Advertisement

Genome Biology

, 12:I17 | Cite as

Comparative analysis of the vaginal microbiome in health and disease

  • Bryan A White
  • Andres M Gomez
  • Mengfei Ho
  • Margret Berg Miller
  • Susan M Thomas
  • Carl J Yeoman
  • Suleyman Yildirim
  • Douglas J Creedon
  • Tony L Goldberg
  • Steven R Leigh
  • Karen E Nelson
  • Rebecca M Stumpf
  • Brenda A Wilson
Open Access
Invited speaker presentation
  • 1.3k Downloads

Keywords

Microbial Community Lactobacillus Preterm Birth Bacterial Vaginosis Metagenome Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Diseases of the vaginal tract result from perturbations of the complex interactions among microbes of the host vaginal ecosystem. Recent advances in our understanding of these complex interactions have been enabled by next-generation-sequencing-based approaches, which make it possible to study the vaginal microbiome. In harnessing these approaches, we are beginning to define what constitutes an imbalance of the vaginal microbiome and how such imbalances, along with associated host factors, lead to infection and disease states such as bacterial vaginosis (BV), preterm births, and susceptibility to HIV and other sexually acquired infections. We have exploited various approaches to this end: comparative analysis of reference microbial genomes of vaginal isolates; comparative microbiome, metabolome and metagenome analysis of vaginal communities from subjects deemed to be healthy and individuals with BV; and comparative microbiome analysis of vaginal communities from humans and non-human primate species. The results from comparative genome sequencing have led us to suggest that different strains of the proposed pathogen Gardnerella vaginalis have different virulence potentials and that the detection of G. vaginalis in the vaginal tract is not indicative of a disease state [1]. Comparative microbiome, metabolome and metagenome analysis of vaginal communities from humans has demonstrated that the microbial communities from subjects with BV have a defined bacterial composition and metabolic profile that is distinct from subjects who do not have BV [2 and unpublished observations]. Our studies of microbial communities from non-human primate species and humans provide a unique comparative context. From an evolutionary perspective, humans and non-human primates differ considerably in mating habits, estrus cycles and gestation period. Moreover, birth is difficult in humans relative to other primates, increasing the risks of maternal injury and infection. In light of these numerous differences between humans and non-human primates, we hypothesize that humans have microbial populations that are distinct from those of non-human primates. Preliminary results show that the vaginal microbiomes of non-human primates are more diverse and are compositionally distinct from human vaginal microbiomes [3, 4]. The composition of bacterial genera found in non-human primates is dissimilar to that seen in humans, most notably with lactobacilli being much less abundant in non-human primates. Our observations point to vaginal microbial communities being an important component of an evolutionary set of adaptations that separates humans from other primates and is of fundamental importance to health and reproductive function.

References

  1. 1.
    Yeoman CJ, Yildirim S, Thomas SM, Durkin AS, Torralba M, Sutton G, Buhay CJ, Ding Y, Dugan-Rocha SP, Muzny DM, Qin X, Gibbs RA, Leigh SR, Stumpf R, White BA, Highlander SK, Nelson KE, Wilson BA: Comparative genomics of Gardnerella vaginalis strains reveals substantial differences in metabolic and virulence potential. PLoS ONE. 2010, 5: e12411-10.1371/journal.pone.0012411.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim TK, Thomas SM, Ho M, Sharma S, Reich CI, Frank JA, Yeater KM, Biggs D, Nakamura N, Stumpf R, Leigh SR, Tapping RI, Blanke SR, Slauch JM, Gaskins HR, Weisbaum JS, Olsen GJ, Hoyer LL, Wilson BA: Heterogeneity of vaginal microbial communities within individuals. J Clin Microbiol. 2009, 47: 1181-1189. 10.1128/JCM.00854-08.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rivera AJ, Frank JA, Stumpf R, Salyers AA, Wilson BA, Olsen GJ, Leigh S: Differences between the normal vaginal bacterial community of baboons and that of humans. Am J Primatol. 2011, 73: 119-126. 10.1002/ajp.20851.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rivera AJ, Stumpf RM, Wilson B, Leigh S, Salyers AA: Baboon vaginal microbiota: an overlooked aspect of primate physiology. Am J Primatol. 2010, 72: 467-474.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© White et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bryan A White
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Andres M Gomez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mengfei Ho
    • 4
  • Margret Berg Miller
    • 1
  • Susan M Thomas
    • 1
  • Carl J Yeoman
    • 1
  • Suleyman Yildirim
    • 1
  • Douglas J Creedon
    • 5
  • Tony L Goldberg
    • 6
  • Steven R Leigh
    • 1
    • 7
  • Karen E Nelson
    • 8
  • Rebecca M Stumpf
    • 1
    • 7
  • Brenda A Wilson
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.The Institute for Genomic BiologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Animal SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  3. 3.Division of Biomedical SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  4. 4.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  6. 6.Department of Pathobiological SciencesUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  7. 7.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  8. 8.J. Craig Venter InstituteRockvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations