Abstract
Given the current size and complexity of pharmaceutical development programs, continued improvements to streamline the development of new and innovative medicines are critical. Despite significant operational challenges, the conduct of global studies using a single protocol across multiple regions is considered by the innovative pharmaceutical industry as an efficient approach to clinical development. This philosophy is in line with the drivers behind the creation of the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH); specifically, the development of harmonized guideline documents, including ICH E5 (Ethnic Factors in the Acceptability of Foreign Clinical Data). However, despite very significant progress made with the implementation and acceptance of ICH guidelines, barriers to the conduct and acceptability of global development approaches still remain.
The need for simultaneous global development has been recognized as significant, not only by the pharmaceutical industry, but also by a number of governmental agencies. Efforts exist now to evaluate the challenges associated with the conduct of global studies. To make recommendations to facilitate simultaneous global development, a multifunctional group of experts within the Scientific and Regulatory technical groups of PhRMA member companies was convened as the Simultaneous Global Development Committee.
This article only describes the initial observations of the committee and is expected to be followed by future articles on a series of concrete recommendations to address issues inhibiting simultaneous global development. Initial activities of the committee have focused on developing a more rigorous identification and understanding of the barriers to simultaneous global development, and on initiation of communications with health authorities, beginning with the East Asian region, where the drug lag and related topics are currently actively discussed and addressed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
US Department of Health. Food and Drug Administration. Innovation/stagnation: challenge and opportunity on the critical path to new medical products. March 2004.
European Commission. Faster access to belter medicines: the Innovative Medicines Initiative. Press release. May 15. 2007. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/07/190&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/07/190&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN.
Maggioni A, Darne B, Atar D, Abadie E, Pitt B, Zan-nad F. FDA and CPMP rulings on subgroup analyses. Cardiology. 2007;107:97–102.
Myrand SP, Sekiguchi K, Man MZ, et al. Pharmaco-kinetics/genotype associations for major cytochrome P450 enzymes in native and first- and third-generation Japanese populations: comparison with Korean. Chinese, and Caucasian populations. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84(3):347–361.
Guidelines on the implementation of the certification scheme on the quality of pharmaceutical products moving in international commerce. Available at: http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/regulation_legislation/certificalion/guidelines/en/index.html/medicines/areas/quality_safety/regulation_legislation/certificalion/guidelines/en/index.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saillot, JL., Paxton, M. Industry Efforts on Simultaneous Global Development. Ther Innov Regul Sci 43, 339–347 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150904300313
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150904300313