Skip to main content
Log in

Reviewing Statistical Analysis Plans—A Guide for Medical Writers

  • Medical Writing
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over recent years, medical writing has become an integral activity in drug development through the production of high-quality regulatory documents, thus expediting the approval process. In a similar vein, the importance of statistical considerations in drug development has also been increasingly recognized. In particular, the development of a study-specific statistical analysis plan (SAP) is now perceived as best practice for regulatory (and other) studies and is required in many instances. There is a clear need for medical writers and biostatisticians to work closely together during the course of a project; thus, it is advantageous for the medical writer to make a contribution to the development of the SAP. The aim of this article is to detail the benefits to both medical writers and biostatisticians of the project medical writer reviewing the SAP and to highlight the specific issues that should be addressed during the review process. We recommend that this re-view become a routine activity in all pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Korieth K. Medical writing market appreciation. Centerwatch Monthly. July 2004:1–13.

  2. ICH E3: Structure and Content of Clinical Study Reports. CPMP/ICH/137

  3. ICH E9: Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials. (CPMP/ICH/363/96)

  4. Phillips A, Ebbutt A, France L, Morgan D. The international conference on harmonization guideline “statistical principles for clinical trials”: issues in applying the guideline in practice. Drug Inf J. 2000;34:337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pong A, Chow S-C. Statistical/practical issues in clinical trials. Drug Inf J., 1997;31:1167–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Phillips A, Haudiquet V. ICH E9 guideline “Statistical principles for clinical trials”: a case study. Stat Med. 2003;22:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah McPhail PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McPhail, D., Goodwin, I. & Gordon, K. Reviewing Statistical Analysis Plans—A Guide for Medical Writers. Ther Innov Regul Sci 40, 197–202 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150604000208

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150604000208

Key Words

Navigation