Advertisement

BMC Cancer

, 18:795 | Cite as

Body mass index and cancer risk among Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

  • Hui-lin Xu
  • Min-lu Zhang
  • Yu-jie Yan
  • Fang Fang
  • Qi Guo
  • Dong-li Xu
  • Zuo-feng Zhang
  • Fen Zhang
  • Nai-qing Zhao
  • Wang-hong Xu
  • Guo-you Qin
Open Access
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Epidemiology, prevention and public health

Abstract

Background

Obesity and diabetes are two risk factors for cancer. To evaluate the association of body mass index (BMI) with cancer risk in diabetic patients may improve current understanding of potential mechanisms.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 51,004 newly diagnosed T2DM patients derived from an electronic health record (EHR) database of Minhang district in Shanghai, China. Incident cancer cases and all-cause deaths occurred before September 30, 2015 were identified by linking with the Shanghai Cancer Registry and the Shanghai Vital Statistics. To examine the potential non-linear and linear relationships of BMI and cancer risk, Cox proportional hazard models with and without restricted cubic spline functions were used, respectively.

Results

A non-linear association was observed between BMI and overall cancer incidence in men younger than 60 years old (p for non-linearity = 0.009). Compared with those having BMI of 25.0 kg/m2, the cancer risk increased in those with either lower or higher BMI. In women older than 60 years old, linear dose-response relationships were observed between BMI and the risk of both overall cancer and breast cancer. As each unit increase in BMI, the overall cancer risks elevated by 3% (95%CI: 1–5%) and the breast cancer risks increased by 7% (95%CI: 1–13%). No significant association was observed between BMI and other common cancer sites.

Conclusions

Our results show that the effect of BMI on cancer risk in Chinese patients with T2DM may vary by gender, age and cancer subtypes, suggesting different underlying biological mechanisms.

Keywords

Body mass index Retrospective cohort study Type 2 diabetes mellitus Cancer incidence 

Abbreviations

95% CIs

95% confidence intervals

BMI

Body mass index

EHR

Electronic health record

HRs

Hazard ratios

ICD

International classification of diseases

PY

Person-year

RCS

Restricted cubic splines

T2DM

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background

The associations of obesity [1, 2, 3, 4] and diabetes [5, 6] with cancer risks have recently been drawing much attention, mainly due to alarmingly increasing prevalence of the two chronic conditions [7, 8]. A recent research estimated that 5.6% of all incident cancers in 2012, corresponding to 792,600 new cases, were attributable to the combined effects of diabetes and high body mass index (BMI) [9]. As two independent risk factors for overall and certain types of cancer in general population, diabetes and obesity have common biological mechanisms, such as insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia [10, 11, 12, 13]. However, the nature of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) may differ by BMI, a surrogate marker of leanness/obesity. It is reported that patients underweight or with normal weight may suffer from less beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance than those obese [14], while diabetic patients with higher BMI were more likely to experience insulin resistance due to adiposity [15]. T2DM and obesity were also observed to jointly promote the development of certain subtypes of cancer, but the results varied by cancer sites and across populations [16, 17, 18].

To evaluate the association of BMI with cancer risk among T2DM patients is another approach to better understanding the mechanisms that link obesity and diabetes with cancers. However, limited evidence is available on the association between BMI and cancer risks in patients with T2DM [19, 20]. In this study, we conducted a large-scale retrospective cohort study based on the diabetes management database in Minhang district of Shanghai, China, to examine the association between BMI and risks of overall and site-specific cancers in Chinese diabetic patients.

Methods

Study population

This retrospective cohort study was a population-based study based on a standardized management system of diabetes in Shanghai, China. According to the Chinese National Diabetes Prevention Guide, the standardized management of diabetic patients has been carried out as a basic community health service since 2004 in Minhang district, an administrative area with 1,000,000 residents of Shanghai, China [6, 21]. A total of 52,764 patients were diagnosed with T2DM during the period from 2004 to 2014 based on the 1999 criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) [22]. All patients were enrolled in this study and followed up until date of cancer diagnosis, death, or September 30, 2015.

Data collection

Baseline information on demographic factors, diagnosis date of diabetes, self-reported standing height and body weight, and regular exercise was derived from the electronic health record (eHR) database. BMI was calculated as body weight in kilogram divided by squared body height in meters. A total of 1440 patients with any type of cancer at the time of diagnosis of T2DM were excluded, leaving 51,324 (24,124 men, 27,200 women) patients in the study. Patients with incomplete data of BMI (n = 229) and those diagnosed with cancer within three months of T2DM diagnosis (n = 91) were further excluded. Finally, 51,004 patients (23,981 men and 27,023 women) were included in the analysis.

Outcome of interest in this study was the incidence of any primary cancers. The incident cancers and all-cause deaths in the patients until September 30, 2015 were identified by linking with the Shanghai Cancer Registry and the Shanghai Vital Statistics using a unique identification card number [23, 24]. Cancer cases were ascertained according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes by the type of cancers such as Stomach (C16), Colorectum (C18-C20), Pancreas (C25), Trachea, bronchus and lung (C33-C34), Breast (C50), Prostate (C61), Bladder (C67) and Thyroid (C73).

Statistical analysis

Person-year (PY) of follow-up was calculated from the date of T2DM diagnosis to the date of diagnosis of primary cancer, date of death, or the end of follow-up (September 30, 2015), whichever occurred first. Incidence rates were calculated as the number of cancer cases divided by the person-years of observation. Comparisons of demographic characteristics and clinical and lifestyle factors across baseline BMI categorized according to WHO classification [25] were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis tests (for continuous variables) or χ2 tests (for categorical variables). Log-rank test was used to examine the difference of cancer incidence across groups with different BMI levels.

Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the associations between BMI and the risks of both overall and cancer subtypes, adjusting for age at diagnosis of diabetes, comorbidity of hypertension (Yes/No), and family history of diabetes (Yes/No). Patients with unspecified family history of diabetes were treated as a separate group in multivariate analysis. Log-log survival plot was applied to evaluate the proportional hazard assumption for BMI. The potential curvilinear relationship of BMI with cancer risk was examined by utilizing restricted cubic splines (RCS) using the 5th, 50th and 95th percentiles as fixed knots [26, 27]. Two statistical tests were conducted: one was to test the null hypothesis that the regression coefficients of both linear and non-linear terms of the factor were equal to zero, with the result presented as “p for overall association”; another statistical test was for the regression coefficient of nonlinear term (i.e. spline variable), with “p for non-linearity” < 0.05 indicating a non-linear association. The nature of the relationships was shown visually by figures. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated by Cox regression model with RCS functions using BMI values of 25 kg/m2 as reference for any other values of BMI. All analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RCS was completed by SAS macro %RCS [28]. All tests were two-sided and p < 0.05 was considered as significant.

In sensitivity analysis, a novel E-value approach proposed by VanderWeele and Ding was applied to estimate to what extend unmeasured confounders could explain away the observed association [29]. Moreover, the association between BMI and overall cancer risk was compared with or without the variable of smoking status in male with age younger than 60 years old.

Results

Baseline characteristics of T2DM patients

Among newly-diagnosed T2DM patients (n = 51,004) with average age of 61.3 years old, 23,981 (47.0%) were men and 27,023 (53.0%) were women. After a total of 324,116 person-year of follow-up (150,646 in men and 173,190 in women), 2764 cancer cases were identified through a record-linkage with the Shanghai Cancer Registry System.

Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics and clinical and lifestyle factors of T2DM patients by baseline BMI. Significant differences were found for age at diagnosis of T2DM, gender, family history of diabetes, pre-existing hypertension, and regular exercise across BMI categories.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics, clinical predictors and lifestyle factors in T2DM patients by baseline BMI

Characteristics

BMI (WHO category, kg/m2)

P values

< 18.5 (N = 1106)

18.5–24.9 (N = 29,764)

25.0–29.9 (N = 17,578)

> 30.0 (N = 2556)

Diagnosis age of T2DM (x ± SD, yrs)

65.0 ± 12.6

61. 6 ± 11.1

60.6 ± 10.7

60.0 ± 11.2

< 0.001

  < 60 years

395(35.71)

13,890(46.67)

8639(49.15)

1293(50.59)

< 0.001

  ≥ 60 years

711(64.29)

15,874(53.33)

8939(50.85)

1263(49.41)

 Follow-up time (years)

6.42 ± 3.17

6.42 ± 3.10

6.26 ± 3.07

6.05 ± 3.06

< 0.001

Gender (%)

 Male

646(40.3)

14,078(47.3)

8473(48.2)

984(38.5)

< 0.001

 Female

660(59.7)

15,686(52.7)

9105(51.8)

1572(61.5)

Family history of DM (%)

 Yes

237(21.4)

6727(22.6)

4254(24.2)

624(24.4)

0.014

 No

695(62.8)

18,781(63.1)

11,127(63.3)

1608(62.9)

 Unspecified

175(15.7)

4256(14.2)

2197(12.5)

325(12.7)

Pre-existing hypertension (%)

 Yes

647(58.5)

19,859(66.7)

13,544(77.0)

2147(84.0)

< 0.001

 No

459(41.5)

9905(33.3)

4034(23.0)

409(16.0)

Regular exercise (%)

 Yes

260(50.6)

17,918(60.2)

11,004(62.6)

1600(62.6)

0.16

 No

296(26.8)

8513(28.6)

5062(28.8)

751(29.4)

 Unspecified

250(22.6)

3334(11.3)

1512(8.6)

204(8)

Overall and site-specific cancer incidence across BMI categories

As shown in Table 2, the incidence of overall cancer was 853.5/100,000 in all T2DM patients, 919.6/100,000 in men, and 794.6/100,000 in women. The incidence was higher in underweight (1140.3/100,000) or obese patients (879.6/100,000) than in normal (847.2/100,000) or overweight patients (842.4/100,000). This pattern was more evident in men, among whom the incidence in both underweight (1661.8/100,000) and overweight (871.0/100,000) patients were higher comparing to both normal weight (955.8/100,000) and obese (821.2/100,000) patients (p < 0.001). The median follow-up time from T2DM diagnosis to cancer diagnosis was 4.28 and 4.27 years in men and women, respectively.
Table 2

Cancer incidence by baseline BMI in T2DM patients

Characteristics

BMI (WHO category, kg/m2)

P values

< 18.5 (N = 1106)

18.5–24.9 (N = 29,764)

25.0–29.9 (N = 17,578)

> 30.0 (N = 2556)

Overall

All subjects

No. of Subjects

1106

29,764

17,578

2556

51,004

 

 Person-years

7203.5

191,223.9

110,046.6

15,641.9

324,115.9

 No. of cancer Cases

81

1620

927

136

2764

 Incidence (per 100,000 person-years)

1140.3

847.2

842.4

879.6

853.5

0.069

Male

 No. of Subjects

446

14,082

8468

985

23,981

 

 Person-years

2948.6

89,664.6

52,242.8

5970.3

150,826.4

 No. of cancer Cases

49

857

429

52

1387

 Incidence (per 100,000 person-years)

1661.8

955.8

821.2

871

919.6

< 0.001

Female

 No. of Subjects

660

15,682

9110

1571

27,023

 

 Person-years

4255

101,559.3

57,803.7

9671.6

173,289.5

 No. of cancer Cases

32

763

498

84

1377

 Incidence (per 100,000 person-years)

752.1

751.3

861.5

868.5

794.6

0.073

Table 3 presents the incidence of several common cancer types in diabetic patients by BMI categories. Colorectal cancer ranked first in the number of cancer cases and incidence, followed by trachea, bronchus and lung cancer, stomach cancer, female breast cancer, and prostate cancer.
Table 3

Incidence of common site-specific cancers in Chinese diabetes patients by baseline BMI

Subtypes of cancer

ICD (10th)

No. of cases

Incidence (1/100,000)

By BMI

< 18.5

18.5–24.9

25.0–29.9

> = 30

P values

No. of cases

Incidence (1/100,000)

No. of cases

Incidence (1/100,000)

No. of cases

Incidence (1/100,000)

No. of cases

Incidence (1/100,000)

Stomach

C16

279

86.08

11

152.7

153

80.01

101

91.78

14

89.5

0.157

Colorectal

C18-C20

451

139.15

10

138.8

266

139.1

148

134.49

27

172.61

0.645

Pancreas

C25

137

42.27

3

41.63

87

45.5

41

37.26

6

38.36

0.758

Trachea, bronchus & lung

C33–34

408

125.88

15

208.12

267

139.63

110

99.96

16

102.29

0.005

Breast a

C50

258

79.6

5

69.36

139

72.69

92

83.6

22

140.65

0.129

Prostate b

C61

129

39.8

3

41.61

74

38.7

49

44.53

3

19.18

0.711

Bladder b

C67

57

17.59

3

69.33

28

16.73

22

26.35

4

25.57

0.114

Thyroid a

C73

115

35.48

3

41.59

62

37.13

48

51.8

2

31.97

0.113

Others

 

930

286.93

28

394.17

544

284.48

316

287.15

42

271.64

0.404

a among women only; b among men only

Non-linear associations of BMI with overall and site-specific cancer incidence among T2DM patients

Figure 1 demonstrates the associations between BMI and overall cancer risk in diabetes patients by sex and age group (< 60 years and ≥60 years). BMI was significantly related to the incidence of overall cancer in men with age younger than 60 years old (p for overall association = 0.009). This association was in a non-linear pattern, with an increased risk of overall cancer observed among patients with either lower or higher BMI (p for non-linearity = 0.003). Compared with patients with BMI of 25.0 kg/m2, those with BMI at the 1st percentile (near 18.0 kg/m2) had a 74% increased risk (95% CI: 1.17–2.57) and those at the 99st percentile (near 32.0 kg/m2) had a 60% increased risk (95% CI: 1.07–2.40). However, there was no similar association in men older than 60 years old (p for overall association = 0.749). In women, BMI was only significantly related to the risk of overall cancer (p for overall association =0.009) for those with age older than 60 years old in a linear pattern (p for non-linearity = 0.249) as shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 1

HRs (95%CIs) between BMI (kg/m2) and the risk overall cancer in male T2DM patients by age subgroups, allowing for non-linear effects. The reference BMI for these plots (with HR fixed as 1.0) was 25 kg/m2

Fig. 2

HRs (95%CIs) between BMI (kg/m2) and the risk overall cancer in female T2DM patients by by age subgroups, allowing for non-linear effects. The reference BMI for these plots (with HR fixed as 1.0) was 25 kg/m2

As shown in Fig. 3, no significant association was observed between BMI and the risk of any subtype of common cancers like stomach, colorectal, pancreas, lung, bladder, and prostate cancer in men. Also, no significant association was observed between BMI and cancers of stomach, colorectal, lung, pancreas and thyroid in women. However, a significant and linear association was observed between BMI and the risk of breast cancer (p for overall association = 0.033, p for non-linearity = 0.568). For women older than 60 years old, each unit increase in BMI was linked with a 3% (95%CI: 1–5%) increased risk of overall cancer and a 7% (95%CI: 1–13%) increased risk for breast cancer (Table 4). A similar association pattern was observed for overall and breast cancer when BMI was treated as a categorical variable. Compared with normal weight group (BMI =18.5–24.9 kg/m2), significant higher risks of overall and breast cancer were observed in the obese group (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2).
Fig. 3

HRs (95%CIs) of BMI (kg/m2) with the risk of common site-specific cancers in male (left) and female (right) T2DM patients, allowing for non-linear effects. The reference BMI for these plots (with HR fixed as 1.0) was 25 kg/m2

Table 4

The association of BMI with the risk of selected subtypes of cancer in T2DM patients

Gender

subtypes of cancer

Categories of BMI

< 60 years old

> 60 years old

No. of cancer cases

HR

95%CI

No. of cancer cases

HR

95%CI

Male

All sites of cancer

< 18.5

11

1.42

0.78–2.61

38

1.21

0.87–1.68

18.5–24.9

241

1(ref)

 

616

1(ref)

 

25.0–29.9

128

0.89

0.72–1.11

301

0.98

0.86–1.13

≥30.0

23

1.4

0.91–2.15

29

0.98

0.68–1.43

Female

All sites of cancer

BMI as a continuous variable

 

non-linearity

 

833

1.03

1.01–1.05

< 18.5

9

0.95

0.49–1.85

23

0.9

0.59–1.36

18.5–24.9

295

1(ref)

 

468

1(ref)

 

25.0–29.9

214

1.22

1.02–1.46

284

1.15

0.99–1.33

≥30.0

26

0.86

0.58–1.29

58

1.44

1.10–1.90

Breast cancer

BMI as a continuous variable

 

non-linearity

 

123

1.07

1.01–1.13

< 18.5

1

0.40

0.06–2.90

4

1.38

0.50–3.82

18.5–24.9

78

1(ref)

 

61

1(ref)

 

25.0–29.9

46

0.96

0.67–1.39

46

1.36

0.93–2.00

≥30.0

10

1.2

0.62–2.33

12

2.19

1.18–4.07

Sensitivity analysis

According to the E-value approach, if the observed HR of 1.74 in male would be completely due to unmeasured confounder, a 2.87-fold association between unmeasured confounder and overall cancer risk would be required (Fig. 1). Similarly, a 1.21-fold association between unmeasured confounder and cancer risk would be needed to explain away the observed linear dose response association of BMI and overall cancer risk in female with age older than 60 years old. The association between BMI and overall cancer risk with or without adjusting for smoking status remained unchanged in male younger than 60 years old, as presented in Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Discussion

In this population-based retrospective cohort study, we found that the associations between BMI and cancer risks varied by gender, age groups (< 60 years old and ≥60 years old) and cancer subtypes among Chinese diabetic patients. In men with age younger than 60 years old, the cancer risk increased with either lower or higher BMI comparing to those with BMI of 25.0 kg/m2. In women with age older than 60 years old, a linear dose-response relationship was observed between BMI and the risk of both overall and breast cancer.

Obesity [1, 2, 3, 4] and diabetes mellitus [5, 6] are two independent risk factors for overall and certain types of cancer in general population. In our previous study, comparing to the local general population, diabetic patients had an increased risk of overall cancer in both sexes, as well as increased risks of colon, rectum, prostate, and bladder cancers in men and increased colon, breast, and corpus uteri cancer risks in women [6]. Several studies observed a modifying effect of BMI on the association between diabetes and cancer [15, 16, 17, 18]. However, few studies have evaluated the BMI-cancer association among T2DM patients and the conclusion was inconsistent.

A register-based cohort study in Sweden has reported that excess body weight was associated with increased risks of all cancer, gastrointestinal cancer and colorectal cancer in male T2DM patients and with elevated risks of all cancer, gestational cancer and postmenopausal breast cancer in female T2DM patients [20]. However, the study did not include patients with BMI less than18.5 kg/m2. A study based on the Japan National Center Diabetes Database did not find a significant association between BMI categories and the risk of overall cancers and obesity-related cancers among male patients, but observed a significantly higher risk of overall cancer among female patients with BMI less than 22 kg/m2 [19].

We found that the association between BMI and cancer in people with T2DM depend on sex-specific age subgroups (< 60 years old and ≥60 years old). Due to the application of RCS, nonlinear associations characterized by increased risks of cancer in men with lower and higher BMI was observed when comparing with those having BMI of 25.0 kg/m2. The results were similar with the results of the Sweden study but inconsistent with the Japanese study. In women older than 60 years old, higher BMI values were related to a higher overall cancer risk, which was consistent with the study in Sweden, but differed from the higher cancer risk that observed in Japanese T2DM women with lower BMI. This controversial association was likely due to the difference in source population of the studies. Community population based on eHR system was selected in our study, but hospital population was recruited in the above mentioned Japanese study. Moreover, ethnic background [4], different subtype of cancers [16, 17], and relevant small sample size of the Japanese study may also contribute to the discrepancy.

Regarding to cancer subtypes, a significant association was observed only for breast cancer risk in female. Our findings are somewhat supported by the results of the Sweden study. The increased risk of breast in female with age older than 60 years is also consistent with a previous study conducted in the general population, in which obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2) Chinese women had 36% increased risk of overall cancer and 143% increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer compared to those with BMI of 18.5–22.9 kg/m2 [30]. The difference of BMI and the risk of overall and breast cancer by the age group in female may suggest the effect modification of menopause.

The World Cancer Research Fund reported that being overweight or obese is related to an increased incidence of stomach, colorectal, pancreatic and kidney cancer in both men and women, as well as an elevated risk of advanced prostate cancer in men [31]. For lung cancer, increasing BMI is a protective factor [32]. Different proportion of obesity-related and non-obesity-related cancers in both sexes may contribute to the different association between BMI and the overall cancer risk. However, we did not observe a significant association of BMI with any of these site-specific cancers. The moderate sample size and small number of site-specific cancer cases may lead to limited power for estimating these associations. Ethnicity may also explain the difference of obesity effect between our study and other studies. A positive association of BMI was observed with rectum cancer in European and Australian populations and with pancreatic cancer in North American, but not in Asia-Pacific populations [4]. Further studies are warranted to confirm the observed null associations between BMI and the risk of cancer subtypes observed in our study .

Smoking status may be a potential confounder or an effect modifier. Because about 70% of subjects were also diagnosed with hypertension, we collected smoking information through their hypertension file. For these subjects, the smoking rate for women was only 0.85%. It was unlikely that smoking status biased our estimated association between BMI and cancer in women. The smoking rate for men was about 40%. However, sensitivity analysis suggested that smoking may not be a confounding factor in this study. For other unmeasured confounders, sensitivity analysis with E-value was applied to assess the robustness of the observed association. Even though we do not have these measurements, it is unlikely that these variables would have an effect on cancer risks strong enough to explain away the observed association.

Obesity and type 2 diabetes are closely associated with metabolic abnormalities and poor glycemic control [33, 34] that may contribute to cancer progression [35]. However, the potential mechanisms of obesity, diabetes, and cancer are not yet clear. Many possible explanations have been proposed for certain cancers: The change of hormonal system in insulin, insulin like growth factors, estrogens and other cytokines could be induced by diabetic condition, which may affect the breast cancer risk; the increased production of leptin and the decreased production of adiponectin caused by both obesity and T2DM may cause similar risks for breast cancer [15]. Obesity is being increasingly recognized as sub-clinical inflammation and accordingly contributes to the increase of adipose tissue infiltration of inflammatory components including interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and C-reactive protein (CRP), all of which have shown to be associated with the development of breast cancer etiology [36]. Other possible mechanisms being explored include the contribution of lipids to cancer development and metabolism, the role of the insulin receptor signaling in cancer, the composition of advanced glycation end products, the changes in hormonal systems to female malignant tumor and growth-promoting effects of obesity and type 2 diabetes on different site-specific cancers. Therefore, the mechanisms underlying the associations between obesity and cancers in diabetic patients are complex and heterogeneous.

The strengths of this study include the retrospective cohort study design, relatively large sample size (n = 51,004), and ability to assess associations wih specific cancer sites. Cox proportional hazard models with restricted cubic spline functions help to test potential non-linear relationship with high statistical power. Stratified analysis by sex and age groups enables us to examine the possible difference in sex-specific associations between BMI and overall cancer risk by removing the confounding effect of age. However, several limitations should be mentioned. First, BMI at diagnosis of T2DM may have been affected by the actual duration of diabetes, which is difficult to acquire. Second, self-reported BMI values were used in this study and the number of subjects with BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 or BMI > 30 kg/m2 was not enough to have a stable estimation of associations. Third, we did not include information on waist circumference, percentage of body fat, level of blood sugar, or the intake of medications such as metformin, making it impossible to evaluate the potential effect of these variables on the risk of cancer in diabetic patients. Finally, although smoking status was less likely to bias the results, the study could not provide an estimated measure of BMI and cancer risk adjusted for smoking.

Conclusions

In this population-based retrospective cohort study, we found that the associations of BMI with the overall cancer risk varied by gender, age subgroups (< 60 years old and ≥60 years old) and cancer subtypes among Chinese diabetic patients. This indicates complex and heterogeneous biological mechanisms. Increased risks in younger male patients with either lower or higher BMI and in obese older female patients imply that cancer prevention should be focused on these populations.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Shanghai population-based cancer registries for data collection, sorting, verification.

Funding

The study was supported by a grant from National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 11371100); grant from Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (Grant No. 201640254); and Nature Science Foundation of Minhang district, Shanghai, China (Grant No. 2016MHZ25). The funding contributors had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, or writing of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed in the study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

All of the authors met the ICMJE recommendations for authorship. GYQ and HLX contributed to the study design; HLX and MLZ conducted data analysis. HLX, QG, YJY, and FZ contributed to the first script of the manuscript; WHX, DLX and NQZ contributed to the interpretation of results; WHX ZFZ and FF revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This cohort study used anonymised data from local Diabetes Patient Management System and Cancer Registry, and had approval from the Institutional Review Board of Minhang Center for Disease Control and Prevention (NO: EC-P-2012-002).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12885_2018_4675_MOESM1_ESM.docx (198 kb)
Additional file 1: Figure S1. HRs (95%CIs) between BMI (kg/m2) and the risk overall cancer in male T2DM patients with age younger than 60 years, and pre-existing hypertension allowing for non-linear effects. The shape of the association between BMI and overall cancer risk was compared with or without the variable of smoking status in male with Pre-existing hypertension, and age younger than 60 years old. The reference BMI for these plots (with HR fixed as 1.0) was 25 kg/m2. Left: No adjustment for smoking; Right: Adjustment for smoking; (the effect of smoking after controlling for other variables, p = 0.064). (DOCX 197 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bhaskaran K, Douglas I, Forbes H, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Leon DA, Smeeth L. Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: a population-based cohort study of 5.24 million UK adults. LANCET. 2014;384(9945):755–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rapp K, Schroeder J, Klenk J, Stoehr S, Ulmer H, Concin H, Diem G, Oberaigner W, Weiland SK. Obesity and incidence of cancer: a large cohort study of over 145,000 adults in Austria. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(9):1062–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reeves GK, Pirie K, Beral V, Green J, Spencer E, Bull D. Cancer incidence and mortality in relation to body mass index in the million women study: cohort study. BMJ. 2007;335(7630):1134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. LANCET. 2008;371(9612):569–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin CC, Chiang JH, Li CI, Liu CS, Lin WY, Hsieh TF, Li TC. Cancer risks among patients with type 2 diabetes: a 10-year follow-up study of a nationwide population-based cohort in Taiwan. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:381.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu HL, Fang H, Xu WH, Qin GY, Yan YJ, Yao BD, Zhao NQ, Liu YN, Zhang F, Li WX, et al. Cancer incidence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study in shanghai. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:852.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):235–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, Jia W, Ji L, Xiao J, Shan Z, Liu J, Tian H, Ji Q, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(12):1090–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pearson-Stuttard J, Zhou B, Kontis V, Bentham J, Gunter MJ, Ezzati M. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to diabetes and high body-mass index: a comparative risk assessment. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(2):95–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kasuga M, Ueki K, Tajima N, Noda M, Ohashi K, Noto H, Goto A, Ogawa W, Sakai R, Tsugane S, et al. Report of the Japan diabetes society/Japanese Cancer association joint committee on diabetes and Cancer. Cancer Sci. 2013;104(7):965–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gallagher EJ, LeRoith D. Obesity and diabetes: the increased risk of Cancer and Cancer-related mortality. Physiol Rev. 2015;95(3):727–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Otani T, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Inoue M, Tsugane S. Plasma C-peptide, insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor binding proteins and risk of colorectal cancer in a nested case-control study: the Japan public health center-based prospective study. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(9):2007–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nead KT, Sharp SJ, Thompson DJ, Painter JN, Savage DB, Semple RK, Barker A, Perry JR, Attia J, Dunning AM, et al. Evidence of a Causal Association Between Insulinemia and Endometrial Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(9):djv178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuroe A, Fukushima M, Usami M, Ikeda M, Nakai Y, Taniguchi A, Matsuura T, Suzuki H, Kurose T, Yasuda K, et al. Impaired beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity in Japanese subjects with normal glucose tolerance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2003;59(1):71–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alokail MS, Al-Daghri NM, Al-Attas OS, Hussain T. Combined effects of obesity and type 2 diabetes contribute to increased breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2009;8:33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moe B, Nilsen TI. Cancer risk in people with diabetes: does physical activity and adiposity modify the association? Prospective data from the HUNT study Norway. J Diabetes Complications. 2015;29(2):176–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seow A, Yuan JM, Koh WP, Lee HP, Yu MC. Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer in the Singapore Chinese health study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(2):135–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Choi JB, Moon HW, Park YH, Bae WJ, Cho HJ, Hong SH, Lee JY, Kim SW, Han KD, Ha US. The impact of diabetes on the risk of prostate Cancer development according to body mass index: a 10-year Nationwide cohort study. J Cancer. 2016;7(14):2061–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamamoto-Honda R, Takahashi Y, Yoshida Y, Kwazu S, Iwamoto Y, Kajio H, Yanai H, Mishima S, Shimbo T, Noda M. Body mass index and the risk of cancer incidence in patients with type 2 diabetes in Japan: results from the National Center Diabetes Database. J Diabetes Investig. 2016;7(6):908–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miao JJ, Cederholm J, Gudbjornsdottir S. Excess body weight and cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes who were registered in Swedish National Diabetes Register--register-based cohort study in Sweden. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e105868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu D, Fang H, Xu W, Yan Y, Liu Y, Yao B. Fasting plasma glucose variability and all-cause mortality among type 2 diabetes patients: a dynamic cohort study in shanghai China. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39633.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15(7):539–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xiang YB, Jin F, Gao YT. Cancer survival in shanghai, China 1992-1995. IARC Sci Publ. 2011;162:55–68.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xie SH, Chen J, Zhang B, Wang F, Li SS, Xie CH, Tse LA, Cheng JQ. Time trends and age-period-cohort analyses on incidence rates of thyroid cancer in shanghai and Hong Kong. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:975.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:1–253.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Desquilbet L, Mariotti F. Dose-response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health research. Stat Med. 2010;29(9):1037–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Durrleman S, Simon R. Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med. 1989;8(5):551–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heinzl H, Kaider A. Gaining more flexibility in cox proportional hazards regression models with cubic spline functions. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 1997;54(3):201–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    VanderWeele TJ, Ding P. Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E-value. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(4):268–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu Y, Warren AS, Wen W, Gao YT, Lan Q, Rothman N, Ji BT, Yang G, Xiang YB, Shu XO, et al. Prospective cohort study of general and central obesity, weight change trajectory and risk of major cancers among Chinese women. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(7):1461–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hendriks SH, Schrijnders D, van Hateren KJ, Groenier KH, Siesling S, Maas A, Landman G, Bilo H, Kleefstra N. Association between body mass index and obesity-related cancer risk in men and women with type 2 diabetes in primary care in the Netherlands: a cohort study (ZODIAC-56). BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e18859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Duan P, Hu C, Quan C, Yi X, Zhou W, Yuan M, Yu T, Kourouma A, Yang K. Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16938.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    El-Kebbi IM, Cook CB, Ziemer DC, Miller CD, Gallina DL, Phillips LS. Association of younger age with poor glycemic control and obesity in urban african americans with type 2 diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(1):69–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nguyen NT, Nguyen XM, Lane J, Wang P. Relationship between obesity and diabetes in a US adult population: findings from the National Health and nutrition examination survey, 1999-2006. Obes Surg. 2011;21(3):351–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Villarreal-Garza C, Shaw-Dulin R, Lara-Medina F, Bacon L, Rivera D, Urzua L, Aguila C, Ramirez-Morales R, Santamaria J, Bargallo E, et al. Impact of diabetes and hyperglycemia on survival in advanced breast cancer patients. Exp Diabetes Res. 2012;2012:732027.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bozcuk H, Uslu G, Samur M, Yildiz M, Ozben T, Ozdogan M, Artac M, Altunbas H, Akan I, Savas B. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and fasting serum insulin correlate with clinical outcome in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. CYTOKINE. 2004;27(2–3):58–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public HealthFudan UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Shanghai Minhang Center for Disease Control and PreventionShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of EpidemiologyUCLA Fielding School of Public HealthLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and PreventionShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.Key Laboratory of Public Health SafetyFudan UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  6. 6.Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in HealthFudan UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations