BMC Public Health

, 18:504 | Cite as

Youth’s social network structures and peer influences: study protocol MyMovez project – Phase I

  • Kirsten E. Bevelander
  • Crystal R. Smit
  • Thabo J. van Woudenberg
  • Laura Buijs
  • William J. Burk
  • Moniek Buijzen
Open Access
Study protocol
  • 184 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Health behavior, health promotion and society

Abstract

Background

Youth are an important target group for social network interventions, because they are particularly susceptible to the adaptation of healthy and unhealthy habits and behaviors of others. They are surrounded by ‘social influence agents’ (i.e., role models such as family, friends and peers) that co-determine their dietary intake and physical activity. However, there is a lack of systematic and comprehensive research on the implementation of a social network approach in health campaigns. The MyMovez research project aims to fill this gap by developing a method for effective social network campaign implementation. This protocol paper describes the design and methods of Phase I of the MyMovez project, aiming to unravel youth’s social network structures in combination with individual, psychosocial, and environmental factors related to energy intake and expenditure. In addition, the Wearable Lab is developed to enable an attractive and state-of-the-art way of collecting data and online campaign implementation via social networks.

Methods

Phase I of the MyMovez project consists of a large-scale cross-sequential cohort study (N = 953; 8-12 and 12-15 y/o). In five waves during a 3-year period (2016-2018), data are collected about youth’s social network exposure, media consumption, socialization experiences, psychological determinants of behavior, physical environment, dietary intake (snacking and drinking behavior) and physical activity using the Wearable Lab. The Wearable Lab exists of a smartphone-based research application (app) connected to an activity tracking bracelet, that is developed throughout the duration of the project. It generates peer- and self-reported (e.g., sociometric data and surveys) and experience sampling data, social network beacon data, real-time physical activity data (i.e., steps and cycling), location information, photos and chat conversation data from the app’s social media platform Social Buzz.

Discussion

The MyMovez project - Phase I is an innovative cross-sequential research project that investigates how social influences co-determine youth’s energy intake and expenditure. This project utilizes advanced research technologies (Wearable Lab) that provide unique opportunities to better understand the underlying processes that impact youths’ health-related behaviors. The project is theoretically and methodologically pioneering and produces a unique and useful method for successfully implementing and improving health campaigns.

Keywords

Social network Peer influence Social influence agent Dietary intake Physical activity Social media Social network intervention Smartphone Activity tracker Research app 

Abbreviations

GGD

Dutch Public Health Services

GIS

Geographic Information System

GPS

Global Positioning System

PA

Physical Activity

Q&A

Questions and Answers

TPB

Theory of Planned Behavior

VAS

Visual Analogue Scale

Background

Most Western societies devote substantial financial and human resources to the development and implementation of media health campaigns. The alarming rise of obesity has led to a particular increase in efforts aimed at the prevention and reduction of child and adolescent obesity. Youth are an important target group for health communication, because they are especially susceptible to environmental influences and because habits formed during this developmental period persist into adulthood. Unfortunately, media health campaigns often have a disappointing impact. Health messages may be successful in changing behaviors in a laboratory setting, but evaluation research consistently shows little impact in society [1].

An explanation for the gap between laboratory campaign design and behavioral adoption in society is that most mass media campaigns do not take into account the social context in which the message is received. The crucial role of the social environment on youth’s weight-related behaviors is increasingly recognized by academics, health practitioners, and politicians [2, 3, 4, 5]. Youth are surrounded by family members, peers and other role models (i.e., social influence agents) who support and/or undermine the targeted behaviors. Not only do these social influences compete with media influences, they also play a crucial role in how media messages are transmitted, received, and evaluated. Especially peers are of critical importance when youth reach adolescence, and they play a crucial role in message processing [6]. Recent developments in the media landscape, in particular the explosive growth of social media, present a practical way to incorporate the social context in campaign implementation. Aside from advantages such as wide reach, low costs, and ample technological possibilities, social media enables to reach target recipients via their social networks [7].

Social network interventions make use of peer influence to change behavior throughout the social network [8]. Contrasting traditional mass health intervention campaigns in which all individuals are exposed to an intervention message, social network campaigns only target influential individuals to perform and stimulate specific behaviors. When social influence agents disseminate the appropriate behavior successfully, it is expected that the behavior will be incorporated by others within their social networks. Subsequently, a social network approach has potential to cause long-term behavior change when the behavior becomes incorporated as the group norm. The approach has been successful in improving health-related behaviors such as quitting smoking [9, 10], increasing condom use [11], and promoting water drinking [12]. However, despite their increasing popularity, it remains unclear how social network campaigns actually work and what are the most effective ways to implement them. Greater understanding of social network structures and social influence processes is crucial for the development of theory and evidence-based social network interventions.

The overarching aim of this 5-year research project is to develop and test a method for effective media health campaign implementation by targeting the most powerful influence agents in youth’s social networks. The MyMovez project focuses on two important behavior types of the energy balance equation (i.e., energy intake and expenditure): the consumption of snack foods and (sugar-sweetened) beverages and physical activity (PA). In this protocol paper, we describe the design and methods of the first Phase of the MyMovez project. Phase I focuses on two parallel trajectories: Part A investigates youth’s social network structures and youths’ positions within these networks; and examines how media, personal and social influences co-determine energy intake and expenditure. Specifically, the overall aim is to i) identify the most powerful influence agents and examine similarity of health behaviors in youth’s social networks, and to ii) investigate which factors determine youths’ network positions as well as their energy intake and expenditure. In Part B, the research technology Wearable Lab is developed to enable data collection (and the campaign implementation in Phase II).

During a period of 3 years, a large-scale cross-sequential cohort study is conducted (N = 953) along with several focus group studies. The main sample of the MyMovez project – Phase I exists of two age-cohorts (8-12 and 12-15 y/o) of children and adolescents at 21 primary and secondary schools throughout the Netherlands. The recruitment of schools and participants took place with the assistance of several Dutch Public Health Services (GGDs). The MyMovez project is funded by the European Research Council (ERC) and carried out by a multidisciplinary research team of the Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, in the Netherlands.

Part A: Unraveling youth’s social network structures and positions

This project uses approaches and theories centered around the influence of the social environment to investigate how social influence agents can be identified, the relative importance of selection and influence processes, and what distinguishes social influence agents compared to other peers (i.e., ‘followers’). Ample empirical studies have proven the strong influence of peers on young people’s consumption behavior and physical activity [13, 14, 15]. For example, studies showed that youth follow and model each other’s eating behavior and that peers set guidelines or ‘social norms’ for others’ food choice and intake [16, 17]. In addition, peer groups are found to play a role in shaping physical activity behavior and youth are more active when they are together with peers [15, 18]. Social network interventions integrate peer influence processes in their campaigns to change behavior throughout the social network [8]. Yet, more research is needed to unravel how social influence agents can be identified and selected.

