Advertisement

Acute and sub-acute toxicity of Echinops kebericho decoction in rats

  • Serawit DeynoEmail author
  • Abiy Abebe
  • Mesfin Asefa Tola
  • Ariya Hymete
  • Joel Bazira
  • Eyasu Makonnen
  • Paul E. Alele
Open Access
Research article
  • 149 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Basic Research

Abstract

Background

Echinops kebericho is widely used for treatment of a variety of diseases including infectious, non-infectious disease and fumigation during child birth. Antibacterial, antimalarial, anti-leshimania, anti-diarrheal and insect repellent activities have been elucidated. Its toxicity profile is not yet investigated and thus this study was to investigate acute and sub-acute toxicity of E. kebericho decoctions.

Methods

Acute toxicity study was performed in female Wistar albino rats with single oral dose and followed up to 14 days. The sub-acute oral dose toxicity studies were conducted in rats of both sexes in accordance with the repeated dose 28-day oral toxicity study in rodent OECD guidelines. Physical observations were made regularly during the study period while body weight was measured weekly. Organ weight, histopathology, clinical chemistry and hematology data were collected on the 29th day. Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed if assumptions were met; otherwise Kruskal-Wallis analysis was performed.

Result

Oral administration of E. kebericho decoction showed no treatment-related mortality in female rats up to the dose of 5000 mg/kg. In sub-acute toxicity studies, no significant treatment-related abnormalities were observed compared to negative controls. Food consumption, body weight, organ weight, hematology, clinical chemistry, and histopathology did not show significant variation between controls and treatment groups. However, creatinine, relative lung weight, triglycerides, and monocytes were lower in treated compared to control groups. Significant variations between male and female groups in food consumption, relative organ weight, hematology, clinical chemistry were observed. Histolo-pathology of high-dose treated groups showed fatty liver.

Conclusion

Echinops kebericho showed LD50 of greater than 5000 mg/kg in acute toxicity study and is well tolerated up to the dose of 600 mg/kg body weight in sub-acute toxicity study.

Keywords

Herbal medicine Traditional medicine Safety, plant medicine Adverse effect 

Abbreviations

ALP

Alkaline phosphatase

ALT

Alanine aminotransferase

ANOVA

One-way analysis of variance

AST

Aspartate Aminotransferase

E. kebericho

Echinops kebericho

EO

Essential oil

GHS

Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals

OECD

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

ROW

Relative organ’s weight

Background

Medicinal plants have played significant roles in the treatment of diseases traditionally and in the development of modern drugs [1]. The use of herbal medicines and its supplements is globally increasing tremendously [2] and about 80% of the world population rely on it for some part of their primary healthcare [3]. Tremendous attention is being given to herbal medicines due to limitation of modern medicine. Dissatisfaction with modern medicine, positive aspects associated with herbal medicine, family traditions were the most commonly mentioned reasons why herbal medicine was preferred [2]. Antimicrobial resistance, increased cost, and safety concerns with modern medicines augmented the interest in traditional medicine. The current health care appears to be shifting to a concoction of numerous phytochemicals with polypharmacological effects acting on multiple pharmacological targets resulting in different biological mechanisms and treating varieties of diseases [4].

Ethiopia has a long tradition of herbal medicine use on which most of the populations rely partly for their primary health care [5]. Echinops kebericho Mesfin (Family: Asteraceae) is among the many commonly used endemic medicinal plants in Ethiopia [6]. Echinops kebericho is an erect perennial herb or bush, commonly forming a massive root stock with grassy stems [7, 8, 9]. Echinops kebericho contains flavonoids, alkaloids, triterpenoids, resines, saponins and steroids [7, 10]. Dehydrocostus lactone is isolated and identified from the tuber [7, 11, 12]. Saponfiable and unsaponfiable constituents of the fixed oils from this plant were also investigated [13]. Various in vitro and in vivo studies have confirmed the ethnopharmacological claims [10, 11, 14, 15].

Teklehaymanot and his colleagues documented E. kebericho‘s diverse ethnopharmacological uses [16]. Its smoke is inhaled for fever, typhoid, tonsilitis, tooth ache, typhus, common cold, cancer, hypertension, colic, cough, and for “evil eye” [17]. In general, it is used in wound infections, lung tuberculosis, leprosy, syphilis, malaria, schistosomiasis, amoebic dysentery, tonsillitis, typhoid fever, cancer, stomach ache, headache, toothache, heart disease, migraine, mental illness, kidney disease, snake repellent, and fumigation during child birth [9, 18, 19]. It is also used in veterinary practice where root tubers are powdered mixed with water and given to cattle and sheep for black leg, respiratory manifestations, liver disease and skin infections [20]. E. kebericho is formulated as a water decoction, infusion, smoke inhalant, or chewed [16, 17, 18, 19].

Antibacterial activities from crude extracts [21, 22, 23] and EOs were reported to be significant [24]. Ivan reported anti-mycobacterium activity of dehydrocostus lactone, isolated from E. kebericho, against Mycobacterium smegmatis and significant antimicrobial resistance modulatory effects of the isolate were observed from dichloromethane fraction which was elucidated to be (2-(penta-1,3-diynyl)-5-(4-hydroxybut-1-ynyl)-thiophene) [12]. Significant activities were reported against fungi (Aspergillus flavus and Candida albicans) [23], malaria parasite (Plasmodium berghei) [10], leishmania [11], earthworm [25], and trypanosoma [26]. Echinops kebericho extract produced a dose dependent decrease in intestinal propulsion and mean defecation comparable to loperamide [14] and its essential oil produced dose-dependent mosquito repellent activity [27] and moderate larvicidal activity [28].

Echinops kebericho is also used in Israel for traditional medicinal purpose [29] where the indigenous knowledge were possibly transferred by Ethiopian Jewish community who went there. It is a source of income for a large number of local people and traditional healers in Ethiopia [17, 23]. Many medicinal plants including E.kebericho are blindly considered as safe though they are also well known for toxicity [30]. Drugs coming from medicinal plant like Atropa belladonna and Digitals purpurea are are appreciably toxic [31, 32]. Investigation of safety profile of the plant is highly required given the pervasive use. With full toxicity profile, its further development and optimal use can be promoted. Herein, we evaluated the acute and sub-acute toxicity of E. kebericho decoction in rats to predict its safety in human use, ensure the public safety and promote further development. Rats are recommended lower level of animals for toxicity studies to extrapolate to human biology according to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) safety study guidelines [33, 34]. The finding of the study could also help to guide optimization and validation of the traditional use of the plant.

Methods

Plant material collection, extraction and formulation

Fresh plant tuber was collected from Andracha woreda, Sheka zone, South nation nationalities and people region in Ethiopia. The plant was collected after flowering time in November in the morning. This time was selected as this plant was commonly harvested during this season and traditionally herbal medicines are commonly collected during the morning time in the community.. The plant specimen was identified by taxonomist from Addis Ababa University and voucher specimen was deposited at the National Herbarium, Department of Biology, Addis Ababa University with voucher number SD-001/18. The tuber was rinsed with running water to remove dirt materials. In four cycles, five hundred gram of the fresh tuber was pounded and soaked in clean water and then water was added until about 2–3 cm above the plant material. The water was brought to boiling point with strong heat, and then shifted to gentle heat and simmered for another 30–45 min. The mixture was stirred 2–3 times while heating. The supernatant was collected, filtered and evaporated. The filtrate was then lyophilized, wrapped with aluminum foil to prevent photoxidation, and stored in a refrigerator at -20 °C until use. The yield of the extract was 10%, 50 g was obtained from 500 g of pounded tuber. The residue from decoction was dissolved with distilled water, gently stirred, and then administered in calculated doses. Fresh solution of the decoction was made daily to prevent possible spoilage. The maximum volume administered was 2 ml/100 g animal weight in accordance with OECD guideline [34].

Experimental animals

Wistar albino rats weighing between 250 g – 350 g from Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) were used. The animals were kept in plastic cages in environmental conditions (22–24 °C, 12 h: 12 h dark/light cycle), fed a standard rodent pellet diet and water ad libitum. Food consumption was measured by subtracting the total amount of food remaining from that of the total served. All experimental rats were acclimatized for two weeks before experiment. In acute toxicity study, rats were housed together in groups of three for groups of control, 300 mg/kg, 2000 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg while each group in sub-acute toxicity study comprised of ten animals, five male and five female. A total of five same sex rats of the same group were housed together. The animals were allocated into experimental groups by simple randomization using lottery method. For the purposes of identification the rats were marked using permanent marker in their tail. The study was conducted with proper animal handling under well-founded conditions in accordance with the recommendations of guide for the care and use of animals [35] and institutional ethical review was obtained to carry out the study. At the end of the experiment the animals were sacrificed using cervical dislocation with all possible effort being given to minimize suffering. The ARRIVE guidelines [36] were used for reporting the study and the checklist is added as Additional file 1.

Acute toxicity study

Acute toxicity study was performed in female rats in a stepwise procedure with the use of 3 animals per step as recommended in acute oral toxicity class method OECD 423 guideline [33]. The animals were fasted overnight and provided with only water, and then decoction was administered by oral gavage starting with 300 mg/kg and next animal group was dosed up based on the response [33]. Animals were observed closely for the first 4 h, for any toxicity manifestation, like increased motor activity, salivation, convulsion, coma, and death. Subsequent observations were made at regular intervals for 24 h. The animals were kept under further follow-up for 14 days and the number of rats that died within the study period was noted, if any. At the end of the experiment, the animals were sacrificed to examine gross anatomy. Lethal dose in 50 % (LD50) was determined in accordance with the guideline principle [33].

Sub-acute toxicity study

The sub-acute oral dose toxicity studies were conducted in rats of both sexes in accordance with the repeated dose 28-day oral toxicity study in rodents, OECD 407 guideline [34]. Doses of the decoction (150 mg/kg, 300 mg/kg and 600 mg/kg) and water (used as control) were administered by oral gavage once daily for 28 consecutive days. The doses were determined based on the finding of the acute toxicity study and in accordance with ethnopharmacological claims. The control groups received the same volume of vehicle (water) as the test animals. All animals were observed daily for mortality, signs and symptoms of toxicity. Detailed clinical observations were recorded on day 1 (prior to test substance administration) and daily thereafter. These observations were conducted while handling the animal and with the animal placed in good light condition. Signs that were observed included respiratory rate, changes in skin fur, eyes and mucous membranes, occurrence of secretions and excretions, and autonomic activity (e.g., lacrimation, piloerection, pupil size, and unusual respiratory pattern). Behavioral parameters, changes in gait, posture, and response to handling, as well as the presence of clonic or tonic movements, stereotypies (e.g., excessive grooming, repetitive circling), and bizarre behavior (e.g., self-mutilation, walking backwards) were noted. Body weights were measured and recorded twice during acclimatization, at the beginning and then after every week.

At the end of the study, all animals fasted overnight (water ad libitum) and, on 29th day, the animals were weighed and blood collected for hematological and biochemical analysis by cardiac puncture under chloroform anesthesia and then the animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Finally body organs were harvested for detailed gross anatomy, organ weight and histo-pathological investigation. Blood was collected in a pre-calibrated tube containing EDTA for hematology assessments. Hematological autoanalyzer was used to analyze hematological parameters, including red blood cell (RBC) count, white blood cell (WBC) count, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), mean cell hemoglobin (MCH), mean cell volume (MCV), mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), platelet count, and others. Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min for biochemical analysis. The serum was carefully aspirated with a micro-pipette into sample bottles for the various biochemical assays. The clinical chemistry parameters were assessed using isolated serum samples analyzed under an automatic analyzer. Analytes included aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphate (ALP), total protein (TP), total cholesterol (TC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Crea), total bilirubin (T-Bili), direct bilirubin (Bili-dir), albumin (Alb), triglycerides (TG), and glucose (Glu).

Organ weight determination and histopathology study

The rats were dissected and the liver, kidneys, spleen, lung, and heart, were excised and absolute weights determined. The relative organ weight, defined as the organ weight per 100 g of body weight at sacrifice was calculated. The specimens for histopathology were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin at 18 °C. About 3–4 mm in thickness of each specimen of liver, kidney, and spleen were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin stain following standard laboratory procedures. The stained sections were examined under microscope for cellular damage or change in morphology of particular tissue.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism version 5 statistical software was used for the analysis. Data were presented as mean (Standard deviation, SD). Bartlett’s test for equality of variance and D’Agostino & Pearson omnibus normality test were performed to determine whether assumptions of One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were met. If assumptions were met, ANOVA was performed; if not Kruskal-Wallis analysis was performed. Either Tukey or Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test were performed for significant values in post hoc analysis. The P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Experimental animals were of full health during the experimental allocation and naive to test substance. A total of 6 animals were used in acute toxicity study and followed up to 14 days of treatment. Forty animals were enrolled in sub-acute toxicity studies and 38 animals completed the treatment making 95% completion rate. Two animals died due cases unrelated to treatment during experimental period as confirmed by histopathological findings.

Effect on acute toxicity

Oral administration of E. kebericho decoction showed no treatment-related mortality up to dose of 5000 mg/kg and no significant treatment related morbidity was observed. However, piloerection, muscle twinge, and lethargy were observed immediately after the treatment with 5000 mg/kg which ceased within 5 h. Effects of decoction on body weight showed significant variations in mean body weight of 300 mg/kg treated group compared to 5000 mg/kg treated, p-value = 0.0055. Difference in rank sum of body weight of 300 mg/kg treated group compared to 5000 mg/kg was 9.833. There was a higher drop in body weight of those treated with 5000 mg/kg during the first day of treatment compared to either 300 mg/kg or 2000 mg/kg. Though statistically non-significant, the variations between those treated with 300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg or 2000 mg/kg and 5000 mg/kg appears to be treatment related in which higher dose treated groups showed a drop in body weight as shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Effect of E. kebericho decoction on body weight as function of time (in days) after acute exposure to various dose levels. The body weight appears to decrease just after administration in all of the treatment wings

Effect on sub-acute toxicity

Effect on body weight, food consumption and relative organ weight

Comparison of food consumption and body weight did not show statistically significant variations among treated and control groups of rats, p-value =0.6720 and p-value = 0.1353 respectively. However, comparison of male and female groups showed significant variation in food consumption, males consumed more compared to females; p-value < 0.0001. Although both male and female of nearly the same age were enrolled in the treatment, baseline weights of males were greater compared to females, Fig. 2c. Figure 2c demonstrates that females’ body weight remains constant throughout the treatment while males’ increases and then falls. However, Fig. 2d showed combined groups of rat body weight picking from 10 to 14 days after treatment then falling down.
Fig. 2

Food consumption pattern as a function of time (in days) among different experimental groups; males and females separately analyzed (a) and males and females of the same group combined together, (b), Body weight as a function of time (in days) among different experimental groups, males and females analyzed separately (c) and males and females combined together (d)

Linear regression revealed weight gain among control and highest dose treated male groups whereas all other groups did not show changes in body weights as the regression slopes were not significantly different from zero. When males and females weights were combined together, no significant changes in weight as a function of time (in days) were observed (Table 1). Linear regression also showed a decrease in food consumption rate as function of time (in days) in control males and combined controls. No significant changes in consumption as function of time (in days) were observed among other groups (Table 1).
Table 1

Linear regression of body weight in experimental rats

Group

Weight gain

Food consumption

Slope (95%CI)

p-value

R2

Interpretation

Slop (95%CI)

p-value

R2

Interpretation

Control-Female

0.08454 ± 0.1586

0.6132

0.04522

No change

− 0.5674 ± 0.3562

0.1307

0.1369

No change

150 mg/kg-Female

0.1919 ± 0.1185

0.1566

0.3040

No change

0.1455 ± 0.3601

0.6915

0.01010

No change

300 mg/kg-Female

0.1305 ± 0.1144

0.2973

0.1784

No change

−0.2414 ± 0.2905

0.4183

0.04135

No change

600 mg/kg-Female

0.1459 ± 0.1225

0.2784

0.1914

No change

−0.01497 ± 0.3343

0.9648

0.0001253

No change

Control-Male

0.7122 ± 0.2279

0.0205

0.6194

Gain

−0.8286 ± 0.1760

0.0002

0.5808

Decreased

150 mg/kg-Male

−0.3867 ± 0.2712

0.2037

0.2532

No change

0.3500 ± 0.2481

0.1776

0.1106

No change

300 mg/kg-Male

0.3133 ± 0.2192

0.2028

0.2540

No change

−0.5587 ± 0.3436

0.1235

0.1418

No change

600 mg/kg-Male

1.410 ± 0.3622

0.0080

0.7164

Gain

−0.5029 ± 0.2937

0.1062

0.1548

No change

Combined male and female

 Control

0.3984 ± 0.9936

0.6945

0.01135

No change

−0.6980 ± 0.2965

0.0245

0.1402

Decreased

 150 mg/kg

−0.09742 ± 1.511

0.9495

0.0002968

No change

0.2477 ± 0.2676

0.3610

0.02459

No change

 300 mg/kg

0.2219 ± 1.632

0.8938

0.001319

No change

−0.4000 ± 0.4451

0.4392

0.02320

No change

 600 mg/kg

0.7781 ± 1.073

0.4802

0.03621

No change

−0.2589 ± 0.3308

0.4392

0.01770

No change

No significant differences occurred in relative organ weights (liver, kidney, heart, spleen) of treated and control groups (Table 2). However, there were significant differences in mean relative lung weight of 600 mg/kg treated group compared to the control ones. Relative organ weights of were higher in males compared to females according to post-hoc analysis. Mere observation of absolute organ weights showed variations but this doesn’t hold true with relative organ weight. All evaluated internal organs (right kidney, left kidney, spleen, lung, liver, and heart) showed significant variations among males and females.
Table 2

Effects of 28 days oral administration of E. kebericho decoction on absolute organ weight and relative organ weight

Organs

Male

Female

P-value

control

150 mg/kg

300 mg/kg

600 mg/kg

Control

150 mg/kg

300 mg/kg

600 mg/kg

 

Absolute weight

 Liver (in g)

11.49 ± 1.04

12.13 ± 1.21

11.89 ± 2.41

9.19 ± 0.96

9.85 ± 2.18

9.42 ± 0.89

7.13 ± 0.56

9.12 ± 0.72

 Right kidney (in g)

1.114 ± 0.17

1.22 ± 0.17

1.072 ± 0.17

1.04 ± 0.12

0.91 ± 0.12

0.94 ± 0.10

0.77 ± 0.08

0.86 ± 0.07

 Left kidney (in g)

1.16 ± 0.16

1.25 ± 0.22

1.02 ± 0.13

0.98 ± 0.08

0.89 ± 0.08

0.912 ± 0.14

0.79 ± 0.09

0.87 ± 0.06

Spleen (in g)

