Advertisement

Nanoscale Research Letters

, 13:319 | Cite as

Artesunate-Loaded and Near-Infrared Dye-Conjugated Albumin Nanoparticles as High-Efficiency Tumor-Targeted Photo-Chemo Theranostic Agent

  • Hainan Yang
  • Zaijia Liu
  • Xufeng Li
  • Zhenfeng Zhang
  • Deji Chen
  • Hui Lian
Open Access
Nano Express
  • 151 Downloads

Abstract

Herein, a tumor-targeted multifunctional theranostic agent was synthetized using a facile method, combining four clinically approved materials: artesunate (Arte), human serum albumin (HSA), folic acid (FA), and indocyanine green (ICG). The obtained nanocomposites (FA-IHA NPs) showed an excellent photo- and physiological stability. The ICG in the FA-IHA NPs was used not only for near infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging, but also for photothermal and photodynamic (PTT-PDT) therapy under a single NIR irradiation. In addition, the NIR irradiation (808 nm, 1 W/cm2) could trigger Arte release that showed enhanced chemotherapeutic effect. Through fluorescence imaging, the cell uptake and tumor accumulation of FA-IHA NPs were observed in vitro and in vivo, analyzed by confocal microscopy and NIR fluorescence imaging in tumor xenograft mice. Based on the diagnostic results, FA-IHA NPs at 24 h post injection and combined with NIR irradiation (808 nm, 1 W/cm2) could efficiently suppress tumor growth through a photo-chemo combination therapy, with no tumor recurrence in vitro and in vivo. The obtained results suggested that FA-IHA NPs are promising photo-chemo theranostic agents for future clinical translation.

Keywords

Theranostic agent Artesunate Fluorescence imaging Reactive oxygen species Indocyanine green 

Abbreviations

Arte

Artesunate

FA

Folic acid

HSA

Human serum albumin

ICG

Indocyanine green

NIR

Near infrared

PDT

Photodynamic therapy

PEG

Polyethylene glycol

PTT

Photothermal therapy

Background

During these recent decades, imaging-guided photo-chemo therapy (IGPC) attracted great interest by many researchers, since it is a promising strategy to realize a personalized tumor therapy [1, 2]. IGPC allows the exact location of the tumor and traces the drug in vivo, guaranteeing an effective therapy and reducing side effects [3, 4]. To be effective, IGPC should have the following characteristics: (i) a multifunctional theranostic agent with both imaging and therapeutic functions is needed; (ii) the theranostic agent should be biocompatible, stable, and specific against the tumor [5, 6, 7, 8]. The imaging diagnosis modality in the IGPC usually includes magnetic resonance imaging, photoacoustic imaging, and fluorescence imaging [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Due to the high sensitivity, favorable temporal resolution, and high signal to background ratio, fluorescence imaging was usually applied for basic research and in clinical practice [15, 16].

The photo-chemo therapy methods mainly include photothermal therapy (PTT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and chemotherapy. Since the near infrared (NIR) irradiation is the same, PTT and PDT function can be integrated into one, making possible a selective and efficient destruction of the tumor through a laser beam. However, it was reported that photothermal and photodynamic (PTT-PDT) therapy has often the limitation of an incomplete tumor suppression, which can potentially generate a tumor relapse [17, 18, 19]. Chemotherapy, an extensively used treatment method against cancer, can effectively kill tumor cells through systemic administration, although the toxicity to nearby normal cells due to its non-specificity limits its application [20, 21, 22]. Therefore, the IGPC combination could be a great strategy to overcome the above limitations.

With the development of the nanomedicine, IGPC theranostic agents have been developed, including indocyanine green (ICG), metal-based nanoparticles, carbon nanomaterials, and polymer nanomaterials [23, 24, 25, 26, 27]. Among them, ICG was approved by FDA, and its use in clinical practice is reported to detect cardiac output, liver function, blood flow, and ophthalmic angiography [28, 29]. In addition, ICG has high-absorption efficiency at NIR region, thus inducing high PTT-PDT effect under a single NIR irradiation [30]. However, the following drawbacks such as instability in aqueous solution, rapid clearance in the body, the tendency to self-bleaching, and lack of targeting, severely hinder its extensive application [31, 32]. To overcome these limitations, free ICG molecules are usually carried by vehicles including micelles, polymer nanoparticles, and self-assembled protein nanostructures, to form nanocomposites [33, 34]. Although related works are available, more biocompatible and novel ICG based nanocomposites are still demanded for in vivo imaging and phototherapy.

In this work, we reported a targeted IGPC agent that covalently conjugated folic acid (FA) and ICG with human serum albumin (HSA) nanoparticles which also encapsulated the anticancer drug artesunate (Arte) (FA-IHA NPs). FA has been reported to link nanoparticles to increase their cell uptake efficiency via receptor-mediated endocytosis [17]. HSA is an endogenous protein. Because of its good biocompatibility, non-toxic, and non-immunogenicity, HSA has become one of the most exciting carriers to deliver insoluble anticancer drugs [12, 17, 31]. Arte, a natural drug extracted from Artemisia annua, has been proved a significant efficacy in the treatment of various cancers, such as liver cancer, lung cancer, and breast cancer [35]. The prepared FA-IHA NPs consisted of these four clinical approved materials and showed great biocompatibility and stability. As a multifunctional theranostic nanocomposite, ICG was applied as a NIR fluorescence imaging agent and phototherapy agent due to its PTT-PDT properties. Arte was highly loaded into the NPs and released by NIR irradiation for chemotherapy. Guided by the NIR imaging results, the high effect of the targeted IGPC combination was demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo. According to our results, we believe that FA-IHA NPs might be a potential versatile theranostic agent in controlled drug delivery and imaging-guided tumor-targeted combinational photo-chemo therapy.

Methods

Materials

N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimidehydrochloride (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), and artesunate (Arte, ≥ 99%) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). 4′, 6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). NH2–PEG2000–COOH and NH2–PEG2000-FA were bought from Xi’an Ruixi Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Xi’an, China). DMEM media and phosphate buffer saline (PBS) were provided from Gibco BRL (NY, USA). Sulfo-NHS derivative of ICG (ICG-NHS) was bought from Dojindo Laboratories (Kumamoto, Japan).

Synthesis and Characterization of FA-IHA NPs

Artesunate was dissolved in DMSO and then added into 15 mL water. 10 mg HSA powder was added into the above solution and stirred slightly for 3 h at room temperature. After stirring, the mixture was processed by cross-linking with 150 μL 0.5% glutaraldehyde. In order to remove the redundant chemical reagents, the mixture was dialyzed against distilled water (MW cut off = 8,000–12,000 Da) for 1 day, resulting in a Arte-loaded HSA nanocomposites (Arte-HSA).

To activate the carboxylic groups of HSA, the chemical reagents EDC and NHS were added into the Arte-HSA solution. After that, the mixture was reacted with NH2–PEG2000-FA for 3 h at 4°С. Next, the ICG-NHS was added into the mixture under slight stirring for 30 min at room temperature. The purified FA and ICG-conjugated HSA nanoparticles (FA-ICG-HSA@Arte, FA-IHA NPs) were obtained by dialysis in the deionized water for 24 h. The amount of loaded Arte and ICG was detected by a UV-vis spectrophotometer. The loading efficiency = W1 / W2 × 100%, where W1 represents the weight of Arte or ICG in FA-IHA NPs, and W2 is the weight of Arte or ICG added.

The transmission electron microscopy (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to detect the morphology of the samples. A Zetasizer (Zetasizer 3000; Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK) was used to measure the size and zeta potential of the samples. A UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-1601PC, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was applied to measure the absorbance spectra. The 808 nm single wavelength continuous wave laser (Beijing Laserwave Optoelectronics Technology Co. Ltd) was applied to conduct photothermal experiments, and the temperature was detected by a thermocouple thermometer (Fluke, USA).

Thermal and pH-Triggered Arte Release

To determine the thermal and pH-triggered Arte release, FA-IHA NPs (50 μg/mL) was divided into three groups: (a) pH 6.5, (b) pH 7.4, and (c) pH 6.5 with NIR irradiation (808 nm, 1 W/cm2, 1 min pulse) at selected time points during 36 h. The released amount of Arte was determined according to the UV-vis absorption of Arte at 287 nm in the supernatant.

Detection of Singlet Oxygen Production

1, 3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) was used to detect the singlet oxygen. 15 μL DPBF acetonitrile solution was added into pristine ICG or FA-IHA NPs solution (1.0 mL, 10 μg/mL) and mixed thoroughly, followed by 5 min of irradiation (808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2). The UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded at different time points, and the decrease rate of absorption at 410 nm is proportional to the singlet oxygen production.

Cell Culture and Cellular Uptake

HepG2 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection and in 25 cm2 cell-culture flask respectively, with DMEM culture medium by adding 1% penicillin-streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). HepG2 cells were kept at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.

To observe cellular uptake, HepG2 cells were cultured with free ICG, IHA NPs, and FA-IHA NPs (with 0.05 mg/mL of ICG) for 6 h. After that, PBS was used to wash the treated cells for three times. The cells were then fixed with 200 μL glutaraldehyde and stained with DAPI for 10 min. The fluorescence signals of the nanoparticles in cells were detected by using a confocal laser scanning microscope (FV300, Olympus, Japan).

To further evaluate cellular uptake, a flow cytometer (FCM, BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was applied. As described above, the free ICG-, IHA NPs-, and FA-IHA NPs-treated cells were washed three times with PBS and digested by trypsin-EDTA. The suspended cells were directly introduced to FCM to analyze the cellular uptake ratio.

Generation of Intracellular ROS

HepG2 cells were cultured in 12-well plates with a density of 2 × 105 cells per milliliter and incubated for 24 h, followed by the addition of 1 mL of various samples including (1) PBS, (2) Arte, (3) FA-HA-NPs, (4) free ICG, (5) IHA-NPs, and (6) FA-IHA NPs solution. After a further incubation for 12 h, the cells were irradiated for 5 min (808 nm, 1.0 W/cm2), followed by a treatment with DCFH-DA (5 μg/mL) for another 30 min. Finally, the cells were washed thoroughly with PBS, and the production of intracellular ROS was detected quantitatively by using a cytometer and qualitatively with a Leica-inversed fluorescence microscopy.

In Vitro Tumor Combinational Photo-Chemo Therapy

HepG2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates (2 × 104 cells per well) for 24-h incubation. Free ICG, Arte, IHA NPs, and FA-IHA NPs (with 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30 μg/mL of Arte) were added into the cells. After a 6-h incubation, the old media were discarded. The treated cells were irradiated with or without an 808 nm laser (1.0 W/cm2, 5 min) and cultured for the next 24 h. Cell viability was measured by a classic CCK-8 assay according to the protocol.

In order to further confirm the live and dead cells after NIR treatment, the treated cells were co-stained by calcein-AM/PI. HepG2 cells were pre-seeded in 35 mm plates at a density of 1 × 106 cells per plate and were treated with PBS, PBS + NIR, FA-IHA NPs, or FA-IHA NPs + NIR. After 6 h of incubation, cells were irradiated for 5 min by 808 nm laser (1 W/cm2) and cultured for the next 24 h. Cells were stained with calcein-AM/PI for 30 min, washed with PBS to remove excess dye solution, and then imaged using a confocal laser scanning microscope (calcein-AM lex = 488 nm, lem = 515 nm; PI lex = 535 nm, lem = 617 nm).

Animal Model and In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging

Balb/c nude mice were obtained from The Center of Laboratory Animal Science of Guangdong Province and used under protocols approved by Guangzhou Medical University. In order to establish HepG2 subcutaneous tumors, 1 × 106 HepG2 cells (in 100 μL PBS) were injected into the back of Balb/c nude mouse.

Tumor bearing mice (n = 5) were imaged by a commercially available IVIS Spectrum system (Caliper LifeSciences, USA) before and at 10 min, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-intravenous injection of free ICG, IHA NPs, and FA-IHA NPs.

In Vivo Tumor Combinational Photo-Chemo therapy

Tumor bearing mice were randomly divided into different groups (n = 5) and were treated by PBS, Arte, FA-IHA NPs, ICG + NIR, IHA NPs + NIR, and FA-IHA NPs + NIR (with equal free Arte dose), respectively. Five-minute NIR laser (808 nm, 1 W/cm2) was used to irradiate the tumor region at 24 h (day 0) and 48 h (day 1) post-intravenous injection of these samples. The thermal images and temperature of the irradiated mice were recorded. During the treatment, tumor size was recorded every 4 days and calculated according to the equation: volume = (tumor length) × (tumor width)2 / 2. The results were shown by the relative tumor volume which was the tumor volume divided by the initial tumor volume. After treatment, major organs including heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidney of those mice in PBS and FA-IHA NPs + NIR groups were harvested, fixed in 4% formalin, embedded into paraffin, stained with H&E, and recorded by a digital microscope.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis and Characterization of FA-IHA NPs

Figure 1 illustrates the schematic use of FA-IHA NPs and their application for imaging-guided tumor-targeted combinational photo-chemo therapy. The multifunctional theranostic agents FA-IHA NPs were prepared through a simple and biocompatible self-assembly method. The conjugated ICG was employed as a NIR fluorescence imaging agent and phototherapy agent for its PTT-PDT properties. In addition, the loaded Arte exerted the chemotherapeutic effect.
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of FA-IHA NPs use for imaging-guided tumor-targeted combinational photo-chemo therapy in vitro and in vivo

The TEM image of FA-IHA NPs shows a monodispersed spherical structure with a diameter of approximately 131.2 nm (Fig. 2a). This hydrodynamic diameter was confirmed as 131 ± 2.3 nm long in water, phosphate buffer saline (PBS), and cell medium (Fig. 2b), according to DLS analysis. The zeta potential of 131.2 ± 2.12 was also detected as − 29.2 ± 1.13 mV in these three media (Fig. 2c). Moreover, FA-IHA NPs diameter had no significant change over 7 days in these three media (Fig. 2d). These results indicated that the prepared FA-IHA NPs had a good stability, likely due to the PEG and HSA coating. The UV-vis-NIR spectrum of FA-IHA NPs displayed the absorption peak of both Arte and ICG (Fig. 2e), demonstrating the existence of Arte and ICG in FA-IHA NPs. Arte loading ratio was 98.6 ± 3.1%, and ICG loading ratio was 56.9 ± 2.4%. Figure 2f shows that the FA-IHA NPs had a similar fluorescence property compared to free ICG.
Fig. 2

a TEM image of FA-IHA NPs. b, c Size and zeta potential distribution of FA-IHA NPs in water, cell medium, and PBS. d FA-IHA NPs size change in water, cell medium, and PBS. e Absorbance spectra of free ICG, Arte, and FA-IHA NPs. f Fluorescence spectra of free ICG and FA-IHA NPs

Encouraged by the strong NIR optical absorption of FA-IHA NPs, the photothermal property of FA-IHA NPs was evaluated. Water, free ICG, and FA-IHA NPs (with equal ICG concentration) were irradiated with an 808 nm laser (1 W/cm2). The temperature of the FA-IHA NPs and free ICG increased by approximately 36 °C within 5 min of irradiation (Fig. 3a), while water gave a temperature increment less than 4 °C, demonstrating that the ICG-contained nanoparticles have significant photothermal effect and have the potential for cancer therapy. In addition, Additional file 1: Figure S1 shows the photothermal heating curves of FA-IHA NPs under 5 min of 808 nm laser irradiation with 0.5, 1, and 1.5 W/cm2, indicating that the optimum laser intensity is 1 W/cm2. The photostability tests on FA-IHA NPs and free ICG were performed. Free ICG showed a significant temperature decrease after five cycles compared to FA-IHA NPs (Fig. 3b). Figure 3c shows the absorption intensity change of free ICG and FA-IHA NPs before and after five cycles of NIR irradiation (808 nm, 1 W/cm2). The results suggested that the absorbance intensity at 808 nm of free ICG decreased after five cycles of NIR irradiation, while FA-IHA NPs maintained the pristine absorbance intensity. In addition, we compared the fluorescence stability of free ICG and FA-IHA NPs (Fig. 3d). After 30 days storage at 4 °C, the fluorescence intensity of FA-IHA NPs at 800 nm was 0.72 compared to its initial intensity of 1, while the fluorescence of free ICG dropped to 0.12 compared to its initial intensity, due to the aggregation induced-photobleaching [36]. These results indicated that the covalently conjugated ICG was more stable than the free ICG, likely due to the HSA and PEG self-assembly protecting ICG from internal environment-induced aggregation, such as heat or light. Thus, these results suggested that FA-IHA NPs had excellent photothermal effect and photothermal stability.
Fig. 3

a Photothermal heating curves of water, ICG, and FA-IHA NPs under 5 min 808 nm laser irradiation (1 W/cm2). b Temperature variations of ICG and FA-IHA NPs after continuous 5 min of irradiation with an 808 nm laser for 5 cycles. c The absorption change of FA-IHA NPs at 780 nm before and after irradiation with an 808 nm NIR laser for 5 cycles. d ICG and FA-IHA NPs fluorescence change over 30 days

Next, a ROS-specific probe 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) was used to detect ROS production by FA-IHA NPs after NIR irradiation. As shown in Fig. 4a, FA-IHA NPs produced a significant ROS amount (0.58 in the standard absorbance) within 5 min of NIR irradiation compared to free ICG (0.35), which might be attributed to FA-IHA NPs combination therapy.
Fig. 4

a Normalized DPBF absorbance in the presence of ICG, FA-IHA NPs, and blank sample under 808 nm laser irradiation (1 W/cm2). b Release kinetics of Arte from FA-IHA NPs under pH = 7.4 and pH = 6.5 with or without NIR laser irradiation, respectively

Under NIR laser irradiation (808 nm, 1 W/cm2) and pH condition, the release performance was investigated (Fig. 4b). As the contrast, without NIR irradiation, FA-IHA NPs showed 11.61% and 34.2% Arte release under pH 7.4 and pH 6.5, respectively, while under NIR irradiation for six times, FA-IHA NPs showed a total of 68.4% Arte release at pH 6.5, suggesting that NIR irradiation and acid condition could both significantly trigger Arte release from FA-IHA NPs. The NIR irradiation and acid responsive drug release were likely due to the heat-induced expansion of HSA nanoparticles, and in addition, at acidic environment, the H+ could change the surface charge of HSA that alter the hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance of the nanoparticles [37, 38].

Cell Uptake and Detection of Intracellular ROS

Thanks to ICG fluorescence properties, FA-IHA NPs uptake was directly observed in HepG2 cells through a fluorescence microscope. As shown in Fig. 5a, after treatment of the cells with FA-IHA NPs, the cytoplasm showed stronger red ICG fluorescence than that observed in cells treated with free ICG and IHA NPs. Furthermore, FA-IHA NPs cell uptake ratio was quantitated by FCM as 52.3%, which was higher than that of IHA NPs (25.2%) and free ICG (3.9%) (Fig. 5b). The results demonstrated that the conjugated FA facilitated the nanoparticles to target the FA receptors on tumor cells and thus enhance FA-IHA NPs cell uptake [39, 40, 41].
Fig. 5

a Confocal fluorescent images of HepG2 cells after incubation with free ICG and IHA NPs, and FA-IHA NPs. Red and blue colors represent ICG fluorescence and DAPI-stained cell nuclei, respectively. b Flow cytometry measurement of ICG fluorescence intensities in HepG2 cells after incubation with free ICG and IHA NPs and FA-IHA NPs

By using a fluorescence microscope, we observed the intrinsic photodynamic activity of Arte-, ICG-, and FA-IHA NPs-treated cells with or without NIR irradiation. A ROS probe 2, 7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate was used to visualize cellular ROS production. The results showed that FA-IHA NPs could induce a significantly enhanced ROS production compared with other samples after 5 min of NIR irradiation (Fig. 6a). The corresponding fluorescent values are shown in Fig. 6b.
Fig. 6

a Fluorescence images of ROS production in cancer cells treated with various drugs, and b corresponding fluorescent intensity: (1) PBS, (2) Arte, (3) FA-HA NPs, (4) free ICG + NIR, (5) IHA NPs + NIR, and (6) FA-IHA NPs + NIR

In Vitro Tumor Combinational Photo-Chemo therapy

Figure 7a shows the temperature change of the PBS-, free ICG-, IHA NPs-, and FA-IHA NPs-treated cells (with equal ICG concentration) after 5 min of NIR irradiation (1.0 W/cm2). The temperature of cells treated with FA-IHA NPs showed the highest increase (ΔT = 31 °C) compared with that of PBS-, free ICG-, and IHA NPs-treated cells. The viability of cells treated with Arte, IHA NPs, and FA-IHA NPs at different concentrations for 24 h without NIR irradiation decreased with increased concentration, while free ICG at these concentrations did not show any cytotoxicity (Fig. 7b). Meanwhile, the drug carrier FA-IH NPs (FA-IHA NPs without Arte) also showed no significant cytotoxicity (Additional file 1: Figure S2). In contrast, after NIR irradiation (1.0 W/cm2, 5 min), significant concentration-dependent cell death was observed in cells treated with free ICG, IHA NPs, and FA-IHA NPs (Fig. 7c). The effect was particularly significant in FA-IHA NPs-treated cells. The excellent anticancer effect might be attributed by the targeted combinational photo-chemo therapy, such as the chemotherapeutic effect of the released Arte and the PTT-PDT therapeutic effect of ICG. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity of FA-IHA NPs with or without NIR irradiation was investigated by calcein-AM/PI dual staining. Cells treated with FA-IHA NPs and irradiation were almost completely dead compared to other treated groups (Fig. 7d).
Fig. 7

a Temperature change curves of PBS-, free ICG-, IHA NPs-, and FA-IHA NPs-treated cells in 96-well plates after 5 min of NIR irradiation. b, c Cell viability of cells treated with free ICG, Arte, IHA NPs, and FA-IHA NPs without or with 808 nm laser irradiation (5 min, 1 W/cm2), respectively. d Calcium AM/PI dual-staining images of cells after treatment with PBS (control), PBS + NIR, FA-IHA NPs, and FA-IHA NPs + NIR, respectively

In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging

As shown in Fig. 8a and b 0.1 h post-injection of free ICG, IHA NPs, and FA-IHA NPs, a strong fluorescence signal could be seen in the entire body of the tumor-bearing mice. Fluorescence signals increased in the tumor region with the increasing time, reaching the peak at 24 h post-injection. The tumor fluorescence signals in the FA-IHA NPs group were the highest compared to that of ICG and IHA NPs groups at all tested points (Fig. 8b), indicating that FA-IHA NPs could highly accumulate in the tumor region due to the FA-induced tumor-targeted effect. Additionally, the biodistribution in major tissues, including heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidneys, was conducted by an ex vivo fluorescence quantitative analysis 24 h post-injection. In all tested groups, strong fluorescence signals were detected in the liver tissue (Fig. 8c), indicating that the main metabolic conversion of these compounds follows a hepatic pathway. These results demonstrated that FA-IHA NPs could selectively accumulate in tumors in vivo, likely induced by the FA-targeted effect [37].
Fig. 8

a Representative fluorescence images of tumor-bearing mice after tail vein injection with free ICG, IHA NPs, and FA-RIPNPs. The black dashed circles indicate the tumor region. b Quantitative in vivo analysis of the fluorescence signal in the tumor regions of mice treated with free ICG, IHA NPs, and FA-IHA NPs as a function of injection time. c The fluorescence signal of major organs including heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidney

In Vivo Tumor Combinational Photo-Chemo therapy

As shown in Fig. 9a and b, the tumor temperature in the tumor-bearing mice after treatment with PBS, free ICG, IHA NPs, and FA-IHA NPs at 24 h post-injection under 5 min of NIR irradiation (1 W/cm2) was recorded by a thermal imager. An approximate 22.1 °C increase of the tumor region was detected in FA-IHA NPs-treated group, which was the highest than that of other groups. After two cycles of NIR irradiation (day 0 and day 2), FA-IHA NPs + NIR group exhibited a significant tumor growth suppression without a relapse (Fig. 9c), while the groups treated with PBS, Arte, FA-IHA NPs, PBS + NIR, ICG + NIR, and IHA NPs + NIR exhibited no clear indication of tumor suppression. Furthermore, after 90 days, the mice in FA-IHA NPs + NIR group showed 100% survival rate (Fig. 9d). These results indicate that FA-IHA NPs with NIR irradiation had an excellent in vivo tumor therapeutic efficacy, likely due to active targeted and combination photo-chemo therapy.
Fig. 9

a Tumor region temperatures in tumor-bearing mice after tail vein injection of PBS, ICG, IHA NPs, and FA-RIPNPs at 24 h under 5 min of NIR irradiation (808 nm, 1 W/cm2). b Thermal images of tumor-bearing mice after tail vein injection of PBS, ICG, IHA NPs, and FA-RIPNPs at 24 h under 5 min of NIR irradiation (808 nm, 1 W/cm2). c HepG2 xenograft tumors growth profile after intravenous injection of PBS, Arte, ICG, IHA NPs, and FA-RIPNPs with or without 5 min of NIR irradiation (808 nm, 1 W/cm2). d Survival rate of tumor-bearing mice after tail vein injection with PBS, free Arte, ICG, IHA NPs, and FA-RIPNPs with or without 5 min of NIR irradiation (808 nm, 1 W/cm2)

Finally, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was used to evaluate FA-IHA NPs toxicity. The section images showed no significant histological lesions compared to PBS-treated group (Fig. 10), indicating FA-IHA NPs had neglectable toxicity, which was likely due to the safety of the ingredients of the FA-IHA NPs, thus being beneficial for their future use in clinical practice.
Fig. 10

H&E-stained tissue sections of major organs, including heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidney from mice treated with PBS and FA-IHA NPs

Conclusions

In conclusion, a multifunctional theranostic agent was prepared, covalently conjugating FA and ICG, and encapsulating Arte for imaging-guided tumor-targeted combinational photo-chemo therapy in vitro and in vivo. The prepared FA-IHA NPs showed excellent colloidal- and heat-stabilities and fluorescence property. Under NIR irradiation, FA-IHA NPs showed great photothermal effect which could trigger Arte release and produce much more ROS after NIR irradiation than free ICG that exhibited photodynamic performance. The conjugated FA facilitated a highly efficient cellular uptake and tumor accumulation in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, the highly effective anticancer efficacy of FA-IHA NPs combined active targeting thermal drug chemotherapy, such as PTT-PDT therapy, which was demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. Overall, the results obtained indicated that FA-IHA NPs might be a promising tumor-targeted system feasible for future nanomedicine applications.

Notes

Availability of Data and Materials

The conclusions made in this manuscript are based on the data (main text and figures) presented and shown in this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

HY, ZL, DC, and HL designed the experiment. HY, ZL, ZZ, and XL analyzed the data. HY and ZL conducted the experiments and prepared the manuscript. DC and HL revised and approved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

11671_2018_2700_MOESM1_ESM.docx (31 kb)
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Photothermal heating curves of FA-IHA NPs under 5 min 808 nm laser irradiation with 0.5, 1 and 1.5 W/cm2. Figure S2. Cell viabilities of HepG 2 cells after incubation with different concentration of the drug carrier FA-IH NPs (FA-IHA NPs without Arte). (DOCX 30 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Chen R, Zhang J, Wang Y, Chen X, Zapien JA, Lee CS (2015) Graphitic carbon nitride nanosheet@ metal–organic framework core–shell nanoparticles for photo-chemo combination therapy. Nanoscale 7:17299–17305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li W, Zheng C, Pan Z, Chen C, Hu D, Gao G, Kang S, Cui H, Gong P, Cai L (2016) Smart hyaluronidase-actived theranostic micelles for dual-modal imaging guided photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials 101:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fan W, Yung B, Huang P, Chen X (2017) Nanotechnology for multimodal synergistic cancer therapy. Chem Rev 117:13566–13638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Phan TTV, Bui NQ, Moorthy MS, Lee KD, Oh J (2017) Synthesis and in vitro performance of polypyrrole-coated iron–platinum nanoparticles for photothermal therapy and photoacoustic imaging. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin J, Wang S, Huang P, Wang Z, Chen S, Niu G, Li W, He J, Cui D, Lu G, Chen X, Nie Z (2013) Photosensitizer-loaded gold vesicles with strong plasmonic coupling effect for imaging-guided photothermal/photodynamic therapy. ACS Nano 7:5320–5329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guo M, Mao H, Li Y, Zhu A, He H, Yang H, Wang Y, Tian X, Ge C, Peng Q, Wang X, Yang X, Chen X, Liu G, Chen H (2014) Dual imaging-guided photothermal/photodynamic therapy using micelles. Biomaterials 35:4656–4666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Sayed IH, Huang X, El-Sayed MA (2006) Selective laser photo-thermal therapy of epithelial carcinoma using anti-EGFR antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles. Cancer Lett 239:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim J, Park S, Lee JE, Jin SM, Lee JH, Lee IS, Yang I, Kim JS, Kim SK, Cho MH, Hyeon T (2006) Designed fabrication of multifunctional magnetic gold nanoshells and their application to magnetic resonance imaging and photothermal therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 118:7918–7922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng Y, Tan X, Wang J, Wang Y, Song Y, You Q, Sun Q, Liu L, Wang S, Tan F, Li J, Li N (2018) Polymer-based gadolinium oxide nanocomposites for FL/MR/PA imaging guided and photothermal/photodynamic combined anti-tumor therapy. J Control Release 77:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gollavelli G, Ling YC (2014) Magnetic and fluorescent graphene for dual modal imaging and single light induced photothermal and photodynamic therapy of cancer cells. Biomaterials 35:4499–4507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seo WS, Lee JH, Sun X et al (2006) FeCo/graphitic-shell nanocrystals as advanced magnetic-resonance-imaging and near-infrared agents. Nature Mater 5:971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen J, Li X, Liu X, Yan H, Xie Z, Sheng Z, Gong X, Wang L, Liu X, Zhang P, Zheng H, Song L, Liu C (2018) Hybrid MoSe2–indocyanine green nanosheets as a highly efficient phototheranostic agent for photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal cancer therapy. Biomater Sci 6:1503–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jang B, Park JY, Tung CH, Kim IH, Choi Y (2011) Gold nanorod− photosensitizer complex for near-infrared fluorescence imaging and photodynamic/photothermal therapy in vivo. ACS Nano 5:1086–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen J, Liu C, Zeng G, You Y, Wang H, Gong X, Zheng R, Kim J, Kim C, Song L (2016) Indocyanine green loaded reduced graphene oxide for in vivo photoacoustic/fluorescence dual-modality tumor imaging. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ntziachristos V (2006) Fluorescence molecular imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 8:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoffman JM, Gambhir SS (2007) Molecular imaging: the vision and opportunity for radiology in the future. Radiol 244:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang Q, Wang S, Zhou J, Zhong X, Huang Y (2018) Albumin-assisted exfoliated ultrathin rhenium disulfide nanosheets as a tumor targeting and dual-stimuli-responsive drug delivery system for a combination chemo-photothermal treatment. RSC Adv 8:4624–4633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuthala N, Vankayala R, Li YN, Chiang CS, Hwang KC (2017) Engineering novel targeted boron-10-enriched theranostic nanomedicine to combat against murine brain tumors via MR imaging-guided boron neutron capture therapy. Adv Mater 29:1700850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ayala-Orozco C, Urban C, Bishnoi S, Urban A, Charron H, Mitchell T, Shea M, Nanda S, Schiff R, Halas N, Joshi A (2014) Sub-100nm gold nanomatryoshkas improve photo-thermal therapy efficacy in large and highly aggressive triple negative breast tumors. J Control Release 191:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muthu MS, Leong DT, Mei L, Feng SS (2014) Nanotheranostics˗ application and further development of nanomedicine strategies for advanced theranostics. Theranostics 4:660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cerqueira BB, Lasham A, Shelling AN, Al-Kassas R (2015) Nanoparticle therapeutics: technologies and methods for overcoming cancer. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 97:140–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thangavel S, Yoshitomi T, Sakharkar MK, Nagasaki Y (2016) Redox nanoparticle increases the chemotherapeutic efficiency of pioglitazone and suppresses its toxic side effects. Biomaterials 99:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lozano N, Al-Ahmady ZS, Beziere NS, Ntziachristos V, Kostarelos K (2015) Monoclonal antibody-targeted PEGylated liposome-ICG encapsulating doxorubicin as a potential theranostic agent. Int J Pharm 482:2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gautier J, Allard-Vannier E, Munnier E, Chourpa MSI (2013) Recent advances in theranostic nanocarriers of doxorubicin based on iron oxide and gold nanoparticles. J Control Release 169:48–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mashal A, Sitharaman B, Li X, Avti PK, Sahakian AV, Booske JH, Hagness SC (2010) Toward carbon-nanotube-based theranostic agents for microwave detection and treatment of breast cancer: enhanced dielectric and heating response of tissue-mimicking materials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57:1831–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen M, Tang S, Guo Z, Wang X, Mo S, Huang X, Liu G, Zheng N (2014) Core–shell Pd@ Au nanoplates as theranostic agents for in-vivo photoacoustic imaging, CT imaging, and photothermal therapy. Adv Mater 26:8210–8216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lyu Y, Fang Y, Miao Q, Zhen X, Ding D, Pu K (2016) Intraparticle molecular orbital engineering of semiconducting polymer nanoparticles as amplified theranostics for in vivo photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy. ACS Nano 10:4472–4481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Takahashi H, Zaidi N, Berber E (2016) An initial report on the intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in the surgical management of liver tumors. J Surg Oncol 114:625–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bui NQ, Hlaing KK, Nguyen VP, Nguyen TH, Oh YO, Fan XF, Lee YW, Nam SY, Kang HW, Oh J (2015) Intravascular ultrasonic–photoacoustic (IVUP) endoscope with 2.2-mm diameter catheter for medical imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph 45:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bahmani B, Bacon D, Anvari B (2013) Erythrocyte-derived photo-theranostic agents: hybrid nano-vesicles containing indocyanine green for near infrared imaging and therapeutic applications. Sci Rep 3:2180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mac JT, Vankayala R, Patel D, Wueste S, Anvari B (2018) Erythrocyte-derived optical nano-probes doped with ICG-bound albumin: material characteristics and evaluation for cancer cell imaging. ACS Biomater Sci Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang H, Zhang X, Zhu X, Chen J, Chen Q, Zhang H, Hou L, Zhang Z (2018) NIR light-induced tumor phototherapy using photo-stable ICG delivery system based on inorganic hybrid. Nanomedicine 14:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Abbas M, Zou Q, Li S, Yan X (2017) Self-assembled peptide-and protein-based nanomaterials for antitumor photodynamic and photothermal therapy. Adv Mater 29:1605021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xin Y, Yin M, Zhao L, Meng F, Luo L (2017) Recent progress on nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems for cancer therapy. Cancer Biol Med 14:228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim C, Lee JH, Kim SH, Sethi G, Ahn KS (2015) Artesunate suppresses tumor growth and induces apoptosis through the modulation of multiple oncogenic cascades in a chronic myeloid leukemia xenograft mouse model. Oncotarget 6:4020–4035Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li Y, Wen T, Zhao R, Liu X, Ji T, Wang H, Shi X, Shi J, Wei J, Zhao Y, Wu X, Nie G (2014) Localized electric field of plasmonic nanoplatform enhanced photodynamic tumor therapy. ACS Nano 8:11529–11542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Deng W, Qiu J, Wang S, Yuan Z, Jia Y, Tan H, Lu J, Zheng R (2018) Development of biocompatible and VEGF-targeted paclitaxel nanodrugs on albumin and graphene oxide dual-carrier for photothermal-triggered drug delivery in vitro and in vivo. Int J Nanomedicine 13:439–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schmaljohann D (2006) Thermo-and pH-responsive polymers in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58:1655–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kesharwani P, Iyer AK (2015) Recent advances in dendrimer-based nanovectors for tumor-targeted drug and gene delivery. Drug Discov Today 20:536–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Qiao J, Dong P, Mu X, Qi L, Xiao R (2016) Folic acid-conjugated fluorescent polymer for up-regulation folate receptor expression study via targeted imaging of tumor cells. Biosens Bioelectron 78:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang H, Sheng W (2017) 131I-traced PLGA-lipid nanoparticles as drug delivery carriers for the targeted chemotherapeutic treatment of melanoma. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:365CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Medical ImageEzhou Central HospitalEzhouChina

Personalised recommendations