Advertisement

BMC Plant Biology

, 19:6 | Cite as

Gene regulatory network and abundant genetic variation play critical roles in heading stage of polyploidy wheat

  • Chaonan Shi
  • Lei Zhao
  • Xiangfen Zhang
  • Guoguo Lv
  • Yubo Pan
  • Feng ChenEmail author
Open Access
Review
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Genetics and crop biotechnology

Abstract

Background

The extensive adaptability of polyploidy wheat is attributed to its complex genome, and accurately controlling heading stage is a prime target in wheat breeding process. Wheat heading stage is an essential growth and development processes since it starts at a crucial point in the transition from vegetative phase to reproductive phase.

Main body

Heading stage is mainly decided by vernalization, photoperiod, hormone (like gibberellic acid, GA), and earliness per se (Eps). As a polyploidy species, common wheat possesses the abundant genetic variation, such as allelic variation, copy number variation etc., which have a strong effect on regulation of wheat growth and development. Therefore, understanding genetic manipulation of heading stage is pivotal for controlling the heading stage in wheat. In this review, we summarized the recent advances in the genetic regulatory mechanisms and abundant variation in genetic diversity controlling heading stage in wheat, as well as the interaction mechanism of different signals and the contribution of different genetic variation. We first summarized the genes involved in vernalization, photoperoid and other signals cross-talk with each other to control wheat heading stage, then the abundant genetic variation related to signal components associated with wheat heading stage was also elaborated in detail.

Conclusion

Our knowledge of the regulatory network of wheat heading can be used to adjust the duration of the growth phase for the purpose of acclimatizing to different geographical environments.

Keywords

Polyploidy wheat Heading stage Vernalization Photoperiod Gene regulatory network Genetic variation 

Abbreviations

AP1

APETALA1

CNV

Copy number variation

CO2

CONSTANS 2

ELF3

Early Flowering 3

Eps

Earliness per se

FT

Flowering time

GA

Gibberellic acid

HAP

HEME ACTIVATOR PROTEIN

HAP2

Hemeactivator Protein 2

Hapl_I

HaplotypeI

LD

Long day

MLTE

Mariner-like transposable element

NF-Y

NUCLEAR FACTOR-Y

PHYC

Phytochrome C

Ppd-1

Photoperiod

Ppd-A1

Photoperoid-A1

Ppd-B1

Photoperoid-B1

Ppd-D1

Photoperoid-D1

PRR

Pseudo-response regulator

SAM

Shoot apical meristem

SD

Short day

SOC1

Suppressor of overexpression of CO1

SVP

SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE

TaGI

T. aestivum Gigantea

TaGRP2

T. aestivum glycine-rich RNA binding protein 2

TaHD1

T. aestivum Heading date 1

TaVRT-1

Wheat vegetative to reproductive transition-1

TaVRT-2

Wheat vegetative to reproductive transition-2

TOC1

Timing Of Cab Expression1

UTR

Untranslated region

VER2

vernalization-related 2

Vrn1

Vernalization 1

Vrn2

Vernalization 2

Vrn3

Vernalization 3

WAP1

Wheat APETALA1

WPCL1

Wheat LUX Arrhythmo (LUX)/Phytoclock 1

Background

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is widely cultivated across the globe, where it has adapted to different environments as a result of its natural diversity and complex genome. Bread wheat is a polyploid species with an AABBDD genome, and genome A, B, and D respectively originated from T. urartu, Aegilops speltoides, and Ae. Tauschii [1, 2, 3]. Various cultivars of wheat possess different growth characteristics to endure external stress and adapt to different climatic conditions and geographical environments through regulating their heading stage [4].

Heading occurs in the transition of wheat from the vegetative stage to the reproductive stage. As one of the most important agronomic traits of wheat, the heading days of each cultivar were calculated from the sowing date to the date of more than half of the plants has been heading [5]. The duration of the heading stage determines the flowering time of wheat, which subsequently impacts wheat yield. Vernalization, photoperiod, and exogenous hormones constitute exogenous factors that influence heading stage, while endogenous hormone and narrow-sense earliness per se (Eps) as an endogenous factor influences the duration of the wheat heading stage [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12].

Main text

Part 1. Different signals cross-talk to control wheat heading stage

Interaction among the genes related to vernalization, photoperiod, hormone, and Eps to construct a regulatory network determine wheat growth and development as well as the duration time of the heading stage [7, 11, 12, 13]. The molecular regulatory network of flowering is well understood in the diploid plant Arabidopsis, but remains poorly understood in polyploidy wheat, especially bread wheat which is a long-day hexaploid species. Over the past decades, an increasing number of molecular genetic studies have extended our understanding of the wheat flowering regulatory network. Here, we summarize previous works to further ascertain the genetic networks and epigenetic chromatin modifications in the control of wheat heading stage. The molecular mechanisms of signal cross-talk and allelic variation of related genes in heading stage control in bread wheat are complex, and we hope to provide a relatively complete view of the complex network of wheat heading stage regulatory pathways.

Vernalization signaling regulatory network in wheat

Certain types of plants go through a period of sustained low temperature to promote flowering, namely vernalization [14]. Wheat is a typical crop that requires vernalization to accelerate flowering. Based on growth habit, wheat cultivars with a spring growth habit have no vernalization requirement and can be planted in spring, are classified as spring wheat. Wheat cultivars that planted in autumn and can flower during the subsequent spring are regarded as winter wheat and require vernalization to ensure punctual flowering [15]. In regard to winter wheat with predominant planting area, it suggests that different signals start at different developmental stages based on its growth habit. For example, endogenous hormone and Eps play important roles throughout the growth and development process, and then vernalization, photoperoid and exogenous hormone have a good chance to work in later period of wheat development, as indicated in Fig. 1. The most obvious difference of them is their heading stage response when deal with vernalization or developing in a long-day condition. Vernalization can facilitate the transition from the vegetative stage to the reproductive stage and minimize exposure to harsh surroundings, thereby maintaining a stable output.
Fig. 1

Wheat heading stage are affected by multi-environment. Based on the growth habit of winter wheat, hormone and earliness per se (Eps) can work on the whole life of the wheat growth and development, vernalization always being to take effect on the transition from the vegetative phase to reproductive phase during winter time, following by vernalization, photoperiod functioned to control flowering. Different colors represent different signals

The wheat vernalization regulatory network is mainly controlled by three pivotal genetic loci: Vernalization1 (Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1, Vrn-D1), Vernalization2 (Vrn-A2), and Vernalization3 (Vrn-B3) [16, 17, 18]. These genes have been cloned and validated to directly or indirectly take part in the vernalization pathway. Vrn1 was cloned by chromosome walking in diploid wheat and encodes a MADS-box transcription factor, which is homologous to the Arabidopsis APETALA1 with a protein-binding site (CArG-box) in the promoter region [16]. Vrn1 can directly activate Vrn-B3 expression under LD conditions [19, 20]. It could be significantly up-regulated by prolonged exposure to a cold environment and directly accelerates the transition to reproductive development at the shoot apex, but Vrn1 is not essential gene of wheat flowering since Vrn1 mutants (with premature stop codon of Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1 and Vrn-D1) can flower and produce seeds under both vernalized and unvernalized conditions, suggesting the existence of other wheat flowering association genes that make wheat cultivars preferable adapted to vagaries of climate [21]. When a winter wheat carries the 3 recessive vrn-1 (Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1 and Vrn-D1) alleles, transition is significantly accelerated by vernalization treatment [22, 23]. Voss-Fels et al. (2018) showed that six SNP markers of a highly significant QTL for nodal root angle index on chromosome 5B was identified to have strong linkage disequilibrium to Vrn-B1, and thus speculate that Vrn1 was possibly involved in the regulation of plant morphology in wheat and barley [24]. In addition, Wheat vegetative to reproductive transition-1 (TaVRT-1) and Wheat APETALA1 (WAP1) were identified to be highly similar to Vrn1, and these three genes maybe the same locus. They were identified on chromosome 5A, 5B and 5D, and encode an APETALA1 (AP1)-like MADS box gene. They are all not only induced by vernalization and photoperiod but also are involved in the phase transition and are maintained during the reproductive phase [16, 22, 23].

Histone modification is an important post-translational process in epigenetic regulation, and it can influence various phenotype by changing gene expression [25, 26]. Methylation modification of histone lysine mainly occurs in the 4, 9, 27, and 36 lysine residues of histone H3 in eukaryotes. H3K9me and H3K27me have been confirmed to be related to the inhibition of gene expression, but H3K4me and H3K36me were related to the activation of gene expression [27]. Vernalization activated the Vrn1 transcript by changing the ratio of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3. Vernalization enhanced the H3K4me3 expression level of Vrn1 and Vrn3 with no concurrent change in H3K27me3 in winter wheat. Vrn2 repression is associated with methylation and a lower H3K27me3 methylation level, but the enrichment of H3K27me3 may have a role in repressing Vrn2 [28]. In barley, however, Vrn1 transcripts were up-regulated during vernalization regardless of whether under long or short days, whereas the expression levels of Vrn3 and Vrn2 had no obvious changes under short days. It is thus speculated that Vrn1 is a direct target gene of vernalization. Researchers found that vernalization started the epigenetic regulation of the Vrn1 chromatin state, but no similar phenomenon was observed in Vrn2 or Vrn3, further verifying that Vrn1 is a direct target gene of vernalization. In Arabidopsis, vernalization-induced flowering is mediated by the epigenetic regulation of the floral repressor FLC, but in barley or other cereals, is mediated by the epigenetic regulation of the floral activator Vrn1. Vernalization alters the methylation level of Vrn1 and increases the levels of the active histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) and suppresses the levels of histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) [29].

Vrn2, initially mapped on chromosome 5A, as a dominant repressor of flowering time that is downregulated by vernalization, is composed of two tandem duplicated CCT domain (CONSTANS, CO-like, and TOC1) genes ZCCT1 and ZCCT2 with a putative zinc finger in the N-terminus and a CCT domain in the C-terminus, and reduction of the expression of ZCCT1 is closely associated with the acceleration of flowering time. They have no orthologs of Vrn2 in rice or Arabidopsis, so Vrn2 may be a special regulatory element during the evolution of wheat [17]. Vrn3 encodes a RAF kinase inhibitor–like protein that positively regulates wheat flowering and shows high similarity to FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) in Arabidopsis. Vrn3 is induced by long days and acts as a bridge linked to the vernalization and photoperiod pathway, which then further accelerates reproductive apex development [18]. Therefore, an active Vrn1 or Vrn3 can accelerate flowering, but the activation of Vrn2 requires vernalization in plants to flower. Vrn-D4, derived from the insertion of part of the long arm of chromosome 5A (including Vrn-A1) into the short arm of chromosome 5D, is a homologous gene of Vrn1. As another vernalization-related gene, Vrn-D4 encodes a protein with high similarity to the Arabidopsis meristem identity protein APETALA1 (AP1). This gene was first identified in an Australian wheat cultivar Gabo that made an important contribution to the development of the spring growth habit in ancient wheat from South Asia [30, 31]. Detailed information on the participation of these genes in vernalization pathways was shown in Table 1.
Table 1

The detailed information of genes association with the wheat heading-flowering regulatory network

Gene

Chromosomr. location

Protein product

Description

Functions

Mutant phenotype

Gene number in IWGSC1.0

Position in IWGSC1.0

References

Vrn1

5A, 5B, 5D

Encodes a MADS-box transcription factor, also named as WAP1 or TaVRT1

Induced by prolonged cold, long photoperiod

Not only promotes the apex transition to generative development, but also activation of long day response in leaves

Recessive alleles at all Vrn-1 homoeoloci confer a winter growth habit (vernalization sensitive), whereas one or more dominant alleles at Vrn-1 homoeoloci result in a spring growth habit (vernalization insensitive).

TraesCS5A01G391700, TraesCS5B01G396600, TraesCS5D01G401500.

5A:587423056–587,423,240, 5B:573815719–573,815,903, 5D:467184094–467,184,278.

[16, 22, 23]

Vrn2

5A

Encodes a protein containing a putative zinc finger and a CCT protein-protein interaction domain

Down-regulated when plants are vernalized

A dominant repressor of flowering

Functional mutations in the ZCCT genes result in a spring growth habit and early flowering

No

No

[17]

Vrn3

7B

Encodes a mobile protein, homologous to the Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT)

Induced by vernalization and long days

Accelerates reproductive apex development

Transgenic wheat plants overexpressing Vrn-3B have an extra-early flowering phenotype without the need of vernalization

TraesCS7B01G013100

7B:9700818–9,704,363

[18]

Vrn4

5D

Encodes a MADS-box transcription factor highly similar to VRN1

VRN-D4 locus originated by the insertion of a large segment from chromosome arm 5AL into chromosome arm 5DS

Vrn-D4 likely operates upstream of the positive regulatory feedback loop connecting Vrn1, Vrn2 and Vrn3.

The mutation flowered later than plants carrying the wild type allele

No

No

[30, 31]

VER2

2D

Encodes a nucleocytoplasmic carbohydrate-binding protein, a jacalin-like lectin, with high affinity for glcnac and galactose

After vernalization, VER2 accumulates predominantly in the nucleus in shoot tips and young leaves

Nuclear-localized VER2 interacts with O-glcnac-modified TaGRP2 to relieve the repression on tavrn1 transcript accumulation and to promote flowering in hexaploid winter wheat

VER2 downregulated in winter wheat results in flowered later

No

No

[47, 50]

TaGRP2

No.

Glycine-rich RNA binding protein

TaGRP2 is dynamically O-glcnacylated during vernalization

TaGRP2 binds to the pre-mRNA of Vrn1 and inhibits Vrn1 expression

TaGRP2-Ri plants accelerated flowering compared with wild type

No

No

[50, 51]

TaVRT2

7A, 7B, 7D

Encodes a predicted protein of 226 amino acids, belongs to the StMADS 11

Accumulate in winter wheat during the vegetative phase and decline towards the transition to the reproductive phase.

The presence of Vrn2 and TaVRT-2 transcripts early during long time exposure could reduce or delay the expression of Vrn1

Mutation of TaVRT-2 results in the advance of flowering

No

No

[48]

TaGI

3A, 3B, 3D

Encodes a nucleoplasmically localized protein which contains 1174 amino acid residues

The patterns of TaGI rhythmic expression in leaves are regulated by circadian clocks, but can be disturbed by light/dark cycle

Functions in mediating photoperiodic flowering, controlling circadian rhythms and phytochrome signaling

Mutations in the TaGI gene cause delayed flowering only in long day photoperiod

TraesCS3A01G116300; TraesCS3B01G135400; TraesCS3D01G118200.

3A:84189859–84,191,364; 3B:117928502–117,930,007; 3D:71969619–71,970,784.

[63, 64]

WSOC1

4DL

Is a member of the monocot SOC1-like gene family

WSOC1 expression is affected neither by vernalization nor photoperiod, whereas it is induced by gibberellin at the seedling stage

WSOC1 functions as a flowering activator like SOC1 in Arabidopsis

Downregulated of WSOC1 results in delayed flowering

TraesCS4D01G341700

4D:498394464–498,398,154

[71]

WPCL1

No.

Encodes a MYB transcription factor belonging to the GARP family

Maybe regulated by circadian clock

Controlling the early flowering phenotype in the einkorn wheat mutant

Deletion of WPCL1 leads to flowering even under short-day conditions

No

No

[60, 61]

TaHD1

6A, 6B, 6D

Encodes a transcription factor with zinc finger motif and nuclear localization signals, also called CO2

Can regulated by long-day condition and circadian clock

Directly regulate vernalization gene under long-day condition

The co mutant show a delayed flowering response under long-day environment

TraesCS6A01G289400; TraesCS6B01G319500; TraesCS6D01G269500.

6A:521453035–521,453,945; 6B:567398838–567,399,457; 6D:379572052–379,572,962.

[44, 62]

TaPHYC

5A, 5B, 5D

No

Long-day induced wheat PHYC forms signaling active homodimers and translocate into the nucleus

Promotes wheat flowering under inductive photoperiods

The loss of function of wheat PHYC results in altered expression of circadian clock and photoperiod genes and a dramatic delay in flowering under long days

TraesCS5A01G391300; TraesCS5D01G401000; TraesCS5B01G396200.

5A:586595153–586,599,481; 5D:466221190–466,223,373; 5B:573216947–573,219,055

[60, 61]

Ppd1

2A, 2B, 2D

Encodes a pseudo-response regulator (PRR) protein with a CCT domain, also named taprr37

Induced by long-day

Can regulated vernalization genes and participate in circadian clock function

Knockdown of Ppd1 made the wheat delayed flowering

TraesCS2A01G081900; TraesCS2D01G079600

2A:36936362–36,938,400; 2D:33952488–33,955,629.

[8, 57]

Before vernalization, the expression level of Vrn1 and Vrn3 are low; a phenomenon that has a negative effect on wheat flowering. However, prolonged cold exposure increases Vrn1 transcripts to promote rapid flowering both under short and longer days, and the higher expression of Vrn1 at the shoot apex can facilitate the development and differentiation of wheat inflorescence meristems, whereas the expression of Vrn1 in the leaves participates in the long-day flowering response pathway. However, the expression level of Vrn2 decreases after vernalization. At the low Vrn2 expression level, long days induce the expression of Vrn3/TaFT1. Vrn1, Vrn2, Vrn3, and some other association genes are involved in a positive regulatory feedback loop that aims to balance the expression levels of positive and negative regulatory elements, finally regulating the transition of the apex from the vegetative stage to the reproductive stage [32, 33, 34, 35, 36]. Vrn1 can bind the promoter of Vrn3 in vernalized plants, and also can target Vrn2 that were repressors of flowering that are down-regulated in vernalized plants [33, 37]. As a duplicated copy of Vrn-D1, Vrn-D4 is pivotal for ancient wheat from South Asia to develop a spring growth habit, and expresses in the leaves and accumulates after prolonged exposure to low temperature. Furthermore, Vrn-D4 is expressed earlier than other VRN1 genes in the absence of vernalization, and induced mutations in this gene resulted in delayed flowering [31]. NUCLEAR FACTOR-Y (NF-Y) belongs to the HEME ACTIVATOR PROTEIN (HAP) transcription factor family. Previous studies showed that there were different NF-Y proteins involved in the integration of wheat vernalization and the photoperiod pathway [39, 40, 41]. Prior to vernalization treatment, the products of Vrn2 competed with other CCT-domain proteins (such as the photoperiod gene CO2, which is the functional homolog of CO in wheat) to interact with NF-Y transcription factors to inhibit the transcription of Vrn3. Further influence of this interaction is to facilitate or postpone flowering depending on the subunits in the NF-Y complex and the new formation of the complex including the type of CCT domain proteins. In rice and Arabidopsis, the FT protein acts as a long-distance flowering signal (florigen) that moves from the leaves to the shoot apical meristem via the phloem and promotes flowering in a wide range of plant species [42, 43]. TaFDL, a homologous gene of FD/OsFD1, exists in the stem apical meristem of bread wheat, and the VRN3 protein can form a functional protein complex with TaFDL to bind the CArG box domain which is located in the promoter region of Vrn1 in vitro, leading to transcriptional activation of Vrn1 [44].

Another vernalization-induced gene vernalization-related 2 (VER2) was identified to encode a nucleocytoplasmic carbohydrate-binding protein. VER2 constitutes a jacalin-like lectin and has a close relationship with GlcNAc and galactose. This gene not only impacts wheat flowering, but also is involved in the regulation of spikelet development. Prolonged exposure to low temperatures enhances the integral O-GlcNAcylation levels. However, if plants are subjected to high temperatures following cold treatment, the integral O-GlcNAcylation levels in plants will decrease. VER2 accumulated in the nucleus in the shoot tips and young leaves when wheat long-term exposure to low temperature [45, 46, 47], and VER2 can specifically recognize O-GlcNAc-modified proteins in vernalized wheat plants. Wheat vegetative to reproductive transition-2 (TaVRT-2) is a member of the StMADS-11 clade of flowering repressors and encodes a predicted protein of 226 amino acids that is also involved in the flowering pathway in wheat. In addition to the existing conserved domains in the TaVRT-2 protein is an MIKC structure (M, MADS domain; I, intervening region; K, K box; C, C-terminal domain), as well as another conserved bipartite nuclear targeting sequence in the MADS domain, and several putative phosphorylation sites [48].

T. aestivum glycine-rich RNA binding protein 2 (TaGRP2) encodes an RNA-binding protein and AtGRP7 is an orthologous gene in Arabidopsis involved in the direct binding to transcripts of genes that participate in flowering regulation and resistance to stress conditions [49]. In the first intron of the Vrn1 pre-mRNA, there is a critical regulatory region that is regarded as the RNA binding site following transcription. Before vernalization, TaGRP2 can directly bind to this binding site of Vrn1 to prevent transcript accumulation. After vernalization, the role of the O-GlcNAc signaling-mediated Vrn1 transcripts in the flowering transition stage in winter wheat can be activated. Phosphorylated VER2 (VER2-P) transfers into the nucleus and then gathers in the shoot tips and young leaves, physically interacting with the RNA-binding protein TaGRP2 that is O-GlcNAc modified, and the nuclear-localized VER2 interacts with the O-GlcNAc-modified TaGRP2 to decrease the inhibitory action on Vrn1 expression [50, 51]. Furthermore, SNP at the binding site of the TaGRP2 protein in the Vrn-A1 first intron was significantly associated with heading date after vernalization, and plants with 3 SNPs at this binding site headed significantly earlier than those with 1 SNP [52].

Additionally, prior to vernalization in winter wheat, TaVRT2 (VEGETATIVE TO REPRODUCTIVE TRANSITION 2) encodes a MADS box gene with sequence similarity to the Arabidopsis SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP) [48], which is regulated independently by photoperiod and vernalization and accumulates during the vegetative phase. It can also directly bind the CArG box of the Vrn1 promoter in vivo to inhibit its activity, and this inhibition is enhanced by VRN2. Once vernalized, the expression of TaVRT2 and Vrn2 are repressed, thus resulting in the gradual accumulation of Vrn1. In the shoot apical meristem (SAM), the activation of Vrn1 induces the transition of the stem apical meristem from the vegetative to the reproductive phase [53].

Photoperiod and other factors cross talk with vernalization signaling pathways

Based on the ability of reproductive growth to be initiated by photoperiod, crops can be classified into long day (LD) or short day (SD) species. LD plants can promote flowering by an over-threshold day length, but a sub-threshold day length can make SD plants flower. Plants growing under long day conditions can flower faster by boosting the transition to reproductive growth. As a long-day crop, wheat can adapt to a broad range of climatic and environmental conditions due to its insensitivity to photoperiod (day length). Wheat can punctually flower when growing under SD conditions (illumination time less than 10 h) under vernalization, and the plants foretell external environmental changes and adjust the flowering time appropriately through photoperiod information [54]. Plants have its own photoreceptors to perceive light signaling, and they can also accommodate the rhythm of light and dark to readjust their circadian clock. Research on flowering time controlling in Arabidopsis also not only concerned day length, but also photoreceptors and circadian clock [55, 56]. Many major components have been identified in Arabidopsis, but only a handful of homologous genes have been cloned in wheat, and the molecular mechanism of the photoperiodic network in wheat is not clear.

In wheat, the photoperiodic regulation of flowering is determined by the dominant genes Photoperoid-A1 (Ppd-A1), Photoperoid-B1 (Ppd-B1), and Photoperoid-D1 (Ppd-D1) located on chromosomes 2A, 2B, and 2D, respectively, and they can reduce the retardation of heading stage under SD conditions by controlling wheat sensitivity to photoperiod [54]. The barley Ppd-H1 gene has been cloned by positional cloning and codes for a pseudo-response regulator (PRR) protein with a CCT domain as a kind of genes were involved in circadian clock. The recessive Ppd-H1 barley mutation exhibits a later flowering time under long-day, but with no short-day phenotypic effect [8, 57]. Ppd-D1a is a homologous gene of the Ppd-H1 in hexaploid wheat with early flowering, other than barley, the semi-dominant Ppd-D1a wheat mutation has a phenotype that flowers rapidly in short-day or long-day environments [57]. In addition, Ppd-1 has a close relationship to the development of wheat spikelet via promoting the expression level of Vrn3 that is a hub between these two pathways, and the Ppd-D1 is the main active site to regulate wheat heading and flowering dates in the Yellow and Huai winter wheat region, followed by Vrn-B1 and Vrn-D1 [5, 58]. Early studies discovered that the factors that influence photoperiodic flowering include day length and different photoreceptors. When a red/far-red-light photoreceptor has an optical signal that contains red light, this facilitates the accumulation of physiologically active Pfr (PHYB:PHYC heterodimers and PHYC:PHYC homodimers). Under far-red light, Pfr is transformed into the devitalized Pr form. PHYTOCHROME C (PHYC) can independently activate the transcription of PPD1 and the circadian clock output genes CO2/TaDH1 under irradiation [59, 60]. GZ3260 is detected in einkorn wheat and encodes a member of the MYB transcription factor family and is a homolog of PCL1 and LUX in rice and Arabidopsis, respectively. It also named WHEAT LUX ARRHYTHMO (LUX)/PHYTOCLOCK 1 (WPCL1) and might suppress Ppd-1 transcription by combining in the promoter region of Ppd-1. As observed in Arabidopsis, the WPCL1 gene expresses in the daytime and the transcriptional level of the WPCL1 gene achieve a high level at night [60, 61]. The recessive ppd-H1 allele in barley can enhance the circadian rhythm gene CO homologs and is associated with a decrease in FT expression, which is consistent with the late flowering phenotype. The T. aestivum Heading date 1 (TaHD1) gene, also called CONSTANS 2 (CO2), encodes a transcription factor with a zinc finger motif, a CCT domain, and nuclear localization signals, and is the homolog of CO in wheat, and its expression pattern follows a diurnal rhythm under long days. TaHD1 can compete with VRN2 to integrate the NF-Y transcription factors to form a complex, and plays an opposing role to VRN2 to equilibrate the decreased transcripts of Vrn3 that are inhibited by VRN2 [44, 62]. The T. aestivum GIGANTEA (TaGI) gene works upstream of CO and encodes a nucleoplasmically-localized protein that contains 1174 amino acid residues, which is initiated by photoperiod and then expressed in the leaves at the seedling stage. It is controlled by the circadian clock under a light/dark cycle and produces a bulky protein complex that binds to the critical region in the CO gene promoter [63, 64]. ODDSOC2 is another MADS box transcription factor, that can indirectly restrain flowering, but when plants express Vrn1 or long time to prolong cold, the expression level of this gene will be down-regulated [38, 65, 66].

When given wheat enough vernalization and photoperiod, differences exist among wheat varieties that are regulated by Eps genes. Narrow-sense earliness per se (Eps) of wheat is the third effector that influences wheat heading stage equivalently to the autonomous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis. Wheat always displays Eps when the seeds are subjected to full vernalization and are grown under long days [12, 67]. No major genes have been cloned for this character, and the molecular mechanisms and wheat cultivars of different alleles/allelic combinations have scarcely been reported. Eps genes are supposed to be involved in various periods of wheat heading stage and work independently. The Eps-Am1 gene was identified as the wheat ortholog of circadian clock regulator EARLY FLOWERING 3 (ELF3) in T. monococcum [12]. Meanwhile, an Eps quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapped on the 1DL based on different types of molecular markers also included TaELF3, which had functional similarity to the T. monococcum Eps-Am1 locus. Premature stop codons or deletion of the TaELF3 gene results in its failure to function and an early flowering phenotype, and thus may be a repressor of flowering [67, 68, 69, 70]. The molecular mechanism by which Eps regulates heading stage is unknown, and the location of these genes suggests that they are possibly cross-talking with vernalization genes and photoperiod genes, which maybe overspread their influence. Another important factor influencing wheat heading stage is plant hormones. In Arabidopsis, GAs, as a class of hormones, can up-regulate the transcription of SOC1 (SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO1), which encodes a MADS-box gene to accelerate flowering [70]. Wheat SOC1 (WSOC1) in polyploid wheat is homologous with SOC1 in Arabidopsis thaliana, can partially restore the Arabidopsis SOC1 mutation. Its expression is induced by GA at the seedling stage, but cannot be regulated by vernalization and photoperiod. This gene was expressed in young spikes initiated before the reproductive transition, but was preferentially expressed in leaves and was associated with the expression of WAP1/Vrn1 in the flowering pathway [71]. The existence of both GA and Vrn1 precipitate the up-regulation of WSOC1 and WFL (Wheat FLO/LFY) to accelerate process of wheat spike development [72]; WFL is a gene identified in the floral meristem associated with young spike development that is widely conserved in both monocots and dicots. In conclusion, both VRN1 and GA are important to wheat shoot apical meristem and spike development under short days by accelerating the expression of SOC1–1 and WFL [73, 74]. The detailed information and function of genes related to wheat heading stage are described in Table 1.

Part 2. Abundant genetic variation of signal components associated with wheat heading stage

As a heterogeneous hexaploid crop, wheat genome possesses the abundant genetic variation, such as insertions, deletions, point mutations, copy number variation and haplotype diversity etc. Many studies indicated that genetic variants can alter vernalization requirement and photoperiod response to regulate heading stage and flowering times in wheat [75, 76].

Genetic variation of vernalization-related genes influence wheat heading stage

As a pivotal regulatory element, the allelic diversity of genes regulating the wheat growth life cycle is extensively adapted towards dealing with constant changes and pressure. The variation in Vrn1 is the most abundant. The existence of one dominant allele of at least one Vrn1 gene homolog (Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1, Vrn-G1, or Vrn-D1) determines the spring growth habit in wheat. Several important domains exist in the promoter region of the Vrn1 gene, for example, CArG-box is a common binding site for MADS-box proteins located 180 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site, and Vrn-box is a sequence (TTAAAAACCCCTCCCC) of 16 bp that determines whether the wheat requires vernalization to promote flowering. Between the CArG box and Vrn-box is a G-box (CACGTG), which is a binding site for bZIP transcription factors [16]. In the pre-mRNA of Vrn1, a crucial region contributes to the interaction between TaGRP2 and VRN1. Therefore, the allelic variation of Vrn1 relies on mutations in the promoter region or the intron1 of the A, B, and D genome. An analysis of the mutations in the Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1, and Vrn-D1 genes in accessions with a spring growth habit are shown in Table 2. The number of distinct mutations that were reported in the promoter region or intron1 of Vrn1 can be described as follows. The Vrn-A1a gene has three alleles termed Vrn-A1a.1, Vrn-A1a.2, and Vrn-A1a.3. Vrn-A1a.1, and Vrn-A1a.3, also known as Vrn-A1a, which were identified in hexaploid and tetraploid wheat separately. They are associated with a foldback repetitive element insertion and a duplicated region in the promoter, resulting in an intense impact on the vernalization response. Vrn-A1a.2 displays a 16-bp deletion and four single nucleotide deletions within the MITE insertion compared to Vrn-A1a.1 [76, 77]. Six types of Vrn-A1b allele variants exist that have 20-bp deletions at 157 bp, and Vrn-A1b.1-Vrn-A1b.5 differ from each other only on account of a polymorphism of the A-tract within the Vrn-box, and are indicated in turn as AAAAT, AACCC, AAACC, AAAAC, and AAACA. Nevertheless, Vrn-A1b.6 takes a “C- > G” transversion in the C-rich fragment than vrn-A1b4 and Vrn-A1b.1. Then Vrn-A1b.2, Vrn-A1b.5, Vrn-A1b.6 detected for “spring” but vrn-A1b.3, vrnA1b.4 detected for “winter” variants [76, 77]. Vrn-A1c, Vrn-A1d, Vrn-A1e, Vrn-A1f, and a series of allele variants have been characterized in polyploid wheat. Compared with the recessive vrn-A1 allele, Vrn-A1c, Vrn-A1L, and Vrn-A1u have a deletion in intron1, respectively. A variant with a 7.2-kb deletion in intron1 was identified in the tetraploid cultivar ‘Langdon’, and this allele was named Vrn-A1L. Vrn-A1u is the variant of the 1.4-kb deletion in intron1 identified in T. urartu and polyploid species, and Vrn-A1ins is another variant with a 0.5-kb insertion near the 5′ side of intron1 in two spring accessions of T. monococcum [76, 78]. Vrn-A1d, Vrn-A1e, Vrn-A1f, and Vrn-A1h are four alleles that are missing different lengths of fragments in the promoter region. Vrn-A1d has a deletion of 32 bp and this fragment contains the complete HDD region and part of the CArG box, generating a diagnostic 147-bp Msp I restriction fragment [79]. Another 54-bp deletion in Vrn-A1e, covering the CArG box and HDD regions, was discovered in the Vrn-A1 promoter region of the T. turgidum ssp. dicoccum accession ST 27 [78]. The Vrn-A1f allele has an 8-bp deletion in the 128 to 120 bp region as well as a 50-bp deletion in the 112 to 62 bp region, which is located in the foldback element insertion present in the G genome in tetraploid wheat species [28]. Vrn-A1h has a 20-bp deletion near the CArG- box, resulting in the loss of one MspI site [78].
Table 2

The detailed information of genes association with the wheat heading-flowering regulatory network

Gene

Accession number of NCBI

Mutation region

Mutation pattern

Phenotype

Ployploid wheat

Reference

vrn-A1

AY747600

Promoter

A 222-bp foldback element insertion in the promoter region

Later heading

T. aestivum cultivar Triple Dirk C

[79]

Vrn-A1a

Vrn-A1a.1

AY616458

Promoter

A 222-bp foldback element insertion in the promoter region

Early heading

T. aestivum cultivar Triple Dirk C

[17]

Vrn-A1a.3

Early heading

Vrn-A1a.2

KR782255

A 16-bp deletion and 4 single nucleotide deletions within the MITE insertion when compared to Vrn-A1a.1

Early heading

Triticum compactum cultivar Tiroler Fruhe Binkel

[76]

Vrn-A1b

Vrn-A1b

AY616461

A 20-bp deletion at − 157 bp in promoter region

A 20-bp deletion at −157 bp

Early heading

T. aestivum cultivar Spring Marquis

[17]

Vrn-A1b.1

KM047646

A-tract within the VRN-box: AAAAT

Early heading

Triticum turgidum strain PI 264954

[76]

Vrn-A1b.2

KM047641

A-tract within the VRN-box: AACCC

Early heading

Triticum dicoccoides strain PI 233288

[76]

Vrn-A1b.3

KM047647

A-tract within the VRN-box: AAACC

Early heading

Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccon strain UA0300214

[76]

Vrn-A1b.4

KM047651

A-tract within the VRN-box: AAAAC

Early heading

Triticum dicoccoides strain PI 466941

[76]

Vrn-A1b.5

KM047652

A-tract within the VRN-box: AAACA

Early heading

Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccon strain UA0300212

[76]

Vrn-A1b.6

KT692944

Takes along a “C- > G” transversion in the C-rich fragment than Vrn-A1b

Early heading

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum strain CItr 10,024

[76]

Vrn-A1c

AY747599

Intron1

Intron 1 deletion in the A genome copy

Early heading

T. aestivum cultivar IL369

[79]

Vrn-A1d

AY616462

Promoter

A 32-bp deletion, which included the complete HDD region and part of the CArG box.

Early heading

Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccoides

[17]

Vrn-A1e

AY616463

Promoter

A 54-bp deletion, which included the CArG box and HDD regions

Early heading

Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccum ST27

[17]

Vrn-A1f

DQ146421

Promoter

An 8-bp deletion in the region between −128 and − 120, and a 50-bp deletion in the region between −112 and − 62

Early heading

Triticum monococcum strain PI503874

[29]

Vrn-A1h

GQ451745

Promoter

A 20-bp deletion near the CArG box

Early heading

Triticum monococcum subsp. aegilopoides

[78]

Vrn-A1i

KM016790

Promoter

Nucleotide substitution in promoter region

Weak effect on the vernalization response

Triticum turgidum strain PI 208912

[76]

VRN-A1u

GQ451737

Intron1

A 1.4-kb deletion in intron1

Later heading

Triticum urartu isolate Tu54

[78]

vrn-B1

AY747604

Promoter

 

Later heading

T. aestivum cultivar Triple Dirk C

[79]

Vrn-B1a

AY747603

Intron1

6850-bp deletion at + 836 bp

Early heading

T. aestivum cultivar Triple Dirk B

[79]

Vrn-B1b

FJ766015

Intron1

6850-bp deletion at + 836 bp and 37-bp deletion at + 7992 bp

\

T. aestivum

[80]

Vrn-B1c

HQ593668

Intron1

The deletion of 0.8 kb coupled with the duplication of 0.4 kb in intron1

Early heading

T. aestivum

[81]

Vrn-B1ins

HQ130482

Intron1

817 bp deletion from 798 to 1614 bp, and 432 bp (from 798 to 1614 bp upstream) duplicated

Early heading

T. aestivum cultivar Saratovskaya29

[82]

KR782252

Promoter

A retrotransposon insertion in the promoter

Early heading

Triticum turgidum cultivar Zerdakia

[76]

vrn-D1

AY747606

No.

No.

Later heading

T. aestivum cultivar Triple Dirk C

[79]

Vrn-D1a

AY747597

Intron1

A 4235-bp deletion in intron1 (625–4859 bp)

Later heading

T. aestivum cultivar Triple Dirk E

[79]

Vrn-D1b

JQ406528

Intron1

Deletion in intron 1 identical to Vrn-D1a allele and a single nucleotide mutation C to A at − 161 bp in CArG box in promoter region

Later heading

T. aestivum

[83]

Vrn-D1c

KP721800

Promoter

An 174-bp fragment was inserted into the 5′-UTR at − 601 bp (relative to ATG) of the Vrn-D1 gene

Early maturity

T. aestivum

[85]

Vrn-D1s

KF800714

Intron1

An 844-bp insertion which is a novel transposable DNA element in intron1

 

Triticum spelta strain PI 348700

[84]

vrn-B3

DQ890162

Promoter

A 5295-bp repetitive element insertion that is absent in the CS allele associated with late flowering

Later heading

T. aestivum cultivar Chinese Spring

[18]

Vrn-B3a

DQ890165

Promoter

A 5295-bp repetitive element inserted 591 bp upstream from the start codon

Later heading

T. aestivum cultivar CS(Hope7B)

[18]

Vrn-B3b

JN627519

Promoter

An exact 890-bp fragment was inserted into the 5’ UTR (untranslated region) at − 429 bp

Later heading

T. aestivum

[93]

Vrn-B3c

JQ082311

Promoter

A 20-bp deletions at −3543 bp and a 4-bp deletion at − 3591 bp compared with Vrn-B3a

Later heading

T. aestivum cultivar Ji874–109

[93]

Note, No. Means there are no more information refer to

In the Vrn-B1 locus, one distinct deletion of 6850 bp occurs in intron1 in the Vrn-B1a mutant, position is counting start with intron1 in TDB (Triple Dirk B, vrn-A1/Vrn-B1/vrn-D1). TDB is a spring wheat that carries a dominant Vrn-B1 allele, and TDC (Triple Dirk C, vrnA1/vrnB1/vrnD1) carries recessive alleles at the three Vrn-1 loci with a winter growth habit. In addition to this large deletion, two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in intron1 and intron2 were detected in TDC and TDB (Fu et al., 2005). Vrn-B1b is a mutation with a 6850-bp deletion at + 836 bp and a 37-bp deletion at + 7992 bp in TDC [80]. An 817-bp deletion from 798 to 1614 bp, and a 432-bp duplication upstream of this region was found in the T. aestivum cultivar Saratovskaya29, suggesting that distinct alterations within the Vrn-B1c allele may influence the flanking sequence of intron1 by breaking a putative binding site [81, 82]. Based on the Vrn-D1 genome, four alleles have been identified and three of them occur in intron1, while only one allele was found in the promoter region. Vrn-D1a was first identified in TDE (vrn-A1/vrn-B1/Vrn-D1), which is a spring wheat with the dominant Vrn-D1 allele. It has a 4235-bp deletion (625–4859 bp) in intron1 compared to TDC [79]. Vrn-D1b has the same deletion in intron1 in comparison with the Vrn-D1a allele, and in addition, a single nucleotide C to A mutation at 161 bp in the CArG box results in 32-day-later heading [83]. Vrn-D1s has an 844-bp insertion in intron1 of T. spelta strain PI 348700 and this fragment is a novel transposable DNA element (named DTA_Chimera_KF800714) [84]. The fourth allele constitutes the only one insertion mutant in the promoter region of Vrn-D1c. Cultivars with Vrn-D1c exhibit earlier heading and flowering than others with the recessive allele vrn-D1 without vernalization, but display extension heading when treated with prolonged low temperature. The Vrn-D1c genotype is important to bread wheat cultivars from the Yellow and Huai Valley areas, and was discovered in Yunong 876 with a 174-bp fragment insertion in the 5’-UTR at 601 bp of the vrn-D1 gene [85].

Copy number variation (CNV), as a type of gene mutation, play the vital role in the regulation of extensive adaptability. The CNV of Vrn-A1 alleles investigated also influenced gene expression and showed a slight influence on wheat heading stage and flowering time. One, two, and three Vrn-A1 copies dictate the time under longer period of exposure to cold conditions that a plant requires to accelerate flowering, and plants with an increased CNV require longer cold treatment to reinforce flowering [75]. A SNP in exon4 of vrn-A1 affected the QTL of winter wheat development genes, and the alleles vrn-A1a and vrn-A1b resulted in early flowering in the wheat cultivars Jagger and 2174, respectively [86]. The diverse variation in VRN1 can be seen in Table 2.

Vrn2 encodes a zinc finger transcription factor and includes two tandem-duplicated CCT domains, ZCCT1 and ZCCT2, with 76% analogy to a putative zinc finger, CONSTANS (CO), CONSTANS-LIKE (CO-like), or TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1 (TOC1) [17, 29]. In Arabidopsis, the CCT domain and yeast HEMEACTIVATOR PROTEIN2 (HAP2) act similarly as key elements for the HAP2/HAP3/HAP5 complex to bind to CCAAT boxes in the promoter region of their target genes to regulate their expression. Variation in the CCT domain impacting on the functions of proteins CO, TOC1, VRN2, and PPD-H1 has been identified several in plants, but rare alleles in the CCT domain have been detected in bread wheat [87]. Plants with homozygous recessive vrn-2 alleles have a spring growth habit, but RNA interference of ZCCT1 in the hexaploid winter wheat cultivar Jagger can also accelerate flowering [88, 89]. If alleles for winter growth habit are present at all VRN1 loci, then allelic variation for VRN2 would be detected. The ZCCT1 and ZCCT2 proteins from nonfunctional vrn-2 alleles have mutations at positions 16, 35, or 39 of the CCT domain that are conserved between the CCT and HEME ACTIVATOR PROTEIN2 (HAP2) proteins. Therefore, both ZCCT-B2 gene mutations are sufficient to make tetraploid wheat exhibit a spring growth habit [89]. Non-vernalized synthetic vrn2-null plants flowered 118 days earlier than the winter control, and showed a limited vernalization response. In the mutant, Vrn-B2 expressed higher than the Vrn-D2 and displayed an inhibiting action under partial vernalization, but without vernalization, it only carried Vrn-B2 or Vrn-D2 in the heterozygous condition. This suggested that different combinations of Vrn-B2 and Vrn-D2 may participate in regulating the vernalization network in mild winter regions [89].

The T. aestivum cultivar Chinese Spring (Hope7B) allele Vrn-B3a has a 5295-bp repetitive element inserted 591 bp upstream in the promoter region and resulted in early flowering, while the vrn-B3 allele in Chinese Spring makes wheat flower later. Vrn-B3b is an exact 890-bp fragment inserted into the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) at 429 bp identified in one Chinese landrace cultivar Chadianhong. Then, a 20-bp deletion at 3543 bp and a 4-bp deletion at 3591 bp when compared with Vrn-B3a in Ji874–109 were discovered and designated as the Vrn-B3c allele [18]. The condition of the Vrn3 alleles is illustrated in Table 2.

Recent studies relating to the characterization of the Vrn-D4 locus, which arose via the duplication of Vrn-A1, discovered the existence of a SNP in the conserved TaGRP2 RIP-3 region that influences the binding ability of TaGRP2 with Vrn1 [30].

Diverse variants of photoperiod (Ppd-1) genes play different roles in wheat heading stage regulation

Large deletions, insertions, SNP, and copy number variations in Ppd1-A1, Ppd1-B1, and Ppd1-D1 have been reported to influence wheat sensitivity to photoperiod [57, 90, 91].

A 2089-bp deletion in the promoter region of Ppd-D1 in the photoperiod-insensitive wheat cultivar ‘Ciano 67’, regarded as the Ppd-D1a allele, was detected and co-segregated with wheat early flowering and has four varieties-Ppd-D1a.1, Ppd-D1a.2, Ppd-D1a.3 [8, 57, 91]. These four alleles with different length deletions in the promoter region appear in Winter-Abukumawase, “GS-100”, “GS-105”, and Kanak, respectively. Other than barley, the semi-dominant Ppd-D1a mutation in wheat permits plants to flower earlier under both SD and LD conditions, while in barley there is no phenotypic effect under SD conditions [8, 57]. Three SNPs were detected in the promoter of wheat cultivars of Winter-Abukumawase (Ppd-A1b.2) and Chinese Spring (Ppd-A1b.1), with two In/Dels of 1-bp more in Ppd-A1b.2. In the 5’ UTR, a 308-bp insertion was identified in Winter-Abukumawase, which results in an insensitive phenotype regarded as Ppd-B1a.1. Ppd-B1b.1 and Ppd-B1a.2 separately represent a SNP mutation in the promoter region of Chihokukomugi (Ppd-B1b.1) and Chinese Spring (Ppd-B1a.2) [57, 91] (see Additional file 1). Moreover, some cultivars possessed the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a allele and other cultivars had the photoperiod sensitive Ppd-D1b allele had been also identified in Huanghuai wheat region [92].

Other modalities of mutations have subsequently been reported. ‘Mercia’ flowers earlier under SD conditions than some photoperiod-sensitive varieties due to the existence of a mariner-like transposable element (MLTE) in intron1, which differs distinctly from the 2089-bp deletion in ‘Ciano 67’ [57].

A recent study indicated that some connection exists between the distribution frequency of Ppd-D1 haplotypes and the geographical environment of the wheat cultivation regions. A total of eight Ppd-D1 haplotypes were detected. HaplotypeI (Hapl_I) was characterized by a 5-bp deletion in exon 7, and the addition of a 2-kb upstream deletion distinguished Hapl_II from Hapl_I. Hap_III has an extra TE insertion in intron1 compared with Hapl_II, and Hapl_IV only possessed the 5-bp deletion in exon7. Hap_V carries a 2-kb deletion in the promoter region, a 5-bp deletion in exon7, and a 16-bp insertion in exon8. Hap_VI has a 24-bp plus a 15-bp insertion in the 2-kb upstream region [93]. Two new polymorphism combinations in Ppd-D1 designated as Hapl-VII and Hapl-VIII were identified in cultivars that originate from the Yellow and Huai Valley of China. Hapl-VII is characterized by the absence of a 2089-bp in exon8 and the presence of both TE in intron1 and 5-bp deletion in exon7, while these are absent in Hapl-VIII [92]. An additional file shows the haplotypes of Ppd-1 in wheat in more detail (see Additional file 2).

Some genes also influence flowering time regulation when they exhibit CNV, but no sequence changes. CNV is closely associated with gene expression and there is less chance of CNV occurring in independent alleles of Ppd1. However, copy number variations in the Ppd-B1 locus have been detected with increased gene numbers that results in earlier flowering [75].

It is clear that diverse mutations of these genes associated with wheat heading stage and flowering influence their expressions, resulting in earlier or later flowering under certain circumstances.

Conclusions

Based on the current research in wheat, four major pathways exist that regulate wheat heading-flowering time. Vernalization and photoperiod pathways integrate environmental signals to determine the transition from the vegetative phase to the reproductive phase, while Eps and GA pathways act as internal stimuli independently of the environmental signals. GA and Eps perform throughout wheat growth and development, while vernalization occurs during the transition from the vegetative phase to the reproductive phase during winter, and directly influences spikelet initiation. In addition to vernalization, photoperiod plays a leading role to control flowering begins from spikelet initiation and determines floret initiation and spikelet development, as indicated in Fig. 1.

A better understanding of the genetic regulatory mechanism of wheat heading stage assisted breeding. In the case of vernalization, Vrn1, Vrn2, and Vrn3 generate a positive feedback loop and were assisted by TaGRP2, VER2, TaVRT2, and TaFDL2, constituting a vernalization regulatory network initiating wheat heading stage and flowering. Then, the photoperiodic pathway cross-talks with the vernalization pathway via Ppd1, TaPHYC, TaHD1, WPCL1 and TaGI. WSOC and LHY also regulate wheat heading stage and flowering time independently via the GA pathway. A schematic summary of the wheat heading stage regulatory network is depicted in Fig. 2. These genes encode members of multitudinous transcription factors, for instance, MADS-box families, some MYB transcription factors, types of Myc and zinc finger families, RNA-binding proteins, and other protein families, and can directly or indirectly interact with each other, thereby supporting the entire wheat heading stage and flowering regulatory network. In spite of lots of researches about heading-flowering based on Arabidopsis constructing a relatively prefect network, Arabidopsis cannot fully reflect wheat and its relative. Some other components may also exist that participate in the pathway, and the identified genes in the wheat heading-flowering time regulation network are still unclear. Therefore, there are lots of tasks on unknown gene cloning by rapidly growing modern biotechnology, such as high-throughput sequencing, multi-omics profiling, mutant screening and association mapping to offer new exciting insights into future researches. For instance, the VRN2 protein interacts with CO2 (CONSTANTS2) in vitro and can competitively bind with members of the NUCLEAR FACTOR-Y (NF-Y) transcription factor family, but the detailed integration and competitive process of these interactions remains unclear. And if any other hormones participate in the wheat heading stage regulation pathway? The genetic regulation mechanism of hormone and Eps is not clear in wheat maybe because of the masking by strong influence of vernalization and photoperoid, Eps will be important for fine-tuning some of these traits and understanding their basis is the next major step.
Fig. 2

Schematic summary of the wheat heading stage regulatory network. Before vernalization, VRN2 competes with other CCT-domain proteins (like CO2) to interact with NF-Y transcription factors to inhibit the transcription of VRN3. Secondly, TaGRP2 can directly bind to this binding site of VRN1 to prevent transcript accumulation. Thirdly, TaVRT-2 can directly bind to the CArG box of the TaVRN1 promoter in vivo to inhibit its activity, and this inhibition is enhanced by VRN2. Following vernalization, VRN1 transcripts were enhanced by changing the ratio of H3K4me3 to active gene transcription. However, the expression level of VRN2 decreases after vernalization to release VRN3, then they can move from the leaves to the apices via the phloem. In the stem apical meristem, the VRN3 protein then forms a functional protein complex with TaFDL to bind the CArG box domain in the promoter of VRN1 in vitro, leading to transcriptional activation. Meanwhile, phosphorylated VER2 (VER2-P) transfers into the nucleus and then gathers in the shoot tips and young leaves, physically interacting with the RNA-binding protein TaGRP2, which is O-GlcNAc-modified,to decrease the inhibitory action on VRN1 expression. Furthermore, the expression levels of TaVRT2 and VRN2 decrease, and VRN1 gradually accumulates. Finally, the expression level of VRN1 is significantly enhanced to accelerate flowering. VRN-D4, as a duplicated copy of VRN1, expresses in the leaves and accumulates after prolonged exposure to low temperature, and can directly or indirectly influence VRN1 among the three vernalization genes the earliest, but has less effect than Vrn-A1. Long-day (LD) induces the accumulation of physiologically active Pfr (PHYB:PHYC heterodimers and PHYC:PHYC homodimers) and then activates the transcription of PPD1 and circadian clock output genes CO2/TaDH1, and the VRN3 transcript can be promoted by PPD1 and CO2. However, PPD1 is inhibited by WPCL1, which is a flowering negative regulator, but the interaction mechanism of these two genes is unknown. TaGI, which is controlled by the circadian clock under a light/dark cycle, works on the upstream of CO and produces a bulky protein complex with other suspected proteins, binding to the critical region in the CO gene promoter to induce its transcription. Eps genes work throughout wheat growth and development via an unknown pathway, Green arrows represent promotion, red arrows represent inhibition in the signal pathway

Our knowledge of the regulatory network of wheat heading-flowering can be applied to targeted breeding or other means, including adjusting the duration of the growth phase for the purpose of acclimatizing to different geographical environments.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Prof. Liuling Yan from Oklahoma State University and Prof. Guiliang Tang from Michigan Technological University, for providing suggestions to improve this manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFD0101802), Henan Major Science and Technology Projects (181100110200) and Henan Science and Technology Innovation Outstanding Youth Funding (174100510001) of China.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (supplementary information files).

Authors’ contributions

FC designed the paper. CS and FC wrote the paper. LZ, XZ, GL and YP participated in writing on the influence of vernalization and photoperiod alleles with heading and flowering dates in this paper and gave critical reviews. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12870_2018_1591_MOESM1_ESM.doc (38 kb)
Additional file 1: Table S1 Diversity variations of Ppd-D1 gene in wheat. (DOC 37 kb)
12870_2018_1591_MOESM2_ESM.doc (26 kb)
Additional file 2: Table S2 Haplotype information of Ppd-D1 gene in wheat. (DOC 26 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Feldman M. Origin of cultivated wheat. In the world wheat book, a history of wheat breeding. Londres: Lavoisier Publishing; 2001. p. 3–56.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kihara H. Discovery of the DD-Analyser, one of the ancestors of Triticum vulgare. Agricul Horticul. 1994;19:13–4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McFadden ES, Sears ER. The origin of Triticum spelta and its free-threshing hexaploid relatives. J Hered. 1946;37:81–107.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Snape JW, Butterworth K, Whitechurch E, Worland AJ. Waiting for fine times: genetics of flowering time in wheat. Euphytica. 2001;119:185–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang X, Chen J, Yan Y, Yan X, Shi C, Zhao L, Chen F. Genome-wide association study of heading and flowering dates and construction of its prediction equation in Chinese common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131:2271-2285.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dennis ES, Peacock WJ. Vernalization in cereals. J Biol. 2009;8:57–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Distelfeld A, Li C, Dubcovsky J. Regulation of flowering in temperate cereals. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009;12:178–84.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Turner A, Beales J, Faure S, Dunford RP, Laurie DA. The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science. 2005;310:1031–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laurie DA, Pratchett N, Snape JW, Bezant JH. RFLP mapping of five major genes and eight quantitative trait loci controlling flowering time in a winter x spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cross. Genome. 1995;38:575–85.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Worland AJ. The influence of flowering time genes on environmental adaptability in European wheats. Euphytica. 1996;89:49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zikhali M, Griffths S. The effect of Earliness per se (Eps) genes on flowering time in bread wheat. In: Ogihara, Yasunari, Takumi, Shigeo, Handa, Hirokazu, editors. Advances in Wheat Genetics: From Genome to Field, Proceedings of the 12th international wheat genetics symposium: Springer; 2015. p. 339–345.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alvarez MA, Tranquilli G, Lewis S, Kippes N, Dubcovsky J. Genetic and physical mapping of the earliness per se locus Eps-A m 1 in Triticum monococcum identifies EARLY FLOWERING 3 (ELF3) as a candidate gene. Funct Integr Genomics. 2016;16(4):365–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shrestha R, Gómez-Ariza J, Brambilla V, Fornara F. Molecular control of seasonal flowering in rice, arabidopsis and temperate cereals. Ann Bot. 2014;114(7):1445–58.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flood RG, Halloran GM. The nature and duration of gene action for vernalization response in wheat. Ann Bot (Lond). 1984;53:263–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trevaskis B. The central role of the VERNALIZATION1 gene in the vernalization response of cereals. Funct Plant Biol. 2010;37:479–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yan L, Loukoianov A, Tranquilli G, Helguera M, Fahima T, Dubcovsky J. Positional cloning of wheat vernalization gene VRN1. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100:6263–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yan L, Loukoianov A, Blechl A, Tranquilli G, Ramakrishna W, SanMiguel P, Bennetzen JL, Echenique V, Dubcovsky J. The wheat VRN2 gene is a flowering repressor down-regulated by vernalization. Science. 2004;303:1640–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yan L, Fu D, Li C, Blechl A, Tranquilli G, Bonafede M, Sanchez A, Valarik M, Yasuda S, Dubcovsky J. The wheat and barley vernalization gene VRN3 is an orthologue of FT. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:19581–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shimada S, Ogawa T, Kitagawa S, Suzuki T, Ikari C, Shitsukawa N, Abe T, Kawahigashi H, Kikuchi R, Handa H, Murai K. A genetic network of flowering-time genes in wheat leaves, in which an APETALA1/FRUITFULL-like gene, VRN1, is upstream of FLOWERING LOCUS T. Plant J. 2009;58:668–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nishiura A, Kitagawa S, Matsumura M, Kazama Y, Abe T, Mizuno N, Nasuda S, Murai K. An early-flowering einkorn wheat mutant with deletions of PHYTOCLOCK 1/LUX ARRHYTHMO and VERNALIZATION 2 exhibits a high level of VERNALIZATION 1 expression induced by vernalization. J Plant Physiol. 2018;222:28–38.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen A, Dubcovsky J. Wheat TILLING mutants show that the vernalization ene VRN1 down-regulates the flowering repressor VRN2 in leaves but is not essential for flowering. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1003134.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Danyluk J, Kane NA, Breton G, Limin AE, Fowler DB. TaVRT-1, a putative transcription factor associated with vegetative to reproductive transition in cereals. Plant Physiol. 2003;132:1849–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murai K, Miyamae M, Kato H, Takumi S, Ogihara Y. WAP1, a wheat APETALA1 homolog, plays a central role in the phase transition from vegetative to reproductive growth. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003;44:1255–65.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Voss-Fels KP, Robinson H, Mudge SR, Richard C, Newman S, Wittkop B, Stahl A, Friedt W, Frisch M, Gabur I, Miller-Cooper A, Campbell BC, Kelly A, Fox G, Christopher J, Christopher M, Chenu K, Franckowiak J, Mace ES, Borrell AK, Eagles H, Jordan DR, Botella JR, Hammer G, Godwin ID, Trevaskis B, Snowdon RJ, Hickey LT. VERNALIZATION1 modulates root system architecture in wheat and barley. Mol Plant. 2018;11:226–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alinsug MV, Chen FF, Luo M, Tai R, Jiang L, Wu K. Subcellular localization of class II HDAs in Arabidopsis thaliana: nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of HDA15 is driven by light. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30846.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hilker M, Schwachtje J, Baier M, Balazadeh S, Bäurle I, Geiselhardt S, Hincha DK, Kunze R, Mueller-Roeber B, Rillig MC, Rolff J, Romeis T, Schmülling T, Steppuhn A, van Dongen J, Whitcomb SJ, Wurst S, Zuther E, Kopka J. Priming and memory of stress responses in organisms lacking a nervous system. Biol Rev. 2015;91(4):1118–33.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yuan L, Liu X, Luo M, Yang S, Wu K. Involvement of histone modifications in plant abiotic stress responses. J Integr Plant Biol. 2013;55(10):892–901.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Diallo AO, Ali-Benali MA, Badawi M, Houde M, Sarhan F. Expression of vernalization responsive genes in wheat is associated with histone H3 trimethylation. Mol Genet Genomics. 2012;287:575–90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dubcovsky J, Loukoianov A, Fu D, Valarik M, Sanchez A, Yan L. Effect of photoperiod on the regulation of wheat vernalization genes VRN1 and VRN2. Plant Mol Biol. 2006;60:469–80.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kippes N, Zhu J, Chen A, Vanzetti L, Lukaszewski A, Nishida H, Kato K, Dvorak J, Dubcovsky J. Fine mapping and epistatic interactions of the vernalization gene VRN-D4 in hexaploid wheat. Mol Genet Genomics. 2014;289:47–62.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kippes N, Debernardi J, Vasquez-Gross HA, Akpinar BA, Budak H, Kato K, Chao S, Akhunov E, Dubcovsky J. Identifcation of the VERNALIZATION 4 gene reveals the origin of spring growth habit in ancient wheats from South Asia. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112:E5401–10.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sasani S, Hemming MN, Oliver SN, Greenup A, Tavakkol-Afshari R, Mahfoozi S, Poustini K, Sharifi HR, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ, Trevaskis B. The influence of vernalization and daylength on expression of flowering-time genes in the shoot apex and leaves of barley (Hordeum vulgare). J Exp Bot. 2009;60:2169–78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Trevaskis B, Hemming MN, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ. The molecular basis of vernalization-induced flowering in cereals. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12:352–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hemming MN, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES, Trevaskis B. Low temperature and day length cues are integrated to regulate FLOWERING LOCUS T in barley. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:355–66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Preston JC, Kellogg EA. Discrete developmental roles for temperate cereal grass VERNALIZATION1/FRUITFULL-like genes in flowering competency and the transition to flowering. Plant Physiol. 2008;146:265–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Alonso-Peral MM, Oliver SN, Casao MC, Greenup AA, Trevaskis B. The promoter of the cereal VERNALIZATION1 gene is sufficient for transcriptional induction by prolonged cold. PLoS One. 2011;6:e29456.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Trevaskis B, Hemming MN, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES. HvVRN2 responds to daylength, whereas HvVRN1 is regulated by vernalization and developmental status. Plant Physiol. 2006;140:1397–405.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Deng W, Casao MC, Wang P, Sato K, Hayes PM, Finnegan EJ, Trevaskis B. Direct links between the vernalization response and other key traits of cereal crops. Nature Communications. 2015;6(1):5882.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stephenson TJ, McIntyre CL, Collet C, Xue GP. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the NF-Y family of transcription factors in Triticum aestivum. Plant Mol Biol. 2007;65:77–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stephenson TJ, McIntyre CL, Collet C, Xue GP. TaNF-YC11, one of the light-upregulated NF-YC members in Triticum aestivum, is co-regulated with photosynthesis-related genes. Funct Integr Genomics. 2010;10:265–76.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stephenson TJ, McIntyre CL, Collet C, Xue GP. TaNF-YB3 is involved in the regulation of photosynthesis genes in Triticum aestivum. Funct Integr Genomics. 2011;11:327–40.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tamaki S, Matsuo S, Wong HL, Yokoi S, Shimamoto K. Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice. Science. 2007;316:1033–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Corbesier L, Vincent C, Jang S, Fornara F, Fan Q, Searle I, Giakountis A, Farrona S, Gissot L, Turnbull C, Coupland G. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science. 2007;316:1030–3.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Li CX, Distelfeld A, Comis A, Dubcovsky J. Wheat flowering repressor VRN2 and promoter CO2 compete for interactions with NUCLEAR FACTOR-Y complexes. Plant J. 2011;67:763–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chong K, Bao SL, Xu T, Tan KH, Liang TB, Zeng JZ, Huang HL, Xu J, Xu ZH. Functional analysis of the ver gene using antisense transgenic wheat. Physiol Plant. 1998;102:87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yong WD, Xu YY, Xu WZ, Wang X, Li N, Wu JS, Liang TB, Chong K, Xu ZH, Tan KH, Zhu ZQ. Vernalization-induced flowering in wheat is mediated by a lectin-like gene VER2. Planta. 2003;217:261–70.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Xing LJ, Li J, Xu YY, Xu Z, Chong K. Phosphorylation modification of wheat lectin VER2 is associated with vernalization-induced O-GlcNAc signaling and intracellular motility. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4854.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kane NA, Danyluk J, Tardif G, Ouellet F, Laliberte JF, Limin AE, Fowler DB, Sarhan F. TaVRT-2, a member of the StMADS-11 clade of flowering repressors, is regulated by vernalization and photoperiod in wheat. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:2354–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Streitner C, Köster T, Simpson CG, Shaw P, Danisman S, Brown JWS, Staiger D. An hnRNP-like RNA-binding protein affects alternative splicing by in vivo interaction with transcripts in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:11240–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Xiao J, Xu S, Li C, Xu Y, Xing L, Niu Y, Huan Q, Tang Y, Zhao C, Wagner D, Gao C, Chong K. O-GlcNAc-mediated interaction between VER2 and TaGRP2 elicits TaVRN1 mRNA accumulation during vernalization in winter wheat. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4572.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Streitner C, Danisman S, Wehrle F, Schöning JC, Alfano JR, Staiger D. The small glycine-rich RNA binding protein AtGRP7 promotes floral transition in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008;56:239–50.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kippes N, Guedira M, Lin L, Alvarez MA, Brown-Guedira GL, Dubcovsky J. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in a regulatory site of VRN-A1 first intron are associated with differences in vernalization requirement in winter wheat. Mol Genet Genomics. 2018;5:1–3.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Li C, Dubcovsky J. Wheat FT protein regulates VRN1 transcription through interactions with FDL2. Plant J. 2008;55:543–54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Worland AJ, Appendino ML, Sayers EJ. The distribution, in European winter wheats, of genes that influence ecoclimatic adaptability whilst determining photoperiodic insensitivity and plant height. Euphytica. 1994;80:219–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Greenup A, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES, Trevaskis B. The molecular biology of seasonal flowering-responses in Arabidopsis and the cereals. Ann Bot. 2009;103(8):1165–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ream TS, Woods DP, Amasino RM. The molecular basis of Vernalization in different plant groups. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2012;77:105–15.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Beales J, Turner A, Griffiths S, Snape J, Laurie D. A Pseudo-Response Regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2007;115:721–33.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Boden SA, Cavanagh C, Cullis BR, Ramm K, Greenwood J, Jean Finnegan E, Trevaskis B, Swain SM. Ppd-1 is a key regulator of inflorescence architecture and paired spikelet development in wheat. Nat Plants. 2015;1:14016.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chen A, Li C, Hu W, Lau MY, Lin H, Rockwell NC, Martin SS, Jernstedt JA, Lagarias JC, Dubcovsky J. PHYTOCHROME C plays a major role in the acceleration of wheat flowering under long-day photoperiod. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(28):10037–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mizuno N, Nitta M, Sato K, Nasuda S. A wheat homologue of PHYTOCLOCK 1 is a candidate gene conferring the early heading phenotype to einkorn wheat. Genes Genet Syst. 2012;87:357–67.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mizuno N, Kinoshita M, Kinoshita S, Nishida H, Fujita M, Kato K. Loss-of function mutations in three Homoeologous PHYTOCLOCK 1 genes in common wheat are associated with the extra-early flowering phenotype. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0165618.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Nemoto Y, Kisaka M, Fuse T, Yano M, Ogihara Y. Characterization and functional analysis of three wheat genes with homology to the CONSTANS flowering time gene in transgenic rice. Plant J. 2003;36:82–93.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sawa M, Nusinow DA, Kay SA, Imaizumi T. FKF1 and GIGANTEA complex formation is required for day-length measurement in Arabidopsis. Science. 2007;318:261–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Zhao XY, Liu MS, Li JR, Guan CM, Zhang XS. The wheat TaGI1, involved in photoperiodic flowering, encodes an Arabidopsis GI ortholog. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;58:53–64.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Greenup AG, Sasani S, Oliver SN, Talbot MJ, Dennis ES, Hemming MN, Trevaskis B. ODDSOC2 is a MADS box floral repressor that is Down-regulated by Vernalization in temperate cereals. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(3):1062–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Greenup AG, Sasani S, Oliver SN, Walford SA, Millar AA, Trevaskis B. Transcriptome analysis of the vernalization response in barley (Hordeum vulgare) seedlings. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(3):e17900.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Zikhali M, Leverington-Waite M, Fish L, Simmonds J, Orford S, Wingen LU, Goram R, Gosman N, Bentley A, Griffiths S. Validation of a 1DL earliness per se (eps) flowering QTL in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Mol Breed. 2014;34:1023–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zikhali M, Wingen LU, Griffiths S. Delimitation of the Earliness per se D1 (Eps-D1) flowering gene to a subtelomeric chromosomal deletion in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). J Exp Bot. 2015;67:287–99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Griffiths S, Simmonds J, Leverington M, Wang Y, Fish L, Sayers L, Alibert L, Orford S, Wingen L, Herry L, Faure S, Laurie D, Bilham L, Snape J. Meta-QTL analysis of the genetic control of ear emergence in elite European winter wheat germplasm. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;119:383–95.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Moon J, Suh SS, Lee H, Choi KR, Hong CB, Paek NC, Kim SG, Lee I. The SOC1 MADS-box gene integrates vernalization and gibberellin signals for flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2003;35:613–23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Shitsukawa N, Ikari C, Mitsuya T, Sakiyama T, Ishikawa A, Takumi S, Murai K. Wheat SOC1 functions independently of WAP1/VRN1, an integrator of vernalization and photoperiod flowering promotion pathways. Physiol Plant. 2007;130:627–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Shitsukawa N, Takagishi A, Ikari C, Takumi S, Murai K. WFL, a wheat FLORICAULA/LEAFY ortholog, is associated with spikelet formation as lateral branch of the inflorescence meristem. Genes Genet Syst. 2006;81:13–20.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Pearce S, Vanzetti LS, Dubcovsky J. Exogenous gibberellins induce wheat spike development under short days only in the presence of VERNALIZATION1. Plant Physiol. 2013;163:1433–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bomblies K, Wang RL, Ambrose BA, Schmidt RJ, Meeley RB, Doebley J. Duplicate FLORICAULA/LEAFY homologs zfl1 and zfl2 control inflorescence architecture and flower patterning in maize. Development. 2003;130:2385–95.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Díaz A, Zikhali M, Turner AS, Isaac P, Laurie DA. Copy number variation affecting the Photoperiod-B1 and Vernalization-A1 genes is associated with altered flowering time in wheat (Triticum aestivum). PLoS One. 2012;7:e33234.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Muterko A, Kalendar R, Salina E. Novel alleles of the VERNALIZATION1 genes in wheat are associated with modulation of DNA curvature and flexibility in the promoter region. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16(Suppl 1):9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Yan L, Helguera M, Kato K, Fukuyama S, Sherman J, Dubcovsky J. Allelic variation at the VRN1 promoter region in polyploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109:1677–86.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Golovnina KA, Kondratenko EY, Blinov AG, Goncharov NP. Molecular characterization of vernalization loci VRN1 in wild and cultivated wheats. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:168.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Fu D, Szucs P, Yan L, Helguera M, Skinner JS, Zitzewitz J, Hayes PM, Dubcovsky J. Large deletions within the first intron in VRN-1 are associated with spring growth habit in barley and wheat. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005;273:54–65.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Santra DK, Santra M, Allan RE, Campbell KG, Kidwell KK. Genetic and molecular characterization of Vernalization genes Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1, and Vrn-D1 in spring wheat germplasm from the Pacific northwest region of the U.S.A. Plant Breed. 2009;128:576–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Milec Z, Tomkova L, Sumikova T, Pankova K. A new multiplex PCR test for the determination of Vrn-B1 alleles in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol Breading. 2012;30:317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Shcherban AB, Efremova TT, Salina EA. Identification of a new Vrn-B1 allele using two near-isogenic wheat lines with difference in heading time. Mol Breed. 2012;29:675–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Zhang J, Wang Y, Wu S, Yang J, Liu H, Zhou Y. A single nucleotide polymorphism at the Vrn-D1 promoter region in common wheat is associated with vernalization response. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;125:1697–704.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Muterko A, Balashova I, Cockram J, Kalendar R, Sivolap Y. The new wheat Vernalization response allele Vrn-D1s is caused by DNA transposon insertion in the first intron. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2015;33:294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Zhang X, Gao M, Wang S, Chen F, Cui D. Allelic variation at the vernalization and photoperiod sensitivity loci in Chinese winter wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.). Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:470.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Chen Y, Carver BF, Wang S, Zhang F, Yan L. Genetic loci associated with stem elongation and winter dormancy release in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;118:881–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Wenkel S, Turck F, Singer K, Gissot L, Le Gourrierec J, Samach A, Coupland G. CONSTANS and the CCAAT box binding complex share a functionally important domain and interact to regulate flowering of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006;18:2971–84.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Tranquilli GE, Dubcovsky J. Epistatic interactions between vernalization genes Vrn-Am1 and Vrn-Am2 in diploid wheat. J Hered. 2000;91:304–6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Distelfeld A, Tranquilli G, Li C, Yan L, Dubcovsky J. Genetic and molecular characterization of the VRN2 loci in tetraploid wheat. Plant Physiol. 2009;149:245–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Wilhelm EP, Turner AS, Laurie DA. Photoperiod insensitive Ppd-A1a mutations in tetraploid wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Theor Appl Genet. 2009;118:285–94.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Nishida H, Yoshida T, Kawakami K, Fujita M, Long B, Akashi Y, Laurie DA, Kato K. Structural variation in the 5′ upstream region of photoperiod-insensitive alleles Ppd-A1a and Ppd-B1a identified in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and their effect on heading time. Mol Breeding. 2013;31:27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Guo Z, Song Y, Zhou R, Ren Z, Jia J. Discovery, evaluation and distribution of haplotypes of the wheat Ppd-D1 gene. New Phytol. 2010;185:841–51.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Chen F, Gao M, Zhang J, Zuo A, Shang X, Cui D. Molecular characterization of vernalization response and photoperiod response genes in bread wheat from the yellow and Huai valley of China. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:199.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science/Agronomy CollegeHenan Agricultural UniversityZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations