Advertisement

BMC Public Health

, 19:128 | Cite as

Associations of recommended food score and physical performance in Korean elderly

  • Gyeo Woon Jeong
  • You Jin Kim
  • Saejong Park
  • Hyesook KimEmail author
  • Oran KwonEmail author
Open Access
Research article
  • 137 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Energy balance-related behaviors

Abstract

Background

A single nutrient or dietary pattern has been associated with physical performance. However, little is still known about the association of overall dietary quality with physical performance. This study aimed to investigate the link between the recommended food score (RFS), defined as an indicator of overall diet quality, and physical performance among the Korean elderly aged over 65 years.

Methods

The study subjects consisted of 622 participants (294 men and 328 women) aged over 65 years from the 2014–2015 National Fitness Award project.

Results

The mean value of RFS was higher in elderly women (30.7 ± 7.6) than elderly men (29.5 ± 8.8), but the difference was only marginally significant (P = 0.065). In elderly women, multiple regression linear models, adjusted for potential confounders, showed that RFS was positively related to absolute hand grip strength (kg) (ß = 0.066, 95% CI = 0.010 to 0.122) and relative hand grip strength (%) (ß =0.109, 95% CI = 0.016 to 0.201); other physical performance indicators did not show any association with RFS. In elderly men, none of the physical performance indexes were associated with RFS.

Conclusions

These results suggest that a better overall diet quality may be associated with improved grip strength among elderly women in Korea.

Keywords

Recommended food score Diet quality Hand grip strength Physical performance Elderly 

Abbreviations

2MST

2-min step test;

F8W

figure of 8 walk test

HEI

Healthy Eating Index;

MET

metabolic equivalent task;

NDS

Nordic Diet Score

RFS

recommended food score;

TUG

timed up and go test;

Background

According to resident registration population statistics of the Ministry of the Interior and Safety [1], in 2017, South Korea was categorized as an ‘aged society’. This term is used to define a population, in a country or region, where the proportion of seniors aged over 65 exceeds 14%. South Korea has become one of the most rapidly aging nations because of a sharp decline in the general fertility rate and an increase in life expectancy at birth. This trend has given rise to many problems associated with the elderly [2, 3]. This population is at high risk of health-related issues associated with frailty [4] and of various diseases, including chronic diseases, which lead to increased medical service costs and a decrease in quality of life [5].

Physical performance is important for quality of life, and consists of a healthy body condition, and the capability of dealing with stress and handling social life [6, 7]. Maintaining physical performance in old age is crucial for healthy aging. Poor physical performance in later life has serious health consequences for individuals regarding disability [8, 9], loss of independence [10], as well as mortality [11], and can lead to an increased need for healthcare and social care [12]. However, despite this importance, there is currently a lack of understanding of the factors that affect physical performance.

There is some evidence that physical performance is associated with lifestyle behaviors, including diet [13, 14], as well as non-modifiable factors, such as age and gender [15]. Several studies have reported a positive link between physical performance and intake of specific single nutrients, including protein [16, 17], vitamin D [18, 19, 20], dietary fiber [21], antioxidative nutrients like β-carotene, and vitamins E and C [22, 23, 24]. Conversely, relatively little is documented about the relation between whole diet and overall physical performance. The few existing investigations have shown that adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet is positively related with physical performance, including mobility and walking speed in older adults [25, 26]. In addition, it has been observed that the healthiest dietary pattern, which means eating the required amounts of fruits, fish/seafood, eggs, nuts and whole grains, may improve physical performance in those aged over 85 years [27].

Some recent literature has focused on the connection between physical performance and overall dietary quality indicators, such as the Health Eating Index (HEI) score [28] or Nordic Diet Score (NDS) [29]. Previous studies conducted in the United States [28] and Finland [29] have shown that a higher dietary quality coexists with better physical performance in the elderly. However, the indicators used in these studies are insufficient to examine the same phenomenon in Korean seniors, because food culture and food source are different.

Most studies on the relationship between diet and physical performance in Koreans have been conducted on adolescents [30], college students [31], or female adults [13, 14, 32]. Although it is possible that overall dietary quality is related to better physical performance, and that better dietary quality aids health and nutrition promotion among elderly people, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated these associations in elderly Korean people. Considering the rapid rise in the aging population in Korea, it is urgent to explore the connection between overall dietary quality and physical performance in the elderly population. Most dietary quality indices are based on food groups and nutrients, whereas recommended food scores (RFS) are based on the foods and food groups recommended in the current American dietary guidelines. RFS is a relatively simple method to assess overall diet. Therefore, this study assessed the overall diet quality by using RFS as an indicator of evaluating dietary quality adapted to the Korean diet [33], and examined the association between RFS and physical performance in men and women aged over 65 years.

Methods

Study design and participants

This study was performed within the framework of a prospective, matched case-control study designed to develop criteria referencing health-related fitness standards for the National Fitness Award. The National Fitness Award project is a large-scale national project that the Korea Institute of Sports Science has been conducting since 2012 with the support of the Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism. Adults and seniors have been recruited since 2014, and the present study was based on elderly people (aged 65 or older) who participated in the project in 2014–2015 [34]. Among a total of 1501 participants, we excluded those who had missing data for RFS (n = 166), physical performances (n = 265), and the covariates (n = 84). We also excluded subjects who had musculoskeletal disorders (n = 364), such as osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, backache, sciatic neuralgia, and herniated cervical disc, based on the fact that these subjects were also excluded in other studies that examined the association between diet and physical performance [16, 35, 36]. Finally, 622 subjects (294 men and 328 women) aged over 65 years were included in the analysis. The present study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all subjects provided a written informed consent. The study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the Korea Institute of Sport Science and Ewha Womans University.

General characteristics, anthropometric measurement, and socioeconomic characteristics

Detailed information about data collection methods has been reported elsewhere [37]. All of the subjects were interviewed by trained interviewers, to obtain general information on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, medical history, and health-related behaviors, including age, family income, education, marital status, smoking behavior, alcohol consumption, and RFS. Standing height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm with a stadiometer (Seca, Seca Corporation, Columbia, MD, USA). Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg by using an electronic weight scale (Inbody 720, Biospace, Seoul, Korea). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight divided by the square of the height (kg/m2). The body fat percentage was estimated by the eight-polar bioelectrical impedance frequencies (Inbody 720, Biospace, Seoul, Korea). Physical activity was assessed through a Korean version of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) short form [38]. Eleven items of physical activity identified the total minutes of activity in the last 7 days spent on inactivity, walking, and moderate and vigorous-intensity physical activity. Responses were converted to metabolic equivalent task hour per week (MET-hr/wk): walking = 3.3 METs × day × hr.; moderate PA = 4.0 METs × day × hr., and vigorous PA = 8.0 METs × day × hr., where PA is physical activity [39].

Recommended food score

The recommended food score (RFS) was used to measure overall diet quality. The RFS is a food-based tally, which evaluates the consumption of foods considered to be consistent with existing dietary guidelines, developed by Kant et al [40]. In the current study, the modified RFS proposed by Kim et al. [33] was used because it is appropriate for the Korean diet, which includes food items, such as mixed grains, beans, vegetables, seaweed, fruits, seafood, dairy products, and nuts. The food items and their corresponding points for the RFS were as follows: daily frequency of meals (1), grains (1), legumes (4), vegetables (17), seaweeds (2), fruits (12), fish (5), dairy products (3), nuts (1) and tea (1). A total of 46 foods or food groups consistent with the recommended food groups were selected and one response for ‘daily frequency of meals’ was used to calculate the RFS. Participants were allocated one point for each recommended food or regular eating pattern (three meals per day) if they consumed the food at least once per week. The score ranged from 0 to 47 points, and higher scores imply a greater diet quality.

Assessment of physical performances

Physical performances were assessed by a physical performance test of the elderly at the national fitness award. The national physical fitness test parameters yielded significantly consistent results, with reliability ranging from 0.62–0.93 [41]. All parameters were measured by certified, professional health and fitness instructors. Four assessments were conducted, including a 2-min step test (2MST), timed up and go test (TUG), figure-of-8 walk test (F8W), hand grip strength test, and arm curl test. The concrete methods of physical performances are as follows:

(1) 2MST (rep·120 s− 1): The participant stands up straight next to the wall, while the level corresponding to midway between the patella and iliac chest. The 2-min step requires the participants to march in place for 2 min, lifting the knees to a marked target on the wall, which is set at each individual’s midpoint between their hip and knee. The number of times the right knee met the marked target was counted. An increased step count within the 2 min was reflective of a greater cardiopulmonary endurance.

(2) TUG (sec): This test assesses a person’s mobility and balance. Participants were instructed to complete the course at their usual pace, by standing up without any support, walking 3 m and around a cone/mark on the floor, walking back to the chair, and then sitting down again. The time that the participant needed to complete the test was recorded. A longer time indicates worse balance and mobility performance.

(3) F8W (sec): The F8W, as a measure of walking skill, evaluates movement control and planning during walking [42]. Participants were instructed to stand midway between two cones placed about 5 ft (1.5 m) apart, start walking at their usual pace in a figure-of-eight walking path around the cones and stop upon returning to the starting position. Timing began when the subject started to take the first step and ended when both of their feet were back in the starting position.

(4) Hand grip strength (kg, %): Hand grip strength was measured using a hand dynamometer (GRIP-D 5101, Takei, Niigata, Japan) placed between the fingers and palm at the base of the thumb in one hand, with the arm extended to the side and squeezed with maximum force. Participants were instructed to stand in the upright position, keep their arms straight, maintain a 15° angle between the arm and torso, and squeeze the dynamometer for 5 s at maximal effort. After both the left and right hand were performed twice, the highest value was recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg. For relative hand grip strength (%), the absolute hand grip strength (kg) was divided by the participant’s body weight (kg) and then multiplied by 100.

