Abstract
Over recent years, medical writing has become an integral activity in drug development through the production of high-quality regulatory documents, thus expediting the approval process. In a similar vein, the importance of statistical considerations in drug development has also been increasingly recognized. In particular, the development of a study-specific statistical analysis plan (SAP) is now perceived as best practice for regulatory (and other) studies and is required in many instances. There is a clear need for medical writers and biostatisticians to work closely together during the course of a project; thus, it is advantageous for the medical writer to make a contribution to the development of the SAP. The aim of this article is to detail the benefits to both medical writers and biostatisticians of the project medical writer reviewing the SAP and to highlight the specific issues that should be addressed during the review process. We recommend that this re-view become a routine activity in all pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Korieth K. Medical writing market appreciation. Centerwatch Monthly. July 2004:1–13.
ICH E3: Structure and Content of Clinical Study Reports. CPMP/ICH/137
ICH E9: Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials. (CPMP/ICH/363/96)
Phillips A, Ebbutt A, France L, Morgan D. The international conference on harmonization guideline “statistical principles for clinical trials”: issues in applying the guideline in practice. Drug Inf J. 2000;34:337–348.
Pong A, Chow S-C. Statistical/practical issues in clinical trials. Drug Inf J., 1997;31:1167–1174.
Phillips A, Haudiquet V. ICH E9 guideline “Statistical principles for clinical trials”: a case study. Stat Med. 2003;22:1–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McPhail, D., Goodwin, I. & Gordon, K. Reviewing Statistical Analysis Plans—A Guide for Medical Writers. Ther Innov Regul Sci 40, 197–202 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150604000208
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150604000208