Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized Lab Norms for Standardizing Data from Multiple Laboratories

  • Statistics
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from multiple laboratories utilizing different units of measurements and different normal reference ranges present challenges when pooling the data to obtain population summary statistics. This manuscript provides an algorithm for obtaining statistical summaries. First, standardization of measurement units by conversion to SI units is proposed. Conversion factors for key clinical analytes focused on oncology are provided. Second, it is proposed that generalized lab norms (GLN) be created for a “phantom” laboratory on which to standardize multiple sources of laboratory data. The percentile method is proposed for developing GLN. Phantom laboratory GLN estimates are provided for standardization. The GLN were applied to data from an oncology trial that utilized 30 local laboratories. Proportions of samples misclassified normal/abnormal were mostly ≤10% (Range: 0% to 14.6%) for different analytes. The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grades based on GLN were generally consistent with grades utilizing individual laboratory normal reference ranges. The Gamma values for concordance applying GLN versus utilizing individual lab normal reference values ranged from 0.98 to 1.0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chuang-Stein C. Laboratory data in clinical trials: A statistician’s perspective. Drug Inf J. 1998; 19:167–177.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chuang-Stein C. Summarizing laboratory data with different reference ranges in multicenter clinical trials. Drug Inf J. 1992;26:77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sogliero-Gilbert G, Mosher K, Zubkoff L. A procedure for the simplification and assessment of lab parameters in clinical trials. Drug Inf J. 1986; 20:279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, J, Brunelle R. A nonparametric method for combining multilaboratory data. Drug Inf J. 2002:36:395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chuang-Stein C. Some issues concerning the normalization of laboratory data based on reference ranges. Drug Inf J. 2001;35:153–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Herrera L. The precision of percentiles in establishing normal limits in medicine. J Lab Clin Med. 1958;52:34–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunden MN, Clark JJ, Sutter ML. A general method of determining normal ranges applied to blood values for dogs. Am J Clin Pathol. 1970;53: 332–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Trost DC, Hu M, Brailey AG, Hoffman JM. Probability-based construction of reference ranges for ratios of Log-Gaussian analytes: An example from automated leukocyte counts. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;117:851–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis Ruvuna PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruvuna, F., Flores, D., Mikrut, B. et al. Generalized Lab Norms for Standardizing Data from Multiple Laboratories. Ther Innov Regul Sci 37, 61–79 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150303700109

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150303700109

Key Words

Navigation