Advertisement

BMC Biotechnology

, 18:43 | Cite as

Construction of a trifunctional cellulase and expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a fusion protein

  • Zi-Lu Liu
  • Hua-Nan Li
  • Hui-Ting Song
  • Wen-Jing Xiao
  • Wu-Cheng Xia
  • Xiao-Peng Liu
  • Zheng-Bing Jiang
Open Access
Research article
  • 759 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Protein and enzyme technology

Abstract

Background

Cellulose is the most important component of lignocellulose, and its degradation requires three different types of enzymes to act synergistically. There have been reports of single gene duality, but no gene has been described to have more than two functions. Cloning and expression of fusion cellulases containing more than two kinds of catalytic domains has not been reported thus far.

Results

We synthesized three different cellulase genes and linked the three catalytic domains with a (G4S)3 flexible linker. The trifunctional cellulase gene (BCE) containing three types of cellulase functions was constructed and expressed in S. cerevisiae successfully. The β-glucosidase, the exoglucanase and the endoglucanase activity of the trifunctional cellulase BCE reached 16.80 IU/mg, 2.26 IU/mg and 20.67 IU/mg, which was 46.27, 6.73 and 46.20% higher than the activities of the β-glucosidase BG, the endoglucanase CBH and the endoglucanase EG. The filter paper enzyme activity of BCE was higher than those of BG, CBH and EG, reached 2.04 IU/mg.

Conclusions

The trifunctional cellulase BCE was designed based on β-glucosidase BG, endoglucanase EG and exoglucanase CBH, and it possessed β-glucosidase activity, endoglucanase activity and exoglucanase activity simultaneously. The BCE has better filter paper activity, it means the potential practical application.

Keywords

Lignocellulose Trifunctional cellulase Filter paper enzyme activity 

Abbreviations

BCE

Trifunctional cellulase gene (BCE)

CBD

Cellulose-binding domain

CBM

Carbohydrate-binding domain

CMC

Carboxymethyl cellulose

FPase

Filter paper enzyme

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

Background

Cellulases are mainly composed of various hydrolytic enzymes acting synergistically on cellulosic material which is the main ingredient in lignocellulose [1, 2]. The cellulase market is expected to expand up to $ 400 million per year [3]. With enormous research on these biocatalysts underway, cellulases are extensively used in many industrial fields such as cotton processing [4], paper recycling [5], detergent formulation [6], juice extraction [7], among others [8]. Cellulolytic enzymes are hydrolases that cleave O-glycosidic bonds and are classified according to the sites on the cellulosic substrate upon which they act. Endoglucanases (EG) cleave internal bonds of the cellulosic fiber, exoglucanases (CBH) act on reducing or non-reducing ends, and β-glucosidases (BG) hydrolyze soluble oligosaccharides into glucose [9].

Considering the demand for a synergistic action of multiple enzymes, the expression of a variety of enzymes in a single cell is likely to improve the efficiency of cellulose degradation [10]. There are many ways to express multiple genes in a single cell, but most rely on multiple screening markers and are complicated to operate. Wang et al. constructed a co-expression vector containing two independent expression cassettes based on six restriction enzyme sites and achieved the co-expression of egv3 (GenBank: HG313887.1) and cbh2 (GenBank: HG313872.1) genes each controlled by a separate promoter in Trichoderma reesei [11]. Using a similar method, Gong et al. achieved the co-expression of eg3 (GenBank: M19373) and bgl1 (GenBank: TRU09580) in S. cerevisiae [12]. Liu et al. constructed a bicistronic plasmid (pcbhA-bgl) by introducing a 36-nucleotide internal ribosomal binding site ahead of the second gene, bgl (Uniprot: O93785), and achieved the co-expression of two kinds of cellulases controlled by a single T7 promoter in Escherichia coli [13, 14, 15]. Furthermore, co-expressed cellulases and scaffoldin complexes were secreted in Corynebacterium glutamicum to enhance saccharification [16]. However, a dockerin domain fusing each cellulase was crucial.

Usually, co-expression can be conducted using either a single plasmid in which it is necessary to select compatible assembly sites to build very large vectors [11], or multiple plasmids, in which case multiple markers and repeated transformations are required [17]. Studies of single proteins containing multiple catalytic domains have attracted great attention in recent years [18, 19]. Mining for this type of enzyme can reduce the complexity of the cloning operation, reduce metabolic stress of the expressing host cell, and enhance the synergistic effect in the process of substrate degradation [20].

Recently, fusion expression strategy, a biotechnology alternative to co-expression, have also been used to express multiple enzymes simultaneously with many advantages including the convenient manipulations of cloning and transforming, the high level of soluble expression, cost-effective purification, and upgraded catalytic capabilities [21]. In addition, it has been confirmed that all individual, fused, and co-expressed endoglucanases and β-glucosidases play a role in hydrolyzing sugarcane bagasse [22].

Previous studies revealed that many natural cellulases have the configuration of modularized domains, such as Cel9B (GenBank: AJ133614); from Paenibacillus barcinonensis containing an endoglucanase catalytic domain (GH9) and two different cellulose-binding domain (CBDs) [23], and a bifunctional cellulase/xylanase from Clostridium thermocellum, called CtCelH (GenBank: ABN52701.1), containing a signal peptide, two catalytic domains, a carbohydrate-binding domain (CBM), and two linkers [20]. Based on this configuration, a versatile protein could be produced by using fusion strategy to connect multiple functional domains. By fusing catalytic domain with the carbohydrate-binding domain (CBM) of another soluble cellulase, the soluble expression of previously insoluble cellulase has been achieved in E. coli [24]. However, cloning and expression of fusion cellulases containing more than two kinds of catalytic domains has not been reported thus far [25]. To address this gap, we designed a fusion protein consisting of two linkers and three kinds of cellulase catalytic domains.

S. cerevisiae can directly degrade and ferment sugars to ethanol [26]. Heterologous expression of cellulase genes in S. cerevisiae has been a focus of investigation to meet the requirement of yeast capable of performing both saccharification and fermentation by expressing cellulases [27]. To reduce the efforts required for cloning and expression, we used a strategy of protein fusion to create a tri-functional enzyme that would enable S. cerevisiae to efficiently degrade cellulose. The catalytic properties of the recombinant strains were investigated in order to assess the use of this strategy to produce cellulases in S. cerevisiae.

Results

Design of the trifunctional single gene

In order to construct a single protein with three functional domains of cellulase enzymes, three different cellulase genes without cellulose binding domains were selected from different species. They all had similar optimal reaction temperatures and pH. SignalP 4.1 tool (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) predicted two unambiguous signal peptide cleavage sites before the G15 site of the exoglucanase and A16 of the endoglucanase. The β-glucosidase has no signal peptide. Inferred from the analysis using PROSITE (https://prosite.expasy.org/) and the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd), the different PCR primers were designed for the catalytic domains of the cellulases. At the end of the first two PCR products, the stop codons were removed, while (G4S)3 linker polypeptides were attached. These primers contained different restriction sites that could splice these three digested PCR products together using T4 DNA ligase generated target fragment showed in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

the strategy for construction of the trifunctional single gene.bg CD: β-glucosidase catalytic domain, cbh CD: exoglucanase catalytic domain, eg CD: endoglucanase catalytic domain, (G4S)3: amino acid linker, bce: the trifunctional cellulase gene

Cloning of the trifunctional single gene

The spliced gene, consisting of three catalytic domains, was cloned into the S. cerevisiae expression vector pHBM368-pgk. The recombinant plasmid is named pHBM368-pgk-bce (Fig. 2). Transformed strains were initially screened by the restriction enzyme digestion of their plasmids using SnaBI and Eco81I. The sequencing results of the same plasmid showed it was in line with our design.
Fig. 2

The recombinant plasmid of the expression vector pHBM368-pgk-bce. PPGK: phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK1) promoter, S: α-factor signal sequence, CYC1 TT: CYC1 transcription termination signal, Ampr: ampicillin resistance gene, Rdna: ribosomal DNA sequence, pUC ori: the replication origin, URA3: select maker

