Skip to main content
Log in

Preparing an Integrated Summary of Safety: A Writer’s Perspective

  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Integrated Summary of Safety (ISS) submitted with a New Drug Application is used by sponsors and regulators to evalutate a new drug’s safety profile. Preparing an ISS is a labor and intellectually intensive process requiring input from many areas of expertise within the pharmaceutical company including medical writing, regulatory affairs, clinical research, biometrics, data management, and programming. This article describes the approach to document production used at Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research Division of Warner Lambert Company and some guidelines for preparing an ISS from a writer’s perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Food and Drag Administration. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). 21:314.50(d)(5), 1989.

  2. Temple RJ. The regulatory evolution of the inte-grated Safety Summary. Drug. Inf J. 1991;25:485–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lineberry C. Approaches to describing common adverse events in the Integrated Safety Summary. Drug Inf J. 1991;25:493–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Scholtes PR, et al. The Team Handbook How to Use Teams to Improve Quality. Madison, WI: Joiner Associates Inc.; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haynes ME. Effective Meeting Skills A Practical Guide for More Productive Meetings. Menlo Park, CA: Crisp Publications, Inc.; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knutson J, Bitz I. Project Management: How to Plan and Manage Successful Projects. New York: AMA-COM; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mathes JC, Stevenson DW. Designing Technical Reports: Writing for Audiences in Organizations. (2nd Edition). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co; 1991:295.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iverson C. (ed.). American Medical Association Manual of Style. (8th Edition); Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Chicago Manual of Style. (13th Edition, Revised and Expanded). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1982.

  10. Zeigler M. Essentials of Writing Biomedical Research Papers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tufte ER. Envisioning Information. Ceshire, CT: Graphics Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tufte ER. The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphic Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spilker B, Schoenfelder J. Presentation of Clinical Data. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Horton, W. Visual Literacy Human Factors in Visual Communication. Huntsville, AL: William Horton Consulting; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O’Neill, RT. Statistical analysis of adverse event data from clinical trials special emphasis on serious events. Drug Inf J. 1987;21:9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Holmes N. Designer’s Guide to Creating Charts and Diagrams. New York, NY: Watson-Guptill; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robertson B. How to Draw Charts and Diagrams. Cincinnati, OH: North Light Books; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schmid CF, Schmid SE. Handbook of Graphic Presentation. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myers, S., Baron, B., Radke-Mitchell, L. et al. Preparing an Integrated Summary of Safety: A Writer’s Perspective. Ther Innov Regul Sci 32, 53–63 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159803200108

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159803200108

Key Words

Navigation