(5) Arm curl test (frequency): The arm curl test assesses upper body strength and endurance. The participant was instructed to sit on the chair, hold the weight in the dominant hand, with palm facing towards the body, and the arm in a positioned vertically down beside the chair. Then, the participant was to brace the upper arm against the body so that only the lower arm was moving, and curl the arm up through a full range of motion, gradually performing elbow flexion with supination. The score is the mean of the total number of left and right arm curls performed in 30 s. The frequency of biceps curls (left and right sides) was recorded.

Statistical analysis

Characteristics of participants were presented as means and standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables, and a number and percentage for categorical variables. Differences in means and the distribution of general characteristics between men and women were analyzed using the Student’s t-test and chi-square test. The differences in distribution of categorical variables (income, education, smoking, drinking) between men and women were analyzed using the Chi-Square test. Student’s t-test was used to compare continuous variables (age, height, weight, BMI, body fat, physical activity (MET-hr/wk), the RFS, and physical performances) between men and women. Pearson’s correlation test was used to analyze correlations between RFS and physical performances. After controlling for potential confounders, multiple regression model analyses were conducted to examine the association between the RFS and physical performances. The covariates were statistically significant in univariate analyses or were known to be risk factors associated with the RFS or physical performance, in existing literature. Model 1 was adjusted for age, body fat percentage, income, education, marital status, smoking, and drinking. Model 2 was adjusted for physical activity (MET-hr/wk), in addition to the adjustments made in Model 1. Multicollinearity between independent variables was checked by performing variance inflation factor (VIF) tests. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS (ver. 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

General characteristics

The mean age of men was 71.7 ± 4.6 years, and the mean age of women was 71.9 ± 5.2 years. The mean height, weight, and lean body mass were higher in men than women, whereas the mean BMI and body fat percentage were higher in women. Women had a greater mean RFS (30.7 ± 7.6) than men (29.5 ± 8.8), but the difference was not significant. Socioeconomic characteristics and health-related behaviors, such as income, education, marital status, smoking, and drinking, were significantly different between the genders. Among physical performances, the mean TUG (P < 0.001) and F8W (P < 0.001) in men were faster compared to women, and the mean scores of grip strength (P < 0.001) and arm curl test (P < 0.001) were higher in men (Table 1).
Table 1

General characteristics of the elderly subjects

 

Total (n = 622)

Men (n = 294)

Women (n = 328)

 

Mean ± S.D. or n (%)

Mean ± S.D. or n (%)

Mean ± S.D. or n (%)

P-value

Age, yrs

71.8 ± 4.9

71.7 ± 4.6

71.9 ± 5.2

0.654

Height, cm

159.0 ± 8.6

166.1 ± 5.6

152.6 ± 5.2

<.0001

Weight, kg

60.5 ± 8.8

65.2 ± 8.0

56.3 ± 7.3

<.0001

BMI, kg/m2

23.9 ± 2.7

23.6 ± 2.5

24.2 ± 2.8

0.008

Body fat, %

29.8 ± 7.9

24.2 ± 5.6

34.8 ± 6.0

<.0001

Lean body mass, kg

22.9 ± 4.7

27.0 ± 3.1

19.3 ± 2.3

<.0001

Income, won/mo

   

0.0002

 Less than 2,000,000

287 (46.1)

159 (54.1)

128 (39.0)

 

 Over 2,000,000

335 (53.9)

135 (45.9)

200 (61.0)

 

Education

   

<.0001

 Elementary/middle school

338 (54.3)

115 (39.1)

223 (68.0)

 

 High school

184 (29.6)

101 (34.4)

83 (25.3)

 

 College

100 (16.1)

78 (26.5)

22 (6.7)

 

Marital status

   

<.0001

 Single

207 (33.3)

42 (14.3)

165 (50.3)

 

 Marital

415 (66.7)

252 (85.7)

163 (49.7)

 

Current smoker, yes

39 (6.3)

36 (12.2)

3 (0.9)

<.0001

Current drinker, yes

235 (37.8)

173 (58.8)

62 (18.9)

<.0001

Physical activity, METs-h/wk

8.7 ± 9.4

8.4 ± 8.3

8.9 ± 10.3

0.535

Recommended food score

30.1 ± 8.2

29.5 ± 8.8

30.7 ± 7.6

0.065

Physical performance

 2-min step test, repㆍ120sec

105.2 ± 23.3

104.5 ± 20.7

105.7 ± 25.5

0.524

 Timed up and go test, sec

6.4 ± 1.6

6.0 ± 1.3

6.7 ± 1.8

<.0001

 Figure of 8 walk test, sec

27.6 ± 7.0

26.0 ± 5.6

29.1 ± 7.8

<.0001

 Grip strength, kg

27.8 ± 8.2

34.5 ± 6.1

21.8 ± 4.1

<.0001

 Grip strength, %

45.8 ± 11.0

53.4 ± 9.1

39.0 ± 7.7

<.0001

 Arm curl test, frequency

16.8 ± 5.0

18.3 ± 5.2

15.5 ± 4.3

<.0001

S.D., standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; Current drinker was defined as consuming alcohol more than once a month and current smoker was defined as current smoking or cessation of smoking within the past 12 months. Marriage was defined as reporting married or living as married

Correlation between RFS and physical performances

In women, RFS was positively correlated with absolute hand grip strength (kg) (r = 0.149, P = 0.007) and negatively correlated with F8W (r = − 0.113, P = 0.041). There was no correlation between RFS and physical performance in men (Table 2).
Table 2

Correlation between RFS and physical performances in the elderly subjects

 

Men (n = 294)

Women (n = 328)

r

P-value

r

P-value

2-min step test, repㆍ120sec

0.050

0.390

0.039

0.487

Timed up and go test, sec

−0.034

0.560

−0.064

0.246

Figure of 8 walk test, sec

0.045

0.443

−0.113

0.041

Grip strength, kg

−0.027

0.648

0.149

0.007

Grip strength, %

−0.113

0.052

0.097

0.080

Arm curl test, frequency

− 0.036

0.544

0.056

0.309

Association between RFS and physical performances

As shown in Table 3, after adjustment for possible confounders (Model 1), multiple regression analysis revealed a positive association between the RFS and grip strength (kg) (ß = 0.063, 95% CI = 0.007 to 0.119) and grip strength (%) (ß =0.105, 95% CI = 0.013 to 0.198) in women; this trend was also observed after further adjustment for physical activity (grip strength (kg) (ß = 0.066, 95% CI = 0.010 to 0.122) and grip strength (%) (ß =0.109, 95% CI = 0.016 to 0.201). Other physical performance indicators did not show any association with RFS. No significant association was observed between the RFS and any of the physical performances in men.
Table 3

Association between RFS and physical performances in the elderly subjects

 

Men (n = 294)

Women (n = 328)

ß

95% CI

P-value

ß

95% CI

P-value

2-min step test, repㆍ120sec

 Unadjusted

0.119

−0.153, 0.390

0.390

0.130

−0.237, 0.497

0.487

 Model 1

0.086

−0.179, 0.351

0.523

0.020

−0.327, 0.367

0.909

 Model 2

0.096

−0.167, 0.358

0.474

0.039

−0.305, 0.384

0.823

Timed up and go test, sec

 Unadjusted

−0.005

−0.021, 0.012

0.560

−0.015

− 0.041, 0.010

0.246

 Model 1

−0.005

−0.020, 0.010

0.480

−0.002

− 0.022, 0.019

0.878

 Model 2

−0.006

−0.021, 0.009

0.458

−0.002

− 0.023, 0.018

0.816

Figure of 8 walk test, sec

 Unadjusted

0.029

−0.045, 0.103

0.443

−0.116

−0.227, − 0.005

0.041

 Model 1

0.016

−0.047, 0.079

0.626

−0.057

−0.148, 0.035

0.222

 Model 2

0.014

−0.049, 0.077

0.660

−0.059

−0.149, 0.031

0.197

Grip strength, kg

 Unadjusted

−0.019

−0.098, 0.061

0.648

0.081

0.022, 0.140

0.007

 Model 1

0.005

−0.070, 0.079

0.905

0.063

0.007, 0.119

0.027

 Model 2

0.005

−0.070, 0.080

0.900

0.066

0.010, 0.122

0.022

Grip strength, %

 Unadjusted

−0.118

−0.236, 0.001

0.052

0.098

−0.012, 0.209

0.080

 Model 1

−0.013

−0.112, 0.086

0.799

0.105

0.013, 0.198

0.026

 Model 2

−0.014

−0.113 0.085

0.780

0.109

0.016, 0.201

0.022

Arm curl test, frequency

 Unadjusted

−0.021

− 0.089, 0.047

0.544

0.032

−0.030, 0.095

0.309

 Model 1

−0.025

−0.090, 0.041

0.459

0.013

−0.048, 0.075

0.668

 Model 2

−0.022

−0.087, 0.042

0.499

0.014

−0.046, 0.075

0.639

Model 1: adjusted for age, body fat percentage, smoking, drinking, education, income, marital status

Model 2: adjusted for age, body fat percentage, smoking, drinking, education, income, marital status, physical activity

Discussion

This study found that overall diet quality (RFS) was positively linked to grip strength among elderly Korean women, but not elderly men. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study showing a positive association between the RFS and grip strength in elderly Korean subjects.

