Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of Molecular Changes in Endometrium Associated With Chronic Use of Progesterone Receptor Modulators: Ulipristal Acetate Versus Mifepristone

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ulipristal acetate (UPA) is a selective progesterone receptor modulator (PRM), which is used as an emergency contraceptive in women. Recent studies demonstrated the efficacy of an UPA contraceptive vaginal ring (UPA-CVR) as a blocker of ovulation. However, the endometrium of women exposed to UPA over a 6-month period display glandular changes, termed PRM-associated endometrial changes (PAECs). We, therefore, investigated whether UPA-induced PAECs are associated with altered expression of the transcription factor heart- and neural crest derivatives-expressed protein 2 (HAND2) whose downregulation is observed in endometrial epithelial hyperplasia and cancer. Our results showed that while exposure to mifepristone, a well-known PRM, leads to suppression of endometrial HAND2 expression, long-term exposure to UPA-CVR did not cause downregulation of this marker. Further studies, using human primary endometrial stromal cells, confirmed that whereas mifepristone-mediated suppression of HAND2 elevated the levels of its downstream target fibroblast growth factor 18, UPA did not significantly alter the expression of this growth factor. A rationale for the differential regulation of HAND2 by these PRMs was provided by our observation that mifepristone-bound progesterone receptors turn over at a faster rate than those bound to UPA. Collectively, these results support the selective effects of different PRMs and indicate that chronic exposure to UPA does not alter the HAND2 pathway whose dysregulation is linked to complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. The results from this study involving a limited number of clinical samples should pave the way for a larger study to determine the safety of UPA for long-term use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wagenfeld A, Saunders PT, Whitaker L, Critchley HO. Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs): progesterone receptor action, mode of action on the endometrium and treatment options in gynecological therapies. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2016;20(9):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Glasier A: The rationale for use of ulipristal acetate as first line in emergency contraception: biological and clinical evidence. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(10):688–690.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Glasier AF, Cameron ST, Fine PM, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):555–562.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gainer EE, Ulmann A. Pharmacologic properties of CDB(VA)-2914. Steroids. 2003;68(10-13):1005–1011.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nichols MI. Ulipristal acetate: a novel molecule and 5-day emergency contraceptive. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1252–1253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brache V, Cochon L, Jesam C, et al. Immediate pre-ovulatory administration of 30 mg ulipristal acetate significantly delays follicular rupture. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2256–2263.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blithe DL, Nieman LK, Blye RP, Stratton P, Passaro M. Development of the selective progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 for clinical indications. Steroids. 2003;68(10-13): 1013–1017.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Creinin MD, Schlaff W, Archer DF, et al. Progesterone receptor modulator for emergency contraception: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(5):1089–1097.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Donnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vazquez F, et al. PEARL II study group. Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(5):421–432.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernandez H, Schmidt T, Powell M, Costa AP, Arriagada P, Thaler C. Real world data of 1473 patients treated with ulipristal acetate for uterine fibroids: Premya study results. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;208:91–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang Y, Jensen JT, Brache V, et al. A randomized study on pharmacodynamic effects of vaginal rings delivering the progesterone receptor modulator ulipristal acetate: research for a novel estrogen-free, method of contraception. Contraception. 2014;90(6):565–574.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mutter GL, Bergeron C, Deligdisch L, et al. The spectrum of endometrial pathology induced by progesterone receptor modulators. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(5):591–598.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pawar S, Hantak AM, Bagchi IC, Bagchi MK. Minireview: steroid-regulated paracrine mechanisms controlling implantation. Mol Endocrinol. 2014;28(9):1408–1422.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hantak AM, Bagchi IC, Bagchi MK. Role of uterine stromal-epithelial crosstalk in embryo implantation. Int J Dev Biol. 2014;58(2-4):139–146.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chandra V, Kim JJ, Benbrook DM, Dwivedi A, Rai R. Therapeutic options for management of endometrial hyperplasia. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016;27(1):e8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horn LC, Schnurrbusch U, Bilek K, Hentschel B, Einenkel J. Risk of progression in complex and atypical endometrial hyperplasia: clinicopathologic analysis in cases with and without progestogen treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14(2):348–353.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Daud S, Jalil SS, Griffin M, Ewies AA. Endometrial hyperpla-sia—the dilemma of management remains: a retrospective observational study of 280 women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. Reprod Biol. 2011;159(1):172–175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang S, Thiel KW, Leslie KK. Progesterone: the ultimate endo-metrial tumor suppressor. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2011;22(4):145–152.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2005;366(9484):491–505.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Q, Kannan A, DeMayo FJ, et al. The antiproliferative action of progesterone in uterine epithelium is mediated by Hand2. Science. 2011;331(6019):912–916.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones A, Teschendorff AE, Li Q, et al. Role of DNA methylation and epigenetic silencing of HAND2 in endometrial cancer development. PLoS Med. 2013;10(11):e1001551.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Whitaker LH, Murray AA, Matthews R, et al. Selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM) ulipristal acetate (UPA) and its effects on the human endometrium. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(3):531–543.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pritts EA, Ryan IP, Mueller MD, et al. Angiogenic effects of norplant contraception on endometrial histology and uterine bleeding. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(4):2142–2147.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaya HS, Hantak AM, Stubbs LJ, Taylor RN, Bagchi IC, Bagchi MK. Roles of progesterone receptor A and B isoforms during human endometrial decidualization. Mol Endocrinol. 2015;29(6):882–895.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Li Q, Kannan A, Das A, Demayo FJ, et al. WNT4 acts downstream of BMP2 and functions via beta-catenin signaling pathway to regulate human endometrial stromal cell differentiation. Endocrinology. 2013;154(1):446–457.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Flannery CA, Fleming AG, Choe GH, et al. Endometrial cancer-associated FGF18 expression is reduced by bazedoxifene in human endometrial stromal cells in vitro and in murine endometrium. Endocrinology. 2016;157(10):3699–3708.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim JJ, Chapman-Davis E. Role of progesterone in endometrial cancer. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28(1):81–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Glasier AF, Wang H, Davie JE, Kelly RW, Critchley HO. Administration of an antiprogesterone up-regulates estrogen receptors in the endometrium of women using norplant: a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(2):366–372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Boggavarapu NR, Berger C, von Grothusen C, Menezes J, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Lalitkumar PG. Effects of low doses of mifepristone on human embryo implantation process in a three-dimensional human endometrial in vitro co-culture system. Contraception. 2016;94(2):143–151.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Greb RR, Kiesel L, Selbmann AK, et al. Disparate actions of mifepristone (RU 486) on glands and stroma in the primate endo-metrium. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):198–206.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Indrani C. Bagchi PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kannan, A., Bhurke, A., Sitruk-Ware, R. et al. Characterization of Molecular Changes in Endometrium Associated With Chronic Use of Progesterone Receptor Modulators: Ulipristal Acetate Versus Mifepristone. Reprod. Sci. 25, 320–328 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117746764

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117746764

Keywords

Navigation