Advertisement

Altered functional connectivity of the red nucleus and substantia nigra in migraine without aura

  • Xiaobin Huang
  • Di Zhang
  • Yuchen Chen
  • Peng Wang
  • Cunnan Mao
  • Zhengfei Miao
  • Chunmei Liu
  • Chenjie Xu
  • Xinying WuEmail author
  • Xindao YinEmail author
Open Access
Research article

Abstract

Background

Functional connectivity (FC) has been used to investigate the pathophysiology of migraine. Accumulating evidence is pointing toward malfunctioning of brainstem structures, i.e., the red nucleus (RN) and substantia nigra (SN), as an important factor in migraine without aura (MwoA). We aimed to identify atypical FC between the RN and SN and other brain areas in patients with MwoA and to explore the association between RN and SN connectivity changes and performance on neuropsychological tests in these patients.

Methods

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were obtained from 30 patients with MwoA and 22 age-, sex-, and years of education-matched healthy controls (HC). The FC of the brainstem structures was analyzed using a standard seed-based whole-brain correlation method. The results of the brainstem structure FC were assessed for correlations with other clinical features.

Results

Patients with MwoA exhibited reduced left RN-based FC with the left middle frontal gyrus, reduced right RN-based FC with the ipsilateral superior parietal lobe, and increased FC with the ipsilateral cerebellum. Additionally, patients with MwoA demonstrated significantly decreased right SN-based FC with the right postcentral gyrus, left parietal lobule, and left superior frontal gyrus. Hypo-connectivity between the right SN and right postcentral gyrus was negatively correlated with disease duration (r = − 0.506, P = 0.004). Additionally, increased connectivity of the right RN to the ipsilateral cerebellar lobes was positively correlated with the Headache Impact Test-6 scores (r = 0.437, P = 0.016).

Conclusions

The present study suggested that patients with MwoA have disruption in their RN and SN resting-state networks, which are associated with specific clinical characteristics. The changes focus on the regions associated with cognitive evaluation, multisensory integration, and modulation of perception and pain, which may be associated with migraine production, feedback, and development. Taken together, these results may improve our understanding of the neuropathological mechanism of migraine.

Keywords

Migraine Red nucleus Substantia nigra Functional connectivity fMRI 

Background

Migraine is the most common primary headache disorder with a reported prevalence of approximately 5.7% in men and 17.0% in women [1]. Moreover, it has socio-economic and personal consequences and was ranked as the seventh leading cause of disability worldwide in the Global Burden of Disease Survey, 2015 [2]. This primary headache disorder is often combined with neck pain, depression, and anxiety, which are also among the top 10 causes of disability worldwide, placing migraine in a central position among the world’s most disabling disorders [3]. Although a growing body of evidence supports that cortical spreading depression and the trigeminovascular system have key roles in migraine pathogenesis [4], the neuromechanism underlying migraine has not been completely elucidated and warrants further attention.

Beyond the neurovascular model, a dysfunctional neurolimbic pain network model expands on the conventional concept of migraine and it could help elucidate migraine attacks, chronicization, and refractoriness [5]. Recent evidence has suggested that the brainstem structures might be crucially involved in the generation of migraine attacks [6]. The red nucleus (RN) and the substantia nigra (SN) are two important components of the brainstem. The RN plays a critical role in motor control and it is involved in regulating muscle tension, initiating conditioned motor responses, motor learning, and nociceptive processing; and the modulation of pathological pain [7, 8]. It has been suggested that the SN plays an important role in functions such as action selection, response inhibition, and cognitive control. It is also known that several key cognitive functions are controlled by the SN such as memory, executive and visuospatial functions. A fMRI study have indiacated that the RN and SN possess close functional connections to the insular cortex and precuneus [9]. These regions are involved in the salience and default mode networks, which are primarily devoted to emotion processing, interoceptive regulation and episodic memory. Thus, when the RN and SN networks are impaired, such as in Parkinson’s Disease, affective and cognitive impairments often coexist. These cognitive functions are also often impaired in migraineurs [10]. Previous diffusion tensor imaging and constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) studies have shown that the human RN and SN are widely interconnected with the sensorimotor and prefrontal cortices, such as the cerebellar cortex, thalamus, paracentral lobule, postcentral gyrus, precentral gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, and superior parietal lobule [11, 12, 13, 14]. Accumulating evidence is pointing toward the RN, and possibly the SN, being involved in somatosensory processing during a migraine attack. A previous study showed that activation (hyperoxia and blood volume increase) of the RN and SN is associated with the visually-triggered symptoms of migraine [15]. A transcranial sonography study found that 70% of patients with migraine with aura (MwA) and 20% of patients with migraine without aura (MwoA) had a hyperechogenic SN [16]. In a medication-overuse headache study, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) showed reduced task-related activity in the SN of patients with medication-overuse headache compared with patients with chronic migraine [17]. The population-based MRI CAMERA study revealed increased iron concentrations in the putamen, globus pallidus, and RN of migraineurs compared with controls [18]. Despite the pathophysiologic evidence pointing toward a relation between the RN and SN and cognitive impairment, a functional imaging marker is missing, and little is known regarding the underlying structural origin of these cognitive impairments.

Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) based on spontaneous blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses has proved to be a useful noninvasive neuroimaging modality to reveal the disease-induced neural dysfunction associated with neuropathology, including alterations in the brains of migraineurs [10, 19]. Based on functional connectivity (FC) analysis, aberrant interactions of cortical networks including the default mode network, executive control network, and dorsal attention system have been previously described [20]. As a best known modulator of somatic pain transmission located in brainstem, the impaired FC of periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) networks had been reported in both animal and human headache models. Atypical FC of PAG with brain regions that are involved in nociception, somatosensory processing, emotional processing, and pain modulation was previously shown in a rat model using seed-based FC analysis [21]. Aberrant connectivity between PAG and several brain areas within nociceptive and somatosensory processing pathways were also revealed in patients with migraine during a pain-free state [22]. However, no studies have focused on the RN and SN networks. The analysis of intrinsic functional architectural changes in the RN and SN with rs-fMRI in migraineurs may have the potential to improve the understanding of disease pathophysiology.

Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the RN and SN resting-state networks are disrupted in patients with MwoA compared with healthy controls and to explore the association between RN and SN connectivity changes and performance on neuropsychological tests in these patients. We hypothesized that: (1) the resting-state functional connectivity of RN and SN in patients with MwoA would be significantly different from that of HC; and that (2) these alterations would associated with specific characteristics in patients with MwoA.

Method

Participants

According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third Edition (beta version) (ICHD-3 beta) [23], 30 patients with MwoA(4 with chronic migraine, and 26 with episodic migraine) and 22 healthy controls were recruited in the study between May 2018 and June 2019. All subjects were right-handed [24]. Migraine attacks were presented with temporal pain in 14 patients, frontal pain in 9 patients, occipital pain in 5 patients and total headache pain in 2 patients. None of the patients took any preventive medications. To avoid any possible interference from pain or pharmacological substances on BOLD signal fluctuation, patients were migraine free, without medication, for at least 3 days before the examination and were followed up 3 days after scanning to ensure that they had remained migraine free during this period. The exclusion criterias were illness affecting central nervous system function, psychotic disorder, any physical illness such as cancer, regular use or overuse of any psychoactive, preventive or chronic medication and contraindications to MRI. 22 age, sex, and years of education-matched healthy subjects were included as HC. The inclusion criterias were having no personal or family history of migraine or any other type of headaches, and free from any chronic medical condition and any chronic treatment. HC met the same exclusion criteria applied to the patient group. To minimize hormonal influences on cortical excitability, all female participants were included at mid-cycle and excluded if pregnant or breast-feeding. All participants completed the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), and Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our university. All participants provided written informed consent before undergoing MR imaging.

Imaging methods

A 3.0 T MRI scanner (Ingenia, Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands) with an 8-channel head coil was used for this study. Functional images were obtained axially using a gradient echo-planar imaging sequence as follows: repetition time (TR) = 2000 ms; echo time (TE) = 30 ms; slices = 36; thickness = 4 mm; gap = 0 mm; field of view (FOV) = 240 mm × 240 mm; acquisition matrix =64 × 64; and flip angle (FA) = 90°. The fMRI sequence lasted 8 min and 8 s. Three-dimensional turbo fast-echo T1WI sequence with high resolution: TR = 8.1 mm; TE = 3.7 ms; slices =170; thickness = 1 mm; gap = 0 mm; FA = 8°; acquisition matrix = 256 × 256; FOV = 256 mm × 256 mm; fluid-attenuated inversion recovery: TR = 7000 ms; TE = 120 ms; slices = 18; slice thickness = 6 mm; gap = 1.3 mm; FA = 110°; voxel size = 0.65 × 0.95 × 6 mm3.

