Advertisement

Nanoscale Research Letters

, 14:30 | Cite as

Free-Standing Selenium Impregnated Carbonized Leaf Cathodes for High-Performance Sodium-Selenium Batteries

  • Bingru Guo
  • Hongwei Mi
  • Peixin Zhang
  • Xiangzhong Ren
  • Yongliang LiEmail author
Open Access
Nano Express
  • 358 Downloads

Abstract

A novel approach of carbonizing leaves by thermal pyrolysis with melt diffusion followed by selenium vapor deposition is developed to prepare the carbon-selenium composite cathodes for sodium-selenium batteries. The carbonized leaf possesses internal hierarchical porosity and high mass loading; therefore, the composite is applied as a binder- and current collector-free cathode, exhibiting an excellent rate capability and a high reversible specific capacity of 520 mA h g−1 at 100 mA g−1 after 120 cycles and 300 mA h g−1 even at 2 A g−1 after 500 cycles without any capacity loss. Moreover, the unique natural three-dimensional structure and moderate graphitization degree of leaf-based carbon facilitate Na+/e transport to activate selenium which can guarantee a high utilization of the selenium during discharge/charge process, demonstrating a promising strategy to fabricate advanced electrodes toward the sodium-selenium batteries.

Keywords

Carbonized leaf Free-standing Binder-free Sodium-selenium battery 

Abbreviations

BET

Brunauer-Emmett-Teller

CV

Cyclic voltammogram

DEC

Diethyl carbonate

EC

Ethylene carbonate

EIS

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

FESEM

Field emission scanning electron microscopy

GITT

Galvanostatic intermittent titration technique

LIBs

Lithium ion batteries

Li-S

Lithium-sulfur

Na-Se

Sodium-selenium

SEI

Solid electrolyte interface

SEM

Scanning electron microscopy

SIBs

Sodium ion batteries

TEM

Transmission electron microscopy

TGA

Thermogravimetric analysis

XPS

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

XRD

X-ray diffraction

Introduction

With the rapid growth of electronic devices, sustainably rechargeable batteries are urgently needed, giving the urgent rise to exploit energy storage devices with high capacity and satisfactory rate performance [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Lithium ion batteries (LIBs) are the dominant power for electronic devices because of the advantages of high energy/power density and long-term stability [4, 6]. While the commercial LIBs cannot meet the future energy requirement of electric vehicles, lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries were greatly developed by the reasons of the low cost and high theoretical energy density of S [7, 8, 9, 10]. However, the insulated nature of S and the dissolution of polysulfides are major challenges, leading to sluggish electrochemical reaction and low utilization of S, which hinders their practical applications [11, 12, 13, 14, 15].

Sodium ion batteries (SIBs) are considered to be a promising alternative for LIBs due to the low-cost and large-scale electrical energy storage applications [2, 16, 17, 18, 19]. Especially, sodium-selenium (Na-Se) batteries have drawn increasing interest in these years [20, 21, 22]. The Se element is in the same group with S and has similar electrochemistry versus Na while the energy density of Na2Se (3254 mAh cm−3) is comparable to Li2Se (3467 mAh cm−3) [23, 24, 25, 26]. Moreover, the electric conductivity of Se (10−3 S cm−1) is much higher than that of S (10−30 S cm−1 at 25 °C) [27]. The shuttle effect of polyselenides (which is similar to the polysulfides, Na2Sen, 3 < n < 8) can also deteriorate the cycle life of Na-Se batteries; therefore, it is a key challenge to overcome the hurdle of polyselenides shuttle [28, 29, 30]. Carbon matrixes with appropriate porosity and high electric conductivity, which are always used to load Se, have been regarded as an effective way to address the above issues in recent years [20, 21, 31, 32]. Much endeavor has been made to trap the soluble polyselenides within various carbons including carbon nanofibers [33, 34], carbon spheres [35, 36], and carbon nanosheets [22], which have been proved to effectively improve the electrochemical performance of Na-Se batteries. Nevertheless, the reported materials involve complex multistep processes and additional components (carbon black and binders); moreover, they are usually environmental harmful and economical costly.

Fortunately, renewable materials with remarkable properties provided by nature can meet our needs [5, 37]. For example, natural leaves are diversified with heteroatom-doping and exceptional porous structure and these natural hard carbons, which possess the impressive ability to store sodium ions, can act as alternative substitutes of traditional materials as electrode materials for SIB devices [32, 37]. The leaves of Ficus can be carbonized by thermal pyrolysis, and it is extremely satisfying that obtained leaves possess a hierarchical porous structure and moderate surface area. In brief, the porous voids can endow the pyrolysis products with high loading capacity and serve as ion-buffering reservoirs during electrochemical process, improving rate capability and power density [5, 38].

Herein, we prepared a new type of the free-standing Se impregnated electrode by melting diffusion followed Se vapor deposition into carbonized leaf which is obtained by thermal pyrolysis of natural leaves in a facile way. The highly reversible specific capacity (84% of the theoretical capacity of Se) is achieved for the first time when the biochar-selenium composite is applied as binder- and current collector-free cathodes for Na-Se batteries. In addition, the as-prepared composite electrode exhibits satisfactory rate capability and cycling stability. With the superiority properties, the carbonized leaf electrode demonstrated desirable electrochemical performance, which is a potential anode material for the Na-Se batteries.

Methods

Preparation of Carbonized Leaf

Dry leaves were cut into circular plates (17 mm in diameter). The leaf wafers were fastened between ceramic slides to avoid curling or pulverization during the carbonization process as shown in Fig. 1a. The leaf wafers were put into the tube furnace to carbonize at 800 °C for 2 h with a ramping rate of 5 °C min−1 under N2 flow. The carbonized leaf (denoted as R800) was immersed in 3.0 M HCl for 12 h to remove the inorganic salts. The R800 specimens were immersed in 1.0 M KOH for 12 h, then put into the tube furnace and activated at 600 °C for 2 h with a ramping rate of 5 °C min−1 under N2 flow to obtain porous materials (denoted as R800A). The samples were washed with deionized water several times and dried at 70 °C overnight in vacuum oven.
Fig. 1

a Schematic illustration showing the preparation processes of the Se-R800A free-standing electrode. Digital photographs of b the dried R, c the R800, d the R800A, and e the Se-R800A

Preparation of Se-R800A

Se powder was put on bottom of the porcelain boat, and the free-standing R800A films were suspended by an irony support in midair right above the Se powder, and the weight ratio of Se:C is not less than 2:1 in order to ensure excess Se powder as shown in Fig. 1a. Then the Se was melted at 260 °C under N2 atmosphere and maintained for 10 h to ensure a good penetration of Se. The weight of Se in the final Se-R800A electrode was measured by thermogravimetric analysis.

Materials Characterization

The morphology and microstructure were observed by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi SU-70), the field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JSM-7800F, and TEAM Octane Plus), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100, and X-Max80). The structure and Raman spectra were collected on the X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical Empyrean with Cu-Kα radiation) and Raman microscope (Renishaw, inVia), respectively. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, STA409PC) was tested from room temperature to 700 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under N2 atmosphere. BELSORP-max Surface Area and Porosimetry instrument was used to measure the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of electrodes. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) tests were carried out using a Thermo K-Alpha+ system.

Electrochemical Measurements

The electrochemical tests were carried out using CR2032 coin cells, which were assembled with manual Na foil prepared by tableting press as the counter electrode inside an argon-filled glove box (MBRAUN, UNILab2000) with moisture and oxygen levels lower than 1 ppm. Glass fiber (Whatman) was used as the separator. The electrolyte was 1 M of NaClO4 in a mixture of ethylene carbonate /diethyl carbonate (EC/DEC, 1: 1 in volume). The free-standing Se-R800A was directly used as the working electrode without any binder and carbon conductor. The cyclic voltammogram (CV) measurements were performed on an electrochemical workstation (CHI660D). The galvanostatic charge-discharge tests were carried out over a voltage range of 0.005–3.0 V (vs. Na+/Na) on a battery test system (Land, CT-2001A). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were tested using the electrochemical workstation (CHI 760D) by applying a voltage of 5 mV over a frequency of 10−2–105 Hz. The galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) test was performed by the discharge/charge process of the cells for 10 min at 10 mA g−1 and followed by a 40-min relaxation at most 50 cycles. All the cells were held at room temperature for at least 12 h before tests. All the specific capacity in this work was calculated on the basis of the loading Se weight. For the ex situ SEM tests, tested electrodes were carefully washed with DEC solvent for three times and dried overnight in vacuum oven.

Results and Discussion

The Se-R800A free-standing electrode was fabricated by carbonization, KOH activation, and Se impregnation processes, which is presented in Fig. 1.

After carbonization process at 800 °C, the size of R800 (Fig. 1b) barely shrank (17 mm to 12 mm in diameter) and the thickness changed hugely (800 μm to 240 μm) with the weight loss of 74%. Figure 1c shows the R800 turned into black indicating that R was successfully transformed into carbon. After activation process, the weight of R800 continued to decrease ~ 9%. However, after Se impregnation process, the weight of R800A (Fig. 1d) increased 90% to transform into the Se-R800A as shown in Fig. 1e. It is noteworthy that the R800A films suspended in midair right above the Se powder were surrounded by Se vapor. This is an original idea of melt diffusion and vapor deposition due to avoiding isolated stray of Se in carbon matrixes [20]. Finally, the Se-R800A maintains well mechanical strength as a free-standing electrode for Na-Se batteries.

Figure 2a shows the typical structure of a natural leaf with two different surfaces, where the upper surface is flat while the back surface contains uniform stomata. Figure 2b shows that the cross section of the leaf is plentiful porous with palisade and sponge cells inside to build enough space for the exchange of O2 and CO2 [37]. The carbonized leaf shows similar structure to the original porous structure of leaf; therefore, the whole structure with hierarchical porosity is suitable for the storage of sodium ions. Figure 2c shows the inside of the carbonized leaf where is filled with reticulated sheets overlapped. The thickness of the interconnected sheet is less than 100 nm, which can facilitate the electrolyte infiltration and shorten diffusion length for the ions. The whole thickness of the Se-R800A is about 240 μm as shown in Fig. 2d, and the stomata of the back surface provides enough channels for the electrolyte and Na+ ions to pass the arranged sponge layer of the carbonized leaf, then enter through the overlapping carbon sheets filled with Se (Fig. 2e) to fulfill the main electrochemical reaction and this layer concatenates with a well-aligned palisade layer. The upper surface is taken as the current collector and electrons travel along the conductive carbon sheet and then are collected by the upper surface layer [37]. Figure 2f shows further insight into the microstructure of the Se-R800A, where some Se particles and amorphous carbon were found. The inset image shows the lattice fringes for the ordered region measured by 0.2 nm, which could be attributed to the (111) crystal plane of Se. The Se-R800A with multilayered leaf structure aims at significantly mitigating the shuttle effect to improve long-term cycling and activating Se to ensure high Se utilization, which will improve the electrochemical performance of Na-Se batteries.
Fig. 2

SEM images of the R800 a upper surface and back surface and b cross-sectional view. c Magnified SEM image of the carbon sheet in the sponge layer of the R800A. d FESEM image of the cross section. e Magnified FESEM image. f HRTEM image of the Se-R800A

As shown in Fig. 3a, the Se-R800A maintains the morphology of R800 and no isolated Se could be observed, while the EDX elemental mapping of the Se-R800A verifies the homogeneous distribution of Se as demonstrated in Fig. 3, which proves complete penetration of Se into the R800A. It confirms C-Se composites have been successfully manufactured. The Se signal is uniform through the cross section, the Se-R800A with a corresponding C, N, and O element mappings in the same region (Fig. 3b). As mentioned above, heteroatom-doping of N and O originated from biochar makes for facilitating electrochemical process and settling polyselenides [6, 39, 40, 41].
Fig. 3

a FESEM images of the Se-R800A. b Elemental mapping images of C, N, O, and Se of the Se-R800A and the corresponding EDX results

To further study the structure of the Se-R800A, R800, and Se powder, the XRD patterns are shown in Fig. 4a. After Se infiltrating into R800A, the diffraction peaks of crystalline Se in Se-R800A mostly disappear and only amorphous humps (resemble the R800) could be seen, implying a full dispersion of amorphous Se into the R800A. The amorphous Se is proved to facilitate cycling stability and retard formation of soluble polyselenides in carbonate-based electrolyte [21, 22, 31]. However, the magnified peak at 29.7° (the inset in Fig. 4a) in Se-R800A is clearly observed, demonstrating a small quantity of crystalline Se still exists. Raman spectroscopy was applied to investigate the three samples. As indicated in Fig. 4b, the raw Se displays a sharp peak located at 234 cm−1, which is corresponding to the equilibrium trigonal Se [27]. However, for Se-R800A, these characteristic peaks disappear, and leaves a broad peak at 250–300 cm−1 on account of C-Se stretching vibration and the C-Se-Se group vibration [21]. The weak Se peak intensity is blue-shifted to 260 cm−1 (the inset in Fig. 4b), which is associated with the transformation from crystalline to molecular of Se [22, 24, 28, 39]. In addition, both R800 and Se-R800A feature the D-band at 1346 cm−1 and the G-band at 1598 cm−1, relating to the disordered and graphitic carbon, respectively. The intensity ratio of ID/IG in Se-R800A is about 0.92 and higher than 0.88 of R800, revealing that Se insets and impacts the graphitization of the R800A but maintaining excellent electric conductivity [32]. This further confirms the Se-R800A can be used as a satisfactory cathode for Na-Se batteries. To examine the effects of KOH activation and Se impregnation, Fig. 4d demonstrates the surface structure of the R800, R800A, and Se-R800A, which all are the type IV isotherm similar to the adsorption of the microporous materials [31]. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) calculated surface area is 270, 934, and 434 m2 g− 1 respectively, revealing that KOH is able to enlarge specific surface area by pore-creating to effectively trap Se [5]. Remarkably, after the Se impregnation, the specific surface area of the Se-R800A decreases by 54% in Fig. 4c, accompanied by a remarkable decrease in pore-size distribution in the range of 0.5–2 nm as shown in Fig. 4d, implying the diffusion of Se into the micropores of the R800A. These abundant micropores have been confirmed to effectively confine amorphous Se in the previous report [22, 27, 42]. The TGA is applied for the sake of affirming the loading weight of Se in the final composite material. The Se in Se-R800A began significantly evaporating at 300 °C, resulting in 47% Se weight loss by 550 °C. As illustrated in Fig. 4e, the Se-R800 presents the similar curve of the Se-R800A but only 11% Se loading is obtained, suggesting it is necessary to activate biochar and form micropores by KOH for loading Se. Up to 700 °C, R800 exhibited slight weight loss (< 2%) caused by the deep thermal pyrolysis and further graphitization. The chemical state of Se was further investigated by XPS as indicated in Fig. 4f. The 3d peak of Se is split into 3d3/2 and 3d5/2 with binding energies of 56.23 and 55.38 eV, respectively. These are slightly higher than those of crude Se 3d (55.95 and 55.15 eV), indicating the intense chemical interaction between Se and R800 matrix [34]. Generally, the R800 as biomass possesses heteroatoms (e.g., N and O as shown in Fig. 3 for N, O), especially O, offers strongly binding between Se and R800. This is proved by the appearance of Se-O (58.33 eV) peak in the spectrum. Obviously, two new peaks centered at 57.18 and 55.88 eV appear for the Se-R800A composite, indicating the generation of Se-O-C bonds during the impregnation process. The new peaks could be implied the formation of Se-O-C bonding, which leads to lower electron density of O site. This chemical bridging bond (-O-) endows C strongly to couple with Se and suppresses the shuttle effect of the polyselenides during cycling [24, 27, 39, 43].
Fig. 4

a XRD patterns and b Raman spectra. c N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and d pore-size distribution curves obtained by the DFT method. e Thermogravimetric analysis. f XPS spectra of Se in the Se-R800A

In order to evaluate the electrochemical performance of the Na-Se batteries, the Se-R800A was directly used as the cathode in CR2032 coin cell. It is worthy to mention that the back surface of Se-R800A faces the metal Na and upper surface is as the current collector.

Figure 5a shows the CV curves in the range of 0.005–3.0 V at a scan rate of 0.2 mV s−1. In the initial discharge process, in addition to the peak near 0 V which is the adsorption of Na+ at the defect sites and micropores of carbon matrix [44] like R800A and R800 samples, only a cathodic peak appears at about 1.2 V, indicating that the conversion of Se into Na2Se (Se ↔ Na2Se) is only a one-step reaction, which is very different from the mechanism of multistep reactions (Se ↔ Na2Sen, 3 < n < 8 ↔ Na2Se) between Se and Na [21, 24, 39]. And then the peak shifts to a more steady 1.1 V resulting from the electrochemical activation process [27]. For the charge process, only one anodic peak is observed and remains steady at 1.7 V in three cycles, indicating that it is a direct transformation of Na2Se into Se (Na2Se ↔ Se) at 1.7 V; therefore, the Se-R800A delivers to effectively facilitate suppression of the shuttle effect and maintenance of the specific capacity. The discharge/charge voltage profiles at 50 mA g−1 show the same trends in Fig. 5b, which coincides with the CV analysis. The single plateau is related to the conversion of Se to insoluble Na2Se [27]. The charge curves almost overlap during three cycles, while discharge curves alter from the initial with a capacity of 1100 mA h g−1 to the following cycles with a reversible capacity of 700 mA h g−1. It might account for the formation of the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film on Se-R800A with partly irreversible trapping of Na+ in the pores [22]. Following the subsequent cycles, discharge curves overlap together as well, demonstrating that the Se-R800A achieves the superior cycling stability. The cycling performance of the Se-R800A electrode is shown in Fig. 5c. The capacity delivered initial capacity of 620 mA h g−1 and retained 520 mA h g−1 at 100 mA g−1 after 120 cycles, which is 84% of the theoretical capacity of Se, indicating the excellent cycling stability, and the coulombic efficiency was maintained 100% except for that the initial coulombic efficiency is under 80% due to Na+ trapped in the porous biochar. By contrast, the specific capacity of R800A is only 18 mA h g−1, which may be attributed to severe SEI resistance due to the tremendous specific surface area. It is worth mentioned that the specific capacity of R800 is 80 mA h g−1 at 100 mA g−1 after 120 cycles but exceptionally stable, validating the unique natural superiority of multilayer biomass-derived materials is critical to extend Na-Se batteries lifespan. The rate performance of the Se-R800A electrode at different current densities is further investigated and shown in Fig. 5d. As the current density increased from 20, 60, 100, 200, 300 to 600 mA g−1, the Se-R800A electrode provided a specific capacity was from 745, 674, 655, 610, 573 to 486 mA h g−1, respectively. When the current density was set to 20 mA g−1, the reversible capacity recovered to 711 mA h g−1, delivering a remarkable rate capability of the electrode. Importantly, even at a high current density of 2 A g−1, the Se-R800A still delivered an excellent high reversible capability of 300 mA h g−1 after 500 long cycles with no capacity fading (Fig. 5e). This superior specific capacity and rate performance surpass most reported typical C-Se cathodes for Na-Se batteries (Table 1).
Fig. 5

The electrochemical performance of the Se-R800A cathode in Na-Se batteries, a the CV curves at scan rate of 0.2 mV s−1, b the galvanostatic discharge/charge voltage profiles tested at 50 mA g−1, c the cycling performance of the Se-R800A, R800A, and R800 at 100 mA g−1, d the rate capability at various current densities, and e the cycling performance of the Se-R800A at 2 A g−1

Table 1

The comparison of cycling performance for the C-Se cathodes for Na-Se batteries reported in literature

Materials

Current density (A g−1)

Reversible capacity (mA h g−1)

References

Se@PCNFs

0.05

520 at 80th cycle

[51]

C/Se

0.1

258 at 50th cycle

[52]

Se/C

0.1695

340 at 380th cycle

[38]

Se/(CNT@MPC)

0.678

441 at 100th cycle

[53]

Se@MCNFs

0.5

430 at 300th cycle

[31]

Se@CNFs-CNT

0.5

410 at 240th cycle

[34]

CNF/Se

0.339

478 at 200th cycle

[27]

Se-MnMC-B

0.0678

535 at 150th cycle

[54]

CPAN/Se

0.203

410 at 300th cycle

[55]

Se-NCMC

0.1356

400 at 150th cycle

[24]

Se-R800A

0.1

520 at 120th cycle

This work

It is noteworthy that the cycling stability at high current density, even at 2 A g−1, is better than that at 0.1 A g−1. This may be due to the following reasons: (i) the inartificially hierarchical biochar and moderate graphitization degree of the Se-R800A tremendously accelerate the Na+ and e transport to activate amorphous Se, therefore ensuring facile electrochemical kinetics even at high current density; (ii) the intermediates (Na2Sen, 3 < n < 8) at low current density have more chances to dissolve into the carbonate electrolyte, but the polyselenides are firmly confined in the micropores and retained by overlapping carbon sheets, which is effective to alleviate the shuttle effect, resulting in a high efficient utilization of Se during the long-term cycling [27].

In order to gain further information about the improved electrochemical performance of the Se-R800A, the charge-transfer resistance (Rct) and ion-diffusion resistance (Rid) of the R800, R800A, and Se-R800A were measured by EIS. As shown in Fig. 6, the Nyquist plot of the R800 cathode exhibits the semicircle in the high-frequency regions attributed to Rct containing the SEI layer and electrode-electrolyte interface [45, 46] and a sloping line in the low-frequency region corresponding to Rid representing the impedance of Na+ diffusion [47]. The R800A electrode presents larger radius semicircle after activation by KOH, indicating that abundant micropores contribute to accelerating the kinetic process of the electrochemical reactions but will distinctly increase the SEI layer resistance due to the tremendous surface area [22, 27, 31, 39, 40]. Furthermore, compared with the R800 electrode in Table 2, the smaller Rid implies micropores as ion-buffering reservoirs efficiently shorten ion-diffusion distance.
Fig. 6

a Nyquist plots of Na-Se batteries assembled with the R800, R800A, and Se-R800A as cathodes for impedance analysis and the inset is the equivalent circuit. b Magnified the section of the Se-R800A. c Voltage profiles and d the Na+ diffusion coefficients of the R800, R800A, and Se-R800A obtained via the GITT technique during discharge/charge processes

Table 2

The resistance values were obtained by modeling the equivalent circuit for experimental impedance

Materials

Rid (ohm)

Rct (ohm)

R800

10.07

320.2

R800A

4.87

575.4

Se-R800A

4.33

89.44

When the loaded Se occupies the most of micropores, the Se-R800A electrode shows obviously smaller Rct and Rid confirmed by the excellent electrochemical performance. The pores of the carbonized leaf are most in the range of 0.1–2 nm, and these abundant micropores are more suitable to load and confine Se, finally bringing a moderate surface area for higher coulombic efficiency [31, 37]. The Na+ diffusion coefficients of the three samples are calculated by the GITT method during discharge/charge process in Fig. 6c, d [48]. It can be observed that the Na+ diffusion coefficients of R800, R800A, and Se-R800A are the same order of magnitude (10−16 cm2/s) but the Se-R800A is higher than the others, which reveals that the Na+ diffusion in the carbon matrixes is notably improved due to the presence of Se [49, 50]. Together with these properties, both the electronic conductivity and the ionic diffusion efficiency in the carbon-selenium composite were effectively enhanced, resulting in an excellent electrochemical performance of Se-R800A electrode for Na-Se batteries.

After disassembling the testing cell, the morphology of the Se-R800A (Fig. 7b) keeps the same as the anteriority (Fig. 7a), suggesting that the carbonized leaf is qualified to serve as a favorable framework for Na-Se batteries. Figure 7c shows the hierarchical structure of the Se-R800A electrode after 500 cycles, and it maintained the original morphology as well. Therefore, it can be pointed out that the excellent cycling and rate performance can be due to the following reasons: firstly, the free-standing Se-R800A with abundant heteroatoms (such as N, O) for accommodating Se can suppress the shuttle effect of the polyselenides. Secondly, the hierarchical structure of the carbonized leaf with anisotropic surface could meet the need of the e and Na+ transport to activate inner Se. The polyselenides are confined in the micropores and retained by overlapping carbon sheets to increase the energy barrier of the polyselenide diffusion [42]. Finally, as binder- and current collector-free cathodes, the 3D interconnected framework and interlinked carbon sheets can profoundly facilitate the electrolyte infiltration and shorten ions diffusion distance [22]. These advantages are critical for the enhanced capacity and extended lifespan.
Fig. 7

SEM images of the Se-R800A electrode film a before and b after cycles. c Magnified SEM image of the carbon sheet after cycles

Conclusions

In conclusion, it was demonstrated that a novel fabrication of the Se-R8000A can be finished by a tube furnace. It was successful to confine Se into the microporous carbonized leaf by common melt-infusion methods, which can effectively reduce the shuttle effect of polyselenides, resulting in excellent electrochemical performance for Na-Se batteries. The Se-R8000A shows a reversible capacity as high as 520 mA h g−1 at 100 mA g−1 after 120 cycles, which supports the superior cycling stability and rate capability. The inartificially hierarchical leaf structure and moderate graphitization degree of the Se-R800A were proved to significantly promote the efficient utilization of Se. Generally, the Se-R800A, owing to the free-standing, high-performance, and cost-effective characteristics, was demonstrated to be a promising alternative to conventional and substantial electrode materials in Na-Se batteries.

Notes

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21878189 and 51774203), Shenzhen Science and Technology Project Program (Nos. KQJSCX20170327151152722 and JCYJ20160422112012739), the Natural Science Foundation of SZU (No. 827–000039).

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Authors’ Contributions

YL conceived and designed the experiments. BG performed the experiments and analyzed the data. HM, XR and PZ contributed the analysis tools. BG and YL wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Goodenough JB (2011) Evolution of strategies for modern rechargeable batteries. Acc Chem Res 46:1053–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Slater MD, Kim D, Lee E, Johnson CS (2013) Sodium-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 23(8):947–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goodenough JB (2014) Electrochemical energy storage in a sustainable modern society. Energy Environ Sci 7(1):14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nitta N, Wu F, Lee JT, Yushin G (2015) Li-ion battery materials: present and future. Mater Today 18(5):252–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao YP, Zhai ZB, Huang KJ, Zhang YY (2017) Energy storage applications of biomass-derived carbon materials: batteries and supercapacitors. New J Chem 41(20):11456–11470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zheng F, Yang Y, Chen Q (2014) High lithium anodic performance of highly nitrogen-doped porous carbon prepared from a metal-organic framework. Nat Commun 5:5261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lei T, Chen W, Huang J, Yan C, Sun H, Wang C et al (2017) Multi-functional layered WS2 nanosheets for enhancing the performance of lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 7:1601843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen W, Lei T, Qian T, Lv W, He W, Wu C et al (2018) A new hydrophilic binder enabling strongly anchoring polysulfides for high-performance sulfur electrodes in lithium-sulfur battery. Adv Energy Mater 8(12):1702889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen W, Lei T, Wu C, Deng M, Gong C, Hu K et al (2018) Designing safe electrolyte systems for a high-stability lithium-sulfur battery. Adv Energy Mater 8(10):1702348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen W, Qian T, Xiong J, Xu N, Liu X, Liu J et al (2017) A new type of multifunctional polar binder: toward practical application of high energy lithium sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 29(12):1605160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu M, Yuan W, Li C, Hong JD, Shi G (2014) Performance enhancement of a graphene-sulfur composite as a lithium-sulfur battery electrode by coating with an ultrathin Al2O3 film via atomic layer deposition. J Mater Chem A 2(20):7360–7366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li X, Li X, Fan L, Yu Z, Yan B, Xiong D et al (2017) Rational design of Sn/SnO2 /porous carbon nanocomposites as anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Appl Surf Sci 412:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xiao L, Cao Y, Xiao J, Schwenzer B, Engelhard MH, Saraf LV et al (2012) A soft approach to encapsulate sulfur: polyaniline nanotubes for lithium-sulfur batteries with long cycle life. Adv Mater 24(9):1176–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu F, Ye Y, Chen R, Qian J, Zhao T, Li L et al (2015) Systematic effect for an ultralong cycle lithium-sulfur battery. Nano Lett 15(11):7431–7439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu D, Zhang C, Zhou G, Lv W, Ling G, Zhi L et al (2018) Catalytic effects in lithium-sulfur batteries: promoted sulfur transformation and reduced shuttle effect. Adv Sci 5(1):1700270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim SW, Seo DH, Ma X, Ceder G, Kang K (2012) Electrode materials for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries: potential alternatives to current lithium-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 2(7):710–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Palomares V, Serras P, Villaluenga I, Hueso KB, Carretero-González J, Rojo T (2012) Na-ion batteries, recent advances and present challenges to become low cost energy storage systems. Energy Environ Sci 5(3):5884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yabuuchi N, Kubota K, Dahbi M, Komaba S (2014) Research development on sodium-ion batteries. Chem Rev 114(23):11636–11682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hong SY, Kim Y, Park Y, Choi A, Choi NS, Lee KT (2013) Charge carriers in rechargeable batteries: Na ions vs. Li ions. Energy Environ Sci 6:2067–2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ding J, Zhou H, Zhang H, Stephenson T, Li Z, Karpuzov D et al (2016) Exceptional energy and new insight with a sodium–selenium battery based on a carbon nanosheet cathode and a pseudographite anode. Energy Environ Sci 10(1):153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang X, Wang H, Yu DYW, Rogach AL (2018) Vacuum calcination induced conversion of selenium/carbon wires to tubes for high-performance sodium-selenium batteries. Adv Funct Mater 28(8):1706609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang SF, Wang WP, Xin S, Ye H, Yin YX, Guo YG (2017) Graphitic nanocarbon-selenium cathode with favorable rate capability for Li-Se batteries. ACS Appl Mater Inter 9(10):8759–8765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jia M, Mao C, Niu Y, Hou J, Liu S, Bao S et al (2015) A selenium-confined porous carbon cathode from silk cocoons for Li–Se battery applications. RSC Adv 5(116):96146–96150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ding J, Zhou H, Zhang H, Tong L, Mitlin D (2018) Selenium impregnated monolithic carbons as free-standing cathodes for high volumetric energy lithium and sodium metal batteries. Adv Energy Mater 8(8):1701918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu L, Hou Y, Wu X, Xiao S, Chang Z, Yang Y et al (2013) Nanoporous selenium as a cathode material for rechargeable lithium-selenium batteries. Chem Commun 49(98):11515–11517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu L, Hou Y, Yang Y, Li M, Wang X, Wu Y (2014) A Se/C composite as cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries with good electrochemical performance. RSC Adv 4(18):9086–9091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang H, Jiang Y, Manthiram A (2018) Long cycle life, low self-discharge sodium-selenium batteries with high selenium loading and suppressed polyselenide shuttling. Adv Energy Mater 8(7):1701953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bucur CB, Bonnick P, Jones M, Muldoon J (2018) The evolution of selenium cathodes: from infusion melts to particle synthesis. Sustain Energy Fuels 2(4):759–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xu G-L, Liu J, Amine R, Chen Z, Amine K (2017) Selenium and selenium–sulfur chemistry for rechargeable lithium batteries: interplay of cathode structures, electrolytes, and interfaces. ACS Energy Lett 2(3):605–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dutta D, Gope S, Negi DS, Datta R, Sood AK, Bhattacharyya AJ (2016) Pressure-induced capillary encapsulation protocol for ultrahigh loading of sulfur and selenium inside carbon nanotubes: application as high performance cathode in Li–S/se rechargeable batteries. J Phys Chem C 120(51):29011–29022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yuan B, Sun X, Zeng L, Yu Y, Wang Q (2018) A freestanding and long-life sodium-selenium cathode by encapsulation of selenium into microporous multichannel carbon nanofibers. Small 14(9):1703252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ma D, Li Y, Yang J, Mi H, Luo S, Deng L et al (2018) Atomic layer deposition-enabled ultrastable freestanding carbon-selenium cathodes with high mass loading for sodium-selenium battery. Nano Energy 43:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jung JW, Lee CL, Yu S, Kim ID (2016) Electrospun nanofibers as a platform for advanced secondary batteries: a comprehensive review. J Mater Chem A 4(3):703–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zeng L, Wei X, Wang J, Jiang Y, Li W, Yu Y (2015) Flexible one-dimensional carbon-selenium composite nanofibers with superior electrochemical performance for Li-Se/Na-Se batteries. J Power Sources 281:461–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liu QC, Xu JJ, Xu D, Zhang XB (2015) Flexible lithium-oxygen battery based on a recoverable cathode. Nat Commun 6:7892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Guo J, Wang Q, Qi C, Jin J, Zhu Y, Wen Z (2016) One-step microwave synthesized core-shell structured selenium@carbon spheres as cathode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Chem Commun 52(32):5613–5616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sun L, Deng Q, Li Y, Deng L, Wang Y, Ren X et al (2016) Solvothermal synthesis of ternary Cu2O-CuO-RGO composites as anode materials for high performance lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 222:1650–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Luo C, Xu Y, Zhu Y, Liu Y, Zheng S, Liu Y et al (2013) Selenium@mesoporous carbon composite with superior lithium and sodium storage capacity. ACS Nano 7(9):8003–8010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu Y, Si L, Du Y, Zhou X, Dai Z, Bao J (2015) Strongly bonded selenium/microporous carbon nanofibers composite as a high-performance cathode for lithium-selenium batteries. J Phys Chem C 119(49):27316–27321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cai Q, Li Y, wang L, Li Q, Xu J, Gao B et al (2017) Freestanding hollow double-shell Se@CN x nanobelts as large-capacity and high-rate cathodes for Li-Se batteries. Nano Energy 32:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jiang Y, Ma X, Feng J, Xiong S (2015) Selenium in nitrogen-doped microporous carbon spheres for high-performance lithium-selenium batteries. J Mater Chem A 3(8):4539–4546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yang CP, Xin S, Yin YX, Ye H, Zhang J, Guo YG (2013) An advanced selenium-carbon cathode for rechargeable lithium-selenium batteries. Angew Chem 52:8363–8367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ou X, Yang C, Xiong X, Zheng F, Pan Q, Jin C et al (2017) A new rGO-overcoated Sb2Se3 nanorods anode for Na+ battery: in situ X-ray diffraction study on a live sodiation/desodiation process. Adv Funct Mater 27(13):1606242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hu Z, Liu Q, Chou SL, Dou SX (2017) Advances and challenges in metal sulfides/selenides for next-generation rechargeable sodium-ion batteries. Adv Mater 29(48):1700606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Conder J, Villevieille C, Trabesinger S, Novák P, Gubler L, Bouchet R (2017) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of a Li–S battery: part 1. Influence of the electrode and electrolyte compositions on the impedance of symmetric cells. Electrochim Acta 244:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Conder J, Villevieille C, Trabesinger S, Novák P, Gubler L, Bouchet R (2017) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of a Li–S battery: part 2. Influence of separator chemistry on the lithium electrode/electrolyte interface. Electrochim Acta 255:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Luo C, Zhu Y, Wen Y, Wang J, Wang C (2014) Carbonized polyacrylonitrile-stabilized SeSx cathodes for long cycle life and high power density lithium ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 24(26):4082–4089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang YZ (2010) Galvanostatic intermittent titration technique for phase-transformation electrodes. J Phys Chem C 114:12Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Li Z, Zhang J, Lu Y, Lou XW (2018) A pyrolyzed polyacrylonitrile/selenium disulfide composite cathode with remarkable lithium and sodium storage performances. Sci Adv 4:1687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yu FD, Que LF, Wang ZB, Zhang Y, Xue Y, Liu BS et al (2016) Layered-spinel capped nanotube assembled 3D Li-rich hierarchitectures for high performance Li-ion battery cathodes. J Mater Chem A 4(47):18416–18425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zeng L, Zeng W, Jiang Y, Wei X, Li W, Yang C et al (2015) A flexible porous carbon nanofibers-selenium cathode with superior electrochemical performance for both Li-Se and Na-Se batteries. Adv Energy Mater 5(4):1401377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Luo C, Wang J, Suo L, Mao J, Fan X, Wang C (2015) In situ formed carbon bonded and encapsulated selenium composites for Li-Se and Na-Se batteries. J Mater Chem A 3(2):555–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Xin S, Yu L, You Y, Cong HP, Yin YX, Du XL et al (2016) The electrochemistry with lithium versus sodium of selenium confined to slit micropores in carbon. Nano Lett 16(7):4560–4568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Li X, Liang J, Hou Z, Zhang W, Wang Y, Zhu Y et al (2015) A new salt-baked approach for confining selenium in metal complex-derived porous carbon with superior lithium storage properties. Adv Funct Mater 25(32):5229–5238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wang H, Li S, Chen Z, Liu HK, Guo Z (2014) A novel type of one-dimensional organic selenium-containing fiber with superior performance for lithium-selenium and sodium–selenium batteries. RSC Adv 4(106):61673–61678CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Chemistry and Environmental EngineeringShenzhen UniversityShenzhenPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Guangdong Flexible Wearable Energy and Tools Engineering Technology Research CentreShenzhen UniversityShenzhenPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations