Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic Accuracy of Urinary Cytokeratin 19 Fragment for Endometriosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endometriosis affects up to 10% of women of reproductive age and 176 million women worldwide. The prevalence in women with infertility is between 30% and 50% but may be higher in women with pelvic pain, interstitial cystitis, or irritable bowel syndrome. Cytokeratin 19 has been suggested as a potential biomarker in urine for the diagnosis of this condition. The objective of this study was to prospectively determine the accuracy and the performance of a urinary cytokeratin 19 (uCYFRA 21-1) test for diagnosing endometriosis. Ninety-eight consecutive women who underwent laparoscopy had a urinary sample obtained before surgery and were included in the study. Endometriosis was diagnosed by laparoscopy and pathology in 64.3% (63 of 98 women). The estimates and 95% confidence intervals for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios were 11.1% (4.5%–21.5%), 94.3% (80.8%–99.3%), 77.7% (39.9–97.1), 37% (27–47.9), 1.94 (0.43–8.86), and 0.94 (0.84–1.06), respectively. Despite the high specificity, the uCYFRA 21-1 test has limited value for clinical practice to discriminate between women with and without endometriosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giudice L, Kao L. Endometriosis. Lancet. 2004;364(9447): 1789–1799.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bulun S. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):268–279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burney R, Giudice L. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):511–519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hadfield R, Mardon H, Barlow D, Kennedy S. Delay in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a survey of women from the USA and the UK. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(4):878–880.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Furuta A, Suzuki Y, Hayashi N, Egawa S, Yoshimura N. Transient receptor potential a1 receptor-mediated neural cross-talk and afferent sensitization induced by oxidative stress: implication for the pathogenesis of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Int J Urol. 2012;19(5):429–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smorgick N, Marsh C, As-Sanie S, Smith Y, Quint E. Prevalence of pain syndromes, mood conditions, and asthma in adolescents and young women with endometriosis. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013;26(3):171–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sijanovic S, Vidosavljevic D, Sijanovic I. Role of laparoscopic surgery in treatment of infertility. Med Glas (Zenica). 2012; 9(1):10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Littman E, Giudice L, Lathi R, Berker B, Milki A, Nezhat C. Role of laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis in patients with failed in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(6): 1574–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Walter A, Hentz J, Magtibay P, Cornella J, Magrina J. Endometriosis: correlation between histologic and visual findings at laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1407–11; discussion 1411–1413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wykes C, Clark T, Khan K. Accuracy of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic quantitative review. BJOG. 2004;111(11): 1204–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. May K, Villar J, Kirtley S, Kennedy S, Becker C. Endometrial alterations in endometriosis: a systematic review of putative biomarkers. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(5):637–653.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tokushige N, Markham R, Crossett B, et al. Discovery of a novel biomarker in the urine in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):46–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grimes D, Schulz K. Uses and abuses of screening tests. Lancet 2002;359:881–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(5):817–821.

  15. Malhotra R, Indrayan A. A simple nomogram for sample size for estimating sensitivity and specificity of medical tests. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010;58(6):519–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soreide K, Korner H, Soreide J. Diagnostic accuracy and receiver–operating characteristics curve analysis in surgical research and decision making. Ann Surg. 2011;253(1):27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. A. Lessey MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lessey, B.A., Savaris, R.F., Ali, S. et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Urinary Cytokeratin 19 Fragment for Endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 22, 551–555 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719114553064

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719114553064

Keywords

Navigation