Skip to main content
Log in

Reduction of Variability of Response-Adaptive Designs for Continuous Treatment Responses in Phase 3 Clinical Trials

  • Biostatistics
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several response-adaptive designs are available to allocate sequentially entering patients between two competing treatments, so that a larger number of patients are treated by the better treatment. Most of the designs are for binary treatment responses. Among the few available designs for continuous responses, the continuous drop-the-loser (CDL) rule of Ivanovo et al. (2006) has lower variability of the proportion of allocation to any treatment. The present article provides some modifications to the existing CDL design and extends the CDL rule to provide two new designs that have more or less the same allocation to the better treatment as the CDL, but the variability is shown to be nearly 40% less than that of CDL. The applicability of the proposed designs is illustrated by redesigning some real clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhattacharya R. Urn-based response adaptive procedures and optimality. Drug Inf J. 2008; 42:441–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang L, Biswas A. Optimal failure-success response-adaptive designs for binary responses. Drug Inf J. 2007;41:709–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ivanova A, Rosenberger WF. Adaptive designs for clinical trials with highly successful treatments. Drug Inf J. 2001;35:1087–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartlett RH, Roloff DW, Cornell RG, Andrews AF, Dillon PW, Zwischenberger JB. Extracorporeal circulation in neonatal respiratory failure: a prospective randomized trial. Pediatrics. 1985;76: 479–487.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rout CC, Rocke DA, Levin J, Gouws E, Reddy D. A reevaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:262–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tamura RN, Faries DE, Andersen JS, Heiligenstein JH. A case study of an adaptive clinical trial in the treatment of out-patients with depressive disorder. J Am Stat Assoc. 1994;89:768–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Biswas A, Dewanji A. Inference for a RPW-type clinical trial with repeated monitoring for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Biometric J. 2004;46:769–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wei LJ. The generalized Polya’s um design for sequential medical trials. Ann Stat. 1979;7:291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wei LJ, Durham S. The randomized play-the-winner rule in medical trials. J Am Stat Assoc. 1978; 73:840–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisele J. The doubly adaptive biased coin design for sequential clinical trials. J Stat Plann Inference. 1994;38:249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zelen M. Play the winner rule and the controlled clinical trial. J Am Stat Assoc. 1969;64: 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ivanova A. A play-the-winner type urn model with reduced variability. Metrika. 2003;58:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Neyman J. On two different aspects of the representative method: the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive sampling. J R Stat Soc. 1934:97:558–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Melfi VF, Page C, Geraldes M. An adaptive randomized design with application to estimation. Can J Stat. 2001;29:107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenberger WF. Asymptotic inference with response-adaptive treatment allocation designs. Ann Stat. 1993;21:2098–2107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bandyopadhyay U., Biswas A. An adaptive allocation for continuous response using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney score. J Stat Plann Inference. 2004;123:207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bandyopadhyay U, Biswas A. Adaptive designs for normal responses with prognostic factors. Biometrika. 2001;88:409–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu F, Ivanova A. Adaptive designs. In Chow S-C, ed., Encyclopedia of Biopharmaceutical Statistics. 2nd ed. Informa Healthcare; 2004.

  19. Hu F, Rosenberger WF. The Theory of Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Ivanova A, Biswas A, Lurie A. Response adaptive designs for continuous outcomes. J Stat Plann Inference. 2006;136:1845–1852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dworkin RH, Corbin AE, Young JP, et al. Pregabalin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 2003;60:1274–1283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Atkinson AC, Biswas A. Bayesian adaptive biased coin design for sequential clinical trials. Biometrics. 2005;61:118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang L, Rosenberger WF. Response-adaptive randomization for clinical trials with continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 2006;62:562–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Biswas A, Bhattacharya R. Optimal responseadaptive designs for normal responses. Biometric J. 2009;51(1):193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Biswas A, Bhattacharya R, Zhang L. Optimal response-adaptive designs for continuous responses in phase III trials. Biometric J. 2007;49: 928–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prasad AS, Fitzgerald JT, Bao B, Beck FWJ, Chandrasekar PH. Duration of symptoms and plasma cytokine levels in patients with the common cold treated with zinc acetate. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 133:245–252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Imrey PB, Kingman A. Analysis of clinical trials involving noncavitated caries lesions. J Dent Res. 2004;83(Special Issue C):C103–C108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atonu Biswas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biswas, A., Bhattacharya, R. Reduction of Variability of Response-Adaptive Designs for Continuous Treatment Responses in Phase 3 Clinical Trials. Ther Innov Regul Sci 44, 9–19 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286151004400102

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286151004400102

Key Words

Navigation