Expression of extracellular recombinant cellulose

The resulting plasmid, pHBM368-pgk-bce, was linearized with Hpa I to promote plasmid integration into the rDNA sequence in S. cerevisiae genomic DNA. Transformants were selected based on their ability to grow on minimal agar medium lacking uracil due to the presence of the Orotidine 5′-phosphate decarboxylase gene (URA3) in the transforming vector. The integration of the recombinant expression cassette into the yeast genome was confirmed by PCR using the same primers used for gene amplification. Transformants were inoculated onto a chromogenic substrate plate to detect secreted cellulase activity based on the formation of a hydrolysis halo. A clear zone surrounding colonies indicated that recombinant plasmids have been introduced into the host cell (Fig. 3), and that the recombinant enzyme was produced by the expression cassette and secreted into the culture medium. An active strain was chosen and named S. cerevisiae BCE. The wild-type strain hardly grown because it could not decompose or utilize cellulose. Finally, to detect the recombinant enzymes (BCE) being produced, culture supernatant collected after a 4-day cultivate were purified as descripted in Methods and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Additional file 1). The concentration of purified enzyme BCE in the supernatant was 2.23 mg/L, then the purified BCE was used for following assay.
Fig. 3

Plate assay of cellulase activity in transformed S. cerevisiae. CMC agar plates were stained with trypan blue and enzyme activity was detected by the presence of a halo around the colony. WT: wild-type strain, 1–4: recombinant strains with different cellulase activity

Recombinant cellulase specificity

To understand the substrate specificity of the recombinant enzymes, the activities were assayed using special substrates, namely p-NPG, Avicel and CMC. The β-glucosidase activity of BCE reached 16.80 IU/mg, which was 46.27% higher than BG. The exoglucanase activity of BCE reached 2.26 IU/mg, 6.73% higher than CBH. The endoglucanase activity was 20.67 IU/mg, 46.20% higher than EG. (Fig. 4). The results showed that the fusion recombinant cellulase BCE possessed β-glucosidase activity, endoglucanase activity and exoglucanase activity simultaneously. To evaluate the practical application, the Filter Paper Activity (FPase) was assayed. The FPase of BCE reached 2.04 IU/mg, 270.9, 1.5 and 80.5% higher than those of BG (0.55 IU/mg), CBH (2.01 IU/mg) and EG (1.13 IU/mg) (Fig. 5). These results indicated that BCE has significant cellulase activity and the potential to degrade complex substrates.
Fig. 4

Comparation of enzyme activity based on specific substrate. BCE: trifunctional cellulase BCE, Single cellulase:β-glucosidase BG, exoglucanase CBH and endoglucanase EG. All the hydrolysis experiments were carried out in triplicates

Fig. 5

Comparation of FPAase activity between BCE and single cellulase. BG:β-glucosidase BG, EG: endoglucanase EG, BCE: trifunctional cellulase BCE. All the hydrolysis experiments were carried out in triplicates

Discussion

The lignocellulose degradation needs three kinds of cellulases synergistic action. To achieve efficient degradation and biotransformation of lignocellulose, engineering strains with multiple cellulases is a general method. Many works focused on co-expression multiple cellulases [11, 12, 13], it’s easy for co-expression two genes in engineering strains. But three kinds of cellulases synergistic action is necessary for efficient degradation of lignocellulose, while co-expression of three genes is difficult. Three or more genes co-expression means low transformation efficient and difficult to achieve recombinants screening. To avoid this problem, constructing a trifunctional cellulase with a single gene could be an effective solution. Many successful studies have been performed on developing the bifunctional cellulase with fusion expression of two different catalytic domains, including endoglucanase catalytic domain fused with β-glucosidase catalytic domain [14, 22], exoglucanase catalytic domain fused with β-glucosidase catalytic domain [15], exoglucanase catalytic domain fused with endoglucanase catalytic domain [25]. However, it has not been reported of an active trifunctional cellulase with three different catalytic domains.

In our studies here, an active trifunctional cellulase BCE was constructed, which presented the activities of β-glucosidase, endoglucanase, and exoglucanase of 16.80 IU / mg, 2.26 IU / mg, and 20.67 IU / mg, respectively, through specific substrate analysis. Compared to the single catalytic domain in the same condition, specific activities of β-glucosidase BG, endoglucanase CBH, and exoglucanase EG were all increased, with the β-glucosidase activity being enhanced the most of 46.27%. These results showed that the active trifunctional cellulase with strengthen catalytic ability could be obtained through the fusion of three different cellulase catalytic domains.

The currently reported bifunctional cellulase with two fused catalytic domains have been expressed mostly in Escherichia coli [13, 14, 15], Corynebacterium glutamicum [16], Clostridium thermocellum [18], and Clostridium cellulovorans [24]. Comparably, there is no report of using Saccharomyces cerevisiae system to express multifunctional cellulase. Although functional studies of these enzymes have all been carried out, it needs to be pointed out that it has no practical significance to compare the different enzymatic properties of these enzymes due to the differences in enzyme activity unit definitions and reaction conditions. In this work, Saccharomyces cerevisiae were used as the host cells for expressing trifunctional cellulase BCE, and it was expected that the production of ethanol could be carried out directly by this recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain through using cellulose as a substrate for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation.

The synergistic function of β-glucosidase, endoglucanase, and exoglucanase is necessary for efficient enzymatic hydrolysis of natural cellulose. Filter paper enzyme activity is one of the main parameters to measure the actual application performance of cellulase, which can truly reflect the synergistic effect of enzymatic hydrolysis of the natural cellulose. Through evaluating its enzyme activity against filter paper, the trifunctional cellulase BCE obtained in this study showed a good enzyme activity of 2.04 IU/mg, which is higher than that of a single cellulase expressed in the same system. This result further confirmed that the three different catalytic domains in our constructed trifunctional cellulase BCE could prompt each other, exerting better catalytic function. Comparing with current reports, our work provided an easy approach and methodology for efficient degradation and biotransformation of lignocellulose.

Conclusion

The trifunctional cellulase BCE was designed based on β-glucosidase BG, endoglucanase EG and exoglucanase CBH, and it possessed β-glucosidase activity, endoglucanase activity and exoglucanase activity simultaneously. The filter paper activity of BCE reached 2.04 IU/mg, a strategy for efficient lignocellulose degradation was provided.

Methods

Strains, plasmids, and genes

Escherichia coli XL10-Gold was used for cloning and plasmid manipulation. This strain was grown in Luria Bertani (LB) medium (0.5% yeast extract, 1% peptone and 1% NaCl) supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin at 37 °C. The S. cerevisiae strain, INVSc1 (His, Leu, Trp, Ura), was used as the host for cellulase production. It was routinely grown in yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD) medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone and 2% glucose) at 30 °C. Synthetic complete minimal medium without uracil (SC-U) medium (1.34% yeast nitrogen base, 2% glucose, 0.01% histidine, 0.01% leucine, 0.01% tryptophan, and 2% agar) was used to screened transformants. An rDNA-mediated integrated expression vector, named pHBM368-pgk, was used for the expression of target genes in S. cerevisiae [28]. Three cellulase genes, eg (GenBank: CAL48345), cbh (GenBank: AGT15838) and bg (GenBank: ADY18331), were chemically synthesized (Generay Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai), then cloned into pHBM368-pgk, to produce the recombinant plasmids named pHBM368-pgk-eg, pHBM368-pgk-cbh and pHBM368-pgk-bg, respectively.

Construction of the fusion-expression vector

The strategy used to construct a trifunctional single gene described in this work is depicted in Fig. 1. The DNA fragment encoding the bg gene was amplified from pHBM368-pgk-bg by PCR using primers bg-SnaBI-F (5′-ATGTACGTAAGTAATCCGTTCCCCGAC) and bg-L-XbaI-R (5′-ATCTAGACGAGCCACCGCCACCCGACCCACCACCGCCCGAGCCACCGCCACCCCCCAGGCACGCCCCATT) which contain restriction sites (shown in bold) for SnaBI and XbaI, respectively. The amplicon represents the sequences that encoded the mature BG catalytic domain without the translation start codon or the translation stop codon. A glycine-serine linker, was used as a flexible linker for the construction of fusion protein in the construct: GGGGSGGGGSGGGGS [named (G4S)3] [29], the reverse coding sequences (underlined in the primer sequence) of which were added in via the bg-L-XbaI-R primer. The DNA fragment encoding the cbh gene was amplified from pHBM368-pgk-cbh by PCR using primers cbh-XbaI-F (5′-ACTTCTAGACAGGGAAATCAGGATTTC) and cbh-L-EcoRI-R (5′-AGAATTCCGAGCCACCGCCACCCGACCCACCACCGCCCGAGCCACCGCCACCATAAGTGCTATCAATCGGA) which contain restriction sites (shown in bold) for XbaI and EcoRI, respectively. The amplicon represents the sequences that encode the mature CBH catalytic domain without its native signal peptide, the translation start codon or the translation stop codon. The reverse coding sequences of (G4S)3 (underlined in the primer sequence) were added in cbh-L-EcoRI-R. The DNA fragment encoding the eg gene was amplified from pHBM368-pgk-eg by PCR using primers eg-EcoRI-F (5′-ATCGAATTCCAGTCGCTTTGCGACCAAT) and eg-Eco81I-R (5′-ACTCCTGAGGCTAGTTGTTTTGTTGGGCGGA) which contain restriction sites (shown in bold) for EcoRI and Eco81I, respectively. The amplicon represents the sequences that encode the mature EG catalytic domain without its native signal peptide or the translation start codon.

Three amplified cellulase DNA products were ligated together using T4 DNA ligase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) as per manufacturer’s instructions. The fusion gene was then amplified from the ligation product by PCR using primers bg-SnaBI-F and eg-Eco81I-R, digested with SnaBI and Eco81I (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and then cloned into pHBM368-pgk to generate plasmid pHBM368-pgk-bce. The resulting vector was sequenced by TsingKe Biological Technology Company (Wuhan, China).

Transformation of S. cerevisiae

Three individual-expression vectors and one fusion-expression vector were transformed into S. cerevisiae INVSc1 by electroporation after linearization with HpaI. Electrocompetent cells were prepared from a culture growing in log phase, mixed with 10 μg of linearized DNA and electroporated under 1.5 kV, 25 μF, 200 Ω using MicroPulser Electroporator (Bio-Rad, München, Germany). Transformants were selected for their ability to grow on SC-U plates at 30 °C.

Screening for cellulase activity

Individual transformed colonies were picked from SC-U plates and transferred to YPD plates. Three transformed clones of each individually-expressed cellulase were preliminarily screened for their activity against specific substrates.

Cells expressing the fused cellulase construct were grown at 30 °C for 72 h, then transferred to chromogenic substrate plates containing 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and 0.02% trypan blue. Cellulase-producing colonies were identified by the presence of a hydrolysis halo around the colony. Individual cellulase-producing colonies were chosen for PCR validation.

Production and purification of the recombinant enzyme

The colonies with high cellulase activities were further cultured in 50 mL of YPD medium at 30 °C with an agitation rate of 200 rpm for 48 h. Cells were then harvested and resuspended in 50 mL of fresh YPD medium and grown for a further 48 h induction at 30 °C. The culture supernatants were collected by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, followed by ultrafiltration using a Vivaflow® 50 ultrafiltration membrane with a molecular weight cut-off of 30 kDa. Anion exchange chromatography was performed using an ÄKTA Purifier (GE Healthcare, USA). The enzymes were eluted at 0.3 M NaCl. The purified enzymes were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), diluted with sodium citrate buffer and stored at 4 °C. The concentration of protein was measured using Bradford Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China).

Characterization of enzyme properties

The yeast cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was used to determine three kinds of cellulase activity. Exoglucanase activity was determined by measuring the glucose yield from 1% (w/v) Avicel, according to a previously described method [30]. Endoglucanase activity was determined by measuring the glucose yield from a 1% (w/v) CMC solution [31]. β-glucosidase activity was determined by measuring the concentration of p-nitrophenol (pNP) liberated from p-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside (pNPG) [32]. Colorimetric detection was performed with SpectraMax M5 Microplate Reader (Molecular Device, USA) at 540 nm and 405 nm for glucanase and β-glucosidase, respectively. One unit (IU) of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to liberate 1 μmol of glucose or p-nitrophenol per minute.

Filter Paper Activity (FPase) Assay was used to examine the ability of the cellulases to degrade complex cellulosic structures in line to the modified standard procedure [33]. Each of the reaction systems contained two pieces of Whatman No. 1 filter paper (approximately 5 mg/mL), which had been soaked in citrate-phosphate buffer for one day. One unit (IU) of FPase was defined as the amount of enzyme required to liberate 1 μmol of glucose per minute.

All the hydrolysis experiments were carried out in triplicates. The error bars were calculated and displayed in results.

Notes

Funding

Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2018CFA019), Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hubei Province (2018ABA098, 2017ABA139), Science and Technology Program of Wuhan (2017020201010229).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