The RFS was used as a simple tool to evaluate the quality of the overall diet, in our study. However, pre-existing studies have used various other tools to determine the overall diet scores. Beibei et al. [28] showed that a higher HEI score is positively linked to physical performance in adults aged over 60 years. A 10-year cohort study by Mia-Maria et al. [29] reported a significant positive association between NDS and physical performance in women. Especially, a high consumption of fruit and berries, cereals, and alcohol, among NDS food items, was positively related to the overall physical performance in women [29]. It was presumed that the results of the current research would be similar to those mentioned in the literature because the components of the RFS, including fruits and vegetables, fish, dairy products, and grains, are similar to food components in the tools mentioned above. In this study, the mean RFS of men and women was 30.7 and 29.5, respectively, of a total 47 points, and the mean RFS for women was marginally significantly higher than that for men. The RFS values of this study’s subjects were somewhat higher than those of other countries, although the total RFS points were different because there is a different way of calculating RFS according to the dietary characteristics of the people of each country. In a study of Australian men and women aged 55–65 years [43], mean RFSs were 23 and 26.6, respectively, which was lower than the RFS of our study subjects. However, in Australia, the maximum RFS is 49, which is two points higher than that used in our study. In the US Nurses’ Health Study [44], the mean RFS of women aged 43–69 years was 18 out of a total 51 points, which was significantly lower than that of our subjects. This suggests that the dietary quality of Korean people, as calculated using RFS, is higher than in other countries.

Akin to overall diet quality, several researchers have documented a link between dietary pattern and physical performance in the elderly. A prospective study by Antoneta et al. [27] found that a healthy dietary pattern, consisting of high intakes of fish, fruits, nuts, cereal, vegetables, dairy products, and oils rich in unsaturated fatty acids, has a prolonged effect on better age-related physical performance and reduces adverse health outcomes in the elderly. Moreover, physical performance, including mobility and walking speed, was greater in those with higher adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern in cohort studies [25, 26]. Given that dietary pattern and the RFS are related, a superior RFS may mean that sufficient food intake, consisting of healthy nutrients, is related to physical performance and various other health benefits.

There are several mechanisms explaining the association between physical performance and the RFS. The RFSs in this study were calculated using information about the overall intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, milk products, legumes, fish, and nuts. These are food items that contain a substantial amount of complex carbohydrates, unsaturated fat, fiber, and antioxidants, such as vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients [33]. According to preceding studies, antioxidants have an important role in increasing skeletal muscle repair and a protective function against the age-dependent increase in oxidative stress [28, 33, 45]. Oxidative stress is considered to be the common factor underlying chronic diseases, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease, which, in turn, leads to poor physical performance and muscle function [28, 45]. According to Kim et al. [33], a higher RFS indicated a high consumption of energy, macronutrients, and antioxidants, and was associated with muscle function, as well as a decline in oxidative stress. Therefore, it could be suggested that a higher RFS resulted in beneficial effects on physical performance through, at least in part, a reduction in oxidative stress.

Another possible mechanism to explain the connection between physical performance and the RFS may be related to the positive effects of dietary fiber on systemic inflammation [21] via the reduction of the serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein level. Systemic inflammation contributes to poor physical performance. A high fiber intake can also provide beneficial metabolic effects, such as an attenuation of hyperglycemia, improved insulin sensitivity, and hypercholesterolemia, which, in turn, are related to enhanced physical performance. Several food items of the RFS, such as whole grains, fruits, and vegetables are rich in dietary fiber, which may have contributed to establishing physical exercise benefits.

In the present study, among physical performance measures, grip strength was particularly associated with the RFS in elderly women. We do not know the exact reason why other physical performance indicators were not related to RFS. However, RFS is a dietary indicator related to antioxidant capacity, and grip strength is a major determinant of sarcopenia or frailty associated with oxidative stress among the various physical performance measures. It is thus presumed that grip strength is the most sensitive index among physical performance measures associated to dietary factors. In recent years, there has been accumulating scientific evidence of a significant inverse relationship between hand grip strength and total mortality [46], chronic disease morbidity [47], and mortality [48], even after adjustment for major risk factors and cardiorespiratory function [49]. Some studies conducted on representative national data of the Korean population revealed a trend toward a lower prevalence of hypertension [50] and improved health-related quality of life with increased grip strength [51, 52]. Moreover, a study conducted in Korea suggested grip strength as a clinical marker for muscle strength, to diagnose sarcopenia and that the cut-off values for grip strength might be useful as reference values when classifying sarcopenia [53].

Hand grip strength is used to assess muscle strength, and it is also an outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status [36, 54]. According to several studies related to hand grip strength and nutrition, nutritional status has an important role in muscle strength because muscle function reacts quickly to dietary variations [15] and grip strength may be easily influenced by diet [36, 54]. Robinson et al. [55] noted that grip strength was positively influenced by a high prudent dietary pattern score, characterized by a high consumption of fruit, vegetables, wholemeal cereals, and fatty fish. Furthermore, an adequate intake of dietary protein, antioxidants, and vitamin D was related to a decline in oxidative stress, anti-inflammation, and maintenance of muscle function, resulting in a greater grip strength [55]. In this context, grip strength is related to diet, the prevalence of various diseases, and the health-related quality of life. Thus, a better dietary quality is important for improved muscle strength and prevention of a range of diseases.

