Skip to main content
Log in

Selection Criteria for Phase I Contract Research Organizations by Pharmaceutical Companies

  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The choice of a Phase I contract research organization is clearly a key point for a successful strategy at this early stage of development. A survey was performed with the help of a questionnaire filled in by 36 pharmaceutical companies operating in France and sponsoring Phase I trials.

This survey addressed the following main questions: number and type of Phase I studies, information on Phase I centers, and criteria of choice for a Phase I center. Finally, the answers were compared to a similar survey performed five years earlier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scrip Magazine. March 1994:32-34.

  2. Püchler K, Witte PU. The German CRO market. App Clin Trials. 1996;6(8):24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hughes, G. Criteria for choice of Phase I contract research organizations by pharmaceutical companies. Clin Trials Meta-Analysis. 1994;29(4):288.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenzweig P, Bergougnan L, Brohier S, et al. Les centres de Phase I: le point de vue de l’industriel. La Lett Pharmacol. 1991;5(7):248–252.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vogel JR, Resnich N. A case study in evaluating and selecting a CRO. App Clin Trials. 1996;6(8):30–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schanlder M. A strategic role for CROs. App Clin Trials. 1994;3(9):56–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenzweig, P. Selection Criteria for Phase I Contract Research Organizations by Pharmaceutical Companies. Ther Innov Regul Sci 32, 825–830 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159803200322

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159803200322

Key Words

Navigation