ZLL and HNL carried out construction of the fusion-expression vector and drafted the manuscript. HTS and WJX carried out screening for cellulase activity. HCX participated in electroporation. XPL carried out fermentation. ZBJ conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12896_2018_454_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (453 kb)
Additional file 1: Figure S1. SDS-PAGE analysis of the recombinant multifunctional cellulase. (JPG 453 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Li Z, Yao G, Wu R, Gao L, Kan Q, Liu M, Yang P, Liu G, Qin Y, Song X, et al. Synergistic and dose-controlled regulation of cellulase gene expression in Penicillium oxalicum. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(9):e1005509.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66(3):506–77. table of contentsCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Percival Zhang YH, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR. Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv. 2006;24(5):452–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu Y, Yuan J, Wang Q, Fan X, Wang P, Cui L. Noncovalent immobilization of cellulases using the reversibly soluble polymers for biopolishing of cotton fabric. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2015;62(4):494–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gomes D, Domingues L, Gama M. Valorizing recycled paper sludge by a bioethanol production process with cellulase recycling. Bioresour Technol. 2016;216:637–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaubert A, Jeudy J, Rougemont B, Bordes C, Lemoine J, Casabianca H, Salvador A. Identification and absolute quantification of enzymes in laundry detergents by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(17):4669–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharma HP, Patel H, Sugandha. Enzymatic added extraction and clarification of fruit juices-a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(6):1215–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilson DB. Cellulases and biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20(3):295–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ganner T, Bubner P, Eibinger M, Mayrhofer C, Plank H, Nidetzky B. Dissecting and reconstructing synergism: in situ visualization of cooperativity among cellulases. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(52):43215–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou J, Wang YH, Chu J, Luo LZ, Zhuang YP, Zhang SL. Optimization of cellulase mixture for efficient hydrolysis of steam-exploded corn Stover by statistically designed experiments. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(2):819–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang W, Meng F, Liu P, Yang S, Wei D. Construction of a promoter collection for genes co-expression in filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;41(11):1709–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gong Y, Tang G, Wang M, Li J, Xiao W, Lin J, Liu Z. Direct fermentation of amorphous cellulose to ethanol by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae coexpressing Trichoderma viride EG3 and BGL1. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2014;60(5):198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu M, Yu HW. Cocktail production of an endo-beta-xylanase and a beta-glucosidase from Trichoderma reesei QM 9414 in Escherichia coli. Biochem Eng J. 2012;68:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu M, Gu J, Xie W, Yu H. Directed co-evolution of an endoglucanase and a beta-glucosidase in Escherichia coli by a novel high-throughput screening method. Chem Commun (Camb). 2013;49(65):7219–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu M, Xie W, Xu H, Gu J, Lv X, Yu H, Ye L. Directed evolution of an exoglucanase facilitated by a co-expressed beta-glucosidase and construction of a whole engineered cellulase system in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett. 2014;36(9):1801–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim SJ, Hyeon JE, Jeon SD, Choi GW, Han SO. Bi-functional cellulases complexes displayed on the cell surface of Corynebacterium glutamicum increase hydrolysis of lignocelluloses at elevated temperature. Enzym Microb Technol. 2014;66:67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nakatani Y, Yamada R, Ogino C, Kondo A. Synergetic effect of yeast cell-surface expression of cellulase and expansin-like protein on direct ethanol production from cellulose. Microb Cell Factories. 2013;12(1):66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carvalho AL, Goyal A, Prates JA, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Pires VM, Ferreira LM, Planas A, Romao MJ, Fontes CM. The family 11 carbohydrate-binding module of Clostridium thermocellum Lic26A-Cel5E accommodates beta-1,4- and beta-1,3-1,4-mixed linked glucans at a single binding site. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(33):34785–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cunha ES, Hatem CL, Barrick D. Insertion of endocellulase catalytic domains into thermostable consensus ankyrin scaffolds: effects on stability and cellulolytic activity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(21):6684–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yuan SF, Wu TH, Lee HL, Hsieh HY, Lin WL, Yang B, Chang CK, Li Q, Gao J, Huang CH, et al. Biochemical characterization and structural analysis of a bifunctional cellulase/xylanase from Clostridium thermocellum. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(9):5739–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adlakha N, Rajagopal R, Kumar S, Reddy VS, Yazdani SS. Synthesis and characterization of chimeric proteins based on cellulase and xylanase from an insect gut bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(14):4859–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kurniasih SD, Alfi A, Natalia D, Radjasa OK, Nurachman Z. Construction of individual, fused, and co-expressed proteins of endoglucanase and beta-glucosidase for hydrolyzing sugarcane bagasse. Microbiol Res. 2014;169(9–10):725–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chiriac AI, Cadena EM, Vidal T, Torres AL, Diaz P, Pastor FI. Engineering a family 9 processive endoglucanase from Paenibacillus barcinonensis displaying a novel architecture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86(4):1125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Murashima K, Kosugi A, Doi RH. Solubilization of cellulosomal cellulases by fusion with cellulose-binding domain of noncellulosomal cellulase engd from Clostridium cellulovorans. Proteins. 2003;50(4):620–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elleuche S. Bringing functions together with fusion enzymes--from nature’s inventions to biotechnological applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(4):1545–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zuroff TR, Xiques SB, Curtis WR. Consortia-mediated bioprocessing of cellulose to ethanol with a symbiotic Clostridium phytofermentans/yeast co-culture. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6(1):59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Davison SA, den Haan R, van Zyl WH. Heterologous expression of cellulase genes in natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(18):8241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Song HT, Liu SH, Gao Y, Yang YM, Xiao WJ, Xia WC, Liu ZL, Li R, Ma XD, Jiang ZB. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of corncobs with genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae and characterization of their microstructure during hydrolysis. Bioengineered. 2016;7(3):198–204.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adlakha N, Sawant S, Anil A, Lali A, Yazdani SS. Specific fusion of beta-1,4-endoglucanase and beta-1,4-glucosidase enhances cellulolytic activity and helps in channeling of intermediates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(20):7447–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mahmood RT, Asad MJ, Mehboob N, Mushtaq M, Gulfraz M, Asgher M, Minhas NM, Hadri SH. Production, purification, and characterization of exoglucanase by Aspergillus fumigatus. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;170(4):895–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Biochem. 1959;31(3):426–8.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kaur B, Oberoi HS, Chadha BS. Enhanced cellulase producing mutants developed from heterokaryotic Aspergillus strain. Bioresour Technol. 2014;156:100–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ghose TK. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem. 1987;59(2):257–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology College of Life ScienceHubei UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Resources and Environmental ScienceHubei UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Green Transformation of Bio-ResourcesHubei UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Department of Biological Science and TechnologyHubei University for NationalitiesEnsiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations