Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Review of the Performance of Tests used to Establish Whether There is a Drug Effect in Dose-Response Studies

  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the pharmaceutical industry the assessment of dose-response is a critical part of a drug development program. When analyzing dose-response studies in clinical research one of the most important questions to be addressed is whether there is a drug effect since only once this is established can other analyses be performed to assess the nature of the dose-response relationship. In this paper the performance of eight tests for establishing a drug effect will be compared for a variety of different patterns of results. It will be shown that specialized tests conditioning on the a priori ordering of responses are robust to a variety of different patterns of results, and therefore, should be used. The more traditional approaches used by statisticians in the pharmaceutical industry based on analysis of variance lead to a loss of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ruberg SJ. Dose response studies. Analysis and interpretation. J Biopharma Stat. 1995;5:15–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products Working Party on Efficacy of Medicinal Products. Biostatistical Methodology in Clinical Trials in Application for Marketing Authorisations for Medicinal Purposes. Stats Med. 1995;15:1659–1682.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ruberg SJ. Contrasts for identifying the minimum effective dose. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84:816–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abelson RP, Tukey JW. Efficient utilization of non-numerical information in quantitative analysis: General theory and the case of simple order. Ann Math Stat. 1963;34:1347–1369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams DA. A test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control. Biometrics. 1971;27:103–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams DA. The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control. Biometrics. 1972;28:519–531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartholomew DJ. A test of homogeneity for ordered alternatives. Biometrika. 1959;46:36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartholomew DJ. A test of homogeneity for ordered alternatives II. Biometrika. 1959;46:328–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartholomew DJ. A test of homogeneity of means under restricted alternatives. J Roy Stat Soc. Series B. 1961;23:239–281.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chacko VJ. Testing homogeneity against ordered alternatives. Ann Math Stat. 1963;34:945–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chase GR. On testing for ordered alternatives with increased sample size for a control. Biometrika. 1974;61:569–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jonckheere AR. A distribution-free K sample test against ordered alternatives. Biometrika. 1954;41:133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shirley EAC. The value of specialized tests in studies where ordered group means are expected. Stats Med. 1985;4:489–496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Phillips BSc, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phillips, A. A Review of the Performance of Tests used to Establish Whether There is a Drug Effect in Dose-Response Studies. Ther Innov Regul Sci 32, 683–692 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159803200309

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159803200309

Key Words

Navigation