, D’Aunno T, Humphreys KN, Pollack HA, et al. The affordable care act transformation of substance use disorder treatment. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(1):31–2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Andrews CM, Grogan CM, Smith BT, Abraham AJ, Pollack HA, Humphreys K, et al. Medicaid benefits for addiction treatment expanded after implementation of the affordable care act. Health Aff Proj Hope. 2018;37(8):1216–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    McCarty D, Gu Y, McIlveen J, et al. Medicaid expansion and treatment for opioid use disorders in Oregon: an interrupted time-series analysis. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2019;14(1):31.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-019-0160-6.
  49. 49.
    Saloner B, Landis R, Stein BD, Barry CL. The affordable care act in the heart of the opioid crisis: evidence from West Virginia. Health Aff Proj Hope. 2019;38(4):633–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dowell D, Haegerich T, Chou R. No shortcuts to safer opioid prescribing. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2285–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Califf RM, Woodcock J, Ostroff S. A proactive response to prescription opioid abuse. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1480–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Deyo RA, Irvine JM, Millet LM, Beran T, O’Kane N, Wright DA, et al. Measures such as interstate cooperation would improve the efficacy of programs to track controlled drug prescriptions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(3):603–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chou R, Korthuis PT, McCarty D, Coffin PO, Griffin JC, Davis-O’Reilly C, et al. Management of Suspected Opioid Overdose with Naloxone in out-of-hospital settings: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(12):867.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tormohlen KN, Tobin KE, Davey-Rothwell MA, Latkin C. Low overdose responding self-efficacy among adults who report lifetime opioid use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;7 Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871619301784. [cited 2019 Jun 7].

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oregon Health and Science University-Portland State UniversitySchool of Public HealthPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Case Western University-University HospitalsClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations