Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Class I recalls possess the greatest degree of health hazard and are frequently conducted to the consumer or user level. This study analyzes all Class I recalls appearing in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Enforcement Reports from 1982–1996. Major causes of Class I recalls over the past 14 years include: drug quality and good manufacturing practices (GMP) violations, mislabeling, and adverse reactions. Class 1 recalls over this time period are analyzed by reason, brand versus generic company, dosage form (eg, injection, tablet), notification method, and further FDA enforcement action (eg, seizure, injunction, criminal prosecution). Trends are identified. Finally, the effectiveness of Class I recalls to the pharmacy level is assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 43 Federal Register 26202 (1978).

  2. Fine SD. Recalls—Definition and exposition. Food Drug Cosmetic Law J. 1972;27:662–671.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harper BM. Mandatory food and drug recalls. An analysis of a developing FDA enforcement tool. Food Drug Cosmetic Law J. 1981;35:669–687.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rumore MM. The drug product recall system and the pharmacist: Are consumers protected? N. Y. State J. Health Syst Pharm. 1996;15(10):137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  5. FDA Enforcement Manual. Tab 600. Recalls and administrative injunction. Thompson Publications Group, Inc.; 1992:44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. FDA Regulatory Procedures Manual. Part 5, Ch. 5.00-20. Recall and emergency procedures.

  7. Clevenger WL. Recalls. Food, Drug, Cosmetic Law J. 1972;27:332–343.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parker BR, Valentino G. Handling a pharmaceutical recall: why it pays to do it right. Drug lnf J. 1994; 28:899–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Labeling/packaging error recalls down 43% in 1996. The Pink Sheet. T&G 6–7, January 20, 1997.

  10. FDA seeks labeling regulation changes, disclosure of clinical trials in preliminary legislative agenda. FDC Reports—The Pink Sheet. 59(11):3–4, March 17, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gumbhir AK, Jamison ML. Assessing the effectiveness of drug recalls in pharmacies. Drug & Cosmetic Ind. 1975;117:40–43, 113.

    Google Scholar 

  12. U.S.P. Quality Review. The U.S.P. Convention. 8/96.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rumore, M.M. An Analysis of Class I Recalls: 1982–1996. Ther Innov Regul Sci 32, 65–71 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159803200109

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159803200109

Key Words

Navigation