Advertisement

BMC Surgery

, 19:3 | Cite as

A rare intrahepatic subcapsular hematoma (ISH) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report and literature review

  • Qiao-fei Liu
  • Ling-ling Bian
  • Meng-qing Sun
  • Rong-hua Zhang
  • Wei-bin Wang
  • Yong-ning LiEmail author
  • Jun-chao GuoEmail author
Open Access
Case report
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Case reports

Abstract

Background

Intrahepatic subcapsular hematoma (ISH) is an extremely rare, life-threatening complication after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Only few cases have been reported. Herein, we reported a rare giant ISH after LC and summarized all of the reported cases.

Case presentation

A 32-year old woman with recurrent acute cholecystitis for one year, underwent elective LC without intra-operative complications and was discharged 2 days after operation. On the next day after discharge, she developed severe right upper abdominal pain and was sent to our emergency department. The computed tomography scan showed a 10.9 × 12.5 × 6.6 cm ISH in the right liver without free fluid and the hemoglobin dropped to 86 g/l from 127 g/l. Postoperative hemorrhagic shock and a giant ISH after LC were diagnosed. After fluid resuscitation, the hemodynamic was still unstable and the hemoglobin kept dropping. An emergency laparoscopic exploration was performed and the ISH was confirmed, however no active bleeding point was found. A drainage tube was placed under liver for early warning of rupture. Patient was discharged home 10 days after readmission.

Conclusions

Giant ISH is an extremely rare, life-threatening complication after LC. This case showed that the need to consider this rare complication in patients suffering abdominal pain after LC and timely and correct diagnosis and treatment were crucial to saving the lives of the patients.

Keywords

Intrahepatic subcapsular hematoma Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Complication 

Abbreviations

CT

Computed tomography

ISH

Intrahepatic subcapsular hematoma

LC

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

NSAIDS

Non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) substantially reduced the incidence of surgical complications in experienced hands [1]. At present, it is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis patients. The most common complications of LC include iatrogenic bile duct injury, postoperative bleeding, damage to adjacent structures and infections [2]. Intrahepatic subcapsular hematoma (ISH) is an extremely rare complication after LC, which could be life-threatening. Till now, only very few cases have been reported, the experience to diagnose and treat ISH after LC remains largely limited [3, 4]. Herein, we reported a case of giant ISH after LC and reviewed all of the published cases.

Case presentation

The patient was a 32-year old woman with a one-year history episodes of cholecystitis treated conservatively. She did not have any other disease history. After an abdominal magnetic resonance imaging that confirmed multiple gallbladder stones (Fig. 1a), an elective LC was performed without intra-operative complications. The recovery was uneventful and the patient was discharged two days after operation. On the second day after discharge, the patient developed severe right upper abdominal pain and she was sent to our emergency department at 8:30 pm. At arrival, her heart rate was 110 bpm and the blood pressure was 80/55 mmHg. The hemoglobin dropped to 86 g/l from 127 g/l. The CT scan showed a 10.9 × 12.5 × 6.6 cm ISH in the right liver without obvious free fluid in abdominal cavity (Fig. 1b). Two hours after fluid resuscitation including 2 U red blood cell, the hemoglobin further declined to 78 g/l and the hemodynamics remained unstable. The abdominal pain was not relieved, after intravenous analgesics. A Doppler ultrasound was performed, two hours later and it found the hematoma had increased in size. Active intrahepatic bleeding was suspected. We called radiologist for consultation, however, the interventional angiography and embolization was not available at mid night. We explained the potential risk of sudden rupture of hematoma during conservative methods which may cause sudden death, to the patient and her relatives. After careful consideration of the continuous decline of hemoglobin, unstable hemodynamics after fluid resuscitation, we explained our surgical plan to the patient and her relative. We planned to perform laparoscopic exploration at first, if the hematoma continued to expand, we would evacuate or drain it, if not, we would put a drainage tube under liver which could serve as an early warning of rupture. The patient requested surgical method to reduce the risk of sudden death. Therefore, an emergency laparoscopic exploration was performed under general anesthesia. The ISH was confirmed (Fig. 1c). Four U red blood cell and 400 ml fresh frozen plasma were transfused. After fluid resuscitation and blood transfusion, her hemodynamic became stable. During the 3-h intra-operative observation, the hematoma did not expand. Therefore, a non-sucking drainage tube was placed under the liver and she was sent to ICU ward. Next morning, she was transferred to the ordinary ward. The upper abdominal pain gradually relieved. Five days after the laparoscopic exploration, another CT scan showed that the hematoma was largely resolved and we removed drain tube (Fig. 1d). She was discharged, 10 days after readmission.
Fig. 1

Giant ISH after LC: a Multiple gallbladder stones; b Giant ISH after LC; c Laparoscopic view of a giant ISH; d The ISH was absorbed

Totally, 13 papers, including 16 cases of ISH after LC were reported from 1994 to 2015 (Table 1). Nearly half of the patients had instability of hemodynamics. All of the cases were female patients. Age of patients ranged from 25 to 78. All hematomas were mainly located in the right lobe of liver, and some of them extended to the left lobe of liver. Only one case was ruptured at diagnosis. Hepatic capsule laceration was found in two cases, one of whom also took NSAIDS (non-steroids anti-inflammatory drugs) to control the pain after operation. Totally, 58.8% of patients took NSAIDS to control the post-operative pain, and most of them used Ketorolac, however, 35.3% of the patients still did not have definitive risk factors. The time interval to diagnose ISH after LC ranged from seven hours to six weeks. They were diagnosed most commonly (35.5%) within one day after LC. All patients had abdominal pain and 47.1% of the cases developed hypovolaemic shock.
Table 1

Literature review of ISH after LC

No.

Year of Publication

Gender

Age

Causes

Location of hematoma

Time interval after LC

Symptoms

Treatments

Outcomes

1

2015 [12]

Female

25

No definitive cause

Right lobes of liver

One day after LC

hypovolaemic shock

Laparotomy, hematoma evacuation

13 days after laparotomy, discharged

2

2015 [8]

Female

60

No definitive cause

Right lobes of liver

Six days after LC

Right upper abdominal pain, nausea, fever

Percutaneous drainage under ultrasound guidance

18 days after readmission, discharged

3

2012 [3]

Female

77

Coumarin (anticoagulation drug)

Right lobes of liver

Six weeks after LC

Right upper abdominal pain

Selective embolization of the bleeding vessel, drainage under ultrasound guidance

Recovered uneventfully

4

2011 [13]

Female

25

Capsule laceration

Right lobes of liver extended to left side

Two days after LC

Right upper abdominal pain, drop of HGB

Laparoscopic exploration

Right pleural effusion was treated with a pigtail pleural catheter; 5 days after laparoscopic exploration, discharged.

5

2010 [9]

Female

28

Capsule laceration, NSAIDS

Raptured right liver hematoma

One day after LC

Right upper abdominal pain, hypotension, tachycardia, and severe anemia

Laparotomy, and hematoma evacuation, drainage

Discharged without further complaints

6

2010 [4]

Female

60

Ketorolac (NSAIDS), ultiple myeloma

Right lobes of liver

Six days after LC

Right upper abdominal pain, hemodynamic instability

Laparotomy, hematoma drainage and packing

31 days after laparotmy, discharged

7

2010 [4]

Female

29

Ketorolac (NSAIDS)

Right lobes of liver

One day after LC

Perspiration and hypotension

Laparotomy, hematoma drainage and packing

30 days after laparotmy, discharged

8

2009 [10]

Female

Not available

No definitive cause

Right lobes of liver

Not available

abdominal pain

Conservative treatments

Uneventful recovery

9

2008 [14]

Female

Not available

Ketorolac (NSAIDS)

Raptured right liver hematoma

Not available

abdominal pain, hemodynamic instability

Laparotomy, hematoma evacuation and drainage

Uneventful recovery

10

2005 [11]

Female

61

NSAIDS

Right lobes of liver

Three days after LC

Fever, upper abdominal pain,

Percutaneous drainage under CT guidance

Uneventful recovery

11

2005 [11]

Female

66

NSAIDS

Right lobes of liver

Not mentioned

Fever, upper abdominal pain, nausea

Conservative treatments

Uneventful recovery

12

2004 [15]

Female

64

No definitive cause

Right lobes of liver

Ten days after LC

upper abdominal discomfort, nausea, and pyrexia

Percutaneous drainage under ultrasound guidance

14 days later, discharged

13

1998 [16]

Female

48

Ketorolac (NSAIDS)

Right lobes of liver

One day after LC

upper abdominal discomfort, nausea

Percutaneous drainage under ultrasound guidance, twice

14 days later, discharged

14

1998 [16]

Female

28

Ketorolac (NSAIDS)

Right lobes of liver

Seven hours after LC

Right upper abdominal pain, hypotension, tachycardia, and severe anemia

Laparotomy, and hematoma evacuation, drainage

8 days later, discharged, 3 weeks later, the drainage tube was removed

15

1998 [17]

Female

78

No definitive cause

Right lobes of liver

Not available

Right upper abdominal pain

Conservative treatments

Unenventful recovery

16

1994 [18]

Female

35

Ketorolac (NSAIDS)

Right lobes of liver

Nine hours after LC

Tachycardia and hypotension

Laparotomy

1 week after laparotomy, discharged

Treatment strategies included: conservative treatment (antibiotics, blood transfusion, strict bed-reset), percutaneous drainage under CT or B ultrasound guidance, selective embolization of the bleeding vessel, laparoscopic exploration and laparotomy. Eighteen percent of patients had stable condition without fever and underwent conservative treatments. The only case of angioembolization was complicate by infection and required percutaneous drainage. For the patients with stable condition, fever and serious compression of inferior venal cava (IVC) always were indications for percutaneous drainage under CT or B ultrasound guidance. In these 17 cases, 29.4% of the patients underwent percutaneous drainage. For the patients with hemodynamic instability, emergent reoperation was adopted. Totally, nine cases underwent reoperation, including two case of laparoscopic operation and seven cases of laparotomy. For our case, we only performed laparoscopic exploration and did not perform evacuation or drainage of the hematoma, since the hemodynamic became stable after plenty fluid resuscitation and the hematoma did not expand, during the 3 h of intra-operative observation. For another case, laparoscopic exploration found small capsule laceration, and hemostasis was performed. In the seven cases of laparotomy, six patients underwent evacuation and drainage of hematoma, only one case underwent only laparotomy without evacuation or drainage.

All patients survived. Most of patients stayed one to two weeks after readmission, however, the longest hospital stay was up to 31 days after reoperation.

Discussion and conclusion

LC is a widely performed procedure for symptomatic gallbladder stone. Although the overall morbidity is less than 7%, it carries certain risks, the most common complications include infections, bile leak and postoperative bleeding [5]. Postoperative bleeding after LC is observed in less than 1% of cases. The most common sites of postoperative bleeding include: gallbladder bed, sites of trocar, cystic artery, falciform ligament and bleeding from the ruptured liver capsule [6]. The ISH is a rare, life-threatening complication after LC. No conclusive cause for ISH has been found. Iatrogenic liver trauma, NSAIDS, anticoagulants, hepatic haemangioma, anatomical variations of the hepatic vascular system have all been named as possible contributing factors [4, 7, 8]. In this case, the patient took Parecoxib to control the pain. The literature review showed that 58.8% of the patients took NSAIDS to control postoperative pain, and most of them took Ketorolac. The preoperative coagulation function of this patient was normal and as well, she did not suffer no steatosis or cirrhosis which may be risk factors for ISH after minor trauma.

When the ISH is small, it is usually asymptomatic, therefore, it is very difficult to detect it at an early stage. However, when it keeps developing, it could be life-threatening, leading to hypovolaemic shock and even death. The treatment for ISH should be adopted according to the condition of the patients. When the ISH is small and the condition of patient is stable, conservative treatment is always preferred. Some other more aggressive treatments, including percutaneous B ultrasound -guided drainage, relaparotomy or relaparoscopy, evacuation or drainage of the hematoma, should be considered when the ISH is too big or the patient is hemodynamically unstable [9, 10, 11]. In all of these 17 cases, only one case was ruptured, however, 14 cases were operated, therefore, rupture may not the unique indication for surgical treatment. The most important key point for ISH is the risk of sudden death due to massive bleeding after rupture of hematoma. When the doctors explain the possibility of this lethal outcome to the patients, they always request to reduce this possibility as much as possible. This patient suffered hemodynamical instability and continuous drop of hemoglobin even if after fluid resuscitation and the hematoma became larger after her admission within 2 h. The risk of rupture did exist for this case. When we explained the risk of rupture to the patient, she rejected the conservative treatment and requested surgical methods to reduce the risk of sudden death after potential massive bleeding. Laparoscopic exploration was minimally invasive and a drainage tube under the live would show the bleeding immediately if it occurred. Therefore, we chose the emergent laparoscopic exploration. After a 3-h intraoperative observation, the ISH did not expand and her condition was stable, in the meanwhile, in consideration to the invasive trauma of debridement and uncertain outcome of drainage of ISH, we only chose to place the drain tubes as early warning for rupture. Later, it gradually resolved. Frankly speaking, if we chose conservative treatments, including further liquid resuscitation and blood transfusion, the outcome would be the same, however, no one could guarantee this satisfactory result at that time, especially when the patients did not accept the possibility of sudden death after rupture during conservative treatment. For this giant ISH, in case of rupture in absence of drainage tube for early warning, it could be difficult to detect the bleeding immediately which may cause disastrous result.

Despite LC has been widely performed and the complications of LC is relatively low in the experienced hands, some serious complications can still occur. Giant ISH is an extremely rare, life-threatening complication after LC. The experience of how to treat this kind giant ISH remains largely limited. Herein, we presented a rare case and summarized all of the previously published cases which could substantially increase our experience to treat this rare condition. The most important key point for this giant ISH is to avoid sudden death after the rupture of hematoma, luckily, according to this literature review, only one case was ruptured and no mortality was reported.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81502068, 81673023 and 81272573) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China (7172177).

Availability of data and materials

All data was included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

QFL, RHZ and YNL designed and performed the literature research; QFL wrote the manuscript; QFL, LLB and MQS took care of the patient; JCG, WBW and QFL performed the operation and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the institutional review board at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The patient from our hospital signed the informed consent form.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the participant for publication.

of this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The southern surgeons Club. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(16):1073–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duca S, Bala O, Al-Hajjar N, Lancu C, Puia IC, Munteanu D, Graur F. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidents and complications. A retrospective analysis of 9542 consecutive laparoscopic operations. HPB (Oxford). 2003;5(3):152–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Castro SM, Reekers JA, Dwars BJ. Delayed intrahepatic subcapsular hematoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Clin Imaging. 2012;36(5):629–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Minaya Bravo AM, Gonzalez Gonzalez E, Ortiz Aguilar M, Larranaga Barrera E. Two rare cases of intrahepatic subcapsular hematoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Surg. 2010;72(6):481–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993;165(1):9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, Trede M, Troidl H. The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991;161(3):385–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang CW, Chen MJ, Shih SC, Chang WH, Yang WJ, Chu CH. Hepatic subcapsular hematoma secondary to intrahepatic pseudoaneurysm following cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52(11):3303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown V, Martin J, Magee D. A rare case of subcapsular liver haematoma following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BMJ Case Rep. 2015, 2015.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shibuya K, Midorikawa Y, Mushiake H, Watanabe M, Yamakawa T, Sugiyama Y. Ruptured hepatic subcapsular hematoma following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of a case. Biosci Trends. 2010;4(6):355–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Antsaklis GI, Karanikas ID, Sakellaridis TE, Alexiou CP, Konstantinidou E, Economou N. Subcapsular hematoma of the liver: a rare complication of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minerva Chir. 2009;64(3):322–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shetty GS, Falconer JS, Benyounes H. Subcapsular hematoma of the liver after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005;15(1):48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gluszek S, Kot M, Nawacki L, Krawczyk M. Subcapsular liver haematoma as a complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015;10(2):320–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hansen AJ, Augenstein J, Ong ES. Large subcapsular liver hematoma following single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2011;15(1):114–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guercio G, Sandonato L, Cintorino D, Ricotta C, Diana G. Hemoperitoneum from rupture of liver subcapsular hematoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy attributed to ketorolac. Report of a case. G Chir. 2008;29(8–9):351–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bhandarkar DS, Katara AN, Shah RS. Intrahepatic subcapsular hematoma complicating laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(5):868–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pietra N, Sarli L, Costi R, Violi V. Intrahepatic subcapsular hematoma. A rare postoperative complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8(4):304–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Obara K, Imai S, Uchiyama S, Uchiyama K, Moriyama Y. A case with subcapsular hematoma of the liver following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi. 1998;65(6):478–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Erstad BL, Rappaport WD. Subcapsular hematoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, associated with ketorolac administration. Pharmacotherapy. 1994;14(5):613–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiao-fei Liu
    • 1
  • Ling-ling Bian
    • 2
  • Meng-qing Sun
    • 1
  • Rong-hua Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wei-bin Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yong-ning Li
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jun-chao Guo
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of International Medical ServicesPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations