Abstract
Ulipristal acetate (UPA) is a selective progesterone receptor modulator (PRM), which is used as an emergency contraceptive in women. Recent studies demonstrated the efficacy of an UPA contraceptive vaginal ring (UPA-CVR) as a blocker of ovulation. However, the endometrium of women exposed to UPA over a 6-month period display glandular changes, termed PRM-associated endometrial changes (PAECs). We, therefore, investigated whether UPA-induced PAECs are associated with altered expression of the transcription factor heart- and neural crest derivatives-expressed protein 2 (HAND2) whose downregulation is observed in endometrial epithelial hyperplasia and cancer. Our results showed that while exposure to mifepristone, a well-known PRM, leads to suppression of endometrial HAND2 expression, long-term exposure to UPA-CVR did not cause downregulation of this marker. Further studies, using human primary endometrial stromal cells, confirmed that whereas mifepristone-mediated suppression of HAND2 elevated the levels of its downstream target fibroblast growth factor 18, UPA did not significantly alter the expression of this growth factor. A rationale for the differential regulation of HAND2 by these PRMs was provided by our observation that mifepristone-bound progesterone receptors turn over at a faster rate than those bound to UPA. Collectively, these results support the selective effects of different PRMs and indicate that chronic exposure to UPA does not alter the HAND2 pathway whose dysregulation is linked to complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. The results from this study involving a limited number of clinical samples should pave the way for a larger study to determine the safety of UPA for long-term use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wagenfeld A, Saunders PT, Whitaker L, Critchley HO. Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs): progesterone receptor action, mode of action on the endometrium and treatment options in gynecological therapies. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2016;20(9):1–10.
Glasier A: The rationale for use of ulipristal acetate as first line in emergency contraception: biological and clinical evidence. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(10):688–690.
Glasier AF, Cameron ST, Fine PM, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a randomised non-inferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):555–562.
Gainer EE, Ulmann A. Pharmacologic properties of CDB(VA)-2914. Steroids. 2003;68(10-13):1005–1011.
Nichols MI. Ulipristal acetate: a novel molecule and 5-day emergency contraceptive. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1252–1253.
Brache V, Cochon L, Jesam C, et al. Immediate pre-ovulatory administration of 30 mg ulipristal acetate significantly delays follicular rupture. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2256–2263.
Blithe DL, Nieman LK, Blye RP, Stratton P, Passaro M. Development of the selective progesterone receptor modulator CDB-2914 for clinical indications. Steroids. 2003;68(10-13): 1013–1017.
Creinin MD, Schlaff W, Archer DF, et al. Progesterone receptor modulator for emergency contraception: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(5):1089–1097.
Donnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vazquez F, et al. PEARL II study group. Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(5):421–432.
Fernandez H, Schmidt T, Powell M, Costa AP, Arriagada P, Thaler C. Real world data of 1473 patients treated with ulipristal acetate for uterine fibroids: Premya study results. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;208:91–96.
Huang Y, Jensen JT, Brache V, et al. A randomized study on pharmacodynamic effects of vaginal rings delivering the progesterone receptor modulator ulipristal acetate: research for a novel estrogen-free, method of contraception. Contraception. 2014;90(6):565–574.
Mutter GL, Bergeron C, Deligdisch L, et al. The spectrum of endometrial pathology induced by progesterone receptor modulators. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(5):591–598.
Pawar S, Hantak AM, Bagchi IC, Bagchi MK. Minireview: steroid-regulated paracrine mechanisms controlling implantation. Mol Endocrinol. 2014;28(9):1408–1422.
Hantak AM, Bagchi IC, Bagchi MK. Role of uterine stromal-epithelial crosstalk in embryo implantation. Int J Dev Biol. 2014;58(2-4):139–146.
Chandra V, Kim JJ, Benbrook DM, Dwivedi A, Rai R. Therapeutic options for management of endometrial hyperplasia. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016;27(1):e8.
Horn LC, Schnurrbusch U, Bilek K, Hentschel B, Einenkel J. Risk of progression in complex and atypical endometrial hyperplasia: clinicopathologic analysis in cases with and without progestogen treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14(2):348–353.
Daud S, Jalil SS, Griffin M, Ewies AA. Endometrial hyperpla-sia—the dilemma of management remains: a retrospective observational study of 280 women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. Reprod Biol. 2011;159(1):172–175.
Yang S, Thiel KW, Leslie KK. Progesterone: the ultimate endo-metrial tumor suppressor. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2011;22(4):145–152.
Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2005;366(9484):491–505.
Li Q, Kannan A, DeMayo FJ, et al. The antiproliferative action of progesterone in uterine epithelium is mediated by Hand2. Science. 2011;331(6019):912–916.
Jones A, Teschendorff AE, Li Q, et al. Role of DNA methylation and epigenetic silencing of HAND2 in endometrial cancer development. PLoS Med. 2013;10(11):e1001551.
Whitaker LH, Murray AA, Matthews R, et al. Selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM) ulipristal acetate (UPA) and its effects on the human endometrium. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(3):531–543.
Pritts EA, Ryan IP, Mueller MD, et al. Angiogenic effects of norplant contraception on endometrial histology and uterine bleeding. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(4):2142–2147.
Kaya HS, Hantak AM, Stubbs LJ, Taylor RN, Bagchi IC, Bagchi MK. Roles of progesterone receptor A and B isoforms during human endometrial decidualization. Mol Endocrinol. 2015;29(6):882–895.
Li Q, Kannan A, Das A, Demayo FJ, et al. WNT4 acts downstream of BMP2 and functions via beta-catenin signaling pathway to regulate human endometrial stromal cell differentiation. Endocrinology. 2013;154(1):446–457.
Flannery CA, Fleming AG, Choe GH, et al. Endometrial cancer-associated FGF18 expression is reduced by bazedoxifene in human endometrial stromal cells in vitro and in murine endometrium. Endocrinology. 2016;157(10):3699–3708.
Kim JJ, Chapman-Davis E. Role of progesterone in endometrial cancer. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28(1):81–90.
Glasier AF, Wang H, Davie JE, Kelly RW, Critchley HO. Administration of an antiprogesterone up-regulates estrogen receptors in the endometrium of women using norplant: a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(2):366–372.
Boggavarapu NR, Berger C, von Grothusen C, Menezes J, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Lalitkumar PG. Effects of low doses of mifepristone on human embryo implantation process in a three-dimensional human endometrial in vitro co-culture system. Contraception. 2016;94(2):143–151.
Greb RR, Kiesel L, Selbmann AK, et al. Disparate actions of mifepristone (RU 486) on glands and stroma in the primate endo-metrium. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):198–206.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kannan, A., Bhurke, A., Sitruk-Ware, R. et al. Characterization of Molecular Changes in Endometrium Associated With Chronic Use of Progesterone Receptor Modulators: Ulipristal Acetate Versus Mifepristone. Reprod. Sci. 25, 320–328 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117746764
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117746764