Skip to main content
Log in

Proposed Statistical Methods for Signal Detection of Adverse Medical Device Events

  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes several statistical approaches for analyzing spontaneous reports of adverse medical device events. The chi-square statistic is used to detect a sudden increase in reports from pairwise comparison of numbers of reports per month. The Cox-Stuart nonparametric trend test is used to detect a gradual, increasing trend in adverse events reports over time. The negative binomial probability model is also used to assess sudden increases by setting threshold values. In this paper, only numerator data (reports of adverse events), not denominator data (device use), are used. The Box-Jenkins ARIMA time series model failed to fit the observed data successfully due to the extremely irregular distributions, including many zeros, of the observed data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conover, WJ. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. New York: John Wiley; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fisz, M. Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics. New York: John Wiley; 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feller, W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications. New York: John Wiley; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bliss, CI, Fisher, RA. Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data. Biometrics. 1953;9: 176–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anscombe, FJ. The statistical analysis of insect counts based on the negative binomial distribution. Biometrics. 1949;5:165–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gallus, G, Radaelli, G, Marchi, M. Poisson approximation to a negative binomial process in the surveillance of rare health events. Methods Inf Med. 1991; 30:206–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Norwood, PK, Sampson, AR. A statistical methodology for postmarketing surveillance of adverse drug reaction. Stat Med. 1988;7:1023–1030.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsong Y. Comparing reporting rates of adverse events between drugs with adjustment for year of marketing and secular trends in total reporting. J Biopharma Stat. 1995;5:95–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsong Y. False Alarm rates of statistical methods used in determining increased frequency of reports on adverse drug reaction. J Biopharma Stat. 1992; 2:9–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guideline For Postmarketing Reporting Of Adverse Drug Experiences. Rockville, MD: U. S. Food and Drug Administration; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frisen, M. Evaluations of methods for statistical surveillance. Stat Med. 1992;11:1489–1502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Symposium on statistics in surveillance. Stat Med. 1989;8:251–397.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lao, C.S., Kessler, L.G. & Gross, T.P. Proposed Statistical Methods for Signal Detection of Adverse Medical Device Events. Ther Innov Regul Sci 32, 183–191 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159803200126

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159803200126

Key Words

Navigation