In this study, it was observed that RFS was associated with physical performance, especially grip strength in elderly women but not men. Similar gender differences were demonstrated by Mia-Maria et al. [29]. They observed that a healthy Nordic diet was related to better overall physical performance in older Finnish women but not in men. Martin et al. [56] found that the associations between single nutrients and foods (rather than a diet quality index) and physical performance exist in a UK population of community-dwelling older women but not in men. Mishra et al. [57] also reported that higher daily protein intake was positively associated with grip strength in US women but not in men. The reasons for this gender difference are unclear, but they may be explained by the difference in absolute value in grip strength and muscle mass [58, 59] between men and women or the degree of decrease in grip strength and muscle mass [58, 60] with increasing age. This may be related to sex differences in hormonal factors [60, 61]. It has been reported that compared to women, a rapid age-related decline in physical function and grip strength was observed in men despite their higher initial levels of muscle strength score and grip strength [58]. Doherty demonstrated that the greater loss of muscle mass observed in men may be related to declines in growth hormone and androgens with aging [60]. Taekema et al. reported that the significant relationship between insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) levels and muscle strength found in women but not in men suggests a gender-specific influence of IGF1 on muscle strength [61]. Further research is needed to determine the exact mechanism to explain the effect of gender disparity on the association between RFS and grip strength.

The present study found that a high RFS was associated with grip strength, even after adjusting for physical activity. According to several studies, physical activity is known to be positively associated with physical performance in the elderly [62, 63]. Conversely, Beibei et al. [28] noticed that an association between HEI-2005 scores and physical performance in the elderly was attenuated and no longer statistically significant after adjusting for physical activity. Similarly, another study showed that the link between NDS and physical performance measures was attenuated after adjusting for various factors, including physical activity [29].

The limitations of this study are as follows: first, we cannot determine a causal association between the RFS and physical performance because our research is a cross-sectional study design. Further longitudinal studies are required, to establish the causal relationship between diet quality and physical performance. Second, this study only used the RFS to assess the diet quality, and no instruments were used for evaluating the amount of intake or nutrients. The RFS, in this study, was based on a daily frequency of meals or food frequency, which might have resulted in under- or overestimating of an individual’s intakes. However, a previous study [33] observed that energy intake and the intake of macro- and micronutrients, except vitamins A and C, were higher in subjects with a higher RFS. Therefore, a high RFS may be included mean of high intake of energy and nutrients. To our knowledge, despite these limitations, the current study is the first to observe that the RFS was positively associated with grip strength among elderly women in Korea.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we found that a higher RFS was associated with an improved hand grip strength among Korean elderly, particularly in women. Further prospective studies are warranted to verify the association between RFS and hand grip strength in elderly Korean populations.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science & ICT (2012M3A9C4048761) and by RP-Grant 2017 of Ewha Womans University. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the paper, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

OK and HK designed the research; SP, YJK, and OK conducted the research; GWJ and HK analyzed the data; GWJ, YJK, and HK wrote the manuscript, and OK was primarily responsible for the final contents. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Study protocols and consent forms were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the Korea Institute of Sport Science and Ewha Womans University. All participants provided informed consent to participate in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    The Ministry of the Interior and Safety, “the resident registration population statistics”, http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1BPA002&vw_cd=&list_id=&scrId=&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=E1.Accessed 26 Jan 2017. 
  2. 2.
    Kim MY, Im SW, Park HM. The demographic changes of menopausal and geripausal women in Korea. J Bone Metab. 2015;22:23–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee EY, Kim HC, Rhee Y, Youm Y, Kim KM, et al. The Korean urban rural elderly cohort study: study design and protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381:752–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Studenski S, Perera S, Wallace D, Chandler JM, Duncan PW, et al. Physical performance measures in the clinical setting. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:314–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pate RR. The evolving definition of physical fitness. Quest. 1998;40:174–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim KE, Park WB, Oh MK, Kang EK, Lim JY, et al. The effect of physical performance and physical activity on quality of life in old people: the Korean longitudinal study on health and aging. J Korean Geriatr Soc. 2010;14:212–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Onder G, Penninx BW, Ferrucci L, Fried LP, Guralnik JM, et al. Measures of physical performance and risk for progressive and catastrophic disability: results from the Women’s health and aging study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60:74–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:556–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    den Ouden ME, Schuurmans MJ, Arts IE, van der Schouw YT. Association between physical performance characteristics and independence in activities of daily living in middle-aged and elderly men. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13:274–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooper R, Kuh D, Hardy R. Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systemic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:c4467.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taekema DG, Gussekloo J, Maier AB, Westendorp RG, de Craen AJ. Handgrip strength as a predictor of functional, psychological and social health. A prospective population-based study among the oldest old. Age Ageing. 2010;39:331–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee HS, Lee JW, Chang NS, Kim JM. The effect of nutrition education and exercise program on body composition and dietary intakes, blood lipid and physical fitness in obese women. Korean J Nutr. 2009;42:759–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee HS, Lee JW, Chang NS, Kim JM. The effect of nutrition education and exercise program on body composition and dietary intakes, blood lipid and physical fitness in obese women (2). Korean J Nutr. 2010;43:260–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Budziareck MB, Pureza Durate RR, Barbosa-Silva MC. Reference values and determinants for handgrip strength in healthy subjects. Clin Nutr. 2008;27:357–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gregorio L, Brindisi J, Kleppinger A, Sullivan R, Mangano KM, et al. Adequate dietary protein is associated with better physical performance among post-menopausal women 60-90 years. J Nutr Health Aging. 2014;18:155–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Isanejad M, Mursu J, Sirola J, Kröger H, Rikkonen T, et al. Dietary protein intake is associated with better physical function and muscle strength among elderly women. Br J Nutr. 2016;115:1281–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zamboni M, Zoico E, Tosoni P, Zivelonghi A, Bortolani A, et al. Relation between vitamin D, physical performance, and disability in elderly persons. J Gerontol A Med Sci. 2002;57:M7–M11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Houston DK, Cesari M, Ferrucci L, Cherubini A, Maggio D, et al. Association between vitamin D status and physical performance: the InCHIANTI study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:440–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sharkey JR, Giuliani C, Haines PS, Branch LG, Busby-Whitehead J, et al. Summary measure of dietary musculoskeletal nutrient (calcium, vitamin D, magnesium, and phosphorus) intake is associated with lower-extremity physical performance in homebound elderly men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:847–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu IC, Chang HY, Hsu CC, Chiu YF, Yu SH, et al. Association between Dietary Fiber intake and Physical Performance in Older Adults: A Nationwide Study in Taiwan. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:E80209.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alipanah N, Varadhan R, Sun K, Ferrucci L, Fried LP, et al. Low serum carotenoids are associated with a decline in walking speed in older women. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13:170–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lauretani F, Semba RD, Bandinelli S, Dayhoff-Brannigan M, Giacomini V, et al. Low plasma carotenoids and skeletal muscle strength decline over 6 years. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008;63:376–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cesari M, Pahor M, Bartali B, Cherubini A, Penninx BW, et al. Antioxidants and physical performance in elderly persons: the Invecchiare in chianti (InCHIANTI) study. Am J Ciln Nutr. 2004;79:289–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Milaneschi Y, Bandinelli S, Corsi AM, Lauretani F, Paolisso G, et al. Mediterranean diet and mobility decline in older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2011;46:303–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shahar DR, Houston DK, Hue TF, Lee JS, Sahyoun NR, et al. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and decline in walking speed over 8 years in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:1881–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Granic A, Jagger C, Davies K, Adamson A, Kirkwood T, et al. Effect of dietary patterns on muscle strength and physical performance in the very old: findings from the Newcastle 85+ study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0149699.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xu B, Houston DK, Locher JL, Ellison KJ, Gropper S, et al. Higher healthy eating Index-2005 scores are associated with better physical performance. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012;67:93–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Perälä MM, von Bonsdorff M, Männistö S, Salonen MK, Simonen M, et al. A healthy Nordic diet and physical performance in old age: finding from the longitudinal Helsinki birth cohort study. Br J Nutr. 2016;115:878–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lim JY, Na HB. The relationship between nutrient intakes and physical fitness in middle school students. Korean J Exerc Nutr. 2004;8:385–92.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cho YO, Kim BY. The correlation of anthropometric measurements, physical performance and biochemical measurements with nutrient intakes in male college students. Nutritional Science. 2013;6:113–7.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee HJ, Lee KH. The impacts of dietary habits on self-perceived health-related physical fitness in middle-aged women. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2014;43:916–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kim JY, Yang YJ, Yang YK, Oh SY, Hong YC, et al. Diet quality scores and oxidative stress in Korean adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011;65:1271–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Park S, Kim HJ, Ko BG, Chung JW, Kim SH, et al. The prevalence and impact of sarcopenia on degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B:1093–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tramontano A, Veronese N, Giantin V, Manzato E, Rodriguez-Hurtado D, et al. Nutritional status, physical performance and disability in the elderly of the Peruvian Andes. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016;28:1195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Norman K, Stobäus N, Gonzalez MC, Schulzke JD, Pirlich M. Hand grip strength: outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status. Clin Nutr. 2011;30:135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kim YJ, Hwang JY, Kim H, Park S, Kwon O. Diet quality, physical activity, and their association with metabolic syndrome in Korean adults. Nutrition. 2018;22(59):138–44.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oh JY, Yang YJ, Kim BS, Kang JH. Validity and reliability of Korean version of international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) short form. Korean J Fam Med. 2007;28:532–41.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Committee IR. Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ)–Short and long forms. 2005. Retrieved September 17: 2008. https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/home.
  40. 40.
    Kant AK, Schatzkin A, Graubard BI, Schairer C. A prospective study of diet quality and mortality in women. JAMA. 2000;283:2109–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Choi KJ, Go BG, Park SJ, Song HS, Kim KJ. The development of physical fitness test battery and evaluation criteria of it for Korean elderly person. Korean J Meas Eval Phys Educ Sport Sci. 2014;16:15–29.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brach JS, Van Swearingen JM, Perera S, Wert DM, Studenski S. Motor learning versus standard walking exercise in older adults with subclinical gait dysfunction: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61:1879–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Milte CM, Thorpe MG, Crawford D, Ball K, McNaughton SA. Associations of diet quality with health-related quality of life in older Australian men and women. Exp Gerontol. 2015;64:8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fung TT, McCullough ML, Newby PK, Manson JE, Meigs JB, et al. Diet-quality scores and plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pitsavos C, Panagiotakos D, Weinem M, Stefanadis C. Diet, exercise and the metabolic syndrome. Rev Diabet Stud. 2006;3:118–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sasaki H, Kasagi F, Yamada M, Fujita S. Grip strength predicts cause-specific mortality in middle-aged and elderly persons. Am J Med. 2007;120:337–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Meng G, Wu H, Fang L, Li C, Yu F, et al. Relationship between grip strength and newly diagnosed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a large-scale adult population. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33255.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rantanen T, Volpato S, Ferrucci L, Heikkinen E, Fried LP, et al. Handgrip strength and cause-specific and total mortality in older disabled women: exploring the mechanism. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:636–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Newman AB, Kupelian V, Visser M, Simonsick EM, Goodpaster BH, et al. Strength, but not muscle mass, is associated with mortality in the health, aging and body composition study cohort. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:72–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lee JA. Relationship between grip strength and prevalence of hypertension in Korean adults: the sixth Korean National Health and nutrition examination survey (2015). Health Sports Med. 2017;19:53–60.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Oh YH, Moon JH, Kong MH, Kim HJ. The association between hand grip strength and health-related quality of life in Korean adults. Korean J Sports Med. 2017;35:103–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kwak YH, Kim YJ. Quality of life and subjective health status according to handgrip strength in the elderly: a cross-sectional study. Aging Ment Health. 2017;16:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yoo JI, Choi H, Ha YC. Mean hand grip strength and cut-off value for sarcopenia in Korean adults using KNHANES VI. J Korean Med Sci. 2017;32:868–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Giampaoli S, Ferrucci L, Cecchi F, Lo Noce C, Poce A, et al. Hand-grip strength predicts incident disability in non-disabled older men. Age Ageing. 1999;28:283–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Robinson SM, Jameson KA, Batelaan SF, Martin HJ, Syddall HE, et al. Diet and its relationship with grip strength in community dwelling older men and women: the Hertfordshire cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Martin H, Sayer AA, Jameson K, Syddall H, Dennison EM, et al. Does diet influence physical performance in community-dwelling older people? Findings from the Hertfordshire cohort study. Age Ageing. 2011;40:181–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mishra S, Goldman JD, Sahyoun NR, Moshfegh AJ. Association between dietary protein intake and grip strength among adults aged 51 years and over: what we eat in America, National Health and nutrition examination survey 2011-2014. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191368.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Oksuzyan A, Maier H, Mcgue M, Vaupel JW, Christensen K. Sex differences in the level and rate of change of physical function and grip strength in the Danish 1905 cohort study. J Aging Health. 2010;22:589–610.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Baumgartner RN, Waters DL, Gallagher D, Morley JE, Garry PJ. Predictors of skeletal muscle mass in elderly men and women. Mechanisms Ageing Dev. 1999;107:123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Doherty TJ. The influence of aging and sex on skeletal muscle mass and strength. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2001;4:503–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Taekema DG, Ling CH, Blauw GJ, Meskers CG, Westendorp RG, et al. Circulating levels of IGF1 are associated with muscle strength in middle-aged and oldest-old women. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164:189–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Laddu DR, Wertheim BC, Garcia DO, Brunner R, Groessl E, et al. Associations between self-reported physical activity and physical performance measures over time in postmenopausal women: the women’s health initiative. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65:2176–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Izawa KP, Shibata A, Ishii K, Miyawaki R, Oka K. Associations of low-intensity light physical activity with physical performance in community-dwelling elderly Japanese: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178654.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical Nutrition ScienceThe Graduate School of Clinical Health Sciences, Ewha Womans UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of NutritionEwha Womans University Mokdong HospitalSeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Nutritional Science and Food ManagementEwha Womans UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.Department of Sport ScienceKorea Institute of Sport ScienceSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations