Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical Interactions in a Clinical Trial

  • Biostatistics: Original Research
  • Published:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New statisticians entering industry tend to “test statistical interactions” whenever there is a need. However, in many real-world applications, especially in clinical development of new drugs, most interactions need to be estimated, instead of tested. In this manuscript, the distinction between hypothesis testing and estimation will be articulated, and the use of statistical interactions in clinical development programs will be discussed. According to ICH E-9, the treatment by subgroup interaction should not be included in the prespecified primary statistical analysis model. The reasons behind this ICH E-9 recommendation are also clarified in this manuscript.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108. Published 2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ting N. Confirm and explore, a stepwise approach to clinical trial design. Drug Inform J. 2008:42:545–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Topic E9: Statistical principles for clinical trials. European Medicines Agency, 1998.

  4. Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH, Hunter DJ, Drazen JM. Statistics in medicine—reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2189–2194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chuang-Stein C, Li Y, Kawai N, Komiyama O, Kuribayashi K. Detecting safety signals in subgroups. In: Jiang Q, Xia HA, eds. Quantitative Evaluation of Safety in Drug Development: Design, Analysis and Reporting. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guideline on the investigation of subgroups in confirmatory clinical trials (draft). European Medicines Agency, 2014.

  7. Mallinckrodt CH, Lane PW, Schnell D, Peng Y, Mancuso JP. Recommendations for the primary analysis of continuous endpoints in longitudinal clinical trials. Drug Inform J. 2008;42:303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Stat Med. 2002;21:2917–2930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lagakos S. “The challenge of subgroup analyses: reporting without distorting.” N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1667–1669.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen J, Quan H, Binkowitz B, et al. Assessing consistent treatment effect in a multi-regional clinical trial: a systematic review. Pharm Stat. 2010;9:242–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen J, Wang H. Multiregional clinical trials: assessing consistency of treatment effect. Multiregional clinical trials for simultaneous global new drug development. New York: CRC Press; 2016.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Zink RC, Shen L, Wolfinger RD, Showalter HDH. “Assessment of methods to identify patient subgroups with enhanced treatment response in randomized clinical trials.” In: Chen Z, Liu A, Qu Y, Tang L, Ting N, Tsong Y, eds. Applied Statistics in Biomedicine and Clinical Trials Design: Selected Papers from 2013 ICSA/ISBS Joint Statistical Meetings. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naitee Ting PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ting, N. Statistical Interactions in a Clinical Trial. Ther Innov Regul Sci 52, 14–21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479017716491

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479017716491

Keywords

Navigation