0.53 ± 0.04

0.66 ± 0.13

0.61 ± 0.16

0.65 ± 0.11

0.59 ± 0.16

0.63 ± 0.08

0.67 ± 0.07

0.63 ± 0.10

 Lung (in g)

1.80 ± 0.30

1.86 ± 0.14

1.59 ± 0.13

1.59 ± 0.18

1.65 ± 0.13

1.44 ± 0.06

1.30 ± 0.13

1.19 ± 0.20

 Heart (in g)

1.35 ± 0.042

1.42 ± 0.23

1.33 ± 0.20

1.19 ± 0.11

1.04 ± 0.04

1.02 ± 0.07

1.02 ± 0.13

1.02 ± 0.06

Relative organ weight (Organ weight in gram/100 g of animal weight)

 Liver

3.21 ± 0.26

3.12 ± 0.21

3.13 ± 0.48

2.62 ± 0.35

3.61 ± 0.70

3.60 ± 0.18

3.00 ± 0.24

3.63 ± 0.37

0.0045*/0.2187

 Right kidney

0.31 ± 0.04

0.31 ± 0.03

0.28 ± 0.03

0.29 ± 0.02

0.33 ± 0.04

0.36 ± 0.03

0.32 ± 0.03

0.34 ± 0.03

0.0497*/0.2743

 Left kidney

0.32 ± 0.04

0.32 ± 0.05

0.27 ± 0.03

0.28 ± 0.02

0.33 ± 0.04

0.35 ± 0.03

0.33 ± 0.03

0.34 ± 0.02

0.0206*/0.2759

 Spleen

0.15 ± 0.02

0.17 ± 0.03

0.16 ± 0.03

0.18 ± 0.04

0.22 ± 0.05

0.24 ± 0.04

0.28 ± 0.03

0.25 ± 0.03

0.0013* /0.3968

 Lung

0.50 ± 0.06

0.48 ± 0.04

0.42 ± 0.02

0.45 ± 0.04

0.61 ± 0.05

0.55 ± 0.05

0.54 ± 0.04

0.47 ± 0.08

0.0015* /0.0277**

 Heart

0.38 ± 0.02

0.36 ± 0.05

0.35 ± 0.04

0.34 ± 0.02

0.38 ± 0.01

0.39 ± 0.02

0.43 ± 0.07

0.40 ± 0.04

0.0409*/0.9093

* Significant p-value when males and females are treated separately, **Significant p-value when males and females are grouped together

Effect on clinical chemistry and hematology

Except for monocytes, all hematological parameters did not show significant variations among the different groups, Table 3. Significant variations in mean differences between female and male groups were observed in RBC, MCHC, RDW-SD, RDW-CV, and monocytes where males showed higher value compared to females, while a higher MCV values was observed in females.
Table 3

Mean hematological parameters for 28 week repeated oral doses of E. kebericho decoction treated rats

Parameter

Male

Female

P-value

Control

150 mg/kg

300 mg/kg

600 mg/kg

control

150 mg/kg

300 mg/kg

600 mg/kg

 

WBC × 103

/μL

6.73 ± 4.20

7.31 ± 3.92

8.91 ± 1.79

8.34 ± 2.62

6.62 ± 1.16

5.88 ± 3.00

5.41 ± 1.98

6.60 ± 2.94

0.4956/0.8792

RBC ×106

/μL

8.80 ± 0.19

8.70 ± 0.56

8.78 ± 0.42

8.91 ± 0.89

8.26 ± 0.73

7.74 ± 0.38

7.93 ± 0.54

8.13 ± 0.37

0.0194*/0.6137

HGB (g/dl)

16.14 ± 0.37

15.88 ± 0.90

16.08 ± 0.60

16.46 ± 1.56

15.78 ± 1.42

15.26 ± 0.25

15.42 ± 0.96

15.70 ± 0.7280

0.5654/0.6188

HCT (%)

45.74 ± 1.36

44.98 ± 2.53

46.64 ± 1.86

47.64 ± 3.31

45.82 ± 3.54

44.40 ± 0.98

44.06 ± 2.00

44.80 ± 2.65

0.2559/0.5777

MCV (fL)

51.96 ± 1.49

51.68 ± 0.71

53.18 ± 1.73

53.50 ± 2.56

55.56 ± 1.50

56.46 ± 1.12

54.26 ± 1.46

55.06 ± 1.62

0.0023*/0.8887

MCH pg

18.34 ± 0.30

18.25 ± 0.19

18.32 ± 0.32

18.46 ± 0.45

19.10 ± 0.45

19.16 ± 0.19

19.26 ± 0.57

19.30 ± 0.29

0.0004*/0.6543

MCHC (g/dL)

35.28 ± 0.54

35.33 ± 0.13

34.48 ± 0.73

34.48 ± 1.10

34.42 ± 0.49

33.92 ± 0.54

35.44 ± 0.25

35.08 ± 0.63

0.0143*/0.7061

PLT ×103

/μL

1072 ± 90.91

993.0 ± 32.37

1066 ± 89.12

1037 ± 142.9

1083 ± 56.89

1052 ± 72.99

1091 ± 51.52

820.6 ± 372.1

0.4173/0.2238

RDW-SD(%)

28.78 ± 0.81

29.28 ± 0.93

29.82 ± 1.18

30.24 ± 0.30

29.26 ± 0.94

29.32 ± 1.22

27.90 ± 1.00

28.50 ± 1.39

0.0331*/0.7570

RDW-CV (fl)

19.28 ± 0.23

19.40 ± 0.94

19.46 ± 0.69

19.95 ± 0.74

17.96 ± 1.24

17.28 ± 0.70

17.60 ± 1.11

17.60 ± 1.08

0.0012*/0.8976

PDW (%)

8.68 ± 0.22

8.52 ± 0.28

8.24 ± 0.11

8.60 ± 0.26

8.22 ± 0.41

8.38 ± 0.28

8.12 ± 0.22

8.28 ± 0.33

0.0429*/0.1478

MPV ×103

/μL

7.78 ± 0.16

7.80 ± 0.14

7.64 ± 0.15

7.80 ± 0.27

7.58 ± 0.22

7.74 ± 0.09

7.60 ± 0.16

7.72 ± 0.23

0.3858/0.2674

P-LCR (%)