Image processing

Imaging data analysis was performed with the Conn toolbox [25] version 18b and SPM12 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12/) running on MATLAB R2013b (MathWorks, Natick, MA). Preprocessing of rs-fMRI images included realignment and unwarping, slice-time correction, segmentation of gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); normalization to the Montreal Neurological Institute template, and spatial smoothing based on a Gaussian kernel set at 8-mm full width at half maximum. The ART-based scrubbing method [26], implemented in Conn, was further used to detect outlying volumes with high motion (using a 3-mm subject motion threshold and a global signal threshold set at Z = 9). Nuisance variable regression was then performed, and the first five principal components from the segmented white matter and CSF were regressed out of the signal. The six motion realignment parameters and their first-order derivatives and outlier volumes detected in the scrubbing procedure were similarly regressed out of the signal. The data were then linearly detrended, and the residual signals were bandpass filtered at 0.01 to 0.08 Hz.

Statistical analysis

FC between the bilateral RN and SN and the rest of the brain was tested with the seed-to-voxel approach. The seed regions of interest (ROIs) of the bilateral RN and SN were generated using the WFU PickAtlas software. Seed-to-voxel maps were computed for each subject separately based on the bilateral RN and SN seeds. For between-group comparisons, two-sample t-tests were performed to investigate differences in the FC of the bilateral RN and SN between patients with MwoA and healthy controls with a default whole-brain mask. Age and sex were included as covariates. Significance was determined at a voxel-level threshold (P < 0.01) with Gaussian random field theory correction at a cluster-level threshold (two-tailed, P < 0.05). Positive clusters based on RESTplus were generated as a binary mask, and the connective strengths of the significant regions were extracted based on the z-maps.

Differences in demographic data between patients with MwoA and healthy controls were analyzed using between-groups t-test for means and Chisquare test for proportions (P < 0.05 was considered significant). Regions showing significant differences between the groups were extracted to investigate the relationship between the fMRI data and clinical cognitive characteristics, disease duration and attack frequency of the patients with MwoA. Then, the mean z-values of the aberrant FC region mask were calculated within each subject. Pearson’s correlation analysis between the mean z-values and each clinical cognitive characteristic was performed using SPSS 17.0 (version 17.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, corrected for age, sex, and years of education.

Results

Demographic data and neuropsychological tests

Table 1 summarizes the basic demographic and neuropsychological characteristics of the MwoA and healthy control groups. Neither group showed any significant difference for age (P = 0.122), sex (P = 0.094), MoCA score (P = 0.054), HAMA score (P = 0.119), HAMD score (P = 0.066), or years of education (P = 0.075).
Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants

 

MwoA patients(n = 30)

Healthy controls(n = 22)

P value

Age (years)

39.87 ± 10.43

34.27 ± 8.34

0.122

Gender (male/female)

4:26

8:14

0.094

MoCA score

25.87 ± 3.49

27.5 ± 1.97

0.054

 Visuospatial and executive function

4.47 ± 0.900

4.67 ± 0.727

0.470

 Name recognition

2.80 ± 0.551

2.91 ± 0.294

0.403

 Attention

5.67 ± 0.711

5.82 ± 0.395

0.372

 Language

2.80 ± 0.407

e2.82 ± 0.395

0.873

 Abstract

1.86 ± 0.351

1.90 ± 0.403

0.736

 Delayed memory

3.41 ± 1.368

3.53 ± 1.332

0.744

 Orientation

5.80 ± 0.407

5.95 ± 0.213

0.111

HAMA score

40.2 ± 8.41

36.91 ± 5.72

0.119

HAMD score

40.68 ± 9.56

37.11 ± 6.09

0.066

Education (years)

13.57 ± 3.01

15 ± 2.49

0.075

Duration (years)

9.37 ± 7.77

Frequency(d/m)

5.17 ± 6.17

HIT-6 score

57.3 ± 9.27

MIDAS score

11.63 ± 8.76

e-

Data are presented as mean ± SD; MwoA, migraine without aura; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Scale; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Scale; d/m, day per month; HIT-6, Headache Impact Test-6; MIDAS, Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire

Comparison of FC of the ROIs

Compared with healthy controls, patients with MwoA showed significantly decreased connectivity between the left RN and the ipsilateral middle frontal gyrus. For the right RN, the comparison between the two groups revealed significantly decreased FC in the right superior parietal lobe and increased FC in the ipsilateral cerebellum (Fig. 1; Table 2). Additionally, patients with MwoA demonstrated significantly decreased FC between the right SN and some regions encompassing the right postcentral gyrus, left parietal lobule, and left superior frontal gyrus, whereas no significantly increased or decreased FC was observed between the left SN and other brain regions (Fig. 2; Table 3).
Fig. 1

Altered effective functional connectivity between the left red nucleus and whole-brain regions in patients with migraine without aura (MwoA) compared with healthy controls (first row). Altered effective functional connectivity between the right red nucleus and whole-brain regions in patients with MwoA compared with healthy controls (second row). Blue signifies decreased functional connectivity, and red denotes increased functional connectivity

Table 2

Abnormal functional connectivity of the bilateral red nucleus in patients with MwoA compared with healthy controls

 

Brain region

Peak MNI coordinates

Voxel size

Peak t score

X

Y

Z

L Red Nucleus

L Middle Frontal Gyrus

−18

6

48

293

−3.8345

R Red Nucleus

R superior parietal lobe

12

−60

63

245

−3.7167

R Cerebellum

6

−54

−12

73

5.1646

Significance was determined at a voxel-level threshold (P < 0.01) with Gaussian random field theory correction at a cluster-level threshold (two-tailed, P < 0.05). MwoA Migraine without aura, MNI Montreal Neurological Institute

Fig. 2

Altered effective functional connectivity between the right substantia nigra and whole-brain regions in patients with migraine without aura compared with healthy controls. Blue signifies decreased functional connectivity

Table 3

Abnormal functional connectivity of the bilateral substantia nigra in patients with MwoA compared with healthy controls

 

Brain region

Peak MNI coordinates

Voxel size

Peak t score

X

Y

Z

L Substantia Nigra

NaN

     

R Substantia Nigra

R Postcentral Gyrus

36

−36

48

73

−4.4389

L Parietal Lobule

−3

− 36

72

223

−5.0468

L Superior Frontal Gyrus

−30

−3

57

75

− 4.3164

Significance was determined at a voxel-level threshold (P < 0.01) with Gaussian random field theory correction at a cluster-level threshold (two-tailed, P < 0.05). MwoA Migraine without aura, MNI Montreal Neurological Institute

Correlation analysis

As exhibited in Fig. 3a and b, hypo-connectivity between the right SN and right postcentral gyrus was negatively correlated with disease duration (r = − 0.506, P = 0.004). Further analysis revealed that the increased connectivity of the right RN to the ipsilateral cerebellar lobes was positively correlated with the HIT-6 scores (r = 0.437, P = 0.016). No other significant linear correlations were observed between the FC of the left middle frontal gyrus, right superior parietal lobe, left parietal lobe, and superior frontal gyrus and the neuropsychological test results and attack frequency of patients with MwoA.
Fig. 3

a 3BSignificant correlations between the brainstem structures’ functional connectivity and the characteristics of the patients with migraine without aura. Correlations between the functional connectivity of the right substantia nigra-right postcentral gyrus and disease duration (a). Correlations between the functional connectivity of the right red nucleus-right cerebellum and the Headache Impact Test-6 scores (b)

Discussion

It has been suggested that rs-fMRI is a more sensitive technique for neuropsychological assessment. Previously, diagnosis of “structure normal” disease like depression and schizophrenia often relied on questionnaire, electroencephalogram, etc. [27]. rs-fMRI using Bold sequence reflected inherent abnormality and revealed more foudmental brain functional aleration along with grey/wihte matter structural change in patients with brain disease, injury or dysfunction [28, 29]. Current study showed that patients with MwoA had disrupted resting-state RN/SN FC with a set of brain regions including diverse functional areas. Available evidence supports malfunctioning of the RN and SN as an important factor for migraine [15, 16, 17, 18]. Additionally, the RN and SN play crucial roles in a range of cognitive, motor, and memory controls. Therefore, functional connectivity changes in the RN and SN warrant further study in patients with MwoA. To our knowledge, this is the first examination of RN and SN functional connectivity in interictal MwoA.

