Nanoscale Research Letters

, 13:91 | Cite as

Fabrication of 20.19% Efficient Single-Crystalline Silicon Solar Cell with Inverted Pyramid Microstructure

  • Chunyang Zhang
  • Lingzhi Chen
  • Yingjie Zhu
  • Zisheng Guan
Open Access
Nano Express


This paper reports inverted pyramid microstructure-based single-crystalline silicon (sc-Si) solar cell with a conversion efficiency up to 20.19% in standard size of 156.75 × 156.75 mm2. The inverted pyramid microstructures were fabricated jointly by metal-assisted chemical etching process (MACE) with ultra-low concentration of silver ions and optimized alkaline anisotropic texturing process. And the inverted pyramid sizes were controlled by changing the parameters in both MACE and alkaline anisotropic texturing. Regarding passivation efficiency, the textured sc-Si with normal reflectivity of 9.2% and inverted pyramid size of 1 μm was used to fabricate solar cells. The best batch of solar cells showed a 0.19% higher of conversion efficiency and a 0.22 mA cm−2 improvement in short-circuit current density, and the excellent photoelectric property surpasses that of the same structure solar cell reported before. This technology shows great potential to be an alternative for large-scale production of high efficient sc-Si solar cells in the future.


Inverted pyramid sc-Si solar cell Metal-assisted chemical etching Alkaline anisotropic texturing 





Atomic layer deposition


Energy-dispersive spectrometer


External quantum efficiency


Finite difference time domain


Filling factor


Internal quantum efficiency


Short-circuit current density


Metal-assisted chemical etching


Multi-crystalline silicon


Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition


Reactive ion etching


Single-crystalline silicon


Scanning electron microscope


Standard deviation


Open-circuit voltage


Single-crystalline silicon (sc-Si) solar cell has long dominated the solar cell market owing to its high photoelectric conversion efficiency and comprehensive performance [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. However, the advantage of comprehensive quality over other crystalline and noncrystalline silicon solar cell has gradually diminished, due to the rapid development of diamond wire sawing technique, advanced passivation technique, and other type solar cells [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. As reported in practical production, sc-Si solar wafers with upright pyramid structure fabricated in plant production have a mean reflectivity of 10–12%, which almost has reached the limit of one-step alkaline chemical texturing technique [14]. The improvement in photoelectric conversion efficiency gained little from modulation of upright pyramid structure. In order to change this situation, the improvement in conversion efficiency may be probably continued by fabricate new light-trapping structure such as black silicon [15]. The black silicon technique can be used to modify surface with extremely low reflectivity and high light absorption [16]. Due to its ultra-low reflectivity (near 0.3%) in the ultraviolet visible and near infrared region which benefits efficiency improvement, black silicon solar cell has become a very promising direction of conventional sc-Si solar cell [16]. Thus, the conversion efficiency of sc-Si solar cell can be further improved from the perspective of black silicon.

The black silicon technique has immediately become a research hotspot since its discovery in 1995 [17]. There are three dominant techniques based on nanostructure fabrication: femtosecond laser technique, reactive ion etching (RIE), and metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE) [16, 18, 19]. Given the compatibility of current sc-Si solar cell technology and cost, MACE is the optimal solution to replace conventional alkaline texturing technology [20]. The great light-trapping ability of MACE-fabricated black silicon is beneficial to improve photoelectric conversion efficiency of sc-Si solar cells. However, a lower reflectivity of black silicon corresponds to more nanostructures, which would enlarge surface defect area and accelerate indirect recombination of photo-generated carriers, thereby restraining the photoelectric conversion efficiency [21].

Many pertinent works have been done to solve the problem above. Specifically, the conversion efficiency of sc-Si solar cell can be enhanced by either optimizing the surface structure for light trapping or improving the passivation technique [20, 22]. Savin et al. introduced atomic layer deposition (ALD) into the passivation process and combined it with the interdigitated back contact crystalline silicon solar cells, and the solar cell conversion efficiency reached 22.1% [23]. Despite the improvement of conversion efficiency, however, the application into large-scale industrial production was still limited by despairing costs. RIE-fabricated black silicon could significantly increase light-trapping ability, but the investment in hardware equipments was large which made it hard to be applied in mass production or less competitive against wet chemical texturing technology. The inverted pyramid structure obtained low surface area and great light-absorbing ability [24, 25, 26]. Stapf et al. used mixed solution of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydrofluoric acid (HF), and hydrochloric acid (HCl) to texture sc-Si, and random inverted pyramid structures were accessed, but the light-trapping ability of inverted pyramid structure was still under investigation [27]. The mechanism of MACE (metal = Au, Cu, and Fe) has been explored, and its application in crystalline silicon surface texturation is also studied [28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34]. However, the concentrations of metal ions in MACE ever reported, applied for crystalline silicon solar cells, were very high, which disobeyed the increasingly harder environmental protection policies and cost too much. Moreover, the texturation fabricated in MACE reported before was mostly explored to generate nanostructures as much as possible for light-absorbing ability rather than practical application. It was rarely reported about black silicon technique with low cost, which obtained potential in plant production. Our team introduced MACE with Ag nanoparticles into sc-Si texturing process at a low cost and optimize the MACE process by using specific etching additive, which reduced the concentration of Ag ion to two orders-of-magnitude lower than ever reported [32]. Furthermore, the required temperature of alkaline anisotropic texturing process was relatively lower than that in industrial production.

In this work, the optimized MACE technique was introduced into post rinse treatment of sc-Si solar cell, which promoted the photoelectric performance. Black silicon solar cells with inverted pyramid structure manufactured in bulk were accessed, which the conversion efficiency was up to 20.19%. Meanwhile, the formation mechanism of inverted pyramid structure was studied. As expected, black silicon solar cell with inverted pyramid microstructure showed a great potential in large-scale industrial production.


Diamond wire sawing (100)-oriented P-type sc-Si wafers (200 ± 20 μm thick, 1–3 Ω cm) with standard solar cell size of 156.75 × 156.75 mm2 were used in this experiment. The wafers were rinsed in an aqueous solution consisting of NaOH (AR) and H2O2 (30 wt.%) to remove surface impurities and then rinsed in ultra-pure water. In the MACE process, firstly, wafers were immersed in an aqueous solution containing HF (0.2 M) and AgNO3 (3 × 10−5 M) at 25 °C. Then, nanoporous silicon structures were fabricated when the silicon wafers coated with Ag nanoparticles were etched in the mixed acid solution of H2O2 (3.13 M) and HF (2.46 M) for 3 min, which contained 0.1% commercial additive (C, Nanjing Natural Mew Material Co. Ltd., China). The wafers with nanoporous structures were rinsed in ammonia water (0.1 M) with H2O2 (0.1 M) for 5 min to remove residual Ag nanoparticles. After being rinsed in ultra-pure water, nanoporous silicon structures were modified in an aqueous solution of NaOH (0.003 M) and 0.4% commercial additive (A, Nanjing Natural Mew Material Co. Ltd., China) at 60 °C. Finally, the industrial process for sc-Si solar cells was to produce inverted pyramid solar cells. The detailed steps were phosphorus element diffusion to form p-n junction emitters, acid etching to remove phospho silicate glass, plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) to deposit SiNx antireflection layer, and screen printing to metallize bottom/top electrodes.

The sc-Si surface morphology was observed under cold field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM; Hitachi S-4800, Japan). The sizes of sc-Si surface microstructure were measured on a Zeta 3D metrology system. The optical reflectance index from 300 to 1000 nm was measured by a UV-VIS and NIR spectrophotometer (UV-3101PC, Japan, with an integrating sphere). The SiNx film was measured by film thickness measurement system (Filmetrics, F20-UV, USA). The internal/external quantum efficiency and photovoltaic conversion efficiency of sc-Si solar cells were measured by Enlitech QE-R and PVIV-411V systems, respectively.

Results and Discussion

As reported previously, electroless metal nanoparticles deposited on Si in aqueous solution containing HF were well investigated before [35]. The electroless Ag nanoparticle deposition used in MACE was based on the galvanic displacement reaction while two electrochemical processes occurred simultaneously around the sc-Si surface [36]. SEM images in Fig. 1a–f show the Ag nanoparticles deposited on p-type (100)-oriented sc-Si surface by immersion in an HF solution containing AgNO3. As shown in Fig. 1a–c, Ag nanoparticles were fabricated into the sc-Si surface in the aqueous HF solution containing 5 to 15 ppm AgNO3 at 25 °C for 2 min.
Fig. 1

SEM images of Ag nanoparticles deposited on sc-Si and insert of EDS. SEM images of Ag nanoparticles deposited on sc-Si: ac deposition for 2 min at 25 °C with Ag ion concentration of 5, 10, and 15 ppm, respectively; and df deposition at 25 °C with 5 ppm concentration Ag ion for 2, 4, and 6 min, respectively. EDS result in the inset of a

Figure 1a clearly shows that white sediment was deposited into the sc-Si substrate, which was verified by an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS: inset in Fig. 1a) to be Ag nanoparticles. The reduced Ag nanoparticles substituted silicon where the oxidizing reaction happened and deposited on the silicon substrate. Ag nanoparticles of 15 nm in diameter were distributed evenly and densely with the presence of 5 ppm AgNO3 (Fig. 1a). However, with 10 ppm AgNO3 or higher concentration, the diameters of Ag nanoparticles increased unevenly (Fig. 1b, c). The diameter of regional Ag nanoparticles in Fig. 1b increased to 80 nm, and that in Fig. 1c was up to 100 nm. SEM images in Fig. 1d–f show the Ag nanoparticles deposited for 2, 4, and 6 min, respectively, at which was 5 ppm AgNO3 and 25 °C. It illustrates that shape of Ag sediment changed much and became irregular (varied from one dimension to two dimensions) with deposition time being prolonged. Moreover, these stick-shaped Ag nanoparticles (around 130 nm in length) deposited on the sc-Si surface irregularly by time delaying, which destroyed the uniformity of Ag nanoparticle distribution. In summary, we propose the Ag ion concentration at 5 ppm and deposition time for 2 min at room temperature.

The sc-Si wafers with uniform Ag nanoparticles coating were immersed in mixed acid solution containing commercial additive to fabricate nanoporous silicon structure. This commercial additive that might be a mixture of polyol containing hydroxyl and carboxyl was to separate minute bubbles from the substrate surface because H2 generated in the reaction could not get away from substrate surface automatically in the case of such low Ag concentration (Additional file 1). SEM images in Fig. 2a–f show the morphologies of nanoporous silicon and cross section before and after MACE. As shown in Fig. 2b, nanoporous silicon structures generated in the sc-Si with MACE processing for 1 min. The diameter of nanoporous silicon reached to 20 nm and depth about 1.3 μm. Then, diameter and depth of nanoporous silicon both increased with the prolonging of MACE time, even the diameter varied more obviously. Diameter of nanoporous silicon with MACE processing for 2 min grew to 40 nm, then 50 nm for processing 3 min, 80 nm for processing 4 min, and 110 nm for processing 5 min. Cross section insets in Fig. 2b–f show the depth of nanoporous silicon varied from 1.3 to 3 μm when MACE time increased from 1 to 5 min. However, quite a few nanoholes in cross section generated when MACE time was prolonged. According to Chartier’s report, nanoporous silicon generated in MACE included straight and curved cylindrical pore structures, and the straight nanoholes dominate when the etching solution molar ratio ρ = [HF]/([HF] + [H2O2]) is about 45% [36]. Despite the ρ = 45% in our work, a large amount of curved cylindrical pores generated with over-time etching when MACE processed for 4 min or more (cross sections in both insets of Fig. 2e, f). Through series of experiments, we observed that light-trapping ability of nanoporous silicon decreased with over-time MACE processing. The average reflectivity of nanoporous silicon against MACE treatment time at different temperatures is illustrated in Fig. 3. The average reflectivity minimized for MACE processing 3 min at 35 °C and then increased with time delaying. Meanwhile, the average reflectivity of nanoporous silicon changed little when temperature was 35 °C or higher. It could be explained by the fact that generation of curved cylindrical nanoholes made the nanoporous silicon structures hollow and messy instead of vertical, then incident light might be reflected back to the air through those curved nanoholes. On the other hand, nanoporous silicon itself was oxidized and dissolved slowly in mixed solutions of HF and H2O2 which made the substrate surface smooth and the average reflectivity increased. Similar tendency of reflectivity changing when temperature was above 30 °C showed that the convenient MACE temperature was at 35 °C. In conclusion, nanoporous silicon structures were fabricated in MACE process with ultra-low concentration of Ag ion, which was never reported before. The optimizing condition (temperature at 35 °C and time for 3 min) in MACE to fabricate vertical nanoporous silicon structure is proposed.
Fig. 2

SEM images of nanoporous silicon (cross section in insert) with different processing time. SEM images of nanoporous silicon: a as-fabricated and bf nanoporous silicon and cross section in inset for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min processing at 35 °C

Fig. 3

Average reflectivity nanoporous silicon dependence of time at specific temperatures. Average reflectivity of nanoporous silicon structures dependence of time for treatment at 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 °C, respectively

Nanoporous silicon generated by MACE underlies the formation of inverted pyramid structures. The wafers were modified in the alkaline anisotropic texturing process and additive A in NaOH aqueous solution played a similar role like surfactants in conventional sc-Si texturation. It removed bubbles from the substrate surface and influences the anisotropic factor of etchant. Finally, inverted pyramid structures were accessed. Figure 4a shows the nanoporous silicon structure, and Fig. 4b–f shows inverted pyramid structures with NaOH texturing for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 min, respectively. Figure 4b, c shows the nanoporous silicon structures turned into square holes with inverted pyramid-shaped bottom (inset in Fig. 4b, c) with alkaline anisotropic processing for 1 and 3 min, respectively. With texturing time being prolonged, the inverted pyramid structures were growing as shown in Fig. 4c–f, and specific areas were dissolved gradually. When the alkaline chemical texturing treated for 5 min, the inverted pyramid structures with 500 nm in width and 350 nm in depth were fabricated. However, there existed quite a few defect structures (inset of Fig. 4d). As shown in Fig. 4e, inverted pyramids in width of 1 μm were fabricated and distributed uniformly when texturing processed for 7 min. The dihedral angle was 54.7° and less defect structures existed observed from the cross section (inset in Fig. 4e). When the treatment time was up to 9 min, the inverted pyramids had smooth surface and seldom defect structures (Fig. 4f). However, it was easily observed that some side walls of inverted pyramids were dissolved, and new micro-scale gully arrays with size varied from 2 to 4 μm were formed. The dissolution of side walls made the overlapped structures generated (inset in Fig. 4f). Despite the fact that inverted pyramid structures were distributed with hardly no defect areas, large pit structures might decrease the light absorbance ability. Figure 5 shows the reflectance spectra of inverted pyramid structures with alkaline anisotropic texturing for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 min, respectively. The reflectance spectra showed that light-trapping ability decreased compared with original nanoporous silicon due to large quantities of nanostructure dissolution when alkaline texturing processed for 1 min. The average reflectivity in wavelength range from 300 to 1000 nm is 15.45%. Clearly, with texturing time increasing, light absorbance was enhanced gradually for the formation of inverted pyramid structures. The reflectivity minimized to 9.2% when texturing processed for 7 min, and the uniformity of inverted pyramid sc-Si wafers reached to best compared with others. Then light-trapping ability decreased, and reflectivity rose up to 10.5% with texturing for 9 min, caused by dissolution of inverted pyramids and formation of large-size overlapped pit structures. What is more, this sc-Si texturation was more reflective than that in plant production. Thus, nanoporous silicon structures were textured in aqueous NaOH solution containing specific compound additive, and uniformly distributed inverted pyramid structures with 1 μm size in width were accessed at 60 °C for 7 min. The average reflectivity was controlled at 9.2%.
Fig. 4

SEM images of inverted pyramid (cross sections in insert) processing for different time. SEM images: a nanoporous silicon and bf inverted pyramid surface-section and cross section texturing at 60 °C in aqueous NaOH solution for 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 min, respectively

Fig. 5

Reflectance spectra of inverted pyramid structures with texturing for different time. Reflectance spectra of sc-Si with inverted pyramid structures for alkaline texturing time at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 min, respectively

Considering both light-trapping ability and easy design of surface microstructure for passivation, we chose the inverted pyramid structure with width of 1 μm to fabricate solar cells. Box resistance and SiNx film property by PECVD of inverted and upright pyramid sc-Si wafers are compared in Table 1. We tested ten sets of the test samples and control samples (each set contained 10 pieces). The gap of average box resistance between inverted and upright pyramid sc-Si wafers was small, even the uniformity of inverted pyramid sc-Si distribution led that of upright one a little observed from the STD data. Comparison of SiNx film passivation property by PECVD suggests the SiNx film passivated on sc-Si with inverted pyramid structure is 10 nm thinner and has a refractive index 0.14 higher compared with upright pyramid. It means that passivation cost of inverted pyramid structure might be lower than upright one especially when the SiNx film property passivated on inverted pyramid structure is similar to that of upright one. It is beneficial to the industrialization application of this texturing technology. The average reflectivity, internal quantum efficiency (IQE), and external quantum efficiency (EQE) are shown in Fig. 6. The average reflectivity of inverted pyramid structure in width with 1 μm was 1% lower than that of upright ones in plant production (Fig. 6a). The SiNx film deposition process of sc-Si solar cell with inverted pyramid structure was the same as that of upright pyramid sc-Si. As shown in Fig. 6b, IQE of inverted pyramid sc-Si solar cell was similar to that of upright one. In the other hand, EQE of sc-Si solar cell with inverted pyramid structure shown in Fig. 6c got improved in wavelength 300–600 nm. It was assumed that unoptimized PECVD technique impeded the improvement of IQE of inverted pyramid sc-Si solar cell, and the lead of EQE in short wavelength from 300 to 600 nm might be attributed to reflectivity superiority in short wavelength described above.
Table 1

Comparison of box resistance in P-N injection and PECVD effect between inverted and upright pyramid structures


Box resistance in P-N injection




Thickness of SiNx film/nm

Refractive index

Inverted pyramid sc-Si





Upright pyramid sc-Si





Fig. 6

Comparison of a reflectance spectra, b IQE, and c EQE. a Reflectance spectra of inverted and upright pyramid structures. b IQE and c EQE of inverted and upright pyramid sc-Si solar cells

Three-dimensional (3D) finite difference time domain (FDTD) analysis was used to simulate and analyze photovoltaic effect near the interface of inverted pyramid structure. The simulation dimension of inverted/upright pyramids was designed at 1 μm in width. We used λ = 631.57 nm to calculate the electrical field intensity (|E|2) distribution of electromagnetic wave, which was close to the peak irradiance of solar spectra. As the simulation results shown in Fig. 7a, b, the energy of electromagnetic wave at 631.57 nm mostly gathered inside of inverted pyramid, which was much stronger than that of upright one. This simulation finding confirms the stronger photon-capturing ability of inverted pyramid structure.
Fig. 7

FDTD simulation of electric field intensity distribution in inverted/upright pyramid structure sc-Si. 3D FDTD simulation of electric field intensity distribution in inverted/upright pyramid structure sc-Si. Inverted/upright pyramid size are designed at 1 μm

The main electrical performance comparison of two types of sc-Si solar cells are shown in Table 2. The sc-Si solar cell with inverted pyramid structure shows a higher efficiency of 20.19% and short-circuit current density (Jsc) 0.22 mA cm−2 higher than that of upright one, which reconfirms the 3D FDTD simulating finding. The open-circuit voltage (Voc) of sc-Si solar cell with inverted pyramid structure reached to 647 mV, which was 2 mV higher than that of upright pyramid solar cell. In combination with IQE result, Voc advantage of inverted pyramid solar cell would be expanded if passivation technique was optimized. Its filling factor (FF) was 0.05% higher than the upright one. Further measures of improvement in photoelectric conversion efficiency should be focused on effective restriction of Auger recombination, stronger light-trapping ability, and better passivation technique.
Table 2

Comparison of electrical properties of inverted and upright pyramid sc-Si solar cells



Jsc/mA cm−2

Rs/Ω cm2



Upright pyramid Si






Inverted pyramid Si







In summary, the sc-Si with inverted pyramid microstructure fabricated by modulated alkaline texturing combined with optimized MACE showed great potential in optimizing both optical reflectivity and microstructure size compared with any other texturing technologies. The conversion efficiency of sc-Si solar cells with inverted pyramid structure designed with the size of 1 μm reached 20.19%, and short-circuit current density of solar cell was up to 38.47 mA cm−2. Predictably, cell property will be improved if the optimization of inverted structure or texturation technology continues.



The study was supported by funding of Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Inorganic Function Composites and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 21071081). The computational resources generously provided by the High-Performance Computing Center of Nanjing Tech University are greatly appreciated.


This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 21071081).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article (and its Additional file 1).

Authors’ contributions

CYZ gave the idea and designed and performed the experiment, data processing, and manuscript drafting. LZC did the performance characterization of the samples. YJZ gave help in the theoretical modeling simulation. ZSG modified the manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

11671_2018_2502_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1015 kb)
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Morphology comparison of silicon wafers processed in MACE with and without additive C: (a) with additive C, front view; (b) without additive C, front view; (c) without additive C, oblique view. (DOCX 1014 kb)


  1. 1.
    Masuko K, Shigematsu M, Hashiguchi T, Fujishima D, Kai M, Yoshimura N et al (2014) Achievement of more than 25% conversion efficiency with crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cell. IEEE J Photovoltaics 4:1433–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu Y, Zi W, Liu SF, Yan B (2015) Effective light trapping by hybrid nanostructure for crystalline silicon solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 140:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen K, Liu Y, Wang X, Zhang L, Su X (2015) Novel texturing process for diamond-wire-sawn single-crystalline silicon solar cell. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 133:148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lindroos J, Savin H (2016) Review of light-induced degradation in crystalline silicon solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 147:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao J, Wang A, Green MA, Ferrazza F (1998) 19.8% efficient “honeycomb” textured multicrystalline and 24.4% monocrystalline silicon solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 73:1991–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu F, Sun Y, Zha J, Chen K, Zou S, Fang L et al (2017) Pre-texturing multi-crystalline silicon wafer via a two-step alkali etching method to achieve efficient nanostructured solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 159:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eisenlohr J, Tucher N, Hauser H, Graf M, Benick J, Bläsi B et al (2016) Efficiency increase of crystalline silicon solar cells with nanoimprinted rear side gratings for enhanced light trapping. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 155:288–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee Y, Kim H, Hussain SQ, Han S, Balaji N, Lee Y-J et al (2015) Study of metal assisted anisotropic chemical etching of silicon for high aspect ratio in crystalline silicon solar cells. Mater Sci Semicond Process 40:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cao F, Chen K, Zhang J, Ye X, Li J, Zou S et al (2015) Next-generation multi-crystalline silicon solar cells: diamond-wire sawing, nano-texture and high efficiency. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 141:132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schindler F, Michl B, Krenckel P, Riepe S, Benick J, Müller R et al (2017) Optimized multicrystalline silicon for solar cells enabling conversion efficiencies of 22%. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 171:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu J, Yu P, Susha AS, Sablon KA, Chen H, Zhou Z et al (2015) Broadband efficiency enhancement in quantum dot solar cells coupled with multispiked plasmonic nanostars. Nano Energy 13:827–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu P, Yao Y, Wu J, Niu X, Rogach AL, Wang Z (2017) Effects of plasmonic metal core-dielectric shell nanoparticles on the broadband light absorption enhancement in thin film solar cells. Sci Rep 7:7696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu P, Wu J, Gao L, Liu H, Wang Z (2017) InGaAs and GaAs quantum dot solar cells grown by droplet epitaxy. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 161:377–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vazsonyi E, Clercq KD, Einhaus R, Kerschaver EV, Said K, Poortmans J et al (1999) Improved anisotropic etching process for industrial texturing of silicon solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 57:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Her T-H, Finlay RJ, Wu C, Deliwala S, Mazur E (1998) Microstructuring of silicon with femtosecond laser pulses. Appl Phys Lett 73:1673–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crouch CH, Carey JE, Shen M, Mazur E, Genin FY (2004) Infrared absorption by sulfur-doped silicon formed by femtosecond laser irradiation. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 79:1635–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jansen H, Boer MD, Legtenberg R, Elwenspoek M (1995) The black silicon method: a universal method for determining the parameter setting of a fluorine-based reactive ion etcher in deep silicon trench etching with profile control. J Micromech Microeng 5:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yoo JS, Parm IO, Gangopadhyay U, Kim K, Dhungel SK, Mangalaraj D et al (2006) Black silicon layer formation for application in solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 90:3085–3093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhong S, Huang Z, Lin X, Zeng Y, Ma Y, Shen W (2015) High-efficiency nanostructured silicon solar cells on a large scale realized through the suppression of recombination channels. Adv Mater 27:555–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yue Z, Shen H, Jiang Y, Chen W, Tang Q, Jin J et al (2014) Large-scale black multi-crystalline silicon solar cell with conversion efficiency over 18%. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 116:683–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oh J, Yuan HC, Branz HM (2012) An 18.2%-efficient black-silicon solar cell achieved through control of carrier recombination in nanostructures. Nat Nanotechnol 7:743–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu Y, Lai T, Li H, Wang Y, Mei Z, Liang H et al (2012) Nanostructure formation and passivation of large-area black silicon for solar cell applications. Small 8:1392–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Savin H, Repo P, Gastrow GV, Ortega P, Calle E, Garin M et al (2015) Black silicon solar cells with interdigitated back-contacts achieve 22.1% efficiency. Nat Nanotechnol 10:624–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lu Y-T, Barron AR (2014) Anti-reflection layers fabricated by a one-step copper-assisted chemical etching with inverted pyramidal structures intermediate between texturing and nanopore-type black silicon. J Mater Chem A 2:12043–12052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang Y, Yang L, Liu Y, Mei Z, Chen W, Li J et al (2015) Maskless inverted pyramid texturization of silicon. Sci Rep 5:10843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shi J, Xu F, Zhou P, Yang J, Yang Z, Chen D et al (2013) Refined nano-textured surface coupled with SiNx layer on the improved photovoltaic properties of multi-crystalline silicon solar cells. Solid State Electron 85:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stapf A, Honeit F, Gondek C, Kroke E (2017) Texturing of monocrystalline silicon wafers by HF-HCl-H2O2 mixtures: generation of random inverted pyramids and simulation of light trapping in PERC solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 159:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gao S-P, Peng K-Q, Yan Y-J, Zhu J (2002) Synthesis of large-area silicon nanowire arrays via self-assembling nanoelectrochemistry. Adv Mater 14:1164–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peng K, Zhu J (2003) Simultaneous gold deposition and formation of silicon nanowire arrays. J Electroanal Chem 558:35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jiang Y, Shen H, Yue Z, Wang W, Jin J (2014) Fabrication of black silicon via reactive ion etching through Cu micromask. Micro Nano Lett 9:325–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tang Q, Shen H, Yao H, Gao K, Jiang Y, Zheng C et al (2017) Potential of quasi-inverted pyramid with both efficient light trapping and sufficient wettability for ultrathin c -Si/PEDOT:PSS hybrid solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 169:226–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jiang Y, Shen H, Pu T, Zheng C, Tang Q, Gao K et al (2017) High efficiency multi-crystalline silicon solar cell with inverted pyramid nanostructure. Sol Energy 142:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yu P, Wu J, Liu S, Xiong J, Jagadish C, Wang ZM (2016) Design and fabrication of silicon nanowires towards efficient solar cells. Nano Today 11:704–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Agool IR, Abd AN, Dawood MO, Al-Ameer HMA, Habubi NF, Mansour HL (2017) Improving the photoresponse of porous silicon for solar cell applications by embedding of CdTe nanoparticles. Surf Rev Lett 24:1850012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Morinaga H, Suyama M, Ohmi T (1994) Mechanism of metallic particle growth and metal-induced pitting on Si wafer surface in wet chemical processing. J Electrochem Soc 141:2834–2841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chartier C, Bastide S, Lévy-Clément C (2008) Metal-assisted chemical etching of silicon in HF–H2O2. Electrochim Acta 53:5509–5516CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chunyang Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lingzhi Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yingjie Zhu
    • 1
  • Zisheng Guan
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Materials Science and EngineeringNanjing Tech UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Inorganic Function CompositesNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations