Skip to main content
Log in

Primary Efficacy Endpoint in Clinical Trials of Antiepileptic Drugs: Change or Percentage Change

  • Statistics
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In randomized clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), the seizure frequency per x days during baseline and treatment phase periods are recorded to evaluate efficacy of a drug. The seizure frequency data are often nonnormal, and hence an appropriate mathematical transformation is necessary for a statistical analysis. The most commonly used transformations in AED development research are (a) log-transformation of the seizure frequency data, and (b) calculation of percentage change (PC) from baseline in seizure frequency. The log-transformed postbaseline seizure frequency data are analyzed using a parametric ANCOVA model including the log-transformed baseline data as a covariate and treatment group as a factor in the model. The PC data are analyzed using either a Wilcoxon rank-sum test on the PCs, or ANOVA/ANCOVA analysis on the ranks of PCs including treatment groups as a factor and any covariate of interest in the model. A limited number of research works is available in the literature regarding a choice of log-transformed or PC of seizure frequency data in the statistical analyses. In this research, an attempt is made to evaluate the impacts of choosing either of the two transformations on seizure frequency data of AED trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicines. Note for guidance on clinical investigation of medicinal products in the treatment of epileptic disorders. 2000. CPMP/EWP/566/98.

  2. Vickers AJ. The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001;1:6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berry DA. Statistical Methodology in the Pharmaceutical Sciences. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1989:37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koti KM. On a primary efficacy endpoint. Drug Inf J. 2001;35:157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berry DA, Ayers GA. Symmetrized percent change for treatment comparisons. Am Stat. 2006;60(1):27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berry DA. The consultant’s forum: logarithmic transformations in ANOVA. Biometrics. 1987;43:439–456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carroll RJ. A robust method for testing transformations to achieve normality. J R Stat Soc B. 1980;42:71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conover WJ, Iman RL. Analysis of covariance using the rank transformation. Biometrics. 1982:38:715–724.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Laird N. Further comparative analyses of pretest-posttest research designs. Am Stat. 1983;37:329–330.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Madsen L, Dalthorp D. Simulating correlated count data. Environ Ecol Stat. 2007;14:129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaiser L. Adjusting for baseline: change or percentage change? Stat Med. 1989;8:1183–1190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ohidul Siddiqui PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siddiqui, O., Hershkowitz, N. Primary Efficacy Endpoint in Clinical Trials of Antiepileptic Drugs: Change or Percentage Change. Ther Innov Regul Sci 44, 343–350 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286151004400316

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286151004400316

Key Words

Navigation