Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Two Hot Spots (Black Holes?) in the Regulatory Galaxy: Proactive Safety and eSubmissions—A Call for Contributions

  • Regulatory
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is not meant to present solutions. Its goal is to encourage readers to contribute and submit their ideas to the Drug Information Journal (DIJ) on two main subjects in the regulatory galaxy: the challenges and opportunities of the proactive safety trend and the eSubmission initiatives. Proactive safety and eSubmissions are dramatically broadening the scope of regulatory affairs across all stages of the drugs’ life cycles and portfolio. We also propose topics in the hope of stimulating authors to prepare submissions on these or related topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Conference on Harmonisation. The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union, Vol. 9A, Pharmacovigilance. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pharmaceuticals/eudralex/vol-9/pdf/vol9A_2007-04.pdf.

  2. Strom BL. Improving drug safety: a systems approach. Paper presented at workshop Implementation of Risk Minimization Action Plans (RiskMAPs) to Support Quality Use of Pharmaceuticals: Opportunities and Challenges; June 25–26, 2007; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/meeting/riskMAPs/strom1.pdf.

  3. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Management of safety information from clinical trials: report or CIOMS Working Group VI. Available at: http://www.cioms.ch/frame_management_of_safety_informalion.htm.

  4. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Report of the CHMP Working Group on benefit-risk assessment models and methods. January 22, 2007. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/brmethods/1540407en.pdf.

  5. International Conference on Harmonisation. Electronic common technical document specifications V3.2. Available at: http://estri.ich.org/eCTD/eCTD_Specification_v3_2.pdf.

  6. International Conference on Harmonisation. ICH eCTD specification V3.3.3. Available at: http://estri.ich.org/eCTDV333T/eCTD_Specificalion_v3_3_3.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ProductLife, 5 rue Greffulhe, 75008, Paris, France

    E. Gaussens PhD, S. Daniel, E. Messiaen & P. Banes

Authors
  1. E. Gaussens PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Daniel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Messiaen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Banes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaussens, E., Daniel, S., Messiaen, E. et al. Two Hot Spots (Black Holes?) in the Regulatory Galaxy: Proactive Safety and eSubmissions—A Call for Contributions. Ther Innov Regul Sci 42, 57–64 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150804200109

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150804200109

Key Words

Search

Navigation