Skip to main content
Log in

Use of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Combined With CA-125 to Distinguish Endometriomas From Other Benign Ovarian Cysts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) compared to CA-125 in patients with endometriomas.

Methods

This study was designed as a retrospective comparative study. A total of 807 women who underwent surgery due to benign ovarian cysts between January 2008 and January 2013 were included in the study. The NLR and CA-125 levels were assessed separately and together, with a receiver–operating characteristic curve analysis for the diagnosis of endometriomas.

Results

The mean serum levels of NLR, CA-125, and combined markers were significantly higher in the study group (all P < .001). According to the highest Youden index, the cutoff values were found to be 23.7 IU/mL for CA-125 at 75% sensitivity and 81% specificity and 1.89 for NLR at 70% sensitivity and 74% specificity. The cutoff value for the combined marker was 41.0 with 80% sensitivity and 82% specificity. There was a positive correlation between NLR and CA-125 (P < .001). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was also positively correlated with the endometriosis score (P < .001).

Conclusions

Although NLR is a simple and easily applicable marker, CA-125 is superior for differentiating endometriomas from other benign ovarian cysts. The combination of these 2 markers improves diagnostic accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Witz CA, Burns WN. Endometriosis and infertility: is there a cause and effect relationships? Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002; 53(suppl 1):2–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tokmak A, Ugur M, Tonguc E, Var T, Moraloğlu O, Ozaksit G. The value of urocortin and Ca-125 in the diagnosis of endometrioma. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283(5):1075–1079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eskenazi B, Warner M, Bonsignore L, Olive D, Samuels S, Vercellini P. Validation study of nonsurgical diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(5):929–935.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. May KE, Conduit-Hulbert SA, Villar J, Kirtley S, Kennedy SH, Becker CM. Peripheral biomarkers of endometriosis: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(6):651–674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirsch M, Davis CJ. Preoperative assessment and diagnosis of endometriosis: are we any closer? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(4):284–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nisolle M. Ovarian endometriosis and peritoneal endometriosis: are they different entities from a fertility perspective? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;14(3):283–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nisolle M, Casanas-Roux F, Donnez J. Immunohistochemical analysis of proliferative activity and steroid receptor expression in peritoneal and ovarian endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1997; 68(5):912–919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Redwine DB. Ovarian endometriosis: a marker for more extensive pelvic and intestinal disease. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(2):310–315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giudice LC, Kao LC. Endometriosis. Lancet. 2004;364(9447): 1789–1799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Allan CJ, Metzger DA, Sears DL. Clinical and histologic classification of endometriomas. Implications for a mechanism of pathogenesis. J Reprod Med. 1992;37(9): 77176.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dupuis CS, Kim YH. Ultrasonography of adnexal causes of acute pelvic pain in pre-menopausal non-pregnant women. Ultrasonography. 2015;34(4):258–267. doi:10.14366/usg.15013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanchez AM, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Panina-Bordignon P, Vercellini P, Candiani M. The distinguishing cellular and molecular features of the endometriotic ovarian cyst: from pathophysiology to the potential endometrioma-mediated damage to the ovary. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(2):217–230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sayan CD, Özakşit MG, Sarıkaya E, Eryılmaz ÖG, Mollamahmutoğlu L, Deveer R. Serum interleukin-8, CA-125 levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios, and combined markers in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Turkish J Med Sci. 2013;43(3): 417–423.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Agic A, Xu H, Finas D, Banz C, Diedrich K, Hornung D. Is endometriosis associated with systemic subclinical inflammation? Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;62(3):139–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vodolazkaia A, El-Aalamat Y, Popovic D, et al. Evaluation of a panel of 28 biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(9):2698–2711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. May KE, Villar J, Kirtley S, Kennedy SH, Becker CM. Endometrial alterations in endometriosis: a systematic review of putative biomarkers. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(5):637–653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cho S, Cho H, Nam A, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an adjunct to CA-125 for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(6):2073–2079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mol BW, Bayram N, Lijmer JG, et al. The performance of CA-125 measurement in the detection of endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(6):1101–1108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bedaiwy MA, Falcone T, Sharma RK, et al. Prediction of endometriosis with serum and peritoneal fluid markers: a prospective controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(2):42–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oosterlynck DJ, Meuleman C, Lacquet FA, Waer M, Koninckx PR. Flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations in peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1994;31(1):25–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klentzeris LD, Bulmer JN, Liu DT, Morrison L. Endometrial leukocyte subpopulations in women with endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995;63(1):41–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Iwasaki K, Makino T, Maruyama T, Matsubayashi H, Nozawa S, Yokokura T. Leukocyte subpopulations and natural killer activity in endometriosis. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1999;38(4): 229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gómez-Torres MJ, Acién P, Campos A, Velasco I. Embryotoxicity of peritoneal fluid in women with endometriosis. Its relation with cytokines and lymphocyte populations. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17(3):777–781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gallinelli A, Chiossi G, Giannella L, Marsella T, Genazzani AD, Volpe A. Different concentrations of interleukins in the peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis: relationships with lymphocyte subsets. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2004;18(3):144–151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gagné D, Rivard M, Pagé M, Shazand K, Hugo P, Gosselin D. Blood leukocyte subsets are modulated in patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(1):43–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. D’Hooghe TM, Nugent N, Cuneo S, et al. Recombinant human TNF binding protein (r-hTBP-1) inhibits the development of endometriosis in baboons: a prospective, randomized, placebo-and drug-controlled study. Biol Reprod. 2006;74(1):131–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. D’Hooghe TM, Hill JA, Oosterlynck DJ, Koninckx PR, Bambra CS. Effect of endometriosis on white blood cell subpopulations in peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid of baboons. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(8):1736–1740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim SK, Park JY, Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH. Association of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and CA 125 with the endometriosis score. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2014;41(4):151–157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yavuzcan A, Çağlar M, Üstün Y, et al. Evaluation of mean platelet volume, neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio in advanced stage endometriosis with endometrioma. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013;14(4):210–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang H, Lang JH, Zhu L, Wang S, Sha GH, Zhang Y. Diagnostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the combination of serum CA-125 for stages III and IV endometriosis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(11):2011–2014.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Polak G, Barczynski B, Bednarek W, et al. Increased levels of proteins of the acute inflammatory phase in the peritoneal fluid of women with advanced stages of endometriosis. Ginekol Pol. 2015;86(6):414–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pizzo A, Salmeri FM, Ardita FV, Sofo V, Tripepi M, Marsico S. Behaviour of cytokine levels in serum and peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;54(2): 82–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Salmeri FM, Lagana AS, Sofo V, et al. Behavior of tumor necrosis factor-α and tumor necrosis factor receptor 1/tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 system in mononuclear cells recovered from peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis at different stages. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(2):165–172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Xue P, Kanai M, Mori Y, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for predicting palliative chemotherapy outcomes in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Cancer Med. 2014;3(2):406–415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kurdoglu Z, Gursoy R, Kurdoglu M, Erdem M, Erdem O, Erdem A. Comparison of the clinical value of CA 19-9 versus CA 125 for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1761–1763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Xavier P, Beires J, Belo L, et al. Are we employing the most effective CA 125 and CA 19-9 cut-off values to detect endometriosis? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005; 123(2):254–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chmaj-Wierzchowska K, Kampioni M, Wilczak M, Opala T. Do inflammatory factors play a significant role in etiopathogenesis of endometrial cysts? Part 1. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(4): 854–858.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aytekin Tokmak MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tokmak, A., Yildirim, G., Öztaş, E. et al. Use of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Combined With CA-125 to Distinguish Endometriomas From Other Benign Ovarian Cysts. Reprod. Sci. 23, 795–802 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719115620494

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719115620494

Keywords

Navigation