Detection of an Outlier and Evaluation of its Influence in Chronic Toxicity Studies

Abstract

Targeting quantitative data in repeated-dose toxicity studies using rodents, a method for detecting an outlier and a selection problem between parametric and nonparametric approaches, based on actual toxicity data, was investigated. The consistency between the judgments of veteran toxicologists and several statistical methods (skewness, kurtosis, and the studentized residual) to detect an outlier was evaluated. The studentized residual had the highest consistency with the judgments of toxicologists and was the most effective method for detecting an outlier.

The performance of the parametric (regression) method and the nonparametric method (Jonckheere test) for detecting dose-dependency was evaluated. Parametric and nonparametric approaches had a different result when outliers existed. Parametric methods are sensitive to the presence of outliers and they lose statistical power. In contrast, nonparametric approaches are robust to outliers. The identification of extreme individual measures is, however, a different objective for safety studies versus the detection of dose-dependency, and it may require different methods. Detecting an outlier, and investigating its impact on statistical analysis and biological interpretation, is very important and requires the use of appropriate methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Editorial Supervision by First Evaluation and Registration Division. Pharmaceutical Affairs Bureau, Ministry of Health and Welfare. Guidelines for Toxicity Studies of Drugs (Commentary). Tokyo: Yakuji Nippo; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dunnett CW. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc. 1955;50:1096–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yamazaki M, Noguchi Y, Tanda M, Shintani S. Statistical methods appropriate for general toxicological studies in rats. Algorithms for multiple comparisons of treatment groups with control. J Takeda Res Labs. 1981;40:163–187. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kobayashi K, Watanabe K, Inoue H. Questioning the usefulness of the non-parametric analysis of quantitative data into ranked data in toxicology studies. J Toxicolog Sci. 1995;20:47–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hamada C, et al. A study on the consistency between statistical evaluation and toxicological judgment. Drug Inf J. 1997;31(2):413–421.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Weisberg S. Applied Linear Regression. Second Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide Version 6 Fourth Edition. Cary, NCSAS Institute Inc. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Morris RW, Dietz EJ. How to perform Jonckheere’s test using CORR procedure. Proceedings of SUGI14 1337–1339, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chikuma Hamada MS.

Additional information

Resented at the DIA “3rd Annual Biostatistics Meeting,” August 27–28, 1996, Tokyo, Japan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamada, C., Yoshino, K., Abe, I. et al. Detection of an Outlier and Evaluation of its Influence in Chronic Toxicity Studies. Ther Innov Regul Sci 32, 201–212 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159803200128

Download citation

Key Words

  • Outlier
  • Studentized residual
  • Toxicological evaluation
  • Parametric method and nonparametric method