9.64 ± 1.01

9.72 ± 1.16

8.66 ± 0.62

9.70 ± 1.70

8.26 ± 1.36

9.20 ± 0.69

8.34 ± 1.18

9.12 ± 1.18

0.3365/0.2621

PCT (%)

0.83 ± 0.06

0.78 ± 0.02

0.81 ± 0.06

0.81 ± 0.09

0.82 ± 0.04

0.81 ± 0.06

0.83 ± 0.03

0.63 ± 0.28

0.5053/0.2593

NEUT (%)

16.54 ± 1.43

22.70 ± 7.31

22.03 ± 6.05

25.66 ± 7.47

17.50 ± 3.37

16.64 ± 3.75

21.90 ± 7.15

17.98 ± 6.54

0.1442/0.3017

LYMPH (%)

77.18 ± 1.63

71.18 ± 7.63

71.58 ± 6.20

67.86 ± 7.63

75.84 ± 4.44

74.36 ± 4.63

74.12 ± 7.43

75.58 ± 6.328

0.4319/0.3016

MONO (%)

5.14 ± 1.43

4.72 ± 1.79

4.65 ± 2.05

5.56 ± 0.69

5.12 ± 1.43

7.52 ± 1.61

2.46 ± 1.42

3.22 ± 2.87

0.0231*/0.0295**

EO (%)

0.86 ± 0.21

1.28 ± 0.44

1.58 ± 0.15

0.78 ± 0.11

1.40 ± 0.55

1.22 ± 0.37

1.24 ± 0.58

2.10 ± 2.08

0.0346*/0.1318

BASO (%)

0.28 ± 0.25

0.12 ± 0.10

0.82 ± 1.44

0.14 ± 0.11

0.14 ± 0.05

0.26 ± 0.32

0.08 ± 0.11

0.52 ± 0.73

0.5610/0.8971

IG (%)

0.16 ± 0.15

0.25 ± 0.17

0.17 ± 0.096

0.24 ± 0.15

0.20 ± 0.19

0.08 ± 0.13

0.24 ± 0.055

0.25 ± 0.21

0.6349/0.6137

*Significant p-value when males and females are treated separately, ** significant p-value when males and females are grouped together; Where, PLT Platelets, RBC Red blood cells, WBC White blood cells, MCV Mean corpuscular volume, MCH Mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, RDW Red cell distribution width, PDW Platelet volume distribution width, HCT Hematocrit, HGB Hemoglobin

Clinical chemistry results did not show significant differences in values between treated groups and control ones, except for creatinine, direct bilirubin and TG levels (Table 4). Significantly lower level of TG was observed in those treated with 300 mg/kg and 600 mg/kg compared to the control group. Significant variations were also observed in the level of direct bilirubin among those treated with 150 mg/kg and those with 150 mg/kg versus 300 mg/kg compared to control group (Table 4). Post-hoc analysis showed cholesterol, TG, creatinine, ALP and albumin levels were lower in females compared to males and higher direct bilirubin females compared to males.
Table 4

Mean clinical chemistry parameters for 28 week repeated oral doses of E. kebericho decoction treated rats

Parameter

Male

Female

P-value

control

150 mg/kg

300 mg/kg

600 mg/kg

Control

150 mg/kg

300 mg/kg

600 mg/kg

 

AST (U/L)

260.2 ± 30.06

288.3 ± 70.71

241.6 ± 76.59

173.5 ± 21.89

304.2 ± 256.1

190.6 ± 20.74

193.6 ± 29.08

301.6 ± 309.4

0.0559 /0.1173

ALT (U/L)

84.20 ± 7.73

80.75 ± 6.99

88.00 ± 14.37

64.20 ± 6.30

123.0 ± 128.3

70.40 ± 4.88

56.60 ± 7.16

83.80 ± 22.11

0.0036 */0.6072

ALP (U/L)

74.60 ± 20.26

71.25 ± 23.91

106.6 ± 56.20

131.3 ± 16.88

197.8 ± 126.4

52.20 ± 16.98

45.40 ± 46.41

83.20 ± 32.82

0.0162 */0.0577

Creatinine (mg/dl)

0.60 ± 0.07

0.52 ± 0.10

0.52 ± 0.16

0.30 ± 0.12

0.60 ± 0.07

0.52 ± 0.08

0.46 ± 0.05

0.42 ± 0.11

0.0077 */0.0005 **

Urea (mg/dL)

40.30 ± 2.94

42.00 ± 1.26

50.48 ± 6.58

41.50 ± 3.90

47.22 ± 6.14

48.30 ± 7.97

42.72 ± 5.02

43.88 ± 3.51

0.1288/0.5085

Protein total (g/dl)

5.90 ± 0.73

6.30 ± 0.74

6.32 ± 1.00

5.80 ± 0.63

7.06 ± 0.56

6.60 ± 1.40

6.48 ± 0.58

6.62 ± 0.43

0.1531 /0.9694

Albumin (g/dl)

3.20 ± 0.12

3.22 ± 0.17

3.14 ± 0.21

3.05 ± 0.10

3.56 ± 0.24

3.36 ± 0.15

3.38 ± 0.22

3.42 ± 0.228

0.0122*/0.6266

Glucose (mg/dl)

127.4 ± 42.51

178.8 ± 69.63

181.6 ± 64.31

124.8 ± 33.04

116.2 ± 17.71

193.0 ± 45.67

140.0 ± 31.16

188.6 ± 62.42

0.0457*/0.0581

Bil-total (mg/dl)

0.18 ± 0.04

0.38 ± 0.15

0.20 ± 0.0

0.28 ± 0.10

0.26 ± 0.05

0.16 ± 0.05

0.24 ± 0.09

0.34 ± 0.05

0.0036*/0.0644

Bil-direct (mg/dl)

0.10 ± 0.0

0.32 ± 0.10

0.14 ± 0.06

0.12 ± 0.05

0.14 ± 0.06

0.20 ± 0.07

0.14 ± 0.06

0.22 ± 0.11

0.0129*/0.0065**

TG (mg/dl)

79.40 ± 20.19

79.50 ± 8.96

66.60 ± 20.19

51.25 ± 13.45

98.00 ± 41.43

75.20 ± 14.45

58.00 ± 17.56

62.00 ± 9.38

0.0338*/0.0042**

Cholesterol (mg/dl)

33.60 ± 10.85

79.50 ± 16.76

65.60 ± 15.63

38.50 ± 3.70

84.60 ± 37.63

81.80 ± 29.78

81.20 ± 18.10

80.60 ± 12.52

0.0013*/0.2970

*Significant p-value when males and females are treated separately, **Significant p-value when males and females are grouped together: Where, ALP Alkaline phosphatase, ALT Alanine aminotransferase, AST Aspartate Aminotransferase, TG Triglycerides, Bil-total Bilirubin Total, Bil-direct Direct Bilirubin3.2.3. Post-hoc analysis result

Post-hoc analysis (Tukey or Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test) results revealed that relative lung weights, creatinine, direct bilirubin, TG and monocytes levels showed significant differences among the treatment groups The relative lung weight was significantly higher among 600mg/kg treated group compared to control (0.09221[95%CI: 0.007704, 0.1767]). The group treated with 150 mg/kg decoction showed a higher monocyte level compared to those treated with 300 mg/kg (2.844 [95%CI: 0.3709, 5.318]). Creatinine level decreased in 300 mg/kg and 600 mg/kg treated groups compared to the control group with rank sum difference respectively of 12.70 and 20.07. Lower level of direct bilirubin was observed in controls compared to 150 mg/kg treated groups (rank sum difference − 15.48). The level of TG was reduced in highest dose treated group compared to controls (rank sum difference = 15.84).

Effect on histopathology

Gross anatomical examination of the vital organs (liver, kidney, heart, lung and spleen) in acute and sub-acute oral toxicity study did not reveal any gross pathological lesions. Histo-pathological examinations revealed mild alterations in the liver, however, it appears unrelated to treatment as the pathological changes were also observed in control group. Necrosis was observed in controls, low- and high-dose treated groups, but medium dose treated groups did not show such necrosis. Fatty liver was observed with high dose of treatment. The photomicrographs of the kidney showed normal morphological architecture among the different dose levels and controls. Mild sinusoidal spleen congestion was observed with all treated groups including control group (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Photomicrograph of liver, kidney and spleen in sub-acute oral toxicity. Mild spotty liver necrosis was observed in either sex of of control and low dose (1, 2, 5, and 6) indicated by white arrow. Groups in medium dose group of either sex showed normal morphology (3 and 7). Liver of high dose treated groups in either sex showed moderate fatty change (green arrow), 4 and 8. Kidney of all groups in box sex showed normal morphology (9–16). Spleen of all groups showed normal but mild sinusoidal congestion (17–24)

Discussion

This study presented the first comprehensive investigation on the safety of a commonly used endemic medicinal plant in Ethiopia. It revealed that the LD50 of E. kebericho decoction could be greater than 5000 mg/kg, putting the plant in GHS Category 5. The 28 day repeated dose toxicity study revealed that E. kebericho did not show significant alterations in hematology, clinical chemistry, or derangements in histology up to 600 mg/kg/day compared to controls. Food consumption and body weight were similar in treated groups compared to control. Decrease in food consumption rate was observed across all groups as a function of time (in days). The relative organ weight, hematology and chemistry findings were almost similar in treated compared to controls with little variations in some groups which could be considered as incidental and inconsequential. The level of creatinine, relative lung weight, triglycerides, and monocytes were significantly lower in treated groups compared to controls or higher dose treated groups compared to lower dose treated groups. Food consumption, relative organ weight, hematology, and clinical chemistry showed sex dependent variations.

The findings of the acute toxicity study demonstrated the tolerability of the E. kebericho decoction to the maximum dose recommended (5000 mg/kg). However, significant weight loss was observed with 5000 mg/kg treated group signposting sub-lethal toxicity of the extracts. The weight loss could be due to gastrointestinal irritation which reduces food consumption in contrast to metabolic derangement [37]. To protect animal welfare, testing animals in Category 5 (5000 mg/kg) ranges is discouraged [33] without good justification, yet this experiment was conducted with the assumption that there could be a possibility of exposure to higher dose in both human and veterinary medicine as ethnopharmacolgical studies reveal [18, 20].

Food consumption and body weight was almost constant in all combined groups as shown from linear regression results where the slopes were not significantly different in almost all groups. However, there was weight gain in control male rats while there is reduced food consumption. This could be attributed to edema or some unknown reasons. Food consumption could remain constant but failure to gain weight could be due to experimental stress such as use of oral gavage and/or disturbances from handling [38]. Adjustment to handling or study related procedures is common where pretreatment values differs from post-treatment in control animals [39]. Significant difference observed in relative lung weight between highest doses treated group (600 mg/kg) and control could be attributed to incidental events or some factors related to treatment which the current study could not uncover.

Hematological and clinical chemistry parameters are good indicators in determining toxicity [40]. Blood parameter analysis is appropriate to risk evaluation as the hematological system has a higher prognostic value for toxicity [39, 41]. In the present study, almost all hematological parameters did not show significant variation among treated and control groups indicating the possible absence of hematological toxicity. Reduction in monocyte counts could be expected during severe bone marrow toxicity [42], like administration of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents [43]. This finding could have been corroborated with other incidents where bone marrow toxicity could bring changes, such as reduction in RBC. But, no reduction in RBC could mean absence in bone marrow toxicity which rules out the reduction in monocyte level as incidental.

Liver and renal function tests reveal hepatic and renal toxicity as target organs due to involvement in elimination of xenobiotics. Drug-induced liver injury is a result of its anatomical proximity to the portal blood supply, its involvement in concentration, bio-transformation and elimination of xenobiotics [44]. Preclinical safety assessments could connote any potential adverse effects that could occur to the end users [45]. Liver function test and histo-pathological findings of current study did not show hepatotoxicty. Yet, mild necrosis was observed in low dose treated and control groups, and moderate fatty liver was observed with higher-dose treated group but those treated with medium dose showed normal liver morphology. As alteration in histological architecture, potentially pathological changes, was observed including in the control but not the medium-dose treated group. The mild necrosis observed in control and low-dose treated groups could be considered as subsidiary and negligible but moderate fatty liver with high-dose treated group could potentially be linked with the treatment. The fatty change observed with high-dose treated group could be due to liver problem or some other unknown changes. Problems in muscles mass could have lowered creatinine level in high-dose treated groups compared to control [46].

