Abstract
Complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) involves using practices outside mainstream Western medicine, often derived from Eastern traditional medicine, and combining those practices with Western medicine. Conducting CIM research that is necessary to determine whether particular interventions are beneficial and safe will involve a set of ethical challenges. Institutional review boards (IRBs), also known as research ethics committees or research ethics boards, are responsible for determining that research studies involving human subjects appropriately address ethical and regulatory concerns inherent to the research. Like other research with human subjects, research involving CIM is subject to ethical review and ongoing oversight by an IRB. IRBs are often challenged by the review of CIM. These challenges include accounting for cultural differences and the interests of competing stakeholders. In this report, we describe these issues that were the focus of a workshop that was part of an international conference held in Seoul, Korea, on April 4, 2015.
References
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Complementary, alternative, or integrative health: what’s in a name? https://nccih.nih.gov/health/integrative-health.
Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM. Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997–2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005;11(1):42–49.
Vogel JH, Bolling SF, Costello RB, et al. Integrating complementary medicine into cardiovascular medicine. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (Writing Committee to Develop an Expert Consensus Document on Complementary and Integrative Medicine). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(1):184–221.
Cassileth BR, Deng G. Complementary and alternative therapies for cancer. Oncologist. 2004;9(1):80–89.
Sugarman J, Burk L. Physicians’ ethical obligations regarding alternative medicine. JAMA 1998; 280: 1623–1625.
The medical case, trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. United States v Karl Brandt et al. Washington, DC: US GPO, 1949.
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Ferney-Voltaire, France: World Medical Association, 64th Annual Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1979. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html
World Health Organization. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy: 2014–2023. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health website. https://nccih.nih.gov/.
Protection of Human Subjects. 45 CFR 46. Revised January 15, 2009. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html
IRB membership. Protection of Human Subjects. 45 CFR 46.107. Revised January 15, 2009. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html#46.107
Criteria for IRB approval of research. Protection of Human Subjects. 45 CFR 46.111. Revised January 15, 2009. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html#46.111
Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections (SACHRP): Appendix B. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sachrp/sachrpltrtohhssecapdb.html
Fugh-Berman A. Herb-drug interactions. Lancet. 2000;355(9198):134–138.
Ang-Lee MK, Moss J, Yuan CS. Herbal medicines and perioperative care. JAMA. 2001;286(2):208–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooper, J.A., Borasky, D., Rosenfeld, S. et al. Challenges in the Ethical Review of Research Involving Complementary and Integrative Medicine. Ther Innov Regul Sci 50, 337–341 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479015620246
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479015620246