To date no systematic examination has been conducted on the selection process of social influence agents in peer-driven intervention studies. For example, most research on social networks are based on selecting influence agents who receive the most ‘friendship’ nominations; however, it is unclear whether this selection method is justified in the context of energy intake and expenditure [17]. Selecting influence agents based on ‘advice’ or ‘respect’ nominations (or a combination between these questions) [19] might identify other persons holding influential positions in the network compared to friendship queries. Also, these types of questions can be regarded as general and not directed to specific health behaviors, whereas it might be more useful to ask specific nomination questions (e.g., ‘with whom do you talk about PA?’ or ‘who is modeled a lot for their eating behavior?’) to identify social influence agents that exert power on health behaviors. In addition, there are different ways of analyzing the position or ‘centrality’ of individuals within networks. For example, a person receiving the most nominations has a high ‘in-degree’ centrality. Although this method is commonly used, it might be that ‘closeness’ centrality is a more effective measure because it describes how long it takes to spread information from that person to others (i.e., it takes into account the shortest paths a health message has to travel to reach the entire network). Another option would be to focus on ‘betweenness’ centrality, which indicates whether a person is important for linking different individuals or subgroups/clusters of individuals [20, 21]. To determine which individuals are the ideal social influence agents for the targeted behaviors of the MyMovez project, the selection process of social influence agents is investigated by focusing on different network centrality measures and by examining traditional (advice, leadership, friendship, etc.) and specific nomination items with regard to communication strategies, energy intake and expenditure.

It is also essential to identify which factors determine a person’s network position and which determinants mediate or predict engagement in energy behaviors. For example, research has shown an important role of ingratiation with regard to social normative and modeling behavior [13, 14]. That is, people try to influence each other to become part of a group and to be liked by conforming to social norms or modeling behavior. However, not all individuals are equally susceptible in doing so. Therefore, psychological determinants related to affiliation purposes and uncertainty reduction are collected such as need to belong, fear of negative evaluation, self-esteem, and athletic competence [13]. Nevertheless, research has focused mainly on characteristics of the followers and less on those of the social influence agents. There are limited indications that socially warm persons exert larger social influence than persons acting cold and that social influence agents have leadership status [8, 22]. To examine the characteristics of the influencers, Phase I also examines factors such as opinion leadership, public individuation, pro-social behavior, and participants are asked to profile themselves by choosing seven personality traits that describe themselves best [8, 21, 23, 24]. In addition, information about the social and physical environment is gathered that co-determine youth’s network positions and health behavior such as socio-economic status, social support, accessibility and availability of foods, and PA facilities [25].

The MyMovez project also uses a combination of renowned approaches and theories that predict behavioral change and provide insights in the performance of health behaviors and dissemination in social networks. For example, the constructs of the widely used Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) are examined. The TPB has the general idea that when people have a positive attitude toward behavior and their social environment is supportive while they also feel they are capable and in control of their behavior, their intention to perform the behavior will be strong [26]. Importantly, people often fail to carry out healthy behaviors despite their positive intentions to eat healthy and engage in physical activity [27]. Therefore, additional constructs contributing to young people actually carrying out targeted behaviors (e.g., motivation [28, 29], self-persuasion [30], injunctive and descriptive norms [31], social modeling and impression management [32, 33]) stemming from the Diffusion of Innovation Theory, Social Normative approach [34], Self-Determination Theory [28] and the Fogg Behavior Model [29]), are examined to deepen the understanding of youth’s energy intake and expenditure. These insights from Phase I will contribute to develop an effective social network campaign for Phase II.

Part B: Development of the Wearable Lab

A practical and modern way to conduct large scale research among youth is via smartphones, because it is an efficient, low-cost and less time-consuming method compared to traditional paper-and-pencil questionnaires. In addition, objective measures of health and real-time data can be collected. Furthermore, the social context can be incorporated by facilitating communications via social network functionalities. Part B of this comprehensive research project develops the Wearable Lab, existing of a highly innovative smartphone-based research application (MyMovez app) connected to an activity tracker. The research technology enables examining youth’s social network structures together with energy balance-related behaviors, media consumption, socialization processes and psychosocial determinants of behavior. The smartphone and activity tracker jointly collect self-reported and objective data on daily randomized and fixed time points. Each participant receives the Wearable Lab during each data wave for a period of 7 consecutive calendar days including the weekend.

The Wearable Lab is developed in an ongoing iterative process by means of focus group sessions as well as evaluations via the MyMovez app during the data collection waves. In 2015, six focus group sessions were conducted at primary (N = 30; 10-11 y/o) and secondary schools (N = 27; 12-13 y/o); with groups of boys or girls only and one mixed group at each school. Discussions were videotaped and led by trained researchers, and involved topics such as likes and dislikes of health, research apps and wearables, the design and attractive functionalities or features of the app, wearables and behavior tracking, and the project name. Outcomes contributed to choosing the name ‘MyMovez’ for the research project and co-creating the design and features of the app such as an avatar, game and social media platform called Social Buzz. At the end of 2016, six focus groups were conducted at two secondary schools ((N = 14; 12-14 y/o and N = 28; 12-14 y/o, respectively); with groups of boys or girls only and one mixed group at each school) to gather information about their social media use and to test the implementation of the social network functionality Social Buzz. All together, these focus group studies provided useful insights on youth’s attitudes concerning the design of the research application and practical information about the use of the Wearable Lab.

During Phase I, novel procedures and approaches to process and analyze data are explored. In addition, collaborations are set up, for example, to process photo data, analyze youth’s physical environment by connecting real-time data with Geographic Information System (GIS) measures, and analyze chat conversations from the Social Buzz. This also requires up-to-date safety and data management procedures according to legal and ethical standards. In sum, the Wearable Lab provides an innovative research methodology to collect data that increases the feasibility to implement and evaluate health campaigns.

Methods/design

Ethics statement

The research project is conducted according to the guidelines described in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures were approved by the ethical committee of the European Research Council (617253) and the Faculty Social Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen in the Netherlands (ECSW2014-100614-222).

Design

The MyMovez project consists of a cross-sequential design, following two cohorts (8-12 and 12-15 y/o) over 3 years. Five waves of data are collected during the months February/March 2016 (w1), April/May 2016 (w2), June/July 2016 (w3), February/March 2017 (w4) and February/March 2018 (w5). Outcome measures involve social network characteristics, social media use, physical activity, beverage and snack consumption.

A power analysis was performed based on results from a previous cross-sectional longitudinal study that investigated energy balance behaviors among Dutch youth [35]. It was assumed that obesity inducing risk behaviors are present among approximately 40% of adolescents, and with a statistical significance level of .05 and 80% power, a sample size of 600 participants would be sufficient for the cross-sectional and longitudinal study. This sample size was also deemed appropriate for social network analyses, which require approximately 20-25 complete classroom networks. Assuming that Dutch school classes exist of an average of 25 kids, this would produce a sample between 500 and 625 students. Taking into account a conservative 40% attrition rate [36] we aimed to include 850 participants and oversampled the high school population because this age group is more likely to change schools or classes or drop out while followed during a period of three years. In the end, this led to recruitment of a sample of 953 participants.

Recruitment of schools and participants

All (sub)urban schools following a regular education program were eligible for participation ranging from primary school level, and lower vocational training to secondary school. All schools located near the Nijmegen area were invited to participate in the MyMovez project. Further, Dutch Public Health Services (GGD) of each province were contacted to promote the MyMovez project at their regions. In addition, schools were invited to participate via personal contacts of students and researchers. This random procedure resulted in the participation of 21 (sub)urban schools throughout the Netherlands for Phase I of the MyMovez project. See Fig. 1 for a flow diagram of the recruitment procedure.
Fig. 1

Flow diagram of the MyMovez recruitment procedure

After obtaining (written) consent of the school’s principals, parents/legal guardians received an information letter and/or e-mail via the school announcing the project’s goals, planning, execution and safety procedures. Parents/legal guardians could enlist their child to the MyMovez study by giving consent on either a paper-and-pencil or digital form on the MyMovez website (www.mymovez.nl). The MyMovez website provides easily accessible information and updates about the project, team and progress (e.g., by a video illustrating how a day looks like for a participant, Q&A page, photos, and infographics). Researchers also visited schools to explain and promote the project in school classes and to hold information meetings for teachers, student mentors, and parent advisory boards.

Despite the schools’ and researchers’ efforts to promote the MyMovez project, parents/legal guardians did not always take notice of the research (e.g., the response rate at some schools was < 5%), resulting in disappointed pupils who wanted to participate on the day the research materials were handed out to their classmates. These pupils were given the opportunity to contact their parents/legal guardians to give their consent via the website or hand in a written consent form after the school break. In addition, pupils had the opportunity to participate during each of the following data collection waves, which has thus far resulted in different sample sizes for each data wave (in combination with drop out cases): n = 792 in Wave 1; n = 852 in Wave 2; n = 824 in Wave 3 and n = 671 in Wave 4. It is expected that the participation rates for Wave 5 (February 2018) will differ as well due to attrition and new participations.

Wearable lab

In this comprehensive project, the innovative research tool Wearable Lab is developed to collect a unique longitudinal dataset according to the highest standards in ethical and legal safety regulations. The smartphone with the MyMovez research app is connected to an activity tracker that both generate different types of data that are transferred wirelessly to a secured data server. Data types are self-reported and peer-reported (i.e., short surveys and sociometric queries, respectively) and experience sampling data, Social Network Beacon data, real-time physical activity data (i.e., steps and cycling) and location information, photos and chat conversation data on individual and class level by the social media platform Social Buzz (added to the MyMovez research app since January 2017). These data are used to examine youth’s media and social network exposure, socialization experiences, psychosocial determinants of behavior, and energy balance-related behaviors.

Social network information is gathered by asking youth to nominate peers with various characteristics (i.e., who is a leader?) as well as by recording chat connections and reports between participants on the social media feature Social Buzz in the MyMovez research app. In addition, social network information is also collected using the Social Beacon Network, in which the smartphones detect and register the research phones of interaction partners during multiple time points a day via Bluetooth. These data collection methods collectively provide insights into micro-processes (with multiple measurement points during a day) as well as macro-processes (multiple assessments across a school year). Furthermore, these methods provide information about youths’ perceived networks (i.e., sociometric items) as well as more objective assessments of networks based on physical proximity (i.e., the Social Beacon Network).

Furthermore, the Wearable Lab allows for the collection of other novel types of data such as photo queries and global positioning system (GPS) data. For example, photo data are coded and used for machine learning purposes (e.g., coding of food or media use pictures) contributing to the examination of youth’s diets, social media behavior and other daily activities [37]. The GPS data provides information about cycling1 (the activity tracker only counts the amount of steps and the intensity) and the physical environment, by linking these to Geographic Information System (GIS) data in which youth are exposed to food and PA related facilities [38]. All together, the Wearable Lab allows for the collection of a comprehensive set of data that provides the opportunity to address all of the project’s research goals.

Participants receive surveys, photo questions or notifications on daily randomized or fixed time points. In addition, the researchers can personalize for each school class the time schedule in which participants are allowed to receive questions and notifications (i.e., before and after school and during school breaks only). Regularly used answering categories are already available in the backend of the app which saves researchers time in programming the surveys. In addition, it is possible to include follow-up or feedback loops based on answers to closed questions or PA measured by the activity tracker, send jokes/memes, riddles, and MyMovez news flashes. To keep the participants engaged, the app also includes two games (Zoko and Snake; which are allowed to play 5 min./hour) and participants can create and adjust their own avatar (e.g., face characteristics, hairstyle and -color, and additional attributes such as animals, music instruments, fruits, or sport gear). Participants also have the opportunity to chat with their classmates or with a researcher to ask research related questions, report misconduct, or ask for help.

Procedure

Most schools were visited in advance to promote the research project among the participants before the project started. On the starting day of the initial data collection, trained researchers handed out the research materials (i.e., smartphone and activity-tracking bracelet) and instructed the participants in class or in small groups of approximately 5-8 school children about the use of the Wearable Lab. Specifically, it was explained how to turn the phone on and off, how to use the social chat and avatar, how to check whether the activity tracker is connected to the smartphone, how to check whether the batteries are full, and what to do when the phone displays an error. Participants were also told that they should wear the activity bracelet for the entire week and that the activity bracelet is water resistant. Participants were also shown a short movie clip about how a research day with the Wearable Lab looked like and they were handed a code of conduct showing how to behave in the Social Buzz social media platform. Next, participants signed an assent form and an additional agreement in which they promised to handle the research equipment with care during the 7-day period they were borrowing the research materials. Participants were informed that they could withdraw from the research at any moment, and that their data can be deleted if they or their parents want to. After the instructions they were provided with the opportunity to ask questions and could return to their classrooms. Each year (during Wave 2, 4, and 5), participants’ weight and height is measured individually in a separate room by a trained researcher. Depending on the school schedule, this is done after the instruction or participants are called a second time from their classroom.

On the starting day of each measurement period, participants receive questions after their school day ended. During the following days, they all receive questionnaires at random time points during the day, but never during school hours or at night between 7:30 PM and 7:00 AM. At the end of the measurement period, reminders are sent to the participants when and where they need to hand in the research materials at their schools. Researchers collect the research materials at the schools.

Measurements

Data collection involves explicit self- and peer-reported survey measures (short digital questionnaires administered via the smartphones), objective measures (photos, real-time data, activity tracking, cycling, Social Beacon Network and Social Buzz data), and researcher-assessed measures (participants’ height and weight). Most survey measurements used in the MyMovez project are existing validated questionnaires, translated into Dutch. Some (parts of) questionnaires are adapted from validated questionnaires and tailored to identify specific behaviors. In cases in which no validated measures are available, new items or scales are developed for the MyMovez project. All measurements used in the MyMovez project described in the following paragraphs. The survey instruments are listed in Table 1 and described into detail in Additional file 1.
Table 1

Overview of survey measures MyMovez project – Phase I

 

Content/captures

Instrument(s)

Reference(s)

Individual measures

 

Self-esteem

Rosenberg Self-esteem scale

[49]

 

Body esteem

Figure Rating Scale

[50, 51]

 

Need to belong

Need to belong Scale

[52]

 

Fear of Negative Evaluation

Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale

[53]

 

Happiness

The Faces Scale

[54]

 

Pro-social behavior

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

[55]

 

Public individuation

Public individuation

[56]

 

Self-profiling of personality characteristics

Descriptive

[57]

Behavioral and motivational constructs of energy intake and expenditure

 

Theory of Planned Behavior (attitude, self-efficacy, descriptive and injunctive norms, and intentions)

Theory of Planned Behavior constructs

[26, 58, 59]

 

Motivation

Adapted measures from the Health Care SDT Packet

Perceived competence scale

[60]

 

Fogg Behavior Model (determinants motivation and ability with antecedents pleasure/pain, hope/fear, and social acceptance/rejection, time, money, physical effort, brain cycles, social deviance, and non-routine)

- Fogg Behavior Model

- Theory of Planned Behavior constructs

- Adapted measures from the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale PACES

- Adapted measures from the Perceived Benefits of Physical Activity Scale

- Adapted measures from the Self-Report-Habit-index Scale (SRHI)

[29] [58, 59] [61] [62] [63]

 

Opinion Leadership

- King and Summers Opinion Leadership scale

- Opinion Leadership scale

[23] [24]

 

Perceived social support

Social support scale

[64]

Energy intake related measures

 

Consumption behavior (hunger, thirst, including specific Dutch snack and drink items)

- Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) based on the Dutch EPIC Frequency Questionnaire

[65] [12]

 

Role models or ‘prototypes’ of consumption behavior

Prototype-Willingness Model

[66]

 

Self-regulatory resources (internal and external attribution)

Nutrition Locus of Control

[67]

 

Dieting behavior

Descriptive

 
 

Physical environment diet (availability and accessibility)

- Questionnaire to assess determinants related to fruit and vegetable intakes in children

- Child-reported family and peer influences questionnaire

[68, 69]

 

Parental role modeling

adapted from the Home Environment Scale

[70]

 

Occurrence unhealthy eating behaviors

Descriptive / filler items

 

Energy expenditure related measures

 

Athletic competence

Perceived Competence Scale for Children

[71, 72]

 

Barriers to Physical Activity (body-related, resources, social, fitness, and inconvenience barriers)

Barriers to PA scale

[73]

 

Daily activities and sports participation (which sports they play and like)

Descriptive / filler items

 
 

Environmental factors

Descriptive

[74]

 

Habitual physical activity

- Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents and Adults

- Questionnaire to Assess Health-enhancing physical activity

- ‘Day in the life’ Questionnaire

[75] [76, 77, 78] [79]

 

Social norms and perceived physical activity

Adapted from TPB constructs

[58, 59]

 

Injury check

Descriptive

 
 

Motives for being physically active

The Self-presentation Motives for Physical Activity Questionnaire

[33]

(Social) Media consumption

 

Television (TV) exposure (duration of exposure, type of TV stations, genre TV programs)

Descriptive

[80] [81]

 

Internet and social media exposure (duration of exposure, type of social media platforms)

Descriptive

[80] [81]

 

Video blog (Vlog) exposure (duration of exposure, names of Vloggers, type of Vlogs)

Descriptive

 
 

Gaming behavior (duration, type and genre of games, which devices used, most liked)

Descriptive

 
 

House rules on media use (screen-based activities)

Activity Support Scale for Multiple Groups

[82]

 

Mealtime media use

Descriptive / filler items

[83]

 

Use of health apps and Wearables (most liked, app effectiveness)

Descriptive / filler items

 

Research and app evaluation

 

Evaluation research and app (liking en enjoyment research and app, games, avatar, jokes and memes, and Social Buzz)

Descriptive / filler items

 

Filler items

 

Naming favorite foods, music, brands, animals, movies, celebrities, sports and sports heroes, daily planning, etc.

Descriptive / filler items

 

Outcome variables (e.g., social network characteristics, physical activity, drink and snack consumption), as well as TPB and motivational measures, are measured at each data wave assessment. Other measures are divided over the different data waves. A detailed scheme can be provided upon request to the corresponding author. Participants’ name, birth date, gender and postal code were provided by the school2 to create an ID number in the back-end of the MyMovez research application.

I. Survey measures

Demographics

Self-reported demographics are assessed in a survey during the start of the project (and for every new participant that enrolled in later waves), consisting of participant’s age, sex, grade level, nationality, caregivers’ nationalities, and whether they have older and younger, male or female siblings.

Body mass index (BMI)

Participants’ weight and height are measured individually by a trained research assistant according to standard procedures (without shoes but fully clothed) in wave 2, 4, and 5. Height is measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a stadiometer and weight to the nearest 0.1 kg using a digital scale. Participant’s Body Mass Index (BMI) is calculated using the standard formula weight [kg]/height2 [m]. The BMI-scores are standardized by using the LMS-method, which accounts for variations in growth curves of children and adolescents of different ages and gender for different countries. BMI (z-score) cutoff points were used representing the current z-BMI standards for Dutch children and adolescents [39]. Self-reported measures about height en weight are assessed when participants entered the project after Wave 2 (when weight and height were measured by the researchers).

Socioeconomic status

The socioeconomic status of the participant’s family is measured with the second version of the Family Affluence Scale (FAS II) [40]. This scale consists of six items concerning the number of computers, laptops or tablets, cars and bathrooms in the household, and a question about the number of holidays the family could afford each year. In addition, it is asked whether the participants have their own bedroom, and whether there is a dishwasher in the household. Answering categories about the bedroom and dishwasher are dichotomous. Other answering categories ranged from ‘None’ (0) to either ‘Two or more’ (2) or ‘Three or more’ (3). The sum score of the scale (ranging between 0 and 13) indicates a higher socioeconomic status. In addition, the participant’s postal codes provide information about their socioeconomic status. The neighborhoods in which participants live are classified on socioeconomic status by Statistics Netherlands.

II. Sociometry and social beacon network

Sociometric questions

To map social network structures and identify social influence agents for the health behaviors, participants are asked to complete a total of 16 peer nomination items during the course of the research week (approximately 3 questions per day). The class name list provided by the schools are uploaded into the backend of the MyMovez app, so participants can scroll down the list and tick off names of peers who are in the same grade regardless of their participation in the MyMovez project.3 Participants could nominate an unlimited number of peers for each item, but could not nominate themselves. Participants are required to nominate at least one peer for each item.

The general network questions are based on previous research [9, 12, 19]: ‘Who are your friends?’, ‘Who do you ask for advice? With this we mean children from you class or school whose opinion you value.’, ‘Who are leaders or take the position of leader in a group?’, ‘Who do you respect? With this we mean children you admire, because they, for example, are good at something.’, ‘With whom do you spend time?’ In addition, questions are added to detect innovators (‘Who often has new gadgets and clothes?’) and ask about modeling behavior (‘Whom do others want to look like?’).

Additionally, participants are asked to nominate peers for each of the specific health behaviors (dietary intake, physical activity, and media use) to detect innovators, role models, impression managers, and messengers. For example, ‘With whom do you talk about what you eat or drink?’ (dietary communication), ‘Of whom do you think it is important that they see you as someone who is physically active?’ (PA impression management), and ‘Who eats or drinks products that you would like to eat or drink?’ (dietary modeling).

In addition to the sociometric questions, participants are also asked from which source they like to receive advice about eating healthy snacks, physical activity and media use, and would follow advice from, with several reference groups as response options (e.g., peers, older adolescents, celebrities, vloggers, parents, experts, teachers).

Social beacon network

Social networks are also assessed with Bluetooth technology to detect proximal peers via smartphones. The Social Beacon Network is an innovative unobtrusive way to measure physical distances between all participants. The research smartphones scan and detect other participants’ phones that are within Bluetooth range (approximately 10 m). When participants are within close proximity for more than half an hour, two questions are triggered to check whether participants are actually spending time together and to avoid measurement error caused by participants passing by accidentally while the phone was scanning the proximity (‘Are you spending time with someone?’ If so, ‘With whom are you spending time?’). In addition, they are asked to indicate what they are doing in an open-ended format. The Social Beacon Network provides one way of validating the sociometric questions and the social networks created from these items.

In conclusion, the Social Beacon Network can provide insights into the relative frequency of interactions between individuals (with multiple measurement points) during the day, which complement the sociometric items, which are only assessed once per data collection wave. This unobtrusive research method requires new data management strategies that are being developed during this project.

III. Activity tracking bracelet

Participant’s activity tracking bracelet Fitbit Flex (i.e., accelerometer) measures physical activity as the number of steps in continuous time (i.e., minute to minute). The bracelet calculates active minutes using metabolic equivalents (METs). METs are widely used as indicators for exercise intensity measuring in a comparable way among persons of different weights. The intensity of the activity is categorized in sedentary activity, light intensity activity, moderate intensity activity, and vigorous intensity activity, in line with the Center for Disease Control’s (CDC) recommendations [41]. The number of steps each day, as well as the number of minutes in each of the PA categories recorded on each Fitbit is automatically transferred to the MyMovez app. The first and the last day of the measurement period are excluded because the participants do not wear the bracelet the entire day (i.e., the research materials were given to and received from participants during school hours).

IV. Real-time data

The Netherlands is famous for its cycling culture and almost every household owns at least one bicycle [42]. Because the wearable accelerometer is worn at the wrist, the device does not detect physical activity while riding a bicycle. Therefore, to have a complete assessment of PA for Dutch youth, cycling data is obtained to complement the activity detected by the accelerometer. On the basis of the velocity patterns measured by the accelerometer in the smartphone, the software estimates the location of smartphone. Based on the GPS locations of the beginning and the end of the cycling trip, the average speed and distance is calculated.

The GPS data also provide information about the physical environment of the participants to investigate the proximity of facilities conducive to snack consumption and physical activity (e.g., snack bars, swimming pools, parks, etc.).

V. Photos

Participants receive two photo questions at random time points during the day in each data wave from day 2 to 5. They are asked to make a picture of what they are doing at that moment [43]. When the photo is taken, a question is triggered so that the participants can categorize the photo into ‘reading or doing homework’, ‘watching TV/tablet/computer’, ‘gaming’, ‘having a snack, drink or meal’ or ‘other.’ Depending on their answer, they are directed to follow-up questions to explain their activity in further detail (e.g., which game they are playing) and describe what is in the picture they photographed. In addition, the photos are coded for detailed content. Before the coding of the photo data by independent coders, a trained researcher of the MyMovez team inspected all the photos to ensure that no identifiable or sensitive information is being shared. A codebook is available on request.

VI. Social buzz chats

Starting in January 2017 (Wave 4), participants are able to chat with each other in the social media platform Social Buzz, which is a safe chat environment within the MyMovez app. Social Buzz involves three chat levels, with separate time lines. Participants are able to talk with their classmates 1-on-1 (individual time line in the MyBuzz), with their classmates in a group chat (class-level time line in the ClassBuzz), and with the MyMovez research team (the MyMovez time line). Besides chat conversations, participants have the opportunity to like, share and respond to messages or images sent by their peers or by the MyMovez team. Images can be sent from picture folders that are composed by the MyMovez team. By January 2018, participants will also be able to like, share and comment on short video clips. For privacy reasons, it is not possible for participants to send pictures, images, or videos they make or create themselves. The MyMovez research team has the opportunity to send messages to the participants as well (individual level or class level).

Within the Social Buzz environment, we integrated the option for participants to flag inappropriate behavior. When participants use the flag button, for example, when they see a message that they do not think is appropriate, researchers from the MyMovez team receive a notification so that they can solve the situation immediately. MyMovez team members have the possibility to remove specific messages that are flagged, block specific users, or shut down the entire Social Buzz option for a class. The Social Buzz is also very useful for MyMovez researchers when they want to communicate with the participants, for example to remind them to hand in their Wearable Lab.

The purpose of the Social Buzz is two-fold: On the one hand, it reinforces participant’s engagement in the project, on the other hand it provides the opportunity to investigate social media use and social network relations (i.e., who are connected to each other). In Phase II, the Social Buzz will be used to implement and test intervention messages which will provide interesting insights in how intervention messages disseminate through social networks and which strategies are used to stimulate or discourage health behaviors in social networks. The Social Buzz data can be exported (from January 2018) into four separate data log files in which 1) group and individual messages are listed, 2) all given likes are listed which can be traced back to the source, 3) media exposure are listed (e.g., which video and duration of watching), and 4) a summary file is listed composed of several variables from the other 3 files. These log files are available on request.

Strategy of analysis

A variety of statistical techniques are used to address the project aims. In order to identify the most powerful influence agents traditional centrality measures (e.g., indegree centrality) are utilized, as well as more advanced techniques capable of identifying influence agents, such as “greedy” search algorithms available in the KeyPlayer package in R (R Core Team, 2015) [44]. To examine similarity and social influence of health behaviors in youth’s social networks, dyadic modeling techniques, such as actor-partner interdependence models [45] and stochastic actor-oriented models of network and behavioral co-evolution are used [46]. These modeling techniques are specifically designed to account for the known interdependencies in relational data. The stochastic actor-oriented models are particularly useful because of their capability to initially assess similarity in health behavior among friends, and also to disentangle processes associated with peer selection (i.e., creating or dissolving relationships on the basis of health behaviors) from peer influence (i.e., youth adapting the health behaviors of their peers).

In order to investigate which factors determine youths’ network positions as well as their energy intake and expenditure, multiple linear regression analyses, multilevel regression analyses, structural equation models (SEM) and mixed effect models are used to fit the observed data to theoretical constructs, and test the predicted relationships. Due to the innovative features of this project, some of the generated data require exploratory data analysis and sometimes without golden standards to refer to (e.g., Social Network Beacon data). Analyses are conducted with various statistical programs, including SPSS (version 24; IBM Corp., 2016), Mplus (7) [47], and R (R Core Team, 2015).

Discussion

The MyMovez project-Phase I is a comprehensive multidisciplinary research project that extends existing knowledge by investigating the interplay between social network influences in relation to individual and environmental factors for youth’s energy-balance behaviors in a contemporary social media landscape. Moreover, the cross-sequential design allows for the assessment of changes within participants over time as well as differences between the two age cohorts. This pioneering project explores new standards for social network research, processing data and eventually the implementation of media health campaigns (Phase II of the project). The systematic way in which youth’s social networks are investigated by focusing on different social network aspects (i.e., types of questions and centrality measures for each of the health behaviors) in conjunction with individual and environmental (physical, social, and media) factors make this research project unique. The MyMovez project contributes to theory development by bringing together several approaches and theories of media and marketing effects, behavioral change, socialization, and network dynamics [8, 26, 32, 34]. In addition, this project develops the Wearable Lab by which the findings do not rely solely on self-reported measures but also on objective and real-time measures. The Wearable Lab supports keeping youth motivated and engaged to participate in the MyMovez project by adding a modern and fun factor.

There are some limitations to be discussed concerning Phase I of this project. For example, participation in the MyMovez project requires obtaining active consent from school principals, parents/legal guardians, and participants. Although the enrollment procedure is made as easy as possible (e.g., through online registration via a link or QR code as well as paper-and-pencil forms), we experience that parents/legal guardians are occupied with their daily routines and often forget to enroll their child. In addition, some parents/legal guardians may find the project too engaging or even intrusive. As a result, participation rates differ within classes. Participation rates lower than 60% per class affect social network analysis, leading to less power and validity of the results [48]. In addition, it is quite common that in longitudinal research, participation rates vary across data waves due to attrition and in our case because participants can enter each wave or do not finish the 7-day research period. Missing data can cause restrictions on the validity of the research findings; however, having obtained some participant data enables imputing missing data to solve this limitation. Another challenge in this exploratory project is the innovativeness of the methods used. For example, the Social Beacon Network, activity tracking among young people, using real-time data and social chats and photos require unconventional data analysis strategies and management protocols. The MyMovez project team takes great care of keeping up to date with current developments and is open for collaborations with other researchers.

In sum, the MyMovez project contains a rich data set that allows to investigate how various social influences co-determine youth’s energy intake and expenditure in combination with individual, psychosocial and environmental factors. The technological features of the Wearable Lab advances research due to the development of novel analytical and research strategies and the added fun-factor that contributes to the motivation of the participants. The project is theoretically and methodologically pioneering and will produce a unique and feasible method for improving large-scale media health campaigns. The MyMovez project-Phase I will give new theoretical and practical directions to scientific settings and intervention studies using social network interventions.

Footnotes

  1. 1.

    Cycling data is an important aspect of youth’s PA in the Netherlands

  2. 2.

    Some schools only provided just participants’ names. Additional info was then gathered via self-report survey measures.

  3. 3.

    The MyMovez app also provides the possibility to tick off names of other class lists within the same school year; however, this data is not suitable for further analysis because the participation rate is too low for creating a social network on school level.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Rebecca de Leeuw and Esther Rozendaal as advisors of the MyMovez project for their input and support.

Funding

The research leading to the results of the MyMovez project has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) / ERC grant agreement n° [617253].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during the current project are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

MB compiled the original grant application to the European Commission and KEB has written the manuscript with input and critical feedback from CRS, TJW, LB, WJB and MB. KEB, CRS, TJW and LB collect data. KEB, CRS, TJW, LB and WJB analyze data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research project is conducted according to the guidelines described in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures were approved by the ethical committee of the European Research Council (617253) and the Faculty Social Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen in the Netherlands (ECSW2014-100614-222). Active parental consent is obtained for child participation next to written consent of the school’s principals and school children.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12889_2018_5353_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (279 kb)
Additional file 1: Detailed description of survey measures MyMovez project – Phase I. Detailed description of all measures administered in the MyMovez project – Phase I by the Wearable Lab: individual measures, personality traits, behavioral and motivational constructs of energy intake and expenditure, energy intake and expenditure related measures, (social) media consumption, research and app evaluations and filler items. (PDF 279 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Snyder LB, Hamilton MA, Mitchell EW, Kiwanuka-Tondo J, Fleming-Milici F, Proctor D. A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behavior change in the United States. J Health Commun. 2004;9(S1):71–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herman CP, Polivy J. Normative influences on food intake. Physiol Behav. 2005;86(5):762–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Valente TW, Fujimoto K, Chou C-P, Spruijt-Metz D. Adolescent affiliations and adiposity: a social network analysis of friendships and obesity. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45(2):202–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Volksgezondheid NK: Wat zijn de mogelijke oorzaken van overgewicht? 2014.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steinberg L, Monahan KC. Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Dev Psychol. 2007;43(6):1531–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Noar SM, Harrington NG: eHealth applications: promising strategies for behavior change: Routledge; 2012.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Valente TW, Pumpuang P. Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Health Educ Behav. 2007;34(6):881–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campbell R, Starkey F, Holliday J, Audrey S, Bloor M, Parry-Langdon N, Hughes R, Moore L. An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 371(9624):1595–602.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Valente TW, Hoffman BR, Ritt-Olson A, Lichtman K, Johnson CA. Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(11):1837–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kelly JA, St Lawrence JS, Diaz YE, Stevenson LY, Hauth AC, Brasfield TL, Kalichman SC, Smith JE, Andrew ME. HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis. Am J Public Health. 1991;81(2):168–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smit CR, de Leeuw RNH, Bevelander KE, Burk WJ, Buijzen M. A social network-based intervention stimulating peer influence on children's self-reported water consumption: a randomized control trial. Appetite. 2016;103:294–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cruwys T, Bevelander KE, Hermans RC. Social modeling of eating: a review of when and why social influence affects food intake and choice. Appetite. 2015;86:3–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Salvy S-J, De La Haye K, Bowker JC, Hermans RC. Influence of peers and friends on children's and adolescents' eating and activity behaviors. Physiol Behav. 2012;106(3):369–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maturo CC, Cunningham SA. Influence of friends on children’s physical activity: a review. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(7):e23–38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Higgs S, Thomas J. Social influences on eating. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016;9:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haye K, Robins G, Mohr P, Wilson C. Adolescents’ intake of junk food: processes and mechanisms driving consumption similarities among friends. J Res Adolesc. 2013;23(3):524–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Macdonald-Wallis K, Jago R, Sterne JA. Social network analysis of childhood and youth physical activity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(6):636–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Starkey F, Audrey S, Holliday J, Moore L, Campbell R. Identifying influential young people to undertake effective peer-led health promotion: the example of a stop smoking in schools trial (ASSIST). Health Educ Res. 2009;24(6):977–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borgatti SP. Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Comput Math Org Theory. 2006;12(1):21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kratzer J, Lettl C. Distinctive roles of lead users and opinion leaders in the social networks of schoolchildren. J Consum Res. 2009;36(4):646–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hermans RC, Engels RC, Larsen JK, Herman CP. Modeling of palatable food intake. The influence of quality of social interaction. Appetite. 2009;52(3):801–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Flynn LR, Goldsmith RE, Eastman JK. The king and summers opinion leadership scale: revision and refinement. J Bus Res. 1994;31(1):55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Flynn LR, Goldsmith RE, Eastman JK. Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: two new measurement scales. J Acad Mark Sci. 1996;24(2):137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wouters EJ, Larsen JK, Kremers SP, Dagnelie PC, Geenen R. Peer influence on snacking behavior in adolescence. Appetite. 2010;55(1):11–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Godin G, Kok G. The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 1996;11(2):87–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rhodes RE, Plotnikoff RC, Courneya KS. Predicting the physical activity intention–behavior profiles of adopters and maintainers using three social cognition models. Ann Behav Med. 2008;36(3):244–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Deci E, Ryan R. Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behaviour. New York. DeciIntrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior1985: Plenum Press; 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fogg BJ. A behavior model for persuasive design. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on persuasive technology: ACM; 2009; 2009. p. 40.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aronson E. The power of self-persuasion. Am Psychol. 1999;54(11):875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Robinson E. Perceived social norms and eating behaviour: an evaluation of studies and future directions. Physiol Behav. 2015;152:397–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Roth DA, Herman CP, Polivy J, Pliner P. Self-presentational conflict in social eating situations: a normative perspective. Appetite. 2001;36(2):165–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Howle TC, Dimmock JA, Whipp PR, Jackson B. The self-presentation motives for physical activity questionnaire: instrument development and preliminary construct validity evidence. J Sport Exer Psychol. 2015;37(3):225–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Herman CP, Roth DA, Polivy J. Effects of the presence of others on food intake: a normative interpretation. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(6):873.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    van der Horst K, Oenema A, van de Looij-Jansen P, Brug J. The ENDORSE study: research into environmental determinants of obesity related behaviors in Rotterdam schoolchildren. BMC Public Health. 2008;8(1):142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Goodman JS, Blum TC. Assessing the non-random sampling effects of subject attrition in longitudinal research. J Manag. 1996;22(4):627–52.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mezgec S, Koroušić Seljak B. NutriNet: a deep learning food and drink image recognition system for dietary assessment. Nutrients. 2017;9(7):657.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Larson N, Wall M, Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D. Home/family, peer, school, and neighborhood correlates of obesity in adolescents. Obesity. 2013;21(9):1858–69.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schönbeck Y, Talma H, van Dommelen P, Bakker B, Buitendijk SE, HiraSing RA, van Buuren S. Increase in prevalence of overweight in Dutch children and adolescents: a comparison of nationwide growth studies in 1980, 1997 and 2009. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27608.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Boyce W, Torsheim T, Currie C, Zambon A. The family affluence scale as a measure of national wealth: validation of an adolescent self-report measure. Soc Indic Res. 2006;78(3):473–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Centers for disease Control and Prevention. Physical activity. 2015 ; [www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/basics].
  42. 42.
    Stoffers M. Cycling as heritage: representing the history of cycling in the Netherlands. J Transp Hist. 2012;33(1):92–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dunton GF, Liao Y, Intille SS, Spruijt-Metz D. Investigating Children's physical activity and sedentary behavior using ecological momentary assessment with mobile phones. Obesity. 2011;19(6):1205–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    An W, Liu Y-H: Keyplayer: locating key players in social networks. In., 1.0.3 edn; 2016: R package.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Burk WJ, Steglich CEG, Snijders TAB. Beyond dyadic interdependence: actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors. Int J Behav Dev. 2007;31(4):397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide. CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998-2011.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Marks PEL, Babcock B, Cillessen AHN, Crick NR. The effects of participation rate on the internal reliability of peer nomination measures. Soc Dev. 2013;22(3):609–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rosenberg M. Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Accept Commit Therapy Meas Package. 1965;61:52.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tiggemann M, Wilson-Barrett E. Children's figure ratings: relationship to self-esteem and negative stereotyping. Int J Eat Disord. 1998;23(1):83–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cafri G, & Thompson JK. (2004). Measuring Male Body Image: A Review of the Current Methodology. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 2004;5(1):18–29.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.5.1.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Leary MR, Kelly KM, Cottrell CA, Schreindorfer LS. Construct validity of the need to belong scale: mapping the nomological network. J Pers Assess. 2013;95(6):610–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Leary MR. A brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1983;9:371–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Holder MD, Coleman B. The contribution of temperament, popularity, and physical appearance to children’s happiness. J Happiness Stud. 2008;9(2):279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Int Rev Psychiat. 2003;15(1-2):173–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Maslach C, Stapp J, Santee RT. Individuation: conceptual analysis and assessment. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985;49(3):729–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Fetterman AK, Robinson MD. Do you use your head or follow your heart? Self-location predicts personality, emotion, decision making, and performance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013;105(2):316–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zebregs S, van den Putte B, de Graaf A, Lammers J, Neijens P. The effects of narrative versus non-narrative information in school health education about alcohol drinking for low educated adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1085.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pedersen S, Grønhøj A, Thøgersen J. Following family or friends. Social norms in adolescent healthy eating. Appetite. 2015;86(Supplement C):54–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
  61. 61.
    Moore JB, Yin Z, Hanes J, Duda J, Gutin B, Barbeau P. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in children: validation of the physical activity enjoyment scale. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2009;21(sup1):S116–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Barr-Anderson DJ, Neumark-Sztainer D, Schmitz KH, Ward DS, Conway TL, Pratt C, Baggett CD, Lytle L, Pate RR. But I like PE: factors associated with enjoyment of physical education class in middle school girls. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008;79(1):18–27.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Verplanken B, Orbell S. Reflections on past behavior: a self-report index of habit strength. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2003;33(6):1313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kiernan M, Moore SD, Schoffman DE, Lee K, King AC, Taylor CB, Kiernan NE, Perri MG. Social support for healthy behaviors: scale psychometrics and prediction of weight loss among women in a behavioral program. Obesity. 2012;20(4):756–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ocke MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Goddijn HE, Jansen A, Pols MA, van Staveren WA, Kromhout D. The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. I. Description of the questionnaire, and relative validity and reproducibility for food groups. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26(suppl 1):S37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Spijkerman R, Van den Eijnden RJ, Overbeek G, Engels RC. The impact of peer and parental norms and behavior on adolescent drinking: the role of drinker prototypes. Psychol Health. 2007;22(1):7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Springer NS, Bogue E-L, Arnold M, Yankou D, Oakley D. Nutrition locus of control and dietary behaviors of pregnant women. Appl Nurs Res. 1994;7(1):28–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Cullen KW, Baranowski T, Rittenberry L, Cosart C, Hebert D, de Moor C. Child-reported family and peer influences on fruit, juice and vegetable consumption: reliability and validity of measures. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(2):187–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    De Bourdeaudhuij I, Klepp KI, Due P, Rodrigo CP, de Almeida MDV, Wind M, Krølner R, Sandvik C, Brug J. Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure personal, social and environmental correlates of fruit and vegetable intake in 10–11-year-old children in five European countries. Public Health Nutr. 2007;8(2):189–200.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Gattshall ML, Shoup JA, Marshall JA, Crane LA, Estabrooks PA. Validation of a survey instrument to assess home environments for physical activity and healthy eating in overweight children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5(1):3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Harter S. The perceived competence scale for children. Child Dev. 1982;53(1):87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Nagai Y, Nomura K, Nagata M, Ohgi S, Iwasa M. Children’s perceived competence scale: reference values in Japan. J Child Health Care. 2015;19(4):532–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zabinski MF, Saelens BE, Stein RI, Hayden-Wade HA, Wilfley DE. Overweight Children's barriers to and support for physical activity. Obesity. 2003;11(2):238–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA. Parks and recreation settings and active living: a review of associations with physical activity function and intensity. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(4):619–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Chinapaw MJ, Slootmaker SM, Schuit AJ, van Zuidam M, van Mechelen W. Reliability and validity of the activity questionnaire for adults and adolescents (AQuAA). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(1):58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Wendel-Vos GCW, Schuit AJ, Saris WHM, Kromhout D. Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(12):1163–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    de Hollander EL, Zwart L, de Vries SI, Wendel-Vos W. The SQUASH was a more valid tool than the OBiN for categorizing adults according to the Dutch physical activity and the combined guideline. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(1):73–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Edmunds LD, Ziebland S. Development and validation of the day in the life questionnaire (DILQ) as a measure of fruit and vegetable questionnaire for 7–9 year olds. Health Educ Res. 2002;17(2):211–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Llauradó E, Aceves-Martins M, Tarro L, Papell-Garcia I, Puiggròs F, Arola L, Prades-Tena J, Montagut M, Moragas-Fernández CM, Solà R, et al. A youth-led social marketing intervention to encourage healthy lifestyles, the EYTO (European youth tackling obesity) project: a cluster randomised controlled0 trial in Catalonia, Spain. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):607.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lipsky LM, Iannotti RJ. Associations of television viewing with eating behaviors in the 2009 health behaviour in school-aged children study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(5):465–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    van der Voort THA, Vooijs MW. Validity of children's direct estimates of time spent television viewing. J Broadcast Electron Media. 1990;34(1):93–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Lampard AM, Nishi A, Baskin ML, Carson TL, Davison KK. The activity support scale for multiple groups (ACTS-MG): child-reported physical activity parenting in African American and non-Hispanic white families. Behav Med. 2016;42(2):112–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Fulkerson JA, Loth K, Bruening M, Berge J, Eisenberg ME, Neumark-Sztainer D. Time 2 tlk 2nite: use of electronic media by adolescents during family meals and associations with demographic characteristics, family characteristics, and foods served. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(7):1053–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirsten E. Bevelander
    • 1
  • Crystal R. Smit
    • 1
  • Thabo J. van Woudenberg
    • 1
  • Laura Buijs
    • 1
  • William J. Burk
    • 1
  • Moniek Buijzen
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavioural Science InstituteRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations