Advertisement

BMC Anesthesiology

, 19:6 | Cite as

Risk factors for early postoperative cognitive dysfunction after colorectal surgery

  • Yuan Zhang
  • Hong-Guang Bao
  • Yun-Luo Lv
  • Yan-Na Si
  • Liu Han
  • Hong-Yu Wang
  • Yu-Jie Gao
  • Wei-Qing Jiang
  • Chen Zhang
Open Access
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Pain management and analgesia

Abstract

Background

It has been reported that postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is correlated with the degeneration of the central nervous system, oxidative stress, inflammation, and endocrine and immune dysfunction. Increased age, predisposed comorbidity, long surgery time, and prolonged stay in the intensive care unit have been reported to be risk factors for developing POCD for cardiac surgery. In the present study, the risk factors of early POCD after colorectal surgery were investigated.

Methods

Eighty patients, who provided informed consents for their participation in this study, were enrolled and received colorectal surgery under general anesthesia. Neuropsychological tests were performed preoperatively and on postoperative day seven. The risk factors for POCD were analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model.

Results

Nineteen patients were diagnosed with POCD (24.7%). Diabetes history (OR = 8.391 [2.208–31.882], P = 0.012), fasting over 3 days after surgery (OR = 5.236 [1.998–13.721], P = 0.001) and an SIRS score of > 3 on the second day after surgery (OR = 6.995 [1.948–25.111], P = 0.003) were risk factors for early POCD in colorectal cancer patients.

Conclusion

The risk factors for early POCD after colorectal surgery included diabetes history, fasting over 3 days, and an SIRS score of > 3 on the second day.

Keywords

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction Colorectal surgery Diabetes Fasting SIRS 

Abbreviation

CRC

Colorectal cancer

Background

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is associated with poor functional recovery, prolonged hospitalization, hospital expenses, need for long-term rehabilitation and mortality [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Thus, the effective prevention of POCD in elderly patients is very important. One method to prevent the effect of POCD is to identify and avoid its risk factors. A previous study suggested that instable hemodynamics in elderly patients during epidural anesthesia for hip-joint replacement surgery is a risk factor for developing POCD [7]. The dose-dependent effects of intravenous methoxamine infusion during hip-joint replacement surgery decreased the incidence of POCD in a hip-joint replacement surgery population via stabilizing the hemodynamics.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common incident cancers that causes cancer death in China [5]. Its prevalence increases with age, and over 50% of patients with newly diagnosed CRC are older than 70 years of age [8]. Curative resection is recommended for non-metastatic CRC, as well as for metastatic diseases [9]. However, caution should be taken in performing the resection, because the elderly population is vulnerable to postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) [10], and refers to new cognitive impairments after surgery, especially decline in memory and executive functions [11]. However, the risk factors for POCD in CRC patients after surgery remain unclear. Thus, the present prospective study was conducted to reveal the risk factors for POCD in CRC patients.

Methods

Patients

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing First Hospital (ID: KY20131121–01-02) and written informed consent was obtained. A total of 80 Chinese patients, who were 65–75 years old, classified as American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II or III, and scheduled for elective standard open surgical procedures for CRC from January 2014 to December 2015, were included in the present study. A written informed consent was obtained from each patient or an authorized representative when the patient was unable to provide an informed consent prior to inclusion into the study. Based on the 6th edition of tumor site (T), lymph node invasion (N) and distant metastasis (M), that is, the TNM system [12], the preoperative staging of CRC was performed using whole-body computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). None of these patients received preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

The participants were required to satisfy the following inclusion criteria: (1) patients with a physical status classification of ASA II or III; (2) patients who were scheduled for elective standard open surgical procedures for CRC under general anesthesia. In addition, the exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of < 23 points; (2) obvious liver or kidney dysfunction; (3) history of mental illnesses or neurological disease; (4) history of taking tranquilizers or antidepressants, or history of alcohol abuse; (5) serious audio-visual obstacles that affects communication; (6) severe vision or hearing loss; (7) recent treatments with sedatives, antidepressants, analgesics, or monoamine oxidase inhibitors; (8) postoperative delirium (a Confusion Assessment Method [CAM] score of > 22 points).

Standard CRC open surgery and anesthesia

Standard open surgical procedures were performed based on the location, extent and stage of the disease. The anesthesia was induced using 0.03 mg/kg of midazolam, 0.5 μg/kg of sufentanil, 0.3 mg/kg of etomidate, and 0.6 mg/kg of rocuronium. The maintenance of anesthesia was achieved with remifentanil (0.2–0.3 μg/kg/min) and propofol (0.1–0.15 mg/kg/min), and cisatracurium neuromuscular blockade was used when necessary. The Narcotrend® monitor (Narcotrend®-Compact, MT Monitor Technik GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) sensor was placed on the skin of the forehead to record the Narcotrend values during surgery. The Narcotrend index was kept between D1 and E1. During the operation, lactic acid Ringer’s solution and hydroxyethyl starch was intravenously (i.v.) infused, and intermittent arterial blood gas analysis was performed. The infusion of red blood cell suspension or frozen fresh plasma was performed when Hb was < 100 g/L or Hct was < 30%. Pain intensity was evaluated daily using the numeric rating scale (NRS), and pain relief was achieved using a patient-controlled analgesia device through the i.v. infusion of 150 μg of sufentanil plus 6 mg of tropisetron mesylate, according to the patient’s age, weight and ASA classification.

Assessment of cognitive function

Delirium was ruled out postoperatively. Cognition was assessed at 1 day before and 7 days after surgery. Neuropsychological assessment was performed in a quiet room, where only the patient and the evaluator were present. All tests were conducted and scored in a standardized manner to minimize possible bias introduced by different evaluators. Project investigators, who were trained in neuropsychological assessment, completed all data scoring and interpretations.

The test battery consisted of MMSE, visual verbal learning test (VVLT), digital span test (DST1), and digital symbol test (DST2), as described in our previous work [13].

In order to rule out the potential bias caused by the learning effect during the cognitive test, 30 subjects were enrolled from the patients relatives (age range: 65–70 years old, body mass index [BMI] range: 20–25, and no gender limitation), and served as healthy controls. These subjects were enrolled based on the above-mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria, except for the anesthesia or surgery procedure. The same neuropsychological test battery among the healthy controls was repeated twice at each time point, and the difference between the second and first batch of tests was defined as the learning effect. The Z score for each individual was calculated and compared with baseline scores, and divided by the standard deviation (SD) of the learning effect. All neuropsychological functions were tested at 1 day before the surgery and on postoperative day seven. POCD was diagnosed when the Z score was greater than 1.96 or the combined Z score was ≥1.96.

Statistical analysis and sample size estimation

Variables that potentially correlated to cognitive dysfunction were classified in three categories: preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors (Table 1). Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the independent predictors for POCD. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. These statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 13.0 software (IBM, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Table 1

Learning effect and standard deviation (SD) among healthy controls

Item/Instrument

Learning effect

SD

MMSE (0–30)

2.67

0.994

VVLT (0–10)

2.70

1.512

DST1 (0–24)

3.50

1.570

DST2 (0–90)

9.93

3.823

Note: SD standard deviation, MMSE Mini Mental State Examination, VVLT visual verbal learning test, DST1 digital span test, DST2 digital symbol test

Results

The learning effect and SD of healthy controls are presented in Table 1. Among the 77 patients who completed the neurocognitive tests, a total of 19 patients (24.7%) were identified as POCD (POCD group). The test battery scores in the POCD group were significantly lower than those in the non-POCD group (MMSE [P = 0.043], VVLT [P = 0.004], DST1 [P = 0.006], or DST2 [P = 0.019]; Table 2).
Table 2

Neuropsychological test results

Item/Instrument

non-POCD (n = 58)

POCD (n = 19)

P-value

MMSE (0–30)

Preoperatively

27.10 ± 1.00

27.30 ± 1.80

0.331

Seven days after surgery

24.20 ± 2.10

23.40 ± 1.10

0.043

VVLT (0–10)

Preoperatively

8.40 ± 1.00

8.70 ± 1.90

0.495

Seven days after surgery

4.40 ± 2.20

3.20 ± 1.30

0.004

DST 1 (0–24)

Preoperatively

15.80 ± 1.70

16.00 ± 1.90

0.409

Seven days after surgery

9.30 ± 2.50

7.70 ± 1.90

0.006

DST 2 (0–90)

Preoperatively

23.90 ± 7.40

28.40 ± 7.60

0.103

Seven days after surgery

13.30 ± 3.60

9.20 ± 2.40

0.019

Note: POCD postoperative cognitive dysfunction, MMSE Mini Mental State Examination, VVLT visual verbal learning test, DST1 digital span test, DST2 digital symbol test

Among the potential preoperative risk factors, POCD patients were older (P = 0.046) and had higher ASA scores (P = 0.009), higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.001) and lower education levels (P = 0.003), when compared with non-POCD patients (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the POCD and non-POCD groups in terms of gender (P = 0.657), BMI (P = 0.057), tumor location (P = 0.787) and stage (P = 0.099), hypertension (P = 0.691), hemoglobin (P = 0.221), hematocrit (P = 0.346), total protein (P = 0.299), and serum albumin (P = 0.837).

Furthermore, among the potential operative and post-operative risk factors, POCD patients had a longer fasting time (P = 0.000) and higher systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score (P = 0.000). However, there was no significant difference between the POCD and non-POCD groups in terms of hospital days prior to surgery (P = 0.855), operation time (P = 0.122), bleeding (P = 0.400), transfusion (P = 0.845), ΔHb (P = 0.601), urine (P = 0.244), hypotension (P = 0.529), delirium (P = 0.420), Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay (P = 0.250), or in-hospital stay (P = 0.119). These data are presented in Tables 3 and 4.
Table 3

Preoperative characteristics of surgery patients

 

non-POCD (n = 58)

POCD (n = 19)

P-value

Age (mean ± SD, years)

69.30 ± 4.60

73.30 ± 4.80

0.046

Gender (male/female)

32/26

10/9

0.657

BMI (mean ± SD)

23.70 ± 2.04

22.30 ± 2.15

0.057

Education level (mean ± SD, years)

7.80 ± 2.60

5.80 ± 2.30

0.003

ASA classification (II/III)

55/3

11/8

0.000

Tumor location

 Proximal colon

15

4

 

 Distal colon

37

12

0.787

 Rectum

6

3

 

TNM stage

 Stage I

13

1

 

 Stage II

23

6

0.099

 Stage III

22

12

 

 Stage IV

0

0

 

Hypertension, n (%)

18

9

0.691

Diabetes mellitus, n (%)

1 (2)

7 (37)

0.001

History of surgery, n (%)

9 (16)

7 (37)

0.048

Hb preoperatively (g/L)

129.70 ± 18.40

122.70 ± 21.70

0.221

Hct preoperatively (%)

38.90 ± 4.70

37.40 ± 5.90

0.346

TP preoperatively (g/L)

66.20 ± 5.60

63.70 ± 9.40

0.299

Alb preoperatively (g/L)

38.30 ± 5.60

38.60 ± 5.30

0.837

Note: Hb hemoglobin, Hct hematocrit, TP total protein, Alb serum albumin, SD standard deviation

Table 4

Operative and postoperative variables of surgery patients

 

non-POCD (n = 58)

POCD (n = 19)

P-value

Hospital days waiting for surgery (mean ± SD)

2.40 ± 0.49

2.42 ± 0.51

0.855

Operative variables

 Operation time (mean ± SD, minute)

216.02 ± 35.64

225.00 ± 48.42

0.122

 Bleeding (ml)

373.28 ± 44.14

381.58 ± 34.20

0.400

 Transfusion (ml)

123.28 ± 31.37

202.63 ± 52.05

0.845

 ΔHb (%)

9.29 ± 1.51

9.93 ± 1.62

0.601

 Urine (ml)

356.90 ± 178.00

310.53 ± 137.00

0.244

 Hypotension, n (%)

1

1

0.529

Postoperative variables

 Hb 7 days after surgery (g/L)

115.50 ± 15.00

112.80 ± 14.90

0.814

 Hct 7 days after surgery (%)

33.80 ± 4.30

33.10 ± 4.10

0.539

 TP1 at POD 7 (g/L)

56.80 ± 6.70

56.90 ± 4.80

0.692

 Alb1 at POD 7 (g/L)

31.80 ± 3.30

32.50 ± 3.20

0.914

 ICU stay, n (%)

1 (1.70)

2 (10.50)

0.250

 Fasting days (mean ± SD)

2.28 ± 0.62

3.74 ± 0.81

0.000

 SIRS score (0–4)

1.88 ± 0.462

3.26 ± 0.991

0.000

 Hospital stay (days, mean ± SD)

14.80 ± 3.40

16.30 ± 3.60

0.119

∆Hb = (Hb0-Hbmin)/Hb0 × 100%

SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome: (1) temperature > 38 °C or < 36 °C, (2) HR > 90/min, (3) RR > 20/min or PaCO2 < 20 mmHg, and (4) WBC > 12 × 109/L or < 4 × 109/L) or immature monocytes > 10%

Hb, hemoglobin

Hct, hematocrit

TP, total protein

Alb, serum albumin

Hypotension, intraoperative blood pressure drops over 20% of that measured at the rest status

POD, postoperative day

SD, standard deviation

ICU, Intensive Care Unit

The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following risk factors for POCD in elderly CRC patients who underwent CRC surgery: diabetes history (OR = 8.391[2.208–31.882]; P = 0.012), postoperative fasting duration of ≥3 days (OR = 5.236 [1.998–13.721]; P = 0.001), and SIRS score ≥ 3 on the second day after surgery (OR = 6.995 [1.948–25.111]; P = 0.003). These data are presented in Table 5.
Table 5

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for POCD

Variable

Odds ratio

95% confidence interval

P-value

Diabetes mellitus

8.391

2.208–31.882

0.012

Fasting time ≥ 3 days

5.236

1.998–13.721

0.001

SIRS score ≥ 3

6.995

1.948–25.111

0.003

Multivariable model adjusted for gender, body mass index, tumor location and stage, hypertension, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit, total protein, serum albumin, days in hospital waiting for surgery, operation time, bleeding, transfusion, ΔHb, urine, hypotension, duration of Intensive Care Unit stay, and in-hospital stay

Note: POCD postoperative cognitive dysfunction, SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome

Discussion

POCD is a common neurological complication in elderly patients who received various surgical procedures, and its incidence is highly dependent on the type of surgery and general anesthesia management [3]. In addition, cognitive dysfunction exists in some CRC patients [14]. Hence, we moved forward and investigated POCD in the patient population that received surgery, in order to determine these relevant risk factors. It was found that the risk factors for POCD in CRC patients included diabetes history, long fasting time after surgery, and high immunoreactive score (IRS) score on the second day after surgery.

In order to increase the strength of the present study, the investigators attempted to standardize the patient background by including only TMN II-III patients who did not receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy, but received the same surgical procedure and peri−/postoperative treatment. However, based on present trial design, the present study was not able to reveal useful findings.

First, history of diabetes is associated with increased risk of developing POCD in CRC patients. The concept of “diabetic encephalopathy” was raised based on the findings that extensive meninges fibrosis, degradation, and the axonal degeneration of neurons were revealed in diabetic brains, suggesting the high chance of neurological impairment in this patient population [6]. Furthermore, diabetes has also been suggested to be an important risk factor of postoperative neurological complications [15]. In the present study, seven (37%) patients with a diabetic history were identified from these 19 POCD patients, when compared with one (2%) patient with diabetic history out of the 58 non-POCD patients. Moreover, the blood glucose levels of all seven diabetic patients were not effectively controlled. These facts support the close relationship between diabetes (or a blood glucose level that is not well-controlled) and POCD in CRC patients.

Second, extended fasting time after surgery is another risk factor for POCD in CRC patients. It has been previously accepted that early eating after surgery increases the incidence of postoperative complications, including abdominal distension, anastomotic fistula, intestinal obstruction, and reverse flow aspiration [16]. However, in recent years, rapid rehabilitation after surgery has increasingly become popular, based on the fact that early oral feeding and exercise after an operation promotes the recovery of bowel functions [17]. Furthermore, early oral feeding within 24 h after rectal surgery significantly reduces postoperative complications, and decreases the risk of anastomotic fistula [18]. In the present study, the standards (2010 edition) for CRC diagnosis and treatment were strictly followed, and liquid diet was prescribed after gastrointestinal decompression to gas pass, while soft oral food was prescribed a week after the surgery. The present study offers evidence that postoperative fasting time over 3 days increased POCD risk in CRC patients.

Third, the inflammatory status after an operation is another risk factor for POCD in CRC patients. The surgery and anesthesia can affect peripheral and central inflammatory factors, and cognitive function. Circulating inflammatory cytokines can facilitate an overreaction in the central inflammatory system, interfere with neuronal activities and synaptic transmission, and ultimately impair the patient’s cognition [19]. Central inflammatory responses are generally represented by SIRS [20], which are caused by the imbalance between inflammation and anti-inflammation, the decrease in immune function, and uncontrollable inflammation [21]. The present study offers evidence that a SIRS score of > 3 in the second day after surgery increases POCD risk in CRC patients.

Limitations

There were some limitations of the present study. First, the sample size was relatively small due to the inability of patients to perform cognitive tests. Second, pain and opioid treatment are very influential to POCD, and there was a lack of these data in the present study. Third, studies on relevant animal models were not performed to detect the altered protein expression in the hippocampus, which was associated with CRC, in order to support the present hypothesis. Fourth, the present study did not investigate the potential correlation between POCD and body temperature, electrolyte, length of incision, postoperative opioid consumption, or VAS score. Hence, future studies focusing on these issues should be conducted.

Conclusion

Based on the present observation, POCD occurs in certain CRC patients, and the risk factors for POCD in CRC patients include diabetes history, long fasting time after surgery, and high immunoreactive score (IRS) score on the second day after surgery. These risk factors should be taken into consideration when a CRC surgery is planned.

Notes

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This work was supported by grants to YZ from the Medicine Development Project of Nanjing Scientific Committee (YKK15089, 201715033). No funding body played any roles in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: YZ and HGB; Data curation: YLL and YNS; Formal analysis: YZ and YNS; Funding acquisition: YZ, HGB and YNS; Investigation: YZ, LH, YLL, HYW, YJG, WQJ and CZ; Methodology: YZ and HGB; Project administration: YZ, LH and YLL; Resources: YZ, HGB and YNS; Supervision: YZ, YNS and LH; Validation: YZ, YNS and HGB; Writing-original draft: YZ and HGB; Writing-review and editing: YZ and HGB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing First Hospital (ID: KY20131121–01-02), Written informed consent was obtained. The present study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID: ChiCTR-CCS-13004013).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Moller JT, Cluitmans P, Rasmussen LS, Houx P, Rasmussen H, Canet J, Rabbitt P, Jolles J, Larsen K, Hanning CD, et al. Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly ISPOCD1 study. ISPOCD investigators International Study of Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction. Lancet. 1998;351(9106):857–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morandi A, Pandharipande PP, Jackson JC, Bellelli G, Trabucchi M, Ely EW. Understanding terminology of delirium and long-term cognitive impairment in critically ill patients. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2012;26(3):267–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Selnes OA, McKhann GM. Neurocognitive complications after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Neurol. 2005;57(5):615–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tachibana S, Hayase T, Osuda M, Kazuma S, Yamakage M. Recovery of postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients after a long duration of desflurane anesthesia: a pilot study. J Anesth. 2015;29(4):627–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zheng ZX, Zheng RS, Zhang SW, Chen WQ. Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2010. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(19):8455–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krenk L, Rasmussen LS, Kehlet H. New insights into the pathophysiology of postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54(8):951–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun S, Sun D, Yang L, Han J, Liu R, Wang L. Dose-dependent effects of intravenous methoxamine infusion during hip-joint replacement surgery on postoperative cognitive dysfunction and blood TNF-alpha level in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17(1):75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Papamichael D, Audisio RA, Glimelius B, de Gramont A, Glynne-Jones R, Haller D, Kohne CH, Rostoft S, Lemmens V, Mitry E, et al. Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients: International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) consensus recommendations 2013. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(3):463–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van der Stok EP, Spaander MCW, Grunhagen DJ, Verhoef C, Kuipers EJ. Surveillance after curative treatment for colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(5):297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monk TG, Weldon BC, Garvan CW, Dede DE, van der Aa MT, Heilman KM, Gravenstein JS. Predictors of cognitive dysfunction after major noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(1):18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bryson GL, Wyand A, Wozny D, Rees L, Taljaard M, Nathan H. A prospective cohort study evaluating associations among delirium, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and apolipoprotein E genotype following open aortic repair. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58(3):246–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O'Sullivan B, Brierley J, Byrd D, Bosman F, Kehoe S, Kossary C, Pineros M, Van Eycken E, Weir HK, Gospodarowicz M. The TNM classification of malignant tumours-towards common understanding and reasonable expectations. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(7):849–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang Y, Qian Y, Si Y, Bao H, Zhou J. Differential expressions of serum cytokines in cognitive dysfunction patients after colorectal surgery. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015;31(2):231–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gale CR, Deary IJ, Wardle J, Zaninotto P, Batty GD. Cognitive ability and personality as predictors of participation in a national colorectal cancer screening programme: the English longitudinal study of ageing. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(6):530–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hogue CW Jr, Murphy SF, Schechtman KB, Davila-Roman VG. Risk factors for early or delayed stroke after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100(6):642–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    National Comprehensive Cancer N. Cancer-related fatigue. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2003;1(3):308–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, Memon MA. Early versus traditional postoperative feeding in patients undergoing resectional gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011;35(4):473–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ng KH, Ng DC, Cheung HY, Wong JC, Yau KK, Chung CC, Li MK. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancers: lessons learned from 579 cases. Ann Surg. 2009;249(1):82–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baek JH, Kim MS, Lee JC, Lee JH. Systemic inflammation response syndrome score predicts the mortality in multiple trauma patients. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;47(6):523–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li YC, Xi CH, An YF, Dong WH, Zhou M. Perioperative inflammatory response and protein S-100beta concentrations - relationship with post-operative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(5):595–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    DiMondi VP, Townsend ML, Drew RH. Risk factors associated with unfavorable short-term treatment outcome in patients with documented Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015;37(2):348–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology, Nanjing First HospitalNanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations