Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Bias Adjustment on Actuarial Survival Curves

  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medical device companies report the performance of their products through actuarial survival curves. Analyses are based on “passive” databases. For pacemakers, a significant number of explanted devices may not be reported to manufacturers. Thus, expiant information is lost. High rates of underreporting of failures could result. Therefore, performance curves could indicate better survival rates than those that are actually occurring. Samples of closely-followed patients called active samples are used to adjust survival curves for underreported failures. Through simulations, this paper shows a need for a larger sample size for active components and what degree of underreporting failures would be necessary to assure better estimates using adjustments rather than estimates that ignore adjustments. The issues in this paper have a much broader context as pharmaceutical companies increasingly rely on medical devices to monitor patients ’ health or deliver drugs. This can also apply to survival cunes for adverse events in Phase 4 clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mann NR, Schafer RE, Singpurwalla ND. Methods for Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life Data. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller RG. Survival Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalbfleish JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cox DR, Oakes D. Analysis of Survival Data. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gross AJ, Clark VA. Survival Distributions: Reliability Applications in the Biomedical Sciences. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lawless JF. Statistical Methods and Models for Lifetime Data. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson W. Applied Life Data Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Meeker WQ, Escobar LA. Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee ET. Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee ET. Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. Second Edition. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Andersen PK, Keiding N. Survival Analysis, Overview. In: The Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, Volume 6. P Armitage, T Colton, eds. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berkson J, Gage RR. Calculation of survival rates for cancer. Proceedings of Staff Meetings, Mayo Clinic. 1950;25:250.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cutler SJ, Ederer F. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Diseases. 1958;8:699–712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations, J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blischke WR, Murthy DNP, eds. Product Warranty Handbook. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blischke WR, Murthy DNP. Warranty Cost Analysis. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leitch JW, Dear K, Curteis P. Upward bias in estimates of pacemaker reliability: effect of unreported patient mortality. J Am Coll Cardiology. 1994;24: 1078–1081.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brookmeyer R, Yasui Y. Statistical analysis of passive surveillance disease registry data. Biometrics. 1995;51:831–842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. HIMA Pacemaker Task Force. Adjustment procedure for life table in presence of under-reported events. Washington, DC: Advanced Medical Technology Association; April 22, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration. Guidance to Sponsors on the Development of a Discretionary Postmarket Surveillance Study for Permanent Implantable Cardiac Pacemaker Electrodes (Leads). Rockville, MD: Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration; Revised June 9, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, Breslow NE, Cox DR, Howard SV, Mantel N, McPherson K, Peto J, Smith PG. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient, Part II. Br J Cancer. 1977;35:1–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration. Draft Guidance to Sponsors Regarding Required Postmarket Surveillance Studies of Pacemaker Pulse Generators. Rockville, MD: Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration; Revised September 15, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Feinberg SE. Bibliography on capture-recapture modeling with application to census undercount adjustment. Survey Methodology. 1992;18:143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Seber GAF. Capture-recapture methods. In: Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. Vol. 1. S Kotz, NL Johnson, eds. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1982;367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goldman AI, Hillman D. Exemplary data, sample size and power in the design of event-time clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1992;13:256–271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This author is currently working for Amgen Inc., Biostatistics Department, One Amgen Center. MS 24-1-C, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320.

This author is current working for St. Jude Medical Inc., Cardiac Rhythm Management Division, Clinical Research Department, 15900 Valley View Court, Sylmar, CA 91342.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chernick, M.R., Poulsen, E. & Wang, Y. Effects of Bias Adjustment on Actuarial Survival Curves. Ther Innov Regul Sci 36, 595–609 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150203600314

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150203600314

Key Words

Navigation