Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Study of Some Approaches for Estimating Tolerance Limits

  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a dose finding study the aim is to come up with a safe and efficient drug administration. By comparing the estimated tolerance limits of the concentrations with a predetermined desired interval, that is, the therapeutic window, one may be able to adjust the drug dosage to attain a large proportion of the population within the window. For drugs with a therapeutic window situated at high concentrations close to toxic levels, one has to achieve a balance between attaining a large proportion of the population at efficiently high levels on one hand and the risks of an overdose on the other hand. In such cases, it is important to use the proper estimation approach for the upper tolerance limit. Here, the conservative estimation approach intended for a drug with potentially adverse side effects is compared with the expectation approach intended for a drug with harmless side effects. It is shown in an example that the expectation approach can be considerably more efficient when used in the latter case, an advantage that is rarely discussed when proposing estimators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rowland M, Tozer TN. Clinical Pharmacokinetics: Concepts and Applications. London: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mee RW. Normal-distribution tolerance limits for stratified random samples. Technometrics. 1989;31(1):99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guttman I. Tolerance regions, statistical. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL, eds. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. Volume 9. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1982;272–287.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilks SS. Mathematical Statistics. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wald A. An extension of Wilks’ method for setting tolerance limits. Ann Math Stat. 1943;14:45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tukey JW. Non-parametric estimation II: Statistically equivalent blocks and