Abstract
Background
This study compared the timing, regulatory marketing authorization decisions, and the final labeling for products submitted to Swissmedic to those submitted to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA).
Methods
The Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS) conducted an analysis of a representative cohort of 63 new molecular entities (NMEs) that were submitted to Swissmedic from 2006 through 2010 and that were also submitted to, and approved by, the EMA centralized procedure and FDA. Parameters considered included the outcome and timing of regulatory marketing authorization decisions and the comparison of each product’s Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) from the 3 agencies. The results were presented at the Swissmedic 10th Anniversary Symposium, “The Challenges of Regulation and Changing Regulations Paradigms,” and they form the basis of this article.
Results
The median approval times for these NMEs were longer for Swissmedic (480 days) compared with FDA (303 days) and EMA (416 days). However, if an expedited application review procedure (a “priority review” [FDA], “accelerated assessment” [EMA], or “accelerated review” [Swissmedic]) was applied, Swissmedic was faster (207 days) than EMA (300 days) and essentially as fast as FDA (229 days). The main differences were in the nature of the wording of parts of the initial SPC, particularly the “Contraindications” and “Special warnings and precautions” for FDA and “Special warnings and precautions” for EMA.
Conclusions
Results suggest there is no clear evidence that Swissmedic was substantially different in its initial regulatory decisions or SPC recommendations compared with the EMA or FDA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Swissmedic. Swissmedic Annual Report 2012. https://www.swissmedic.ch/ueber/00134/00441/00445/00568/index.html?&download=NHzLpZeg7t,lnp6I0NTU042l2Z6ln1ad1IZn4Z2qZpnO2Yuq2Z6gpJCDdYN3fmym162epYbg2c_JjKbNoKSn6A—. Accessed April 2014.
Dörr P. Improving agency performance: what needs to be measured? In: McAuslane N, Liberti L, Connelly P, eds. “Regional Alignment in Asia Pacific: What needs to be in the regulatory science “toolkit” to enable good regulatory decision making?” http://www.cirsci.org/system/files/private/January_%202011%20Workshop_070711_lowres.pdf. Published January 2011. Accessed March 2013.
Lanier L. Identifying best practice through benchmarking and outcome measurement. Insight. 2004;29:12–14.
McAuslane N, Cone M, Collins J, Walker S. Emerging markets and emerging agencies: a comparative study of how key regulatory agencies in Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and Africa are developing regulatory processes and review models for new medicinal products. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2009;43:349–359.
Hirako M, McAuslane N, Salek S, Anderson C, Walker S. A comparison of the drug review process at five international regulatory agencies. Drug Inform J. 2007;41:291–308.
Heads of Medicines Agencies. Benchmarking European medicines agencies. http://www.hma.eu/uploads/media/BEMA_executive_1st_cycle.pdf. Accessed March 2013.
European Medicines Agency. Cimzia (certolizumab pegol). http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/medicines/000740/human_med_000700.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d125. Accessed April 2014.
USFDA. Lenalidomide: Highlights of prescribing information. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/021880s034lbl.pdf. Accessed April 2014.
New drug approvals in ICH countries: 2002–2011. http://cirsci.org/sites/default/files/NewdrugapprovalsinICHcountries2002-11forrelease.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2016.
Johnson JR, Ning YM, Farrell A, Justice R, Keegan P, Pazdur R. Accelerated approval of oncology products: the food and drug administration experience. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:636–644.
Tafuri G, Trotta F, Leufkens HG, Pani L. Disclosure of grounds of European withdrawn and refused applications: a step forward on regulatory transparency. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;75:1149–1151.
Fischhoff B. Good decision making requires good communication. Drug Saf. 2012;35:983–993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dörr, P., Wadworth, A., Wang, T. et al. An Analysis of Regulatory Timing and Outcomes for New Drug Applications Submitted to Swissmedic: Comparison With the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. Ther Innov Regul Sci 50, 734–742 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479016655841
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479016655841