Microwave detection and quantification of water hidden in and on building materials: implications for healthy buildings and microbiome studies
Excess water in all its forms (moisture, dampness, hidden water) in buildings negatively impacts occupant health but is hard to reliably detect and quantify. Recent advances in through-wall imaging recommend microwaves as a tool with a high potential to noninvasively detect and quantify water throughout buildings.
Microwaves in both transmission and reflection (radar) modes were used to perform a simple demonstration of the detection of water both on and hidden within building materials.
We used both transmission and reflection modes to detect as little as 1 mL of water between two 7 cm thicknesses of concrete. The reflection mode was also used to detect 1 mL of water on a metal surface. We observed oscillations in transmitted and reflected microwave amplitude as a function of microwave wavelength and water layer thickness, which we attribute to thin-film interference effects.
Improving the detection of water in buildings could help design, maintenance, and remediation become more efficient and effective and perhaps increase the value of microbiome sequence data. Microwave characterization of all forms of water throughout buildings is possible; its practical development would require new collaborations among microwave physicists or engineers, architects, building engineers, remediation practitioners, epidemiologists, and microbiologists.
KeywordsAquametry Dampness Humidity Microbiome Microwave Moisture Mold Sick-building-syndrome
Next Generation Sequencing
Volatile Organic Compound
Visible signs of dampness and mold in buildings are epidemiologically associated with adverse health outcomes for occupants [1, 2, 3]. However, there is a quantitatively large variance in studies of such health outcomes [4, 5], and there is a need for deeper understanding of these associations. In addition to factors such as genetic and experiential differences among occupants, a key confounding factor is the limited availability of data on the location and amount of water present. Moreover, information on the presence of water is critical for implementing any remedial action. The most added-value from improved water detection would be expected from methods that are noninvasive, quantifiable, spatially resolved, and able to detect hidden water. The capability to passively monitor over long timescales is also valuable, in order to monitor for water that may only appear sporadically.
Current non-destructive technologies for the measurement of water in buildings have significant limitations, especially in the detection of hidden water [6, 7, 8]. Unaided visual inspection is widely used to assess outer surfaces for signs of water damage or mold, with improved sensitivity sometimes offered by infrared imaging of surface temperature . Infrared imaging relies on detecting the temperature differentials that can form between wet areas, which are often relatively cool, and the surrounding dry areas . To the best of our knowledge, the reviewed literature has not yet critically examined infrared detection of hidden water with regard to sensitivity, quantitative reliability, confounding factors, and how deeply into building materials infrared-based detection can penetrate.
The ability of microwaves to penetrate through walls make them an attractive solution for the detection of hidden water. Microwave aquametry  is already used to measure moisture during the preparation of building materials such as wood [12, 13] and concrete [14, 15], as well as in a range of other materials such as soils , seeds , cheese  and textiles . Moisture monitoring within building walls has been performed with qualified success by measuring microwave transmission between probes drilled into the wall , however this partially-destructive technique has not been broadly adopted.
The present paper makes no claim to have developed a microwave technology that works in a practical way to detect hidden water in buildings. However, we provide a simple demonstration of the detection of small volumes of water in and around common building materials. Interdisciplinary collaboration and engineering efforts will be required to turn this demonstration into a practical device or application. Practical development will be further considered in the discussion.
The reflection and transmission are measured as S-parameters. As indicated in Fig. 1(a), S11 (S22) measures reflection of a signal sent from horn 1 (2), and S21 measures transmission from horn 1, through the test sample, to horn 2. Starting with a dry test sample, we used a pipette add water in 1 mL steps and monitored the resulting change in S-parameters, making measurements within a few seconds of each step. For an S-parameter Sγ (γ = 11, 22, 21), we define the change in reflection or transmission due to the added water as ΔSγ = Sγ - Sγ0, where Sγ0 is the S-parameter measured without any water present. The 4–8 GHz bandwidth of our measurements was chosen to match the bandwidth of the available microwave horns, and the network analyser output power was 0 dBm (1 mW).
Microwaves and water
The microwave characteristics of building materials differ from water in absorption, reflection, and refraction. Common building materials, such as the concrete block used in this study, are almost transparent to microwaves. Communications networks (Wifi, cell phones, etc.) exploit this fact on a daily basis. On the contrary, water is strongly absorptive at microwave frequencies. The difference between these materials with respect to microwave absorption is inverted with respect to visible light, allowing microwaves to detect water where visible light cannot penetrate. Metals, such as steel pipes and beams, will block microwave transmission, but metallic surfaces are highly reflective at microwave frequencies. Water on the surface of metal can be detected through its influence on reflected microwave signals.
Integrating water detection with other building research that uses microwaves
Microwave imaging techniques that can be applied indoors and through-walls [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29] are under development for applications including emergency response, security, and radio-tag tracking for an internet-of-things. The development of hidden water imaging can benefit greatly from the technologies developed for these applications, whose technological requirements are close to those of hidden water detection and quantification. Imaging techniques may soon be extended to perform holographic imaging of entire buildings, whilst hardware requirements may be minimized by taking advantage of the background radiation from wifi routers . The spatial resolution of microwave tomography is currently limited by the microwave wavelength, i.e. approximately the 1-10 cm range. Resolution might be improved further by other means, e.g. through incorporating nearfield detection, perhaps in conjunction with non-canonical detectors [30, 31, 32].
Moisture and microbiomes
Detection and localization of moisture in buildings can yield an understanding of the presence and activity of microbes and microbial products, an important factor in understanding the impact of the building environment on occupant health [33, 34, 35]. Hidden spaces in buildings are difficult to access yet their moisture levels may be critical for understanding the building microbiome.
The presence of water is essential for all living metabolism and growth, and there is a strong correlation of measured dampness with visible signs and/or odors of microbial growth in buildings . A focus on the ability to detect small amounts of water in the built environment (the lower limit of water activity required for microbial metabolism is subject to ongoing research [36, 37, 38]) would facilitate earlier discovery of conditions enabling microbial growth, with the detection of hidden water, i.e. water which is not present on easily-accessed surfaces, of particular importance. Current and potential problems could then be detected before affecting the health of occupants [39, 40], and building remediation would be simplified by the reduction in building damage due to earlier and more reliable detection. Information on the presence of water could also improve the value of analyses based on DNA [41, 42] or Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) [43, 44, 45], because locations with water often correlate with metabolically active microbes. On the other hand, the consequences of moisture on the health of occupants need not always be directly dependent on microbes. Emission and adsorption of VOCs [46, 47] and inorganic but health-relevant radon gas [48, 49, 50] are also sensitive to moisture and humidity.
A building’s microbiome comes from three distinct sources : a) dispersal from occupants; b) the outside environment; and c) microbial growth in the building itself. Building-associated illness has been linked to type c [39, 40]. However, a comparison of studies concerning the human health effects of microbial exposure in buildings reveals an apparent paradox: some studies indicate detrimental health effects while others correlate benefits with microbial exposure . Better data concerning current and historical moisture conditions in buildings, especially at microbiome assay sites, may help clarify and, perhaps, resolve this apparent paradox.
In the last 10 years, there has been spectacular progress in techniques for microbiome characterization in buildings, in particular through Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of DNA  and also VOC sensing [43, 44, 45]. However, these sophisticated methods do not fully address the need to locate and characterize microbial growth and metabolism occurring in building structures (for an exemplary exception to this critique see Adams et al. 2017 ). For example, a given microbiome DNA sequence should be interpreted differently depending on whether the corresponding microbe was metabolically active, but DNA sequences alone do not provide information on whether identified sequences come from organisms that were metabolically active, quiescent, or dead. DNA sequencing can be supported by methods that discriminate microbial viability at the time of sampling  and the intact nature  of target DNA, whilst certain VOCs are consequent to microbial metabolism . However, these approaches are not always sensitive and are not likely to be robust across the range of microbial and environmental diversity. Enthusiasm for NGS may have skewed microbial ecology approaches in the building research community away from classical microbiology, which has for a long time been appreciative of the key role of hidden water in building microbiology [55, 56].
The difficulty of making sequence-based microbiome research relevant to practical problems was addressed in the meeting summary for the International Society for Indoor Air Quality and climate symposium at Healthy Buildings 2015-Europe : “There was general consensus that the applied microbiology developments emerging in this research community —first and foremost, DNA recovery methodology and in particular, next-generation sequencing —have had notable impacts as judged by common academic metrics; however, these advances have not successfully translated into paths which are available for practitioners to apply such methods or interpret these results with confidence in the field.”
The needs of building remediation practitioners were clearly articulated : “Some buildings are obviously in need of remediation. Some buildings are obviously fine. However, there are a large number of intermediate buildings. Residents may express the concern that a building is making them ill but there is no visible problem. We may have many buildings with small or intermediate signs of problem dampness and/or microbial growth but we have no objective way to rank or prioritize them in terms of the necessity for, or order in which to undertake remediation. Furthermore, after remediation activity in a building has been completed, we do not have an objective way to prove that it worked.” The practitioner then asked if microbiome analysis could provide what he and other practitioners need. The consensus answer of the building microbiome and building science researchers at the meeting was that it could not. A US National Academy of Science 2017 study on microbiomes in the built environment also addresses this need as a research priority: “Critical guidance is lacking on when to initiate interventions for damp buildings and on how to gauge the success of these interventions.” .
The need for an interdisciplinary research and development program
The work reported here is an interdisciplinary collaboration of a physicist (AH) with expertise in microwaves and a microbiologist (DST) who has had substantive interactions with the healthy building community. Further development would be most efficient and also exciting through the active collaboration of the healthy building community and microbiologists, alongside microwave engineers and physicists. Health benefits are anticipated to follow from more accurate and objective criteria for assessing building engineering, remediation and design options.
Recent advances in microwave imaging techniques, demonstrated in studies mapping the positions and movement of people and objects in rooms [24, 25, 26, 28] and through walls [27, 29], provide a potential building-scale hidden water imaging solution. Imaging of water inside thermal insulating building materials has already been shown using holographical radar techniques . Microwave illumination could be provided by a user-controlled source, or imaging could be performed using the substantial background microwave field associated with cell phone networks and Wifi routers in the contemporary built environment .
We propose that improved detection and quantification of hidden water in buildings would enable more efficient and effective building design and remediation leading to improved public health. Better data on the state of water in all its forms over time might improve the relevance of microbiome analysis to the health of building occupants. This paper includes a demonstration that microwave sensing offers one approach for the problem of detecting hidden water in the built environment. The most effective realization would be best accomplished via an interdisciplinary research program including the healthy building disciplines, microwave engineering or physics, and microbiology as related to epidemiology.
The authors thank Philipp Treutlein for introducing us and the loan of lab space and equipment, Liz Canner, Fiona Doetsch, Steve Giovannoni, Ben Kirkup, Hal Levin, Maria Nunez, Paula Olsiewski, Miia Pitkaranta, Amy Pruden, Jeff Siegel, Julian Tang, and especially Martin Täubel for critique, insights and encouragement.
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the authors on reasonable request.
The two authors jointly carried out the experiments and wrote the paper. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
- 12.Moschler WW, et al. Microwave moisture measurement system for lumber drying. For Prod J. 2007;57:69–74.Google Scholar
- 17.Pelletier MG, Wanjura JD, Holt GA. Microwave moisture sensing of Seedcotton: part 1: Seedcotton microwave material properties. Sensors (Basel). 2016;16(11).Google Scholar
- 18.Roemhild, H., Using Microwave Sensors to Measure Moisture Levels in Mozzarella Cheese: Why Microwave Resonator-Based Sensors Are the Ideal Approach for Accurately Measuring Moisture in Food Products https://work-microwave.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/150721-WM-Farm-and-Food-Magazine-Cheese-study-v2-1.pdf. retrieved June 26, 2017
- 19.Junfeng, J., W. Bo, and L. Pengfei. The application of microwave detecting textile moisture content. in Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, International Conference on 2010. Changsha, Hunan, China.Google Scholar
- 22.Hecht, E., Optics. 4th ed. 2002, San Francisco, USA.: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
- 23.Mesenbrink, M., Complex Indices of Refraction for Water and Ice from Visible to Long Wavelengths 1996, MS thesis Department of Meteorology, Florida State University p. 53.Google Scholar
- 28.Adib, F. Z. Kabelac, and D. Katabi. Multi-Person Localization via RF Body Reflections. In 12th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ‘15). 2015. Oakland, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- 30.Horsley A, Du G-X, Treutlein P. Widefield microwave imaging in alkali vapor cells with sub-100 um resolution. New J Phys. 2015;17.Google Scholar
- 31.Horsley A, Treutlein P. Frequency-tunable microwave field detection in an atomic vapor cell. Appl Phys Lett. 2016;108.Google Scholar
- 32.Horsley, A., et al., Microwave device characterisation using a widefield diamond microscope arXivorg > quant-ph > arXiv:1802.07402, 2018.
- 39.Hodgson, M.J. and K. Kreiss, Building associated diseases, in Proceedings of the ASHRAE Conference IAQ'86: Managing Indoor Air for Health and Energy Conservation. 1986, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.: Atlanta. p. 1–15.Google Scholar
- 40.Afshari, A., et al., WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: dampness and mould. 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization: Europe.Google Scholar
- 41.Stephens B. What have we learned about the microbiomes of indoor environments? mSystems. 2016;1(4).Google Scholar
- 56.Microbiomes of the Built Environment. A Research Agenda for Indoor Microbiology, Human Health, and Buildings by the Committee on Microbiomes of the Built Environment: From Research to Application. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; 2017.Google Scholar
- 58.Garnys V. Remark from the audience made in public session by Lead Auditor (OHS&E, Quality), NABERS Accredited Assessor, Managing Director and Principal Consultant; 2015.Google Scholar
- 59.Capineri L, et al. Water detection in thermal insulating materials by high resolution imaging with holographic radar. Meas Sci Technol. 2017;28.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.