Our study indicated that there is significantly decreased FC between the left RN and ipsilateral middle frontal gyrus. Areas within the frontal lobe are also part of the brain network involved in pain processing. In particular, the middle frontal gyrus, as part of the prefrontal cortex, is considered to be involved in the cognitive evaluation and modulation of pain [30]. One previous CSD tractography study with healthy controls revealed that the RN was sparsely connected with other cortical areas, including the middle frontal gyrus [11]. The middle frontal gyrus is reportedly involved in the attentional network. More specifically, the middle frontal gyrus has been proposed to contribute to both the dorsal (top-down) and ventral (bottom-up) attention networks [31, 32]. Based on a task-based resting-state fMRI study, Edina reported significant neural activation in response to fearful faces in the right middle frontal gyrus in patients with migraine relative to controls [33]. Activation of this region might be associated with emotional management in patients with migraine. Structural abnormalities have also been previously reported. A large cohort study showed that patients with MwoA had a thinner cortex bilaterally in the middle frontal gyrus than did healthy controls [34]. A study by Russo et al. showed that migraineurs had significant FC reduction within the right frontoparietal networks compared to healthy controls, and reduced connectivity in the middle frontal gyrus was negatively correlated with the pain intensity of migraine attacks [35]. Our result of altered FC between the left RN and ipsilateral middle frontal gyrus in interictal individuals with migraine is consistent with other researchers, indicating both functional and structural alteration in the middle frontal cortex as abnormal neuronal activation thresholds. Thus, impaired FC related to the middle frontal gyrus diminished the capacity for pain modulation and evaluation, which might underline the mechanism of irritable and impulsive reactions in patients with MwoA.

In the present resting-state functional study, we also detected lower connectivity between the right RN and right superior parietal lobe. However, contrary to this finding, patients during a spontaneous migraine attack exhibited increased FC between the right thalamus and several contralateral brain regions including the superior parietal lobe [36]. A previous study showed an increased gyrification index in the left superior parietal lobe in patients with MwoA compared with healthy controls [37]. In a previous positron emission tomography with computed tomography study, the migraine group had decreased glucose metabolism in several contralateral brain regions including the superior parietal lobe [38]. In fact, it has been proposed that the superior parietal lobe is involved in the sensory discrimination of pain information [30, 39]. Thus, impaired connectivity related to the superior parietal lobe may disrupt the pathway used to discriminate the sensory features of pain and induce hypersensitivity to pain stimuli in migraineurs.

Our data showed FC between the right SN and the contralateral superior frontal gyrus. The superior frontal gyrus may modulate the cortical and subcortical nociceptive pathways [40]. Gray matter volume reduction of the dorsolateral and medial parts of the superior frontal gyrus was observed at the 1-year follow-up in a group of patients with MwoA [41]. Functional changes in the frontal lobe have also been reported in other pain disorders. In a recent regional homogeneity (ReHo) study, Wang et al. [42] reported that patients with tension-type headache exhibited lower ReHo values in the superior frontal gyrus. MwoA may also involve superior frontal gyrus functional abnormalities as do other pain disorders.

Our results also suggested significantly reduced FC between the right SN and right postcentral gyrus and left parietal lobule. The altered FC between the right SN and homolateral postcentral gyrus was negatively associated with migraine duration. The postcentral gyrus, which is part of the primary somatosensory cortex, predominantly participates in sensory-discriminative pain processing. It showed extensive connections running from the primary somatosensory area to the homolateral SN in a previous CSD tractography study [14]. The reduced connectivity between the right SN and the homolateral somatosensory area may be associated with disrupted projections and modulation of perception and pain. fMRI studies have revealed activation of postcentral regions in response to painful stimulation [43, 44]. Hypoperfusion in the postcentral gyrus was found in migraineurs in the interictal state using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI [45]. Our findings of reduced FC within the somatosensory area are in line with those of other studies showing decreased amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation [46] and cortical thinning [47] within the postcentral gyrus in migraineurs. Furthermore, the altered FC between the right SN and homolateral postcentral gyrus was negatively associated with migraine duration. Abnormalities of postcentral gyrus FC may comprise part of the disrupted networks associated with the aberrant structures and function processing observed in migraine. We speculate that nociceptive input modifies the functional patterns of the somatosensory cortex and that these changes may account for the functional impairments in MwoA.

By contrast, we found significantly increased connectivity between the right RN and the ipsilateral cerebellum. Interestingly, this increased connectivity was positively related to the HIT-6 scores. Recent functional imaging studies have found robust FC between the cerebellum and many of the known migraine-related areas in the brainstem, midbrain, and cortex, indicating that the cerebellum may have an important role in pain processing [47, 48]. The cerebellum isin communication with the RN, forming a cerebello-thalamo-pre-supplementary motor area-RN feedback loop, which might be implicated in concentration-related optimization for upcoming motor performance [49]. The cerebellum also has anatomical connections with multiple areas of the frontal cortex and limbic system, which are critical for its involvement in cognitive and pain processing. Our result of increased FC of the cerebellum is in agreement with those of several previous studies. Altered low-frequency fluctuations in amplitude were observed in the cerebellum of migraineurs in the interictal period [46]. fMRI of patients during a migraine episode evoked by olfactory stimuli showed significantly increased activity compared to interictally-recorded activity prior to the migraine [50]. Increased cerebellar activity has been shown in response to trigeminal noxious heat stimulation in migraineurs compared with healthy controls [51]. This increased connectivity may reflect a long-time compensatory mechanism, and the impaired neurons require heightened connectivity to create the same signal. In addition, the increased connectivity between the right RN and the ipsilateral cerebellum was positively related to the HIT-6 scores of the migraineurs in the present study. We speculate that these pain-related brain regions provided feedback to the brainstem as pain intensity increases and might underline the mechanism of the hypersensitive response to external stimuli in migraine.

Our study has several potential limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small and does not suffice for generalization of the study findings; there is need for large-scale clinical validation. Second, this study did not enroll typical patients with MwA and a chronic-pain control group, which could establish the specificity of the findings to migraine. Third, our study were limited to a heterogeneous population of patients with MwoA. Chronic migraineurs were not categorized out from whole migraineurs due to small case number(4 with chronic migraine and 26 with episodic migraine). The ICHD-3β criteria for chronic migraine diagnosis required headache at least 15 days/month for least 3 months, it was restrictive to include enough chronic migraineurs compared with Expert Opinion criteria published in 2014 [52]. Fourth, the seed used in this study covered the whole RN and SN; however, the RN was subdivided into the large and small cell portions, and the SN was subdivided into the dorsal pars compacta and pars reticulata. Different parts may have their own distinct impact; therefore, more accurately defined anatomical parcellation of the RN and SN may influence the final seed-based FC maps, which may improve the specificity of the analysis. Finally, the analytical method of FC has intrinsic limitations in terms of anatomical connections and the direction of information flow from one area to another. These issues will be addressed in subsequent studies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results suggested that patients with MwoA have disruption in their RN and SN resting-state networks. This may be associated with functional impairments in pain processing that play a key role in the clinical characteristics of MwoA.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the migraine patients and healthy controls who participated in our research.

