Skip to main content
Log in

Factors That Influence the Decision to Staff a Medical Information Booth at a Medical Meeting

  • Medical Information
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify factors that influence the decision-making process involved when a medical information (MI) department is planning to staff a booth at a medical meeting.

Methods

A seven-question survey was distributed to Ml departments from Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware (n = 39). Each survey participant was asked to rank a list of 16 factors on a five-point Likert scale of how likely each would influence the decision to staff a booth.

Results

The response rate was 53% (17/32). The survey respondents reached consensus that 6 of the 16 factors were likely to influence sending staff to a booth at a medical meeting based upon the lower CI > 3.0. These included: New Product Indication, New Product Approval, Clinical Data Being Presented at the Meeting, Past Experience at the Meeting, and Approved Product Prior to Official Launch.

Conclusion

Having an MI booth at a medical meeting is a multifactorial decision and several factors were identified as likely to influence decision making. The majority of respondents considered the New Product Indication component of a major product label change to be the most likely factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Craves DA. Baker RP The core curriculum for medical communications professionals practicing in the pharmaceutical industry. Drug Inf J. 2000; 34:995–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Society of Health System Pharmacists. ASHP midyear clinical meeting contract for exhibit space, https://doi.org/www.ashp.org/s_ashp/docs/files/mcm2007_exh_contracl.pdf. Accessed June 15, 2007.

  3. Facts and Comparisons. Drug Facts and Comparisons Manufacturer Index. St. Louis. MO: Facts and Comparisons: 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Groves RM, Singer E, Non-response in sample surveys. In: Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley-ln-terscience: 2004:169–195.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kovaleski D. The economic downturn hits medical meetings. MeetingsNet. December 1. 2008. https://doi.org/meetingsnet.com/medicalmeetings/cme_rules_regs/downturn_hits_medicat_meetings_l208/index.html. Accessed Junc 30, 2009.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meredith Abraham PharmD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abraham, M., Heverin, E., Earl, G. et al. Factors That Influence the Decision to Staff a Medical Information Booth at a Medical Meeting. Ther Innov Regul Sci 44, 351–358 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286151004400401

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286151004400401

Key Words

Navigation