Advertisement

BMC Plant Biology

, 18:234 | Cite as

A Glycine soja group S2 bZIP transcription factor GsbZIP67 conferred bicarbonate alkaline tolerance in Medicago sativa

  • Shengyang Wu
  • Pinghui Zhu
  • Bowei Jia
  • Junkai Yang
  • Yang Shen
  • Xiaoxi Cai
  • Xiaoli Sun
  • Yanming Zhu
  • Mingzhe Sun
Open Access
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Plant-abiotic interactions

Abstract

Background

Even though bicarbonate alkaline stress is a serious threat to crop growth and yields, it attracts much fewer researches than high salinity stress. The basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors have been well demonstrated to function in diverse abiotic stresses; however, their biological role in alkaline tolerance still remains elusive. In this study, we functionally characterized a bZIP gene from Glycine soja GsbZIP67 in bicarbonate alkaline stress responses.

Results

GsbZIP67 was initially identified as a putative bicarbonate responsive gene, on the basis of previous RNA-seq data of 50 mM NaHCO3-treated Glycine soja roots. GsbZIP67 protein possessed a conserved bZIP domain, and belonged to the group S2 bZIP, which is yet less well-studied. Our studies showed that GsbZIP67 targeted to nucleus in Arabidopsis protoplasts, and displayed transcriptional activation activity in yeast cells. The quantitative real-time PCR analyses unraveled the bicarbonate stress responsive expression and tissue specific expression of GsbZIP67 in wild soybean. Further phenotypic analysis illustrated that GsbZIP67 overexpression in alfalfa promoted plant growth under bicarbonate alkaline stress, as evidenced by longer roots and shoots. Furthermore, GsbZIP67 overexpression also modified the physiological indices of transgenic alfalfa under bicarbonate alkaline stress. In addition, the expression levels of several stress responsive genes were also augmented by GsbZIP67 overexpression.

Conclusions

Collectively, in this study, we demonstrated that GsbZIP67 acted as a positive regulator of plant tolerance to bicarbonate alkaline stress. These results provide direct genetic evidence of group S2 bZIPs in bicarbonate alkaline stress, and will facilitate further studies concerning the cis-elements and/or downstream genes targeted by GsbZIP67 in stress responses.

Keywords

Transcription factor bZIP family Bicarbonate alkaline stress Wild soybean Alfalfa 

Abbreviations

bZIP

Basic leucine zipper;

H+-Ppase

H+-pyrophosphatase

MDA

Malon dialdehyde

OX

Overexpression

POD

Peroxisome

qRT-PCR

Quantitative real-time PCR

TF

Transcription factor

WT

Wild type

Background

Soil salinization-alkalization imposes a direct detrimental effect on plant survival, and is a serious threat to crop yields and agricultural production worldwide [1]. Around the world, approximately 830 million hectares are saline-alkaline soils, which consist of about 53% alkaline soils and 47% saline soils. Compared to saline soils (NaCl/Na2SO4), alkaline soils are composed primarily of NaHCO3/Na2CO3. An increasing number of researches have suggested that bicarbonate/carbonate alkaline stress imposes much severer repression on plant growth through the complex damages derived from excess Na+, HCO3/CO32−, high-pH (> 8.5) and poor soil structure [2]. Hence, improving the bicarbonate/carbonate alkaline tolerance is of profound importance to crop yields, and will greatly secure the food security. Unfortunately, compared with salt stress, fewer studies have been reported concerning the bicarbonate/carbonate alkaline tolerance.

As direct regulators of gene expression, transcription factors (TFs) influence essentially all aspects of plant growth and development, as well as stress responses. The basic leucine zipper (bZIP) TFs are characterized by a basic region responsible for sequence-specific DNA binding, and a leucine zipper domain required for homo−/hetero-dimerization [3]. There are 75 bZIPs in Arabidopsis genome, which are clustered into 10 groups (group A-I, S) [3]. The S group was further divided into group S1, S2 and S3 [4]. Among them, group A bZIPs are well characterized to mediate ABA and stress responses, while group D bZIPs are involved in development and pathogen defense. Group H play a paramount role in promoting photomorphogenesis. Group C/S1 bZIPs could specifically form homo- and heterodimers, and are involved in the low energy and nutrient signaling [5]. Moreover, several studies reported that C/S1 bZIPs also acted in biotic and abiotic stress responses [6, 7]. However, the biological functions of group S2/S3 bZIPs have not been unraveled until now.

Very recently, a total of 160 bZIP genes were identified in soybean (Glycine max) genome [8]. Until now, the positive function of several GmbZIPs in abiotic stress responses has been reported, for example GmbZIP132/110 in salt stress [9, 10], GmbZIP44/62/78 in salt and freezing stresses [11], as well as GmbZIP1 in cold, salt and drought stresses [12]. However, the biological role of GmbZIPs in bicarbonate/carbonate alkaline stress still remains elusive.

Compared with cultivated soybean, wild soybean (Glycine soja) is much more tolerant to salt-alkaline stress. Previously, from over 300 wild soybean lines, we characterized one line G07256 showing the highest bicarbonate alkaline tolerance, and transcriptionally identified the bicarbonate alkaline responsive genes [13, 14], such as GsCBRLK [15, 16], GsERF71 [17] and Gshdz4 [18]. Among them, some were transformed into Medicago savita to breed transgenic alfalfa with superior bicarbonate alkaline tolerance [19, 20, 21]. In this study, we further identified a group S2 bZIP TF, GsbZIP67, as a novel bicarbonate stress responsive gene. Our results showed that GsbZIP67 localized in nucleus and displayed transcriptional activation activity. Overexpression of GsbZIP67 in alfalfa improved the bicarbonate alkaline tolerance and promoted the expression of stress responsive genes. Collectively, these results provide direct genetic evidence of GsbZIP67 in bicarbonate alkaline tolerance, and will greatly facilitate to further explore the potential cis-elements and/or downstream genes targeted by GsbZIP67 in the regulation of bicarbonate alkaline tolerance.

Results

Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of GsbZIP67

Based on previous wild soybean RNA-seq data [14], Glyma08g28220 encoding a bZIP TF was identified as a putative bicarbonate alkaline stress responsive gene. According to the genome wide identification of G. max bZIP family [8], Glyma08g28220 was designated as GmbZIP67. Hence, we cloned its orthologues in G. soja and named it as GsbZIP67.

As shown in Fig. 1a, GsbZIP67 shared high sequence identity within the bZIP domain with other characterized stress-related GmbZIPs, including GmbZIP110 [10], GmbZIP1 [12], GmbZIP60 [22] and GmbZIP44/62/78 [11]. Previous studies have shown that Arabidopsis bZIP family was divided into 10 groups (group A-I, S) [3]. The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree revealed that GsbZIP67, together with GmbZIP44/60/110, was clustered into group S (Fig. 1b). According to a previous report [4], group S was further divided into three clusters (group S1, S2 and S3). As shown in Fig. 1b, GmbZIP44/60/110 belonged to group S1, while GsbZIP67 belonged to group S2.
Fig. 1

Multiple alignment and phylogenetic analysis of GsbZIP67. a Multiple alignment showing the conserved bZIP domain within GsbZIP67. Multiple alignment was performed by using MEGA5.0 with the full-length amino acid sequences, and the results within the bZIP domain were shown. b Phylogenetic tree of GsbZIP67 and other bZIP proteins. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by using the neighbor-joining method (with a bootstrap of 1000) with soybean and Arabidopsis bZIPs

GsbZIP67 is a nuclear-localized bZIP TF with transactivation activity

Previous studies have shown the nuclear, cytoplasmic [6] and endoplasmic reticulum [23] localization of bZIP TFs. Hence, in this study, to determine the subcellular of GsbZIP67 in plant cells, it was translationally fused with the RFP (Fig. 2a), and co-transformed into Arabidopsis protoplasts with GsERF71-GFP, which was used as a nuclear marker [17]. As shown in Fig. 2b, the transformed protoplasts exhibited overlapping RFP and GFP fluorescence in the nucleus, suggesting that GsbZIP67-RFP and GsERF71-GFP co-localized in the nucleus of Arabidopsis protoplasts.
Fig. 2

Subcellular localization and transcriptional activation of GsbZIP67. a Structures showing the constructs for GsbZIP67 subcellular localization assays. b The nuclear localization of GsbZIP67-RFP protein in Arabidopsis protoplasts. GsERF71-GFP was used as a nuclear marker. c Structures showing the constructs for GsbZIP67 transactivation assays. d The transcriptional activation assays of GsbZIP67 in yeast. The BD and BD-GsERF71 were used as negative and positive controls, respectively

We further investigated the transcriptional activation activity of GsbZIP67 in yeast cells. GsbZIP67 was cloned into the pGBKT7 vector to express BD-GsbZIP67 (Fig. 2c). The empty pGBKT7 vector was used as a negative control, and BD-GsERF71 [17] was used as a positive control. As shown in Fig. 2d, the yeast cells expressing BD-GsbZIP67 and BD-GsERF71 grew well on SD/−Trp-His selective media, and turned blue in the β-galactosidase activity assays, while the BD-containing yeasts could not grow on SD/−Trp-His, and showed no β-galactosidase activity. This finding suggests that GsbZIP67 acts as a transcriptional activator in yeasts.

The expression profiles of GsbZIP67 under bicarbonate alkaline stress and in different tissues

To verify the RNA-seq data, we analyzed the expression pattern of GsbZIP67 under 50 mM NaHCO3 treatment through quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. As shown in Fig. 3a, after NaHCO3 treatment, the transcript abundance of GsbZIP67 declined to the minimum at 1 h, and then started to climb. The expression pattern of GsbZIP67 revealed by qRT-PCR was consistent with the RNA-seq data, and confirmed that GsbZIP67 expression is responsive to bicarbonate alkaline stress, implying its potential involvement in plant responses to bicarbonate alkaline stress.
Fig. 3

Expression profiles of GsbZIP67 under bicarbonate alkaline stress and in different tissues. a RNA-seq data and qRT-PCR results showing the expression profile of GsbZIP67 under bicarbonate alkaline stress. The expression level at 0 h was set as 1. b QRT-PCR results showing the tissue expression pattern of GsbZIP67 in wild soybean. The expression level in root was set as 1. GAPDH was used as an internal control. Data are means ± SE (n = 3)

We further investigated the expression profiles of GsbZIP67 in different tissues, including old leaf, young leaf, root, stem, hypocotyl, embryo, flower and seed (Fig. 3b). Our qRT-PCR results showed that GsbZIP67 was expressed in different tissues. Among the eight tissues detected in this study, GsbZIP67 displayed the highest expression level in young leaf and seed, while the lowest level in old leaf.

Overexpression of GsbZIP67 in alfalfa confers enhanced bicarbonate alkaline tolerance

To investigate the effect of GsbZIP67 on bicarbonate stress tolerance, we overexpressed it in M. savita, which belongs to the same Leguminosae with soybean, but is easier for transformation. To this end, GsbZIP67 was cloned into the pCAMBIA330035Su vector [24] (Additional file 1: Figure S1) and transformed into alfalfa via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated method. The integration of GsbZIP67 in alfalfa genome was confirmed by southern blot analysis (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The constitutive expression of GsbZIP67 was further verified through semi-quantitative RT-PCR assays (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

In order to evaluate whether GsbZIP67 overexpression affects the bicarbonate tolerance, the wild type (WT) and overexpression (OX) alfalfa plants were treated with either 0, or 100, or 150 mM NaHCO3 for 14 days. As shown in Fig. 4a, under stress treatment, the OX lines showed much better growth than WT. The quantitative data revealed that the shoot and root length of OX lines were significantly higher than that of WT under NaHCO3 treatment (Fig. 4b, c). Quantification of the physiological indices showed that compared with WT, the OX lines exhibited less malon dialdehyde (MDA) accumulation (Fig. 5a) and lower ion leakage (Fig. 5b), while displayed higher peroxisome (POD) activity (Fig. 5c) and chlorophyll content (Fig. 5d) under bicarbonate alkaline stress. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that GsbZIP67 overexpression enhanced the bicarbonate alkaline tolerance of transgenic alfalfa.
Fig. 4

Overexpression of GsbZIP67 in alfalfa promoted plant growth under bicarbonate stress. Phenotype (a), shoot length (b), and root length (c) of the WT and GsbZIP67 OX lines under both normal conditions and bicarbonate treatment. The 4-week-old WT and OX plants were irrigated with 1/4 Hoagland solution containing either 0, or 100, or 150 mM NaHCO3 every 2 days for 14 days. Data are means ± SE (n ≥ 10). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; Student t-test

Fig. 5

Changes in the physiological indices of GsbZIP67 transgenic alfalfa under bicarbonate alkaline stress. The MDA content (a), ion leakage (b), POD activity (c) and chlorophyll content (d) of the WT and GsbZIP67 OX lines under both normal conditions and bicarbonate treatment. Data are means ± SE (n ≥ 10). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; Student t-test

Overexpression of GsbZIP67 results in increased expression of stress responsive genes

Previous studies showed that NADP-ME [25] and H+-pyrophosphatase (H+-Ppase) [26] were of great help to maintain the cytosolic pH homeostasis. As determined by the qRT-PCR analysis, the expression of MtNADP-ME (Fig. 6a) and MtH+-Ppase (Fig. 6b) was induced by NaHCO3 treatment in both WT and OX plants. However both of them were up-regulated in the OX lines compared with WT (Fig. 6a, b). Moreover, another two stress responsive marker genes MtRD29A and MtKIN1 were also detected in this study. Our results uncovered that under bicarbonate alkaline stress, the expression levels of MtRD29A and MtKIN1 in the OX lines were obviously higher than that in WT (Fig. 6c, d). Taken together, these findings suggest that overexpression of GsbZIP67 in alfalfa augmented the transcription of stress responsive genes.
Fig. 6

GsbZIP67 overexpression in alfalfa improved the expression of stress responsive genes. Expression levels of the MtNAPD-ME (a), MtH+-Ppase (b), MtKIN1 (c) and MtRD29A (d) in the WT and GsbZIP67 OX lines under bicarbonate treatment. GAPDH was used as an internal control. The expression level of WT at 0 h was set as 1. Data are means ± SE (n = 3)

Discussion

It is widely accepted that bZIP TFs play particularly important roles during a diverse variety of biological processes, such as TGAs (group D) in pathogen defense [27], ABFs (group A) in ABA and abiotic stress tolerance [28], group C/S1 bZIPs in energy homeostasis [5] and HY5/HYH (group H) in light responses [29]. However, most researches about bZIPs were carried out in the reference plants Arabidopsis and rice. Little information is reported regarding bZIPs in non-reference plants, especially in legume. In this study, we isolated a bZIP TF from wild soybean GsbZIP67, and characterized its positive function in bicarbonate alkaline stress responses.

GsbZIP67 was found to be a group S2 bZIP with nuclear localization and transactivation activity. GsbZIP67 protein contained a well-characterized bZIP domain similar to other stress-related GmbZIPs (Fig. 1a). GsbZIP67 localized in the nucleus of plant cells (Fig. 2b), and displayed transcriptional activation activity in yeasts (Fig. 2d). These findings imply that GsbZIP67 might serve as a transactivator of nuclear gene expression. Furthermore, our studies also unraveled that GsbZIP67 belonged to group S2 (Fig. 1b) [3, 4]. Current researches have uncovered the profound importance of group S1 bZIPs in regulating gene expression by forming heterodimers with group C bZIPs [5, 30, 31]. However, group S2 bZIPs are yet poorly characterized. Even though group S2 bZIPs could not heterodimerize with group C bZIPs, low-affinity interactions were detected inside group S2 bZIPs in Arabidopsis [4]. Hence, more experiments are needed to verify whether GsbZIP67 could form homodimers and/or heterodimers with other bZIPs, and whether the dimerization affects its DNA binding affinity and/or transactivation activity.

Numerous studies have unraveled that a large portion of GmbZIPs is differentially expressed under diverse abiotic stresses. A previous genome wide study showed that 75.6% GmbZIPs displayed differential expression after drought and flooding treatments [8]. Experimental evidence was also given to prove the differential expression of some specific GmbZIPs to abiotic stress [9, 11, 12]. A recent study also compared the expression of GmbZIPs in a salt-sensitive cultivated soybean and a salt-tolerant wild soybean [10]. Among them, GmbZIP110 was up-regulated in both accessions; GmbZIP78 was up-regulated, while GmbZIP17 and GmbZIP91 were down-regulated specifically in the salt-tolerant wild soybean. However, until now, none was reported regarding GmbZIPs responses to bicarbonate alkaline stress. In this study, we showed that GsbZIP67 expression is firstly decreased, and then increased by bicarbonate alkaline treatment (Fig. 3a). Our previous RNA-seq data [14] also showed that in addition to GsbZIP67, expression of 56 GsbZIPs was affected by bicarbonate alkaline treatment (Fold change > 2) (Additional file 2: Figure S2). Some of them displayed similar expression patterns with GsbZIP67 (firstly decreased and then increased); while others showed opposite (increased and then decreased) expression. Consistently, another RNA-seq study in wild soybean also revealed the differential expressions of bZIP family genes under bicarbonate alkaline stress (90 mM NaHCO3) [32]. Transcriptional profiling studies also reported the responsive expressions of bZIPs to bicarbonate alkaline stress in several other plant species [33, 34, 35]. In summary, these findings indicate the potential involvement of bZIPs in response to bicarbonate alkaline stress. However, there is no report providing the direct experimental evidence for the genetic and/or functional involvement of bZIPs in bicarbonate alkaline stress.

In this study, we functionally suggested that GsbZIP67 was a key regulator for plant tolerance to bicarbonate alkaline stress (Figs. 4, 5, 6). Even though previous studies have unraveled the function of GmbZIPs in salt [9, 10, 11, 12], drought [11, 12] and cold/freezing [11, 12] tolerance, here our studies, for the first time, reported the novel function of group S2 bZIPs, which are poorly characterized, in regulating bicarbonate alkaline stress responses. Our studies showed that GsbZIP67 ectopic expression in alfalfa could promote the growth of transgenic plants, and modify the stress-related physiological indices and gene expression (Figs. 4, 5, 6). Notably, GsbZIP67 overexpression dramatically down-regulated the MDA accumulation (Fig. 5a), but up-regulated the POD activity (Fig. 5c) in transgenic lines compared with WT under bicarbonate alkaline stress. As shown previously, a great increase in MDA accumulation and POD activity is closely related to the responses of alfalfa to bicarbonate alkaline stress [35, 36]. The transcriptional analysis also revealed the differential expression of alfalfa POD family genes under bicarbonate/carbonate alkaline stress [35]. Hence, it is reasonable to speculate that GsbZIP67 might mediate ROS signaling under bicarbonate alkaline stress.

As alfalfa growth is affected by diverse environmental stresses and salt-alkaline stress always occurs simultaneously, it will be meaningful to determine whether GsbZIP67 could contribute to increased tolerance to other abiotic stress, such as salt, drought and/or cold tolerance. As GsbZIP67 is a nuclear transcriptional activator, future studies are needed to identify the direct cis-elements and/or downstream genes targeted by GsbZIP67 under bicarbonate alkaline stress. Taken together, our results presented in this study provided the genetic evidence of a group S2 bZIP in regulating plant tolerance to bicarbonate alkaline stress. This finding will facilitate to further investigate the regulatory mechanism of bZIPs in bicarbonate alkaline stress.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the data presented here strongly suggests that GsbZIP67 acts as a stress-inducible, nuclear-localized group S2 bZIP transcription activator, and positively regulates bicarbonate alkaline tolerance through modifying the stress-related physiological indices and gene expression. This is the first report characterizing the involvement of group S2 bZIPs in bicarbonate alkaline stress. Our results not only broaden the current knowledge of bZIPs in stress tolerance, but also will greatly benefit future research regarding the molecular basis of bZIPs in alkaline stress.

Methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Seeds of G. soja (G07256) were obtained from Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, and kept by Plant Bioengineering Laboratory. Wild soybean seeds were treated with 98% H2SO4 for 10 min to damage seed coat [37, 38], and then allowed to germinate on soggy filter papers in darkness until 2–3 cm buds appeared. The wild soybean seedlings were transferred for hydroponics in 1/4 Hoagland solution. Seeds of M. sativa (Zhaodong) was provided by Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Science, and used for transformation. The alfalfa plants were grown in pots filled with pearlite:vermiculite (1:1). Both the wild soybean and alfalfa plants were grown in a chamber and/or greenhouse at 24–28 °C and 16/8 h light/dark cycles.

Isolation and sequence analysis of the GsbZIP67 gene

The full-length coding region of GsbZIP67 was PCR-amplified from the wild soybean cDNA templates with gene specific primers (Additional file 3: Table S1). Multiple alignment was performed by using MEGA5.0 with the full-length amino acid sequences with default parameters. The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed with soybean and Arabidopsis bZIP family proteins, and different bZIP groups were annotated according to previous studies [3].

Subcellular localization analyses of GsbZIP67 in Arabidopsis protoplasts

The GsbZIP67 CDS region minus the stop codon was cloned into pBSK-RFP to express GsbZIP67-RFP protein. The pBSK-GsERF71-GFP construct [17] was used as a marker for nuclear protein. The GsbZIP67-RFP and GsERF71-GFP constructs were transiently co-expressed in Arabidopsis protoplasts as described [39]. RFP/GFP/chlorophyll fluorescence was observed by using a confocal laser-scanning microscope Leica SP8 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with 584/488/488 nm excitation and 607/507/650 nm emission, respectively.

Transcriptional activation assays of GsbZIP67 in yeast

GsbZIP67 was cloned into pGBKT7 to produce the BD-GsbZIP67 fusion protein. The empty pGBKT7 and pGBKT7-GsERF71 [17] were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. The pGBKT7, pGBKT7-GsERF71 and pGBKT7-GsbZIP67 were transformed into yeast strain AH109 through the LiAc-mediated method, respectively. Positive clones were cultured in SD/−Trp liquid medium and a serial of diluted culture (1, 10, and 100) were spotted onto SD/−Trp and SD/−Trp-His medium, respectively, and grown for 3 d at 30 °C. The LacZ activity was assessed by using the β-galactosidase colony-lift filter assay.

Transformation and molecular identification of GsbZIP67 transgenic alfalfa

GsbZIP67 was inserted to the binary vector pCAMBIA330035Su [24]. The recombinant construct was introduced into A. tumefaciens strain EHA105, and then transformed into alfalfa by using the cotyledonary node method [40]. The glufosinate-positive plants were firstly verified by PCR analysis using Bar specific primers (Additional file 3: Table S1). The PCR-positive plants were further detected by Southern Blot analysis, with HindIII and EcoRI double-digested genomic DNA. The GsbZIP67 transcript levels in the transgenic plants were analyzed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR, with MtGAPDH (Accession number: Medtr3g085850) as an internal control.

Phenotypic analysis of GsbZIP67 transgenic alfalfa under bicarbonate alkaline stresses

The lignified WT and GsbZIP67 OX alfalfa plants were propagated by stem cuttings [40]. For bicarbonate alkaline stress, the 4-week-old WT and OX plants were irrigated with 1/4 Hoagland solution containing either 0, or 100, or 150 mM NaHCO3 every 2 days for 14 days. Photos were taken to show the growth phenotype and the shoot and root length was measured. Samples were harvested for the physiological indices measurement. The MDA content was determined through the thiobarbituric acid assays described previously [41]. The relative membrane permeability was measured using a conductivity meter as described [42]. The POD activity was detected following the method described previously [43]. The total chlorophyll content was determined in 80% (v/v) acetone extract by measuring the absorbance at 663 and 645 nm.

qRT-PCR analyses

To investigate the expression patterns of GsbZIP67 in wild soybean, the 4-week-old seedlings were treated with 1/4 Hoagland solution containing 50 mM NaHCO3. To analyze the expression of stress responsive genes in transgenic alfalfa, the 4-week-old alfalfa plants treated with 1/4 Hoagland solution containing 150 mM NaHCO3. Samples were harvested at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h, respectively, and stored at − 80 °C freezer. Total RNA was extracted and subjected to cDNA synthesis as described previously [40]. The cDNA was used for qRT-PCR assays with GAPDH in wild soybean (DQ355800) and alfalfa (Medtr3g085850), respectively, as the reference genes, expression of which is not affected by bicarbonate alkaline stress. Expression levels were calculated by using the 2−ΔΔCT method. The expression levels in wild soybean and WT alfalfa at 0 h was set as 1. The gene specific primers used in this study were listed in Additional file 3: Table S1.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Huizi Duanmu (Heilongjiang University) for providing the RNA-seq data, and Liwei Gu (Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University) for technical support on confocal imaging. We also would like to thank all members in Plant Bioengineering Laboratory for their suggestion and help.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31671596 and 31500204), Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province (UNPYSCT-2017105) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017 T100253 and 2015 M581494). The funding bodies did not play a role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, or interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

MZS and YMZ coordinated the project, conceived and designed experiments; SYW, MZS and PHZ performed experiments and analyzed the data; SYW and PHZ wrote the first draft; MZS, XLS and BWJ revised and edited the manuscript; JKY, YS and XXC generated and analyzed the data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research is not applicable to the ethics approval and consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12870_2018_1466_MOESM1_ESM.tif (115 kb)
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Molecular identification of GsbZIP67 overexpression transgenic alfalfa lines. (TIF 114 kb)
12870_2018_1466_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (153 kb)
Additional file 2: Figure S2. Expression profiles of soybean bZIP family genes under bicarbonate alkaline stress based on RNA-seq data. (PDF 152 kb)
12870_2018_1466_MOESM3_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Additional file 3: Table S1. Primers used in this study. (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Guo R, Shi L, Yan C, Zhong X, Gu F, Liu Q, Xia X, Li H. Ionomic and metabolic responses to neutral salt or alkaline salt stresses in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17(1):41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu Y, Wu G, Yuan H, Cheng L, Zhao D, Huang W, Zhang S, Zhang L, Chen H, Zhang J, et al. Identification and characterization of miRNAs and targets in flax (Linum usitatissimum) under saline, alkaline, and saline-alkaline stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16(1):124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jakoby M, Weisshaar B, Droge-Laser W, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Tiedemann J, Kroj T, Parcy F. bZIP transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7(3):106–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ehlert A, Weltmeier F, Wang X, Mayer CS, Smeekens S, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Droge-Laser W. Two-hybrid protein-protein interaction analysis in Arabidopsis protoplasts: establishment of a heterodimerization map of group C and group S bZIP transcription factors. Plant J. 2006;46(5):890–900.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Droge-Laser W, Weiste C. The C/S1 bZIP network: a regulatory hub orchestrating plant energy homeostasis. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23(5):422–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaminaka H, Nake C, Epple P, Dittgen J, Schutze K, Chaban C, Holt BF 3rd, Merkle T, Schafer E, Harter K, et al. bZIP10-LSD1 antagonism modulates basal defense and cell death in Arabidopsis following infection. EMBO J. 2006;25(18):4400–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun X, Li Y, Cai H, Bai X, Ji W, Ding X, Zhu Y. The Arabidopsis AtbZIP1 transcription factor is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to salt, osmotic and drought stresses. J Plant Res. 2012;125(3):429–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang M, Liu Y, Shi H, Guo M, Chai M, He Q, Yan M, Cao D, Zhao L, Cai H, et al. Evolutionary and expression analyses of soybean basic leucine zipper transcription factor family. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):159.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liao Y, Zhang JS, Chen SY, Zhang WK. Role of soybean GmbZIP132 under abscisic acid and salt stresses. J Integr Plant Biol. 2008;50(2):221–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu Z, Ali Z, Xu L, He X, Huang Y, Yi J, Shao H, Ma H, Zhang D. The nuclear protein GmbZIP110 has transcription activation activity and plays important roles in the response to salinity stress in soybean. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20366.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liao Y, Zou HF, Wei W, Hao YJ, Tian AG, Huang J, Liu YF, Zhang JS, Chen SY. Soybean GmbZIP44, GmbZIP62 and GmbZIP78 genes function as negative regulator of ABA signaling and confer salt and freezing tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Planta. 2008;228(2):225–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gao SQ, Chen M, Xu ZS, Zhao CP, Li L, Xu HJ, Tang YM, Zhao X, Ma YZ. The soybean GmbZIP1 transcription factor enhances multiple abiotic stress tolerances in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;75(6):537–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ge Y, Li Y, Zhu YM, Bai X, Lv DK, Guo D, Ji W, Cai H. Global transcriptome profiling of wild soybean (Glycine soja) roots under NaHCO3 treatment. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DuanMu H, Wang Y, Bai X, Cheng S, Deyholos MK, Wong GK-S, Li D, Zhu D, Li R, Yu Y, et al. Wild soybean roots depend on specific transcription factors and oxidation reduction related genes in response to alkaline stress. Funct Integr Genomic. 2015;15(6):651–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sun XL, Sun MZ, Jia BW, Qin ZW, Yang KJ, Chen C, Yu QY, Zhu YM. A Glycine soja methionine sulfoxide reductase B5a interacts with the Ca2+/CAM-binding kinase GsCBRLK and activates ROS signaling under carbonate alkaline stress. Plant J. 2016;86(6):514–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sun X, Yang S, Sun M, Wang S, Ding X, Zhu D, Ji W, Cai H, Zhao C, Wang X, et al. A novel Glycine soja cysteine proteinase inhibitor GsCPI14, interacting with the calcium/calmodulin-binding receptor-like kinase GsCBRLK, regulated plant tolerance to alkali stress. Plant Mol Biol. 2014;85(1–2):33–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu Y, Duan X, Ding X, Chen C, Zhu D, Yin K, Cao L, Song X, Zhu P, Li Q, et al. A novel AP2/ERF family transcription factor from Glycine soja, GsERF71, is a DNA binding protein that positively regulates alkaline stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2017;94(4–5):509–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cao L, Yu Y, DuanMu H, Chen C, Duan X, Zhu P, Chen R, Li Q, Zhu Y, Ding X. A novel Glycine soja homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-zip) I gene, Gshdz4, positively regulates bicarbonate tolerance and responds to osmotic stress in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16(1):184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jia B, Sun M, Sun X, Li R, Wang Z, Wu J, Wei Z, DuanMu H, Xiao J, Zhu Y. Overexpression of GsGSTU13 and SCMRP in Medicago sativa confers increased salt-alkaline tolerance and methionine content. Physiol Plant. 2015;156:176–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang ZY, Song FB, Cai H, Zhu YM, Bai X, Ji W, Li Y, Hua Y. Over-expressing GsGST14 from Glycine soja enhances alkaline tolerance of transgenic Medicago sativa. Biol Plant. 2012;56(3):516–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun M, Sun X, Zhao Y, Zhao C, Duanmu H, Yu Y, Ji W, Zhu Y. Ectopic expression of GsPPCK3 and SCMRP in Medicago sativa enhances plant alkaline stress tolerance and methionine content. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89578.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xu L, Xu Z, Liu X, Huang Y, He X, Ma H, Zhang D, Yi J. The subcellular localization and ectopic expression analysis in Arabidopsis of soybean GmbZIP60 gene. J Plant Biochem Biotech. 2013;24(1):9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu JX, Srivastava R, Che P, Howell SH. Salt stress signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana involves a membrane-bound transcription factor AtbZIP17 as a signal transducer. Plant Signal Behav. 2008;3(1):56–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Geu-Flores F, Nour-Eldin HH, Nielsen MT, Halkier BA. USER fusion: a rapid and efficient method for simultaneous fusion and cloning of multiple PCR products. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(7):e55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fahnenstich H, Saigo M, Niessen M, Zanor MI, Andreo CS, Fernie AR, Drincovich MF, Flugge UI, Maurino VG. Alteration of organic acid metabolism in Arabidopsis overexpressing the maize C4 NADP-malic enzyme causes accelerated senescence during extended darkness. Plant Physiol. 2007;145(3):640–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gaxiola RA, Li J, Undurraga S, Dang LM, Allen GJ, Alper SL, Fink GR. Drought- and salt-tolerant plants result from overexpression of the AVP1 H+-pump. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(20):11444–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alves MS, Dadalto SP, Goncalves AB, De Souza GB, Barros VA, Fietto LG. Plant bZIP transcription factors responsive to pathogens: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(4):7815–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Banerjee A, Roychoudhury A. Abscisic-acid-dependent basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors in plant abiotic stress. Protoplasma. 2017;254(1):3–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lorenzo CD, Sanchez-Lamas M, Antonietti MS, Cerdan PD. Emerging hubs in plant light and temperature signaling. Photochem Photobiol. 2016;92(1):3–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peviani A, Lastdrager J, Hanson J, Snel B. The phylogeny of C/S1 bZIP transcription factors reveals a shared algal ancestry and the pre-angiosperm translational regulation of S1 transcripts. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30444.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weltmeier F, Rahmani F, Ehlert A, Dietrich K, Schutze K, Wang X, Chaban C, Hanson J, Teige M, Harter K, et al. Expression patterns within the Arabidopsis C/S1 bZIP transcription factor network: availability of heterodimerization partners controls gene expression during stress response and development. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;69(1–2):107–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang J, Wang J, Jiang W, Liu J, Yang S, Gai J, Li Y. Identification and analysis of NaHCO3 stress responsive genes in wild soybean (Glycine soja) roots by RNA-seq. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1842.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang C, Gao C, Wang L, Zheng L, Yang C, Wang Y. Comprehensive transcriptional profiling of NaHCO3-stressed Tamarix hispida roots reveals networks of responsive genes. Plant Mol Biol. 2014;84:145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Babuin MF, Campestre MP, Rocco R, Bordenave CD, Escaray FJ, Antonelli C, Calzadilla P, Garriz A, Serna E, Carrasco P, et al. Response to long-term NaHCO3-derived alkalinity in model Lotus japonicus ecotypes Gifu B-129 and Miyakojima MG-20: transcriptomic profiling and physiological characterization. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    An YM, Song LL, Liu YR, Shu YJ, Guo CH. De Novo transcriptional analysis of alfalfa in response to saline-alkaline stress. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:931.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Song T, Xu H, Sun N, Jiang L, Tian P, Yong Y, Yang W, Cai H, Cui G. Metabolomic analysis of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) root-symbiotic rhizobia responses under alkali stress. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1208.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen P, Yan K, Shao H, Zhao S. Physiological mechanisms for high salt tolerance in wild soybean (Glycine soja) from Yellow River Delta, China: photosynthesis, osmotic regulation, ion flux and antioxidant capacity. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jia BW, Sun MZ, Duanmu HZ, Ding XD, Liu BD, Zhu YM, Sun XL. GsCHX19.3, a member of cation/H+ exchanger superfamily from wild soybean contributes to high salinity and carbonate alkaline tolerance. Sci Rep. 2017;7:9423.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yoo SD, Cho YH, Sheen J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(7):1565–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sun M, Jia B, Cui N, Wen Y, Duanmu H, Yu Q, Xiao J, Sun X, Zhu Y. Functional characterization of a Glycine soja Ca2+ATPase in salt-alkaline stress responses. Plant Mol Biol. 2016;90(4–5):419–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Draper HH, Hadley M. [43] Malondialdehyde determination as index of lipid peroxidation. Method Enzymol. 1990;186:421–31.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Peever TL, Higgins VJ. Electrolyte leakage, lipoxygenase, and lipid peroxidation induced in tomato leaf tissue by specific and nonspecific elicitors from Cladosporium fulvum. Plant Physiol. 1989;90(3):867–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liang Y, Qin C, Liu Q, Zhang W, Ding R. Exogenous silicon (Si) increases antioxidant enzyme activity and reduces lipid peroxidation in roots of salt-stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J Plant Physiol. 2003;160(10):1157–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018
corrected publication December 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant Bioengineering LaboratoryNortheast Agricultural UniversityHarbinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Crop Stress Molecular Biology LaboratoryHeilongjiang Bayi Agricultural UniversityDaqingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations