Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of the Position of the Polar Body During ICSI on Fertilization Rate and Embryo Development

  • Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This prospective study was designed to evaluate and clarify further whether the position of the polar body (PB) in relation to injection site during intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) has an impact on fertilization and developmental rates and consequently clinical pregnancy outcome. The study included 264 patients undergoing 306 ICSI cycles from September 2007 to January 2009 performed by the same practitioner. Of all oocytes retrieved, 1736 were in metaphase II (MII). From every woman reaching ovum pick up, all MII-collected oocytes were allocated to 1 of the 4 groups according to PB orientation. In group A, MII oocytes were injected with the PB at 6 o’clock, group B with the PB at 7 o’clock, group C with the PB at 11 o’clock, and a group D with the PB at 12 o’clock. A significantly higher proportion of fertilized oocytes were produced from oocytes that had been injected with the PB at 11 o’clock (79.2%) as compared to those at 6 o’clock (70.5%), 7 o’clock (64.4%), and 12 o’clock (68.8%). Furthermore, embryos derived from oocytes that were injected with the PB at 11 o’clock appeared to be of higher quality score than those of the other groups of oocytes. A higher clinical pregnancy rate (28.7%) was obtained after the transfer of embryos from oocytes that had been injected with the PB at 11 o’clock. Given the higher fertilization, developmental, and pregnancy rate in the 11 o’clock group, it is suggested that this may be the preferred position of the PB at ICSI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersen A, Goossens V, Ferraretti P, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe 2004. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(4):756–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Palermo GD, Joris H, Devroy P, Van Steirteghem C. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340(8810):17–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, et al. The influence of the site of sperm deposition and mode of oolemna breakage at intracytoplasmatic sperm injection on fertilization and embryo development rates. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(12):3171–3177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tarlatzis BC, Billi H. Survey on intracytoplasmatic sperm injection: report from the ESHRE ICSI task Force. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(suppl 1):165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hardarson T, Lundin K, Hamberger L. The position of the meta-phase II spindle cannot be predicted by the location of the first polar body in the human oocyte. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(6): 1372–1376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang WH, Meng L, Hackett RJ, Oldenbourg R, Keefe DL. The spindle observation and its relationship with fertilization after intracytoplasmatic sperm injection in living human oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(2):348–353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Avery S, Martyn B. Effect of the position of the meiotic spindle on the outcome of intracytoplasmatic sperm injection. Hum Fertil. 2003;6(1):19–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blake M, Garrisi J, Tomkin G, Cohen J. Sperm deposition site during ICSI affects fertilization and development. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(1):31–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tournaye H, Liu J, Nagy Z. Intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI): the Brussels experience. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995;7(2): 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. LeMaire-Adkins R, Radke K, Hunt PA. Lack of checkpoint control at the metaphase/anaphase transition: a mechanism of meiotic nondisjunction in mammalian females. J Cell Biol. 1997;139(7): 1611–1619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fulka J Jr, Karnikova L, Moor RM. Oocyte polarity: ICSI, cloning and related techniques. Hum Rerpod. 1998;13(12): 3303–3305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Van der Westerlaken LA, Helmerhorst FM, Hermans J, Naaktgeboren N. Intracytoplasmatic sperm injection: position of the polar body affects pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(10):2565–2569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Palermo GD, Cohen J, Alikani M, Adler A, Rosenwaks Z. Intracytoplasmatic sperm injection: a novel treatment for all forms of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(6):1231–1240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Q, Sun QY. Evaluation of oocyte quality: morphological cellular and molecular predictors. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2007;19(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sousa M, Tesarik J. Ultrastructural analysis of fertilization failure after intracytoplasmatic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(12):2374–2380.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stoddart NR, Fleming SD. Orientation of the first polar body of the oocyte at 6 or 12 o’clock during ICSI does not affect clinical outcome. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(7):1580–1585.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Anifandis PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anifandis, G., Dafopoulos, K., Messini, C.I. et al. Effect of the Position of the Polar Body During ICSI on Fertilization Rate and Embryo Development. Reprod. Sci. 17, 849–853 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719110372421

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719110372421

Keywords

Navigation