Authors’ contributions

XH and DZ designed the study. YC, PW, CM, ZM, CL and CX performed the experiments. XH and DZ analysed the data and prepared the manuscript. All authors red and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The study had no funding.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration. All participants gave their informed, written consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Scher AI, Gudmundsson LS, Sigurdsson S, Ghambaryan A, Aspelund T, Eiriksdottir G et al (2009) Migraine headache in middle age and late-life brain infarcts. JAMA 301(24):2563–2570PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vos T, Allen C, Arora M, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Brown A et al (2016) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet 388(10053):1545–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Charles A (2018) The pathophysiology of migraine: implications for clinical management. Lancet Neurol 17(2):174–182PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen Z, Chen X, Liu M, Dong Z, Ma L, Yu S et al (2017) Altered functional connectivity of amygdala underlying the neuromechanism of migraine pathogenesis. J Headache Pain 18(1):7PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maizels M, Aurora S, Heinricher M (2012) Beyond neurovascular: migraine as a dysfunctional neurolimbic pain network. Headache 52(10):1553–1565PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    May A (2017) Understanding migraine as a cycling brain syndrome: reviewing the evidence from functional imaging. Neurol Sci 38(Suppl 1):125–130PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ding C, Guo Y, Li H, Wang J, Zeng X (2018) Red nucleus interleukin-6 participates in the maintenance of neuropathic pain through JAK/STAT3 and ERK signaling pathways. Exp Neurol 300:212–221PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boadas-Vaello P, Homs J, Reina F, Carrera A, Verdu E (2017) Neuroplasticity of Supraspinal structures associated with pathological pain. Anat Rec 300(8):1481–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang H, Tang H, Chen W, Ji G, Ye J, Wang N et al (2015) Mapping the functional connectivity of the substantia nigra, red nucleus and dentate nucleus: a network analysis hypothesis associated with the extrapyramidal system. Neurosci Lett 606:36–41PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soheili-Nezhad S, Sedghi A, Schweser F, Babaki AES, Jahanshad N, Thompson PM et al (2019) Structural and functional reorganization of the brain in migraine without aura. Front Neurol 10:442PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Milardi D, Cacciola A, Cutroneo G, Marino S, Irrera M, Cacciola G et al (2016) Red nucleus connectivity as revealed by constrained spherical deconvolution tractography. Neurosci Lett 626:68–73PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jang SH, Kwon HG (2015) Change of neural connectivity of the red nucleus in patients with striatocapsular hemorrhage: a diffusion tensor tractography study. Neural Plast 2015:679815PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Habas C, Cabanis EA (2007) Cortical projection to the human red nucleus: complementary results with probabilistic tractography at 3 T. Neuroradiology 49(9):777–784PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cacciola A, Milardi D, Anastasi GP, Basile GA, Ciolli P, Irrera M et al (2016) A direct cortico-nigral pathway as revealed by constrained spherical deconvolution tractography in humans. Front Hum Neurosci 10:374PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cao Y, Aurora SK, Nagesh V, Patel SC, Welch K (2002) Functional MRI-BOLD of brainstem structures during visually triggered migraine. Neurology 59(1):72–78PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blazina K, Mahovic-Lakusic D, Relja M (2017) Brainstem nuclei changes in migraine detected by transcranial sonography. Neurol Sci 38(8):1509–1512PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferraro S, Grazzi L, Muffatti R, Nava S, Ghielmetti F, Bertolino N et al (2012) In medication-overuse headache, fMRI shows long-lasting dysfunction in midbrain areas. Headache 52(10):1520–1534PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kruit MC, van Buchem MA, Launer LJ, Terwindt GM, Ferrari MD (2010) Migraine is associated with an increased risk of deep white matter lesions, subclinical posterior circulation infarcts and brain iron accumulation: the population-based MRI CAMERA study. Cephalalgia 30:129–136PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hadjikhani N, Ward N, Boshyan J, Napadow V, Maeda Y, Truini A et al (2013) The missing link: enhanced functional connectivity between amygdala and visceroceptive cortex in migraine. Cephalalgia 33(2):1264–1268PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coppola G, Di Renzo A, Petolicchio B, Tinelli E, Di Lorenzo C, Parisi V et al (2019) Aberrant interactions of cortical networks in chronic migraine: a resting-state fMRI study. Neurology 92(22):e2550–e2558PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jia Z, Tang W, Zhao D, Yu S (2017) Disrupted functional connectivity between the periaqueductal gray and other brain regions in a rat model of recurrent headache. Sci Rep 7(1):3960PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mainero C, Boshyan J, Hadjikhani N (2011) Altered functional magnetic resonance imaging resting-state connectivity in periaqueductal gray networks in migraine. Ann Neurol 70(5):838–845PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marcori AJ, Martins Monteiro PH, Alves Okazaki VH (2019) Changing handedness: what can we learn from preference shift studies? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 107:313–319PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bes A, Kunkel R, Lance JW, Nappi G, Pfaffenrath V, Rose FC et al (2013) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 33(9):629–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Nieto-Castanon A (2012) Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect 2(3):125–141PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE (2012) Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59(3):2142–2154PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ding X, Yue X, Zheng R, Bi C, Li D, Yao G (2019) Classifying major depression patients and healthy controls using EEG, eye tracking and galvanic skin response data. J Affect Disord 251:156–161PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gong J, Wang J, Luo X, Chen G, Huang H, Huang R et al (2019) Abnormalities of intrinsic regional brain activity in first-episode and chronic schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of resting-state functional MRI. J Psychiatry Neurosci 44(6):180245PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hu L, Xiao M, Ai M, Wang W, Chen J, Tan Z et al (2019) Disruption of resting-state functional connectivity of right posterior insula in adolescents and young adults with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 257:23–30PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen Z, Chen X, Chen Z, Liu M, He H, Ma L et al (2017) Alteration of gray matter texture features over the whole brain in medication-overuse headache using a 3-dimentional texture analysis. J Headache Pain 18(1):112PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vossel S, Geng JJ, Fink GR (2014) Dorsal and ventral attention systems: distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. Neuroscientist 20(2):150–159PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Corbetta M, Patel G, Shulman GL (2008) The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron 58(3):306–324PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Szabo E, Galambos A, Kocsel N, Edes AE, Pap D, Zsombok T et al (2019) Association between migraine frequency and neural response to emotional faces: an fMRI study. Neuroimage Clin 22:101790PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Magon S, May A, Stankewitz A, Goadsby PJ, Schankin C, Ashina M et al (2019) Cortical abnormalities in episodic migraine: a multi-center 3T MRI study. Cephalalgia 39(5):665–673PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Russo A, Tessitore A, Giordano A, Corbo D, Marcuccio L, De Stefano M et al (2012) Executive resting-state network connectivity in migraine without aura. Cephalalgia 32(14):1041–1048PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Amin FM, Hougaard A, Magon S, Sprenger T, Wolfram F, Rostrup E et al (2018) Altered thalamic connectivity during spontaneous attacks of migraine without aura: a resting-state fMRI study. Cephalalgia 38(7):1237–1244PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang J, Wu Y, Su J, Yao Q, Wang M, Li G et al (2017) Assessment of gray and white matter structural alterations in migraineurs without aura. J Headache Pain 18(1):74PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yang M, Yang J, Zeng F, Liu P, Lai Z, Deng S et al (2014) Electroacupuncture stimulation at sub-specific acupoint and non-acupoint induced distinct brain glucose metabolism change in migraineurs: a PET-CT study. J Transl Med 12:351PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Qin Z, He X, Zhang J, Xu S, Li G, Su J et al (2019) Altered spontaneous activity and functional connectivity in the posterior pons of patients with migraine without Aura. J Pain S1526-5900(18):30904Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yang F, Chou K, Fuh J, Huang C, Lirng J, Lin Y et al (2013) Altered gray matter volume in the frontal pain modulation network in patients with cluster headache. Pain 154(6):801–807PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Liu J, Lan L, Li G, Yan X, Nan J, Xiong S et al (2013) Migraine-related gray matter and white matter changes at a 1-year follow-up evaluation. J Pain 14(12):1703–1708PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang P, Du H, Chen N, Guo J, Gong Q, Zhang J et al (2014) Regional homogeneity abnormalities in patients with tensiontype headache: a resting-state fMRI study. Neurosci Bull 30(6):949–955PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wager TD, Atlas LY, Lindquist MA, Roy M, Woo C, Kross E (2013) An fMRI-based neurologic signature of physical pain. New Engl J Med 368(15):1388–1397PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Carlsson K, Andersson J, Petrovic P, Petersson KM, Ohman A, Ingvar M (2006) Predictability modulates the affective and sensory-discriminative neural processing of pain. Neuroimage 32(4):1804–1814PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Arkink EB, Bleeker EJW, Schmitz N, Schoonman GG, Wu O, Ferrari MD et al (2012) Cerebral perfusion changes in migraineurs: a voxelwise comparison of interictal dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI measurements. Cephalalgia 32(4):279–288PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang JJ, Chen X, Sah SK, Zeng C, Li YM, Li N et al (2016) Amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) and fractional ALFF in migraine patients: a resting-state functional MRI study. Clin Radiol 71(6):558–564PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mehnert J, Schulte L, Timmann D, May A (2017) Activity and connectivity of the cerebellum in trigeminal nociception. Neuroimage 150:112–118PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Moulton EA, Becerra L, Johnson A, Burstein R, Borsook D (2014) Altered hypothalamic functional connectivity with autonomic circuits and the locus coeruleus in migraine. PLoS One 9(4):e95508PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Belkhiria C, Mssedi E, Habas C, Driss T, de Marco G (2019) Collaboration of cerebello-rubral and cerebello-striatal loops in a motor preparation task. Cerebellum 18(2):203–211PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stankewitz A, May A (2011) Increased limbic and brainstem activity during migraine attacks following olfactory stimulation. Neurology 77(5):476–482PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Russo A, Tessitore A, Silvestro M, Di Nardo F, Trojsi F, Del Santo T et al (2019) Advanced visual network and cerebellar hyperresponsiveness to trigeminal nociception in migraine with aura. J Headache Pain 20(1):46PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jiang H, Deng Y, Zhang Y, Jin J, Kong X, Zhu Q et al (2016) Field testing of the ICHD-3β and expert opinion criteria for chronic migraine. J Headache Pain 17(1):85PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Nanjing First HospitalNanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Neurology, Nanjing First HospitalNanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
  3. 3.Department of Pain Treatment, Nanjing First HospitalNanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations