The Dictyostelium discoideum homologue of Twinkle, Twm1, is a mitochondrial DNA helicase, an active primase and promotes mitochondrial DNA replication
DNA replication requires contributions from various proteins, such as DNA helicases; in mitochondria Twinkle is important for maintaining and replicating mitochondrial DNA. Twinkle helicases are predicted to also possess primase activity, as has been shown in plants; however this activity appears to have been lost in metazoans. Given this, the study of Twinkle in other organisms is required to better understand the evolution of this family and the roles it performs within mitochondria.
Here we describe the characterization of a Twinkle homologue, Twm1, in the amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum, a model organism for mitochondrial genetics and disease. We show that Twm1 is important for mitochondrial function as it maintains mitochondrial DNA copy number in vivo. Twm1 is a helicase which unwinds DNA resembling open forks, although it can act upon substrates with a single 3′ overhang, albeit less efficiently. Furthermore, unlike human Twinkle, Twm1 has primase activity in vitro. Finally, using a novel in bacterio approach, we demonstrated that Twm1 promotes DNA replication.
We conclude that Twm1 is a replicative mitochondrial DNA helicase which is capable of priming DNA for replication. Our results also suggest that non-metazoan Twinkle could function in the initiation of mitochondrial DNA replication. While further work is required, this study has illuminated several alternative processes of mitochondrial DNA maintenance which might also be performed by the Twinkle family of helicases.
KeywordsTwinkle DNA helicase DNA primase Mitochondrial DNA replication Dictyostelium discoideum
DNA helicases are an important class of enzymes involved in many cellular processes. Their ability to unwind double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) allows the resulting single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to serve as a template for downstream activity (e.g. DNA replication or repair) by other proteins or potentially the helicases themselves. During DNA replication, strand separation allows for the synthesis of a short RNA primer, which in turn is utilized by the DNA polymerase. While the processes of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) replication are similar to their nuclear counterparts, the proteins performing these roles often differ. The replicative DNA helicase in mitochondria is the highly conserved Twinkle family, which was originally identified by its homology to the bacteriophage T7 gp4 primase/helicase . Twinkle is important for mitochondrial function, as mutations in its encoding gene in humans can cause autosomal dominant progressive external ophthalmoplegia, a neuromuscular disorder often associated with mtDNA deletions [1, 2].
Twinkle helicases function as 5′→3′ helicases and, similar to other replicative helicases, form ring-shaped hexamers to unwind dsDNA at the replication fork [3, 4]. Due to this structure, replicative helicases often require a loader protein to allow for the unwinding of DNA with no free 5′ end, which is typically the case for mtDNA [5, 6]. However, both T7 gp4 and human Twinkle are able to load themselves onto circular DNA without the need for accessory proteins . The exact mechanism of this is unknown, although it has been theorized that the N-terminal domain of the protein is involved. While deletion of the N-terminal region in human Twinkle decreases mtDNA replisome activity in vitro, it is unclear whether this is solely due to its role in DNA binding and unwinding , or if the deletion also impairs loading of Twinkle onto a circular template. Furthermore, deletion of the T7 gp4 linker region (located between the primase and helicase domains) results in inefficient loading of the ring-shaped hexamer on DNA , which could also apply to Twinkle. This linker region is also important for the proper function and hexamerization of Twinkle .
Most Twinkle homologues are predicted to possess a primase domain N-terminally of their helicase domain, similar to the T7 gp4 primase/helicase . While both Arabidopsis thaliana and Plasmodium falciparum encode homologues with functional primase domains [11, 12, 13, 14], this domain is purportedly inactive in human Twinkle  and is theorized to be inactive in all metazoan Twinkle homologues . Primase activity in Twinkle is also less well understood (than its helicase activity), however should this domain be active it is likely to prime ssDNA for the initiation of mtDNA replication . While the primase inactivity of metazoan Twinkle could disprove this theory, the ability of the mitochondrial RNA polymerase to prime mtDNA has likely replaced or facilitated the loss of this activity in metazoan Twinkle [15, 16].
Research has largely focused on human Twinkle, meaning that little is known about the protein in non-metazoan eukaryotes. In various organisms, putative homologues have been identified bioinformatically; A. thaliana for example is predicted to encode at least three Twinkle homologues , one of which has been characterized in detail . Interestingly, yeasts and fungi appear to have lost their Twinkle homologues , but also encode helicases only found in these lineages [17, 18]. Beyond multicellular eukaryotes, only PfPREX in P. falciparum has been identified as a replicative primase/helicase which targets to the apicoplast  and possesses an active primase domain . While PfPREX is homologous to Twinkle, its open reading frame also encodes an active DNA polymerase domain , which may form a single polypeptide with the helicase. Given this protein’s putative structure, in conjunction with its apicoplast targeting, there is currently nothing known about mitochondrial Twinkle in unicellular organisms. Further studies outside humans would therefore better our understanding of the collective roles of the Twinkle protein family.
The social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum is a well-established model organism for studying mitochondrial genetics and disease . While previous research has investigated D. discoideum mitochondrial transcription [22, 23], little is known about the processes that govern its mtDNA maintenance. Here we describe the characterization of a Twinkle homologue (Twm1) in D. discoideum, encoded by the nuclear twm1 gene and targeted to mitochondria. Twm1 is important in mitochondria, as antisense inhibition of its encoding gene leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and reduced mtDNA copy number. Heterologously expressed Twm1 possesses nucleoside triphosphatase (NTPase), helicase and, unlike human Twinkle, primase activity in vitro. Finally, using a novel in bacterio system, we demonstrated that Twm1 is capable of promoting DNA replication. Based on these findings we have concluded that Twm1 is a likely replicative mtDNA helicase in D. discoideum and a potential contributor to the initiation of mtDNA replication.
D. discoideum Twm1 localizes to mitochondria
Antisense inhibition of twm1 induces mitochondrial dysfunction and a reduction in mtDNA copy number
Past work in metazoans has shown that overexpression or knockdown of Twinkle increases or decreases mtDNA copy number, respectively . Therefore, the impact of twm1 antisense inhibition on D. discoideum mtDNA was subsequently analyzed. Knockdown of any mtDNA maintenance machinery is likely to produce a decrease in mtDNA copy number , which is expected to be most pronounced when the expression of replicative protein genes is reduced . To investigate this, D. discoideum AX2 and antisense transformants were grown to equal densities and total DNA was extracted. qPCR was used to compare the mtDNA in each transformant relative to both its nuclear DNA and AX2 mtDNA. All antisense transformants possessed less mtDNA than AX2 (Fig. 2c), with the minimum observed being ~ 40%. The reduction in mtDNA correlated with the antisense vector copy number (R2 = 0.9298), while the amount of mtDNA in vector controls was unchanged. The reduction in mtDNA copy number as a result of twm1 antisense inhibition clearly indicates that Twm1 performs an important role in maintaining mtDNA copy number in D. discoideum, either in the replication process or DNA maintenance. Furthermore, reduced mtDNA copy number in vivo would likely result in lowered energy production and the subsequent reduction to growth rate which directly correlates to the degree of antisense inhibition observed (Fig. 2a).
Ethidium bromide exposure increases twm1 expression and results in mtDNA loss from which antisense transformants are less able to recover
Loss and recovery of twm1 antisense transformant mtDNA following EtBr exposure
TAS vector copy number
Initial mtDNA (%) relative to AX2
mtDNA loss (%) after 24 h
mtDNA recovery (%) after 24 h
53.02 ± 2.94
49.34 ± 3.83
86.56 ± 3.98
59.03 ± 3.93
30.30 ± 2.89
78.02 ± 3.30
71.48 ± 4.37
21.40 ± 4.17
66.89 ± 4.21
65.67 ± 2.51
25.68 ± 4.86
59.56 ± 3.71
69.56 ± 2.09
29.86 ± 3.78
68.31 ± 4.84
62.04 ± 2.26
36.31 ± 2.53
39.97 ± 3.81
73.30 ± 4.29
25.75 ± 4.58
Twm1 possesses in vitro NTPase activity which is stimulated by DNA
Twm1 functions as a 5′→3′ helicase which requires open fork-like DNA substrates
Subsequently we decided to examine the requirement of each overhang for proper Twm1 function. Similarly to human Twinkle , Twm1 cannot unwind a dsDNA template with only a 5′ overhang. However, Twm1 is capable of inefficiently unwinding substrates lacking a 5′ overhang (Fig. 6c), provided that they possess a 3′ overhang, regardless of it being single- or double-stranded. This ability is in contrast to human Twinkle , which explicitly requires both overhangs in order to properly unwind target DNA. From this work, it can be concluded that Twm1 is a functional 5′→3′ helicase, which unwinds open fork-like DNA structures with a minimum requirement of a 3′ overhang for its loading.
D. discoideum Twm1 is a functional primase in vitro
Twm1 promotes DNA replication in bacterio both intrinsically and sequence specifically
Dictyostelium discoideum Twm1 is a presumptive replicative mtDNA helicase, given its similarity to other Twinkle homologues and the results of this study. Although the requirements to simulate mtDNA replication in vitro are quite minimal , performing the assay can be difficult due to potential unknown protein components and the nature of the system being examined. While Twm1 itself can be heterologously purified in soluble form, this was not possible for the suspected D. discoideum mtDNA polymerase, PolA (data not shown). Furthermore, a single-stranded binding protein is required for most mtDNA replication systems ; however no candidate has been identified for D. discoideum. To overcome these problems, we have adapted an in bacterio approach used previously to examine mitochondrial transcription in D. discoideum [22, 23].
The in bacterio system employs an Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) strain possessing two vectors; one serves as the template and the other encodes the protein of interest, whose gene is under the control of an IPTG-inducible promoter. While Le et al.  used this system to investigate transcription by the mitochondrial RNA polymerase, we adapted the system to examine mtDNA replication by Twm1. The template vector used in this experiment was pZErO-2:NCRrnl, which carries a non-coding region (NCR) and an adjacent segment of the rnl gene from the D. discoideum mitochondrial genome. Although a mitochondrial origin of replication has yet to be identified in D. discoideum, it is likely that one is located in this NCR much like the previously identified origin of transcription , given that the two regulatory sequences are often located in tandem . This assumption is supported by the lack of other suitable NCRs in D. discoideum mtDNA.
In this study we investigated the D. discoideum Twinkle homologue, Twm1, in order to better understand the function and evolution of this protein family outside of metazoans. Our results, suggest that Twm1 serves as a replicative mtDNA helicase in D. discoideum given its maintenance of mtDNA copy number in vivo (and plasmid copy number in bacterio), upregulation following inhibition of mtDNA replication (as a result of EtBr treatment) and unwinding of open fork-like dsDNA. However, this requires in vivo confirmation, and does not exclude the possibility that there is more than one replicative mtDNA helicase in D. discoideum. While metazoan Twinkle is purported to be the sole replicative mtDNA helicase , uncertainty over the model of mtDNA replication  brings into question the requirement of alternative helicases. Twinkle assumedly serves as the helicase in the replication complex for continuous DNA synthesis (i.e. synthesis of the leading strand), regardless of whether discontinuous synthesis (of the lagging strand, for example) also occurs in mitochondria. This assumption also applies to Twm1 based on the similarities identified in this work, although further investigation is still needed to clarify the exact mechanisms of mtDNA replication, both collectively and in D. discoideum.
Nucleotide hydrolysis is integral for helicase activity, however the nucleotide of choice can vary between unrelated or homologous proteins. T7 gp4, for example, hydrolyzes dTTP and dATP equivalently in the absence of DNA, but hydrolyzes dTTP threefold more when DNA is present . Conversely, human Twinkle is less selective, but without the addition of DNA best hydrolyzes ATP and dATP . This does not largely change with the addition of DNA , although the choice of template (dsDNA with overhangs) can decrease its selectivity for particular nucleotides . Twm1, much like human Twinkle, is somewhat unselective in its use of nucleotides but prefers ATP and dATP (Fig. 5); this is unsurprising, given their close evolutionary relation. However, whether this divergence from the T7 gp4 extends to more distantly related Twinkle homologues, such as those from A. thaliana and P. falciparum, remains to be determined.
As a replicative 5′→3′ mtDNA helicase, Twinkle acts upon dsDNA with overhangs on both strands, akin to an open replication fork . However, we found that while Twm1 readily unwinds these structures, it is also inefficiently capable of unwinding dsDNA with only a 3′ overhang (Fig. 6c). The apparent rate at which this occurred was low, as this was only observed after extended incubation times. This observation suggests that the substrate requirements of metazoan Twinkle are more stringent than those of other homologues, such as Twm1. One potential explanation for this disparity is that the conditions employed in previous work (e.g. incubation time) did not suit this inefficient process, leaving this activity undetected. It is also possible that this difference is due to divergences between the Twinkle homologues in different organisms. Given the importance of the Twinkle N-terminal region for proper loading and the lack of primase activity in metazoans [3, 10], the difference in substrate unwinding could also be due to sequence divergence upstream of the conserved helicase domain. Whether this activity is significant in vivo also remains to be addressed, as a possible role of this function is not as readily apparent as the unwinding of open forks. This could however support the suggestion that Twinkle is involved in recombinational repair , or otherwise might implicate it in alternate mtDNA maintenance processes, such as the resolution of replication fork arrest or lagging strand synthesis/maturation.
In this study we have also shown that D. discoideum Twm1 acts as an active primase in vitro (Fig. 8); this is the second report of primase activity in a mitochondrial Twinkle helicase , and the first outside plants. Based on its ability to synthesize a primer which can be used to initiate replication in vitro, it can be assumed that Twm1 performs this function during in vivo mtDNA replication. Considering this, it is of interest to note that D. discoideum is closely related to the opisthokont lineage, which includes metazoans, whose Twinkle proteins have lost their primase activity, and fungi, who have lost Twinkle entirely . The retention of this function in Twm1 (and also in disparate organisms, such as A. thaliana) supports the notion that primase activity, while lost in metazoans , is conserved across Twinkle homologues (Fig. 7).
Human mtDNA and the T7 bacteriophage genome are both primed for replication by their respective RNA polymerase [15, 16, 44]. While in T7 the strand-coupled mechanism of DNA replication is well documented , there are three models of mtDNA replication which have been demonstrated in human mitochondria , although primer formation during replication initiation has been well attributed to the RNA polymerase . In T7, gp4 is responsible for the generation of primers during lagging strand synthesis . While the identity of an analogous primase in human mitochondria has yet to be determined, a candidate was recently identified; PrimPol, a primase–polymerase . While this protein is an active primase  it is theorized to serve as a supportive enzyme, as it is non-essential and actually decreases mtDNA copy number [48, 49]. Hence, it is possible that the RNA polymerase still functions to completely prime human mtDNA; however this might not be the case in other organisms which possess a Twinkle homologue with functional primase activity, such as D. discoideum. It is therefore possible that primer synthesis for mtDNA replication is carried out strictly by Twm1, or in conjunction with an RNA polymerase, although this remains to be elucidated alongside clarification of the mechanism of mtDNA replication.
The role of the mitochondrial RNA polymerase in primer synthesis links the initiation of mtDNA replication to transcription , much like T7 DNA replication. As this has only been demonstrated in metazoans, it may well be different in other organisms, due to the differences observed between Twinkle homologues. The presence of non-metazoan Twinkle primase activity suggests that the RNA polymerase might not be required for primer formation, which could also extend to the initiation of replication; this remains to be explored, as it is not known whether the D. discoideum RNA polymerase is capable of priming DNA. However, should it be incapable of this function, then the mtDNA replication machinery would require the ability to initiate replication independently; this may be facilitated by the ability of Twinkle to recognize specific sequences observed in this study (Fig. 9). While this result suggests that an origin of replication is located in the NCR of the D. discoideum mitochondrial genome, the most interesting prospect from this work is the ability of Twm1 to specifically recognize this site and potentially drive the initiation of replication. Taken in conjunction with its primase activity , its ability to load itself onto circular DNA  and its preference for binding dsDNA , this activity could potentially provide non-metazoan Twinkle with the capacity to initiate mtDNA replication alone, or in tandem with other replicative proteins, as we might have seen with Twm1 (Fig. 9). While it is possible that the promotion of DNA replication in bacterio by Twm1 was entirely due to its helicase activity complementing bacterial initiation of replication, this is unlikely given that plasmid copy number did not change solely in the presence of NCRrnl (without Twm1). Further work is required to better understand mtDNA replication and its initiation in non-metazoan systems, and confirm which specific functions Twinkle performs in its role as a replicative mtDNA helicase.
This study highlights an interesting divergence between Twinkle homologues, and demonstrates that further work is required to better understand their function in mitochondria. We have concluded that the D. discoideum Twinkle homologue, Twm1, is a replicative mtDNA helicase which unwinds DNA resembling open forks and promotes DNA replication. However, Twm1 is also able to unwind substrates with only a 3′ overhang, suggesting that non-metazoan Twinkle helicases might possess less stringent substrate preferences and participate in alternate mtDNA maintenance processes beyond replication. Furthermore, the ability of Twm1 to prime DNA and recognize a potential origin of replication, suggests that Twinkle homologues outside metazoans can contribute to the initiation of mtDNA replication.
The twm1 subcellular localization construct was created by cloning a portion of twm1 (270 bp; 1–270 bp) encoding a putative mitochondrial targeting signal into the pDV-CGFP expression vector  to create a twm1-gfp fusion gene. The twm1 antisense construct was created by cloning a portion of twm1 (315 bp; 1–315 bp) in the antisense orientation downstream of the actin 6 promoter in the D. discoideum expression vector pDNeo2 . Primers used for amplification of both gene fragments are provided in Additional file 3: Table S1A.
For heterologous protein expression, a twm1 gene fragment (1797 bp; 463–2259 bp) was generated which encodes a truncated Twm1 (599 amino acids; 68 kDa), lacking the first 154 and last 19 amino acids from the full length protein (772 amino acids). D. discoideum encodes a large number of proteins possessing asparagine-rich regions , such as Twm1, which is predicted to include one at each terminus that do not overlap with any predicted functional domains (Additional file 1: Figure S1A). These asparagine-rich stretches are also present in proteins from P. falciparum and are not predicted to perform a cellular function, but do contribute to protein aggregation . Hence, these regions were omitted, along with the N-terminal mitochondrial targeting signal, to minimize expressed protein aggregation. The generated gene fragment was subsequently cloned into the pET-23a:tetA expression vector .
Dictyostelium discoideum strain and culture conditions
Dictyostelium discoideum strain AX2, a derivative of the NC4 strain, and all subsequent transformants were grown axenically in HL-5 medium at 21 °C, shaking at 180 rpm [54, 55]. Non-axenic growth of D. discoideum was performed on SM agar  with Klebsiella aerogenes or Micrococcus luteus PRF3 lawns.
Transformation of Dictyostelium discoideum with vector DNA
Dictyostelium discoideum AX2 was transformed via the calcium phosphate method as described previously  using 20 μg of vector DNA. Transformants were isolated from M. luteus PRF3 lawns on SM plates supplemented with 20 μg/ml G-418 .
To determine the subcellular localization of Twm1, D. discoideum transformants expressing a Twm1-GFP fusion protein, encoded within pDV-CGFP , were analyzed via fluorescence microscopy as described previously [59, 60], using an Olympus BX 61TRF microscope and Olympus DP80 camera, following staining with 50 nM MitoTracker Red (Life Technologies) for 1 h.
Analysis of Dictyostelium discoideum growth rate on bacterial lawns
Dictyostelium discoideum growth was analyzed by measuring plaque expansion rate on bacterial lawns . Strains of interest were collected from the leading edge of grown plaques on K. aerogenes lawns and inoculated on normal agar plates with pregrown E. coli B2 lawns. Plaque diameter was measured every 8 or 16 h for 7 days to determine the mean plaque expansion rate (mm/h). Each strain was analyzed twice with three biological replicates in each experiment.
Quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Copy numbers of the twm1 antisense construct (in D. discoideum transformants), the D. discoideum mitochondrial genome and the pZErO-2 vector (Invitrogen) were determined using qPCR. Reactions were performed using SsoAdvanced™ Universal SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad), total gDNA and appropriate gene-specific primers (cloned portion of twm1 for antisense construct; rns for mtDNA; kanR for pZErO-2). Total gDNA was extracted using DNAzol® (Astral Scientific) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 98 °C for 5 min followed by 50 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s then annealing and primer extension at 60 °C for 30 s in an iCycler iQ® (Bio-Rad). All samples were normalized to a single copy nuclear (tubB) or chromosomal gene (talB) for D. discoideum or E. coli, respectively. At least three biological replicates were analyzed in triplicate for each experiment. p values were calculated using the Student’s t-test function in Microsoft Excel. Primers used are listed in Additional file 3: Table S1B.
Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)
The mRNA transcript levels of twm1 in D. discoideum cells were determined using qRT-PCR. RNA was initially DNase treated using the TURBO DNA-free™ Kit (Life Technologies). Reactions were performed using iScript™ One-Step RT-PCR Kit with SYBR® Green (Bio-Rad), total RNA extracted from D. discoideum AX2 or antisense transformants, and primers specific to twm1. Cycling conditions were as follows: cDNA synthesis at 50 °C for 10 min, reverse transcriptase inactivation at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 60 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s then annealing and primer extension at 60 °C for 30 s in an iCycler iQ® (Bio-Rad). Negative controls without the addition of reverse transcriptase were performed to discount gDNA contamination following DNase treatment. All samples were normalized to a nuclear structural gene (tubB). At least three biological replicates were analyzed in triplicate for each experiment. p values were calculated using the Student’s t-test function in Microsoft Excel. Primers used are listed in Additional file 3: Table S1B.
Exposure of Dictyostelium cells to ethidium bromide
In order to induce and assay mtDNA damage, AX2 and transformant D. discoideum cultures were diluted to 105 cells/ml and grown in the dark for 24 h with 10 μg/ml EtBr. After treatment the cells were pelleted, resuspended in fresh HL-5 and allowed to recover for a further 24 h. Aliquots of cells were harvested by centrifugation before and after treatment and following recovery. Total DNA and RNA were extracted using DNAzol® (Astral Scientific) and TRIzol® (Life Technologies), respectively, as per the manufacturers’ instructions. At least three biological replicates were analyzed in triplicate for each experiment.
Expression and purification of recombinant Twm1
A pET-23a:tetA expression vector encoding Twm1 was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells (Life Technologies) for heterologous expression and purification. A strain containing the empty expression vector was used concurrently (and for all subsequent in vitro assays) as a control for the purified recombinant protein. Cells were grown at 37 °C in LB until the OD600nm reached 0.4, at which point IPTG was added to a final concentration of 1 mM to induce expression of the recombinant 6× His-tagged protein. Cells were grown for a further 4 h at 21 °C and harvested by centrifugation. Cells were resuspended in NPI-20 [pH 8.0, 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole] and incubated with 1 mg/ml each of lysozyme and DNase on ice for 1 h. Cells were disrupted by sonication for 15 min and subjected to centrifugation at 4 °C for 30–60 min. The supernatant was then added to 1 ml Protino® Ni-NTA agarose beads (Macherey-Nagel) and mixed on ice for 1 h to allow protein binding. The suspension was then added to a poly-prep column (Bio-Rad), the supernatant was allowed to flow through and the agarose beads were washed 5 times with NPI-50 [pH 8.0, 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM imidazole]. The protein was then eluted with NPI-250 [pH 8.0, 50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole]. Protein purity was analyzed by gel electrophoresis and peak fractions were combined. Eluted protein was concentrated and dialyzed using Amicon Ultra-0.5 ml 10 K centrifugal filters (Millipore). Final protein concentration was determined via the Bradford method .
Preparation of dsDNA templates
All dsDNA substrates for in vitro assays were prepared by combining oligonucleotides of equal concentrations in annealing solution [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM NaCl]. Mixtures were heated at 95 °C for 5 min and allowed to cool at room temperature for at least 1 h. Oligonucleotide sequences and dsDNA substrates are provided in Additional file 3: Tables S1C and D, respectively.
The in vitro NTPase activity of Twm1 was determined using a protocol adapted from Jemt, Farge . NTP hydrolysis was measured by the release of phosphate using the malachite green phosphate assay. Reactions (20 μl) were prepared containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 4.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM NTP and 25–100 ng of purified Twm1. Reactions were prepared in the presence or absence of DNA and incubated at 21 °C for 4 h. DNA templates used were linear 15 bp dsDNA (FHA0), circular ssDNA (M13mp18; New England Biolabs) and linear 15 nucleotide ssDNA (FHA 3.1). Following incubation, reactions were diluted 2.5-fold in milli-Q sdH2O and dispensed into a 96 well microtiter plate, to which 100 μl of malachite green solution was added. The OD620nm was measured on a CLARIOstar (BMG Labtech), and sample values were normalized based on values obtained for controls. The final concentration of released phosphate was determined from a standard curve of known phosphate concentrations. Malachite green solution and phosphate standards were prepared as described previously . Experiments were repeated for each sample at least five times, with each experiment performed in triplicate. p values were calculated using the Student’s t-test function in Microsoft Excel.
DNA helicase assay
Helicase reactions (10 µl) contained 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 4 mM DTT, 100 µg/ml BSA, 3 mM ATP, 25 nM fluorescent dsDNA substrate (Additional file 3: Table S1B) and 25–100 ng purified Twm1. Reactions were incubated at 21 °C for 1–2 h routinely (or 20 h for extended incubations) and stopped with 5 µl stop solution [90 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 40% glycerol, 10% SDS]. Products were separated on 20% non-denaturing polyacrylamide TBE gels and fluorescence was visualized using a Typhoon FLA 7000 Imaging system (GE Healthcare).
DNA primase assay
The in vitro DNA primase activity of Twm1 was determined using a protocol adapted from Nielsen et al.  and Diray-Arce et al. . Reactions were prepared with 25–100 ng purified Twm1 in 20 μl mixtures containing: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 100 μg/ml BSA, 0.2 mM rNTP mix (CTP, GTP and UTP), 2 mM ATP, 10 μCi/ml α32P-ATP and 0.25 μg M13mp18 ssDNA template (New England Biolabs). Reactions were prepared in the presence and absence of 1 U Klenow (Promega) and 0.1 mM dNTP mix (dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP), and incubated at 21 °C for 1–4 h. Reaction products were separated on 8% non-denaturing TBE or 6% denaturing TBE-Urea gels (Life Technologies). The gel was then exposed to a PhosphorImager screen and visualized using a Typhoon FLA 700 Imaging system (GE Healthcare).
In bacterio DNA replication
Analysis of Twm1’s ability to promote DNA replication in bacterial cells was based on similar work from previous studies [22, 23]. E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells of interest (carrying a template vector and a vector encoding the protein of interest) were grown in LB at 37 °C until an OD600nm of 0.3 was reached, at which point 1 mM IPTG was added to induce heterologous protein expression, and the cultures incubated for 5 h at 21 °C. Duplicate control cultures were grown concurrently which were not induced. Aliquots of cells were harvested by centrifugation prior to and following IPTG induction and total DNA was isolated using DNAzol® (Astral Scientific) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR was performed to determine copy number of the pZErO-2 vector (Invitrogen). At least three biological replicates were analyzed in triplicate for each experiment. Primers used are listed in Additional file 3: Table S1B.
AH and CB conceived the experiments, analyzed the data and contributed to writing the manuscript. AH performed all experiments. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We wish to thank Phuong Le and Sam Manna for providing the strain and template vectors used for the in bacterio replication assay. We also thank Sam Manna for advice with the revision of this manuscript and the reviewers for their feedback. AH was the recipient of a La Trobe University Postgraduate Research Scholarship.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
- 2.Kaguni LS, Oliveira MT. Structure, function and evolution of the animal mitochondrial replicative DNA helicase. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;51:1–12.Google Scholar
- 56.Annesley SJ, Fisher PR. Dictyostelium slug phototaxis. Chemotaxis: methods and protocols. Totowa: Humana Press; 2009. p. 67–76.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.