Advertisement

Nanoscale Research Letters

, 13:208 | Cite as

Facile Synthesis of Ligand-Free Iridium Nanoparticles and Their In Vitro Biocompatibility

  • Anna L. Brown
  • Hayden Winter
  • Andrea M. Goforth
  • Gaurav Sahay
  • Conroy Sun
Open Access
Nano Express
  • 564 Downloads

Abstract

High-density inorganic nanoparticles have shown promise in medical applications that utilize radiation including X-ray imaging and as radiation dose enhancers for radiotherapy. We have developed an aqueous synthetic method to produce small (~ 2 nm) iridium nanoparticles (IrNPs) by reduction of iridium(III) chloride using a borohydride reducing agent. Unlike other solution-based synthesis methods, uniform and monodispersed IrNPs are produced without the use of surfactants or other solubilizing ligands. These nanoparticles are highly crystalline as observed by X-ray diffraction and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In vitro metabolic toxicity assays using hepatocyte and macrophage cells demonstrate that both IrNPs and iridium(III) chloride are well tolerated at concentrations of up to 10 μM iridium. Furthermore, the IrNPs were assessed in a hemolytic assay and found to have no significant impact on red blood cells when exposed to concentrations up to 100 μM. Overall, these results support the potential for the in vivo application of this nanomaterial.

Keywords

Nanoparticle synthesis Nanocrystals Iridium Surface characterization Cellular toxicity 

Abbreviations

AuNP

Gold nanoparticle

DLS

Dynamic light scattering

ICP-MS

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

IrNP

Iridium nanoparticle

PDF

Powder diffraction file

UV

Ultraviolet

XPS

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

XRD

X-ray diffraction

Background

Noble metal nanoparticles are a mainstay of emerging nanotechnologies due to their interesting optical, electronic, and surface catalytic properties. In nanomedicine, these unique biomaterials have drawn significant attention due the ability to tailor their biological interactions through surface modifications for a wide range of applications [1]. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been investigated extensively for sensing and therapeutic applications [2, 3], while other noble metals, including silver, have found niche uses such as anti-microbials [4]. However, nanoparticles composed of platinoid elements, which are commonly employed for their surface catalytic properties [5], have yet to be thoroughly examined for biomedical applications. The exceptional surface stability and known biological compatibility of these elements, as well as their potential novel physical properties on the nanoscale, make them unique alternatives to AuNPs.

High-energy radiation is utilized extensively in medicine including in diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Therefore, functional materials that interact with radiation, such as high atomic number and high-density nanoparticles, may improve the performance of these modalities. The majority of the chemical and engineering studies to date have focused on AuNPs to enhance radiation interactions, although bismuth and hafnium have been examined for diagnostic and therapeutic applications respectively [6, 7].

Here, we present a synthetic method to produce iridium nanoparticles (IrNPs), which are predicted to have strong radiation attenuation due to its high density. Iridium is one of the least reactive metals, considered generally biologically compatible, and has an elemental density of 22.56 g/cm3 (second only to osmium, which is known to be highly toxic). An isotope of iridium, 192Ir, is a commonly used brachytherapy gamma emitter, and part of the success of this material is due to the high density, i.e., the large number of atoms in a small volume of the material. In the current study, we present the synthesis of IrNPs and their in vitro biocompatibility as well as that of iridium ions, which has not previously been evaluated in the selected cell lines. These novel IrNPs have not been readily explored for medical purposes despite the material’s chemical inertness and superior density. Although iridium is a relatively expensive material like other noble metals, its current value as a commodity is approximately three quarters the price of gold and half that of rhodium, making it an interesting economic alternative.

Methods

Synthesis of IrNPs

All synthesis reactions were performed at room temperature under aerobic conditions in purified 18 MΩ water. A 20 mM iridium (III) chloride (Acros Organics) stock was prepared by bath sonication and stirred for at least 20 min to generate an optically clear solution. A solution of 1.0 M borane morpholine (Alfa Aesar) was also prepared by bath sonication. For larger scale syntheses of 500 mL total volume, 25 mL iridium (III) chloride solution was used (diluted to 1.0 mM) and 5.0 mL borane morpholine was added (final 10 mM concentration) with rapid stirring. The solution gradually turned from dark brown to black over 30 min. The nanoparticles were allowed to stabilize for at least 60 min. This colloidal solution was directly added to centrifugal spin filters (Amicon Ultra-4, 10k MWCO regenerated cellulose), and the nanoparticles were collected at 4000×g and washed in purified water. The nanoparticles were then suspended in water, passed through a syringe filter (Millex-MP 0.22 μm EO), and stored for quantification.

Nanoparticle Characterization

For X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis, nanoparticles were suspended in an equal volume nitric acid, collected by centrifugation in a microcentrifuge tube (5 min, 17 rcf), and suspended in water prior to analysis. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on an FEI Tecnai F-20 TEM operating at 200 kV. Purified IrNPs were drop-cast on holey carbon Cu supported TEM grids (Ted Pella) and dried at room temperature overnight. Line diffraction analysis was performed using ImageJ software analysis. For X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, concentrated IrNPs were drop-cast on a glass slide and dried at room temperature. XRD data were collected in focused beam (Bragg–Brentano) geometry on a Rigaku Ultima IV X-ray diffraction system using graphite monochromatized Cu Kα radiation. Scans were performed over the angular range 20–80° 2θ at a scan rate of 0.1°/min at room temperature. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was performed on a Malvern Nano ZSP in disposable polystyrene cuvettes. Nanoparticles were suspended in water, and data is reported as distributed by number. UV-Vis absorbance spectra were collected on a Tecan M200 Pro in a black 96-well plate and a total solution volume of 100 μL. Concentrations of iridium were adjusted to illustrate relative absorbance peaks. XPS analysis was carried out on a PHI Versaprobe II fitted with a hemispherical electron analyzer and aluminum Kɑ (1486.7 eV) X-ray source. Spectrum analysis was performed using the Multipak software suite. Binding energy calibration was performed using the C1s peak at 284.6 eV, and peak fitting was based on asymmetric peaks and an iterated Shirley background, resulting in a chi-squared value of 1.13. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) of IrNPs and iridium(III) chloride solution were assessed prior to biological toxicity assays. Fifty microliters of each IrNP solution was digested in 50 μL aqua regia (3:1 M concentrated nitric acid to hydrochloric acid) overnight at 70 °C in a digestion tube. Samples were then diluted in 5.0 mL 1% nitric acid for analysis. ICP-MS was performed on an Agilent 7900 using helium as a collision gas. Calibration curves were prepared using 100–0.1 μg/mL iridium stock solutions (in 1% HCl), and all samples were diluted such that concentrations were measured in the tens of ppb range.

Cytotoxicity Analysis

HepG2 and J774A.1 cell lines were seeded at 2 × 105 cells per well (100 μL) in a 96-well plate (DMEM with 10% FBS) and allowed to settle for 24 h. Iridium nanoparticles, iridium salt, water, or DMSO was added at 10% volume (10 μL additional volume). Cells were then incubated for 24 or 48 h. For viability analysis, media was removed, and cells were washed once in PBS. One hundred microliters of culture media with 10% Alamar Blue (Thermo Scientific) was incubated with cells for 2 h. Media was then re-plated into a black 96-well plate, and fluorescence was read (ex530/em590) on a Tecan M200 Pro. All data were performed in quadruplicate, and experiments were repeated on independent days to confirm general trends. A hemolytic assay was performed as previously reported [8].

Results

Iridium Nanoparticle Synthesis and Characterization

In this synthesis, we form elemental IrNPs from iridium(III) chloride salt by reduction with a 10-fold molar excess of borane morpholine in water. The reaction is readily scalable to multiple liters, and particles are formed at room temperature under aerobic conditions. This synthetic method produces small (2–3 nm) uniform IrNPs (Fig. 1a) with a high degree of crystallinity as observed by high-resolution TEM imaging. Diffraction patterns obtained from TEM further confirm the identity of the nanocrystals, with a line spacing of 0.22 nm that is indicative of the diffraction grating of iridium (Fig. 1b). The X-ray diffraction pattern closely matches that of elemental iridium (PDF Card No.: 9008470, Fig. 1c). As synthesized, IrNPs are colloidally stable in water and remain suspended in solution for several months at room temperature (Fig. 1d).
Fig. 1

a Iridium nanoparticles are 2–3 nm by TEM imaging, with b with a highly crystalline lattice parameter. c XRD spectrum matches elemental iridium, and d particles have a hydrodynamic size of 5 nm in water by DLS

Nanocrystals form over the course of 30 mins as observed by a color change from the light yellow iridium(III) precursor to a dark black nanoparticle solution (Fig. 2). When exposed to a basic environment, these IrNPs form a predicted iridium oxide, which appears blue. Acidic conditions, such as incubation in neat nitric acid, do not appear to impact particle crystallinity or integrity of the material; however, it does induce flocculation and precipitation. In addition, aggregation was also observed in biologically relevant solutions (phosphate buffered saline and tissue culture media) over the course of hours, suggesting that further surface modification will be necessary for future biomedical applications. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of the IrNPs rinsed in nitric acid and suspended in water reveals a predominant iridium(0) surface, although peak fitting analysis of data indicates 20% surface oxidation (Fig. 3). No preferred crystallite orientation of particles is observed, either by XRD or by XPS. Alternatively, the introduction of a thiol surfactant to the reaction solution during the synthesis process (prior to nucleation) resulted in inhibition of particle formation.
Fig. 2

Iridium(III) chloride appears pale yellow with absorbance peaks at 324 and 386 nm. IrNPs are broad-spectrum absorbers and appear black. Iridium oxide (predicted), produced from oxidized IrNPs treated in a basic solution, appears blue-purple purple with an absorbance peak at 584 nm

Fig. 3

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of IrNPs a predominantly elemental iridium surface state, with approximately 20% oxide surface contamination

Iridium Cytotoxicity

We evaluated the in vitro biological compatibility of the uncapped IrNPs and compared this to iridium(III) chloride salt in two types of mammalian cells. HepG2, a hepatocyte carcinoma cell line, was used to evaluate potential toxicity to the liver. J774A.1 macrophage cells were used to evaluate toxicity to the mononuclear phagocytic system. Cells were incubated with IrNPs or iridium(III) chloride (normalized for total concentration of iridium) for 24 or 48 h and washed to remove extracellular iridium, and metabolic activity was evaluated using the Alamar Blue assay (Fig. 4). HepG2 cells show increased metabolic activity in the presence of iridium(III) at 24 h (up to 115% viability), but the response is mitigated by 48 h, with 500 μM iridium(III) reducing viability to 90%. The HepG2 cells had a reduced cellular viability, from 94 to 78% in the presence of 50 μM IrNPs at 24 and 48 h. Interestingly, J774A.1 cells show an increase in metabolic activity in response to IrNPs at a 50-μM concentration with a 122% viability at 24 h; however, after 48 h, normal cellular function was resumed (98% viability), suggesting a transient metabolic stimulation in response to the nanomaterials. J774A.1 cells incubated with 500 μM IrNPs for 24 h show an apparently neutral metabolic response, but the decrease in viability at this concentration after 48 h suggests this is a result of toxicity and metabolic stimulation that appears as a neutral viability response. In addition, we evaluated the in vitro biocompatibility of IrNPs with blood through a hemolytic assay and found IrNPs induced no significant hemolysis when incubated with erythrocytes in PBS at 37 °C for 1 h (Additional file 1: Figure S1).
Fig. 4

Cellular viability of HepG2 and J774A.1 cells incubated with Ir(0) nanoparticles or Ir(III) salt for 24 or 48 h. *Statistically significant values (p < 0.05) relative to untreated cells

Discussion

Various synthetic processes have been examined to produce nanoscale iridium for catalytic applications, including reduction of iridium salts by hydrides and hydrogen gas [9, 10, 11, 12, 13], UV and gamma radiation [14, 15, 16, 17], and polyol or alcohol reduction [18, 19, 20]. However, many of these synthetic methods are designed for integration of iridium onto a substrate or support for chemical reactions and are not compatible with biological applications [21]. Recently, aerosolized 192Ir was employed as model nanoscale materials for lung toxicity and was chosen for its exceptional inertness [22, 23]. The primary purpose of these studies was to examine the clearance and translocation of inhaled fine particulates from the lungs; however, it also highlights the biocompatibility of this element.

We evaluated the in vitro biological compatibility of the uncapped IrNPs and compared this to iridium(III) chloride salt in two types of mammalian cells that are expected to accumulate the highest concentrations of injected nanoparticles. Iridium(III) toxicity in J774A.1 cells follows a normal toxicity dose-response curve; 100 μM iridium(III) reduces cellular viability to 93 and 66%, and 500 μM results in a 40 and 10% cellular viability at 24 and 48 h respectively. This data reflect interesting cell-specific response to iridium(0) and iridium(III), and we anticipate further exploring these effects in vivo. Smaller IrNPs and other poorly soluble inorganic nanomaterials are expected to be translocated to the kidney and the liver, with a short temporal residence in the kidneys, and longer residence in the liver, which may further impact cell-specific toxicity profiles. Excretion is expected through the feces for larger iridium particles, although we expect the extremely small size of these IrNPs may be readily filtered through the renal system if colloidal stability in vivo can be maintained [23].

In preparation for in vivo applications, the blood compatibility of the IrNPs was evaluated by a hemolytic assay. Utilizing whole mouse blood, we evaluated the effect of these IrNPs on the rupture of erythrocytes and potential release of hemoglobin. Although in-depth studies of the final surface modified IrNP will need to be evaluated, the current IrNP building blocks do not elicit a detectable hemolytic response until extremely high concentrations (500 μM).

Conclusions

We conclude from these studies that iridium(0) nanocrystals can be readily synthesized by a simple aqueous borohydride reduction of iridium(III) chloride, which results in 2–3 nm highly crystalline nanoparticles that are colloidally stable in water with an approximately 5 nm hydrodynamic size. During acute exposure, these particles are non-toxic at concentrations up to 50 μM iridium (compared to 10 μM for iridium chloride) in hepatocytes, stimulate metabolic activity in macrophage cells, and do not elicit a hemolytic response at practical concentrations. These ligand-free nanoparticles may serve as building blocks or cores for subsequent surface-modified IrNPs for use in biological and medical applications. Further investigation of the functional properties of these high-density nanomaterials in the presence of X-rays or other radiation presents the opportunity for novel therapeutic and diagnostic agents.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the laboratory facilities and equipment support provided by the Portland State University (PSU) Center for Electron Microscopy & Nanofabrication.

Funding

This work was supported by the NIH NIGMS as a Maximizing Investigators’ Research Award, 1R35GM119839-01 (C.S.), NIH NIBIB 1R15EB021581-01 (G.S.), and Oregon State University College of Pharmacy Start-up Funds.

Availability of Data and Materials

All datasets on which the conclusions of the manuscript rely are presented in the main paper.

Authors’ Contributions

AB and CS conceived and designed the study. AB and HW carried out the experiments. All authors analyzed the data. AB and CS wrote the manuscript. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

11671_2018_2621_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (175 kb)
Additional file 1: Hemolytic assay—The blood compatibility of IrNPs (0-500 μM) was evaluated by monitoring hemolysis of red blood cells. No significant hemolytic activity was observed until the highest concentration of 500 μM is reached. Triton-X-100 served as a positive control. (PDF 110 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Jain PK, Huang X, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA (2008) Noble metals on the nanoscale: optical and photothermal properties and some applications in imaging, sensing, biology, and medicine. Acc Chem Res 41:1578–1586.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ar7002804 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Conde J, Doria G, Baptista P (2012) Noble metal nanoparticles applications in cancer. J Drug Deliv 2011:e751075.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/751075 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arvizo RR, Bhattacharyya S, Kudgus R, Giri K, Bhattacharya R, Mukherjee P (2012) Intrinsic therapeutic applications of noble metal nanoparticles: past, present and future. Chem Soc Rev 41:2943–2970.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs15355f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yamada M, Foote M, Prow TW (2015) Therapeutic gold, silver, and platinum nanoparticles. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 7:428–445.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stowell CA, Korgel BA (2005) Iridium nanocrystal synthesis and surface coating-dependent catalytic activity. Nano Lett 5:1203–1207.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl050648f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown AL, Naha PC, Benavides-Montes V, Litt HI, Goforth AM, Cormode DP (2014) Synthesis, X-ray opacity, and biological compatibility of ultra-high payload elemental bismuth nanoparticle X-ray contrast agents. Chem Mater.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm500077z
  7. 7.
    Maggiorella L, Barouch G, Devaux C, Pottier A, Deutsch E, Bourhis J, Borghi E, Levy L (2012) Nanoscale radiotherapy with hafnium oxide nanoparticles. Future Oncol 8:1167–1181.  https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.12.96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neun BW, Dobrovolskaia MA (2011) Method for analysis of nanoparticle hemolytic properties in vitro. In: McNeil SE (ed) Characterization of nanoparticles intended for drug delivery. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 215–224 ISBN 978-1-60327-198-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yee CK, Jordan R, Ulman A, White H, King A, Rafailovich M, Sokolov J (1999) Novel one-phase synthesis of thiol-functionalized gold, palladium, and iridium nanoparticles using superhydride. Langmuir 15:3486–3491.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la990015e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Migowski P, Zanchet D, Machado G, Gelesky MA, Teixeira SR, Dupont J (2010) Nanostructures in ionic liquids: correlation of iridium nanoparticles’ size and shape with imidazolium salts’ structural organization and catalytic properties. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:6826–6833.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B925834E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rueping M, Koenigs RM, Borrmann R, Zoller J, Weirich TE, Mayer J (2011) Size-selective, stabilizer-free, hydrogenolytic synthesis of iridium nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotubes. Chem Mater 23:2008–2010.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm1032578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fonseca GS, Machado G, Teixeira SR, Fecher GH, Morais J, Alves MCM, Dupont J (2006) Synthesis and characterization of catalytic iridium nanoparticles in imidazolium ionic liquids. J Colloid Interface Sci 301:193–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.04.073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fonseca GS, Umpierre AP, Fichtner PFP, Teixeira SR, Dupont J (2003) The use of imidazolium ionic liquids for the formation and stabilization of Ir0 and Rh0 nanoparticles: efficient catalysts for the hydrogenation of arenes. Chem Eur J 9:3263–3269.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200304753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kundu S, Liang H (2011) Shape-selective formation and characterization of catalytically active iridium nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 354:597–606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2010.11.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rojas JV, Castano CH (2014) Radiation-assisted synthesis of iridium and rhodium nanoparticles supported on polyvinylpyrrolidone. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 302:555–561.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-3291-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rojas JV, Castano CH (2014) Radiolytic synthesis of iridium nanoparticles onto carbon nanotubes. J Nanopart Res 16:2567.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2567-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rojas, J. V.; Molina Higgins, M. C.; Toro Gonzalez, M.; Castano, C. E. Single step radiolytic synthesis of iridium nanoparticles onto graphene oxide. Appl Surf Sci 2015, 357, Part B, 2087–2093, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.190
  18. 18.
    Bonet F, Delmas V, Grugeon S, Herrera Urbina R, Silvert P-Y, Tekaia-Elhsissen K (1999) Synthesis of monodisperse Au, Pt, Pd, Ru and Ir nanoparticles in ethylene glycol. Nanostructured Mater 11:1277–1284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9773(99)00419-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goel A, Rani N (2012) Effect of PVP, PVA and POLE surfactants on the size of iridium nanoparticles. Open J Inorg Chem 02:67.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ojic.2012.23010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xia X, Figueroa-Cosme L, Tao J, Peng H-C, Niu G, Zhu Y, Xia Y (2014) Facile synthesis of iridium nanocrystals with well-controlled facets using seed-mediated growth. J Am Chem Soc 136:10878–10881.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja505716v CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zahmakiran M (2012) Iridium nanoparticles stabilized by metal organic frameworks (IrNPs@ZIF-8): synthesis, structural properties and catalytic performance. Dalton Trans 41:12690.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2dt31779f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buckley A, Warren J, Hodgson A, Marczylo T, Ignatyev K, Guo C, Smith R (2017) Slow lung clearance and limited translocation of four sizes of inhaled iridium nanoparticles. Part Fibre Toxicol 14:5.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-017-0185-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Buckley A, Hodgson A, Warren J, Guo C, Smith R (2016) Size-dependent deposition of inhaled nanoparticles in the rat respiratory tract using a new nose-only exposure system. Aerosol Sci Technol 50:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1124987. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pharmaceutical ScienceOregon State UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biomedical EngineeringOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  4. 4.Department of Radiation MedicineOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations