Skip to main content
Log in

Pricing Policies in the Pharmaceutical Sector

  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we analyze the problem of determining the price for new drugs in a market where stringent budget constraints on public expenditure exists and we suggest an innovative methodology to set drug prices. The market is characterized by asymmetry of information and a high proportion of investment in research and development, an element that must be taken into account because it is only through research that it is possible to obtain better drugs.

Our proposed method allows one to set the price of new drugs in different market contexts, that is, where less effective alternatives are already sold or in new markets. We also propose a unified methodology to evaluate the social value of drugs in different markets through the definition of a function of the cost per quality adjusted life year that society is willing to pay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Capri S, Terranova L, Merlo FL, et al. and the members of GISF Italian Group for Pharmacoeconomic Studies. Guidelines for Economic Evaluations in Italy: Recommendations from the Italian Group of Pharmacoeconomic Studies. Drug Inf J. 2001; 35(3):189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Levaggi R, Capri S. Economia Sanitaria. (Health Economics) Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Levaggi R. Resources allocation and information: assymetry in the pharmaceutical expenditure. Rivista di Diritto Finanziario e Scienza delle Finanze. 1998; 57(1):155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laffont JJ, Tirole J. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Armstrong MS, Cowan S, Vickers J. Regulatory Reform. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gravelle H. Ex post value reimbursement for pharmaceuticals. Med Decision Making. 1998;18 suppl: S27–S38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tirole J. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baron DP, Myerson RB. Regulating a monopolist with unknown costs. Econometrica. 1982; 50(3):911–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loeb M, Magat WA. A decentralised method for utility regulation. J Law Economics. 1979;22:299–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Benzi G. New European pharmaceutical system and “drug value.” European Union Review. 1998;3:51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Williams A, Kind P. The present state of play about QALYs. In A. Hopkins (ed) Measures of the quality of life. London, United Kingdom: Royal College of Physicians; 1992:21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zweifel P, Breyer F. Health Economics. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosella Levaggi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Capri, S., Levaggi, R. Pricing Policies in the Pharmaceutical Sector. Ther Innov Regul Sci 36, 453–464 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150203600226

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150203600226

Key Words

Navigation