Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monoclonal Antibody Against Prolactin Receptor: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Repeated Subcutaneous Administrations in Postmenopausal Women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BAY 1158061 is a potent monoclonal prolactin (PRL) receptor antibody, blocking PRL receptor (PRLR)-mediated signaling in a noncompetitive manner, which was tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled multiple dose study in postmenopausal women. The objective was to investigate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and effects of BAY 1158061 on serum PRL level. The study consisted of 4 parallel groups receiving up to 3 subcutaneous (sc) administrations of BAY 1158061 or placebo in 2 different dosing regimens. Twenty-nine healthy postmenopausal women were randomized and treated with BAY 1158061 or placebo: 30 mg at 14-day interval (7 participants), 60 mg at 28-day interval (8 participants), 90 mg at 14-day interval (7 participants), and placebo (7 participants). To keep the blinding, all randomized participants received sc injections biweekly (14-day interval) on 3 occasions in the lower abdomen. The PRLR antibody showed a favorable safety and tolerability profile in postmenopausal women with no distinct differences in occurrence of adverse events in BAY 1158061 or placebo-treated participants. BAY 1158061 displayed low immunogenicity with low titers of antidrug antibodies and absence of neutralizing antidrug antibodies. Pharmacokinetics were characterized by slow absorption after sc administration with median peak plasma concentrations 7 to 11 days after first dose and about 2-fold accumulation after repeated dosing every 2 weeks. The apparent mean elimination half-life was 9 to 16 days. The PRL concentration—time profiles over 24 hours showed no differences between verum- and placebo-treated participants. Based on the data obtained, BAY 1158061 is considered a good candidate for further development in endometriosis or other PRL-mediated disease conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marano RJ, Ben-Jonathan N. Minireview: extrapituitary prolactin: an update on the distribution, regulation and functions. Mol Endocrinol. 2014;28(5):622–633.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Freeman ME, Kanyicska B, Lerant A, Nagy G. Prolactin: structure, function and regulation of secretion. Physiol Rev. 2000;80(4):1523–1631.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellis AD, Bizzarro A, Antonio Bellastella A. Role of prolactin in autoimmune diseases. In: Sara E. Walker, Luis J. Jara, eds. Handbook of Systemic Autoimmune Diseases Vol 9; 2008:29–43. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shelly S, Boaz M, Orbach H. Prolactin and autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;11(6–7):A465–A470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernard V, Young J, Chanson P, Binart N. New insights in prolactin: pathological implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(5):265–275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ignacak A, Kasztelnik M, Sliwa T, Korbut RA, Rajda K, Guzik TJ. Prolactin — not only lactotropin — a “new” view of the “old” hormone. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2012;63(5):435–443.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernichtein S, Touraine P, Goffin V: New concepts in prolactin biology. J Endocrinol. 2010;206(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sumiyoshi T. Possible dose-side effect relationship of antipsychotic drugs: relevance to cognitive function in schizophrenia. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2008;1(6):791–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fitzgerald P, Dinan TG. Prolactin and dopamine: what is the connection? a review article. J Psychopharmacol. 2008;22(2 suppl):12–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerlo S, Davis JR, Mager DL, Kooijman R. Prolactin in man: a tale of two promoters. Bioassays. 2006;28(10):1051–1055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gourdou I, Gabou L, Paly J, Kermabon AY, Belair L, Djiane J. Development of a constitutively active mutant form of the prolactin receptor, a member of the cytokine receptor family. Mol Endocrinol. 1996;10(1):45–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee RC, Walters JA, Reyland ME, Anderson SM. Constitutive activation of the prolactin receptor results in the induction of growth factor-independent proliferation and constitutive activation of signaling molecules. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(15):10024–10034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goffin V, Touraine P. The prolactin receptor as a therapeutic target in human diseases: browsing new potential indications. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2015;19(9):1229–1244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gregoriou G, Bakas P, Vitoratos N, et al. G. Evaluation of serum prolactin levels in patients with endometriosis and infertility. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;48(1):48–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lima AP, Moura MD, Rosa e Silva AA. Prolactin and cortisol levels in women with endometriosis. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006;39(8):1121–1127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gómez R, Abad A, Delgado F, Tamarit S, Simón C, Pellicer A. Effects of hyperprolactinemia treatment with the dopamine agonist quinagolide on endometriotic lesions in patients with endometriosis-associated hyperprolactinemia. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):882–888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Craven AJ, Nixon AJ, Ashby MG, et al. Prolactin delays hair regrowth in mice. J Endocrinol. 2006;191(2):415–425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Foitzik K, Langan EA, Paus R. Prolactin and the Skin: a Dermatological Perspective on an Ancient Pleiotropic Peptide Hormone. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129(5):1071–1087.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Agarwal N, Machiels JP, Suarez C, et al. Phase I study of the prolactin receptor antagonist LFA102 in metastatic breast and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Oncologist. 2016;21(5):535–536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Otto C, Särnefält A, Ljungars A, et al. A neutralizing prolactin receptor antibody whose in vivo application mimics the phenotype of female prolactin receptor-deficient mice. Endocrinology. 2015;156(11):4365–4373.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Salfeld JG. Isotype selection in antibody engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(12):1369–1372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Damiano JS, Rendahl KG, Karim C, et al. Neutralization of prolactin receptor function by monoclonal antibody lfa102, a novel potential therapeutic for the treatment of breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(3):295–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. EMEA/CHMP/EWP: Guideline on Immunogenicity assessment of biotechnology-derived therapeutic proteins. 2015. Web site. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2015/10/WC500194507.pdf

  24. FDA CDER-Guidance for Industry: Bioanalytical Method Validation, 2001. Web site. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidance/ucm070107.pdf

  25. EMEA/CHMP/EWP: Guideline on bioanalytical method validation, 2012. Web site. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2011/08/WC500109686.pdf

  26. Shankar G, Pendley C, Stein KE. A risk-based bioanalytical strategy for the assessment of antibody immune response against biological drugs. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(5):555–561.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Richter WF, Jacobsen B. Subcutaneous absorption of biotherapeutics: knowns and unknowns. Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42(11):1881–1889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mager EM. Target-mediated drug disposition and dynamics. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006,72(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Keizer RJ, Huitema AD, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH. Clinical pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010;49(8):493–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dostalek M, Gardner I, Gurbaxani BM, Rose RH, Chetty M. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and physically-based pharmacokinetic modelling of monoclonal antibodies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013;52(2):83–124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Deng R, Jin F, Prabhu S, Lyer S. Monoclonal antibodies: what are the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics considerations for drug development. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxico. 2012;8(2):141–160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rüdiger Nave PhD.

Additional information

Authors’ Note

Rüdiger Nave and Stefan Jodl contributed equally to this publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nave, R., Jodl, S., Hoffmann, A. et al. Monoclonal Antibody Against Prolactin Receptor: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Repeated Subcutaneous Administrations in Postmenopausal Women. Reprod. Sci. 26, 523–531 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719118776806

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719118776806

Keywords

Navigation