Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the decision making approaches for problem solving used by general medical practitioners (GPs) when accessing the animate information sources, colleagues, consultants, drug information centers (DICs), medical information centers, hospital pharmacists, and community pharmacists. Of 463 GPs practicing within the county boundary of Derbyshire on January 1, 1990,106 were randomly sampled from groups stratified for age; gender; type of practice, single or group; and, use or nonuse of DICs. One hundred interviews were conducted. Structured inspection of transcripts indicated that, if a source was used, it was for either mechanical solutions and allocated to “prescribing practice,” or for “general drug information” which encompassed use for subjective problem solving. For each animate information source, GPs’ approaches to “general drug information “ use were collated, categorized, and inspected for global trends. This identified two fundamental, discrete approaches. Forty-eight percent of those interviewed, representing 218/463 of the sample frame, were categorized as “source-dependent” and relied predominantly on one or two specific sources or had a method they applied to all situations. These were distinct from the remaining “problem-dependent “ GPs who used multiple information sources in a manner dedicated to resolving each problem as though it were unique. No significant differences were found in epidemiological characteristics when GPs were grouped into source-dependent and problem-dependent categories. That GPs could be readily differentiated by two distinct approaches has implications for optimizing the provision of information.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Worthen DB. Prescribing influences: An overview. Br Med J Educ. 1973;7:109–117.
Herman CM, Radowskas CA. Community drug information to physicians. J Med Educ. 1976;51:189–196.
Carney T. Workload of general practitioners. Br Med J. 1989;299:753.
Bain J. General practices and the new contract. (II) Future directions. Br Med J. 1991;302:1247–1249.
Barley S. The literature of general practice. In Westcott R, Jones RVH, (eds). Information handling in general practice. London: Croom Helm; 1988: 22–39.
Brodie DC (ed). Drug information: literature review of needs, resources, and services. American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. Report No. PB-223 198, 1972. (Available from National Technical Information Services-NTIS, Springfield, VA)
Eaton G, Parish P. Sources of drug information used by general practitioners. J Roy Coll Gen Pract. 1976; 26(Supp 1):58–64.
Lipsky M. Streel-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1980:19:203.
Clark JC, Gerrett D. General medical practitioners’ perceived use of drug information sources. Int J Pharm Prac. 1994;2(1):247–252.
Miles MB, Huberman MA. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed). London: Sage Publications; 1994.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33: 159–174.
Bucks RS, Williams A, Whitfield MJ, Routh DA. Toward a typology of general practitioners’ attitudes to general practice. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30:537–547.
Miles MB. New methods for qualitative data collection and analysis: Vignettes and pre-structured cases. Qual Stud Educ. 1990;3(1):37–51.
Bloor M. Bishop Berkeley and the adenotonsillectomy enigma. Sociology. 1976;10:43–61.
Denig P, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM. Therapeutic decison making of physicians. Pharm Weekbl (Sci). 1992; 14:9–15.
Sheldon M, Brooke J, Rector A (Eds). Decisionmaking in general practice. Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press Ltd; 1985:1–12, 31–46, 95–118, 257–269.
Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Ed Quart. 1988;15:175–183.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The work was conducted at the Medicines Research Unit of the University of Derby.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerrett, D., Clark, J.C. General Medical Practitioners’ Approaches to Accessing Animate Sources of Drug Information. Ther Innov Regul Sci 31, 221–227 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159703100131
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286159703100131