Lower level of creatinine was observed in higher dose compared to lower dose treated group or controls in this study. Mean reference serum creatinine levels in the rats aged less than six months is 0.6 mg/dl ± 0.12 and 0.7 mg/dl ± 0.13; and the tenth percentile value is 0.5 mg/dl for both males and females [47]. While the control value exactly matches the reference value given, the high dose treated group showed significantly lower level. This possibly indicated some derangements resulting in lowered creatinine level. Histo-pathological changes observed in kidney and spleen could only be considered as incidental and spontaneous as they were also observed in control group and very mild. The low level of serum creatinine could not be associated with kidney disease and the possible explanation for reduction, but may be associated either to liver function problem or muscle mass reduction.

Sex dependent variations in food consumption where males consumed more compared to females could only be attributed physiological variation between male and female. Similar statistically significant variations were also observed from historical data in control Sprague-Dawley rats in pre-clinical toxicity studies [40] and study by Lillie et al., 1996 [48] revealed that male rats generally have a higher HCT, WBC TG, ALP, ALT, RBC, HGB, PLT, and glucose compared to females. Toxicity studies in animals often deliver valued evidence to predict adverse effects of new drugs in humans. Toxic effects can vary between species but can easily be extrapolated to human. Comparative drug disposition data in corresponding with the pilot toxicity studies in different species can provide a strong basis for appropriate toxicity study designs in human [49]. The current study could therefore provide a stepping stone for possible toxicity study in human.

Conclusion

E. kebericho decoction can be considered Category 5 in accordance with GHS safety category in acute toxicity study and well tolerated up to 600 mg/kg/body weight in sub-acute toxicity study. E. kebericho decoction did not cause any significant toxicity resulting in death, or produce any hematological, serum chemical alteration, or histo-pathological derangements. However, significant reductions in the levels of creatinine and TG in high-dose treated groups could be related to mild liver toxicity as fatty liver was observed in liver tissue of high-dose treated group. This study demonstrates the relative tolerability of E. kebericho decoction up to 600 mg/kg suggesting its safety and potential candidature as a future safe pharmaceutical product. Given the polypharmacological effect elucidated in previous studies and the tolerability in the current study, there is a need for pharmaceutical product development.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Pharm-biotechnology and Traditional Medicine Center of Excellence (PHARMBIOTRAC) World Bank African center of excellence II (ACE-II) project for funding this research. We appreciate Dr. Casim Umba Tolo and Dr. Patrick Engue Ogwang for facilitating the research fund. We would like to extend our appreciation to Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) for providing facility for the research. Our heartfelt thanks go to School of Pharmacy, Addis Ababa University for allowing their laboratory for extraction. We would also like to extend our heartfelt thanks to individuals who have contributed to the success of this study: Hussein Abdu for his help in animal dissection, Yewubdar Haile for her contribution in animal care, and Elias Yirdaw for his help in image processing.

Authors’ contributions

SD conceived the research idea. EM, JB, PEA developed the concept, monitored and mentored the proposal development. SD and AH conducted the extraction. SD, AA and RA conducted the experiment. MAT read and interpreted the histo-pathological findings. All authors revised, edited and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by World Bank through Pharm-Biotechnology and Traditional Medicine Centre (PHARMBIOTRAC), African Center of Excellence II (ACE-II) Project. The funder contributed research money and stipends (SD) but has not involved in planning and implementation of the study.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol of this study was reviewed by Faculty Research Committee and approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Uganda. It was also registered with Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST) with reference number HS398ES.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

12906_2019_2794_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.1 mb)
Additional file 1. The ARRIVE Guidelines Checklist.

References

  1. 1.
    Yuan H, Ma Q, Ye L, Piao G. The traditional medicine and modern medicine from natural products. Molecules. 2016;21:559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Welz AN, Emberger-Klein A, Menrad K. Why people use herbal medicine: insights from a focus-group study in Germany. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18:92.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-018-2160-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ekor M. The growing use of herbal medicines: issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Front Neurol. 2014;4:177.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li P, Chen J, Zhang W, Fu B, Wang W. Transcriptome inference and systems approaches to polypharmacology and drug discovery in herbal medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017;195:127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Birhan W, Giday M, Teklehaymanot T. The contribution of traditional healers’ clinics to public health care system in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011;7:39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tadesse M. A revision of the genus Echinops (Compositae-Cardueae) in tropical Africa. Kew Bull. 1997;52:4:879–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abegaz BM, Tadesse IM, Majinda R. Distribution of Sesquiterpene lactones and Polyacetylenic Thiophenes in Echinops. Biochem Syst Ecol. 1991;19:323–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Demissew S. A description of some essential oil bearing plants in Ethiopia and their indigenous uses. J Essent Oil Res. 1993;5:465–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abebe D. Proceedings of the workshop on development and utilization of herbal remedies in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: Ethiopian Health and Nutrition Research Institute; 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Toma A, Deyno S, Fikru A, Eyado A, Beale A. In vivo antiplasmodial and toxicological effect of crude ethanol extract of Echinops kebericho traditionally used in treatment of malaria in Ethiopia. Malar J. 2015;14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0716-1.
  11. 11.
    Tariku Y, Hymete A, Hailu A, Rohloff J. In vitro evaluation of Antileishmanial activity and toxicity of essential oils of Artemisia absinthium and Echinops kebericho. Chem Biodivers. 2011;8:614–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ivana T. Phytochemische und antimikrobielle Untersuchung an Echinops kebericho Mesfin. MSc Thesis 2015.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hymete A, Afifi MS. Investigation of the fixed oil isolated from the roots of Echinops kebericho Mesfin. Mansoura. J Pharmacol Sci. 1997;13:59–69.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shiferie F, Shibeshi W. In vivo antidiarrheal and ex-vivo spasmolytic activities of the aqueous extract of the roots of Echinops kebericho Mesfin ( Asteraceae ) in rodents and isolated Guinea-pig ileum. Int J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;2:110–6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Turek I. Phytochemical and anitimicrobial research of Echinops kebericho Mesfin Phytochemische und antimikrobielle Untersuchung an Echinops kebericho Mesfin; 2015.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Teklehaymanot T, Giday M, Medhin G, Mekonnen Y. Knowledge and use of medicinal plants by people around Debre Libanos monastery in Ethiopia. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;111(2):271–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kloos H. Preliminary studies of medicinal plants and plant products in markets of Central Ethiopia. Ethnomedicine. 1977;4:63–102.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teklehaymanot T, Giday M. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by people in Zegie peninsula, Northwestern Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007;3:12.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-3-12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abera B. Medicinal plants used in traditional medicine by Oromo people, Ghimbi District, Southwest Ethiopia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014;10:40.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yigezu Y, Haile DB, Ayen WY. Ethnoveterinary medicines in four districts of Jimma zone, Ethiopia: cross sectional survey for plant species and mode of use. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:76.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ashebir M, Ashenafi M. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of crude preparations of Zingiber officinale (zingibl), Echinops spp.(kebericho), Coriandrum sativum (dimbilal) and Cymbopogan citratus (tej sar) on some food-borne pathogens. Ethiop J Health Sci. 1999;9.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Desta B. Ethiopian traditional herbal drugs. Part II : Antimicrobial activity of  63 medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 1993;39(2):129–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(93)90028-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ameya, G., Gure, A. & Dessalegn, E.. Antimicrobial activity of Echinops kebericho against human pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med, 2016;13:199–203.  https://doi.org/10.21010/ajtcam.v13i6.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Belay G, Tariku Y, Kebede T, Hymete A, Mekonnen Y. Ethnopharmacological investigations of essential oils isolated from five Ethiopian medicinal plants against eleven pathogenic bacterial strains. Phytopharmacology. 2011;1:133–43.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hymete A, Kidane A. Screening for anthelmintic activity in two Echinops spp. Ethiop Pharm J. 1991;9:67–71.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abdeta D. In vitro and in vivo antitrypanosomal effects of hydromethanolic extract of Solanum anguivi fruits and Echinops kebericho roots. Addis Ababa University (thesis); 2016. http://etd.aau.edu.et/bitstream/handle/123456789/2564/Debela.Abdela.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 10 June 2019.
  27. 27.
    Jemberie W, Tadie A, Enyew A, Debebe A, Raja N. Repellent activity of plant essential oil extracts against malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis Patton (Diptera: Culicidae). ENTOMON. 2016;41 2 SE-Articles. http://entomon.in/index.php/Entomon/article/view/166. Accessed 1 June 2019.
  28. 28.
    Abebe D, Mudie K, Zeleke G. Screening of some Ethiopian medicinal plants for mosquito larvicidal effects and phytochemical constituents. Pharmacologyonline. 2007;3:231–43.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Danino D, Amar Z. Little Ethiopia: An ethnopharmacological study of the Ethiopian community in Israel. Int J Ethiop Stud. 2009;4(no. 1/2):105-34. www.jstor.org/stable/27828907.
  30. 30.
    Burrows GE, Tyrl RJ. Toxic Plants of North America. New Jersey: Wiley; 2013. ISBN: 978-0-813-82034-7.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    George P. Concerns regarding the safety and toxicity of medicinal plants-an overview. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2011;1:40–4.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nasri H. Toxicity and safety of medicinal plants. J HerbMed Pharmacol. 2013;2:2:21–2.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    OECD_423. Test No. 423: Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method. OECD; 2002. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264071001-en.
  34. 34.
    OECD_407. Test No. 407: Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents. OECD; 2008. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264070684-en.
  35. 35.
    Clark JD, Gebhart GF, Gonder JC, Keeling ME, Kohn DF. The 1996 guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. ILAR J. 1997;38:41–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu L, Winston JH, Shenoy MM, Song G, Chen JDZ, Pasricha PJ. A rat model of chronic gastric sensorimotor dysfunction resulting from transient neonatal gastric irritation. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:2070–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Martí O, Martí J, Armario A. Effects of chronic stress on food intake in rats: influence of stressor intensity and duration of daily exposure. Physiol Behav. 1994;55:747–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    York MJ. Clinical pathology. In: A Comprehensive Guide to Toxicology in Nonclinical Drug Development. Cambridge: Elsevier; 2017. p. 325–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Petterino C, Argentino-Storino A. Clinical chemistry and haematology historical data in control Sprague-Dawley rats from pre-clinical toxicity studies. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2006;57:213–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Al-Afifi NA, Alabsi AM, Bakri MM, Ramanathan A. Acute and sub-acute oral toxicity of Dracaena cinnabari resin methanol extract in rats. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18:50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Molyneux G, Andrews M, Sones W, York M, Barnett A, Quirk E, et al. Haemotoxicity of busulphan, doxorubicin, cisplatin and cyclophosphamide in the female BALB/c mouse using a brief regimen of drug administration. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2011;27:13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Doll DC, Weiss RB. Chemotherapeutic agents and the erythron. Cancer Treat Rev. 1983;10:185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Benesic A, Rotter I, Dragoi D, Weber S, Buchholtz M-L, Gerbes AL. Development and validation of a test to identify drugs that cause idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:1488–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cavagnaro JA. Preclinical safety evaluation of biopharmaceuticals: a science-based approach to facilitating clinical trials. New Jersey: Wiley; 2013.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Kashani K. Serum creatinine level, a surrogate of muscle mass, predicts mortality in critically ill patients. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:E305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wolford ST, Schroer RA, Gohs FX, Gallo PP, Brodeck M, Falk HB, et al. Reference range data base for serum chemistry and hematology values in laboratory animals. J Toxicol Environ Heal Part A Curr Issues. 1986;18:161–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lillie LE, Temple NJ, Florence LZ. Reference values for young normal Sprague-Dawley rats: weight gain, hematology and clinical chemistry. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1996;15:612–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Morton DM. Importance of species selection in drug toxicity testing. Toxicol Lett. 1998;102:545–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2020

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PharmacologyMbarara University of Science and TechnologyMbararaUganda
  2. 2.Department of PharmacologySchool of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa UniversityHawassaEthiopia
  3. 3.Pharmbiotechnology and Traditional Medicine Center of Excellence (PHARMBIOTRAC)Mbarara University of Science and TechnologyMbararaUganda
  4. 4.Traditional and Modern Drug Research DirectorateEthiopian Public Health InstituteAddis AbabaEthiopia
  5. 5.Department of PathologySaint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical CollegeAddis AbabaEthiopia
  6. 6.Department of Pharmaceutical chemistry and PharmacognosyAddis Ababa UniversityAddis AbabaEthiopia
  7. 7.Department of MicrobiologyMbarara University of Science and TechnologyMbararaUganda
  8. 8.Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa, College of Health SciencesAddis Ababa UniversityAddis AbabaEthiopia
  9. 9.Department of Pharmacology and Clinical PharmacyCollege of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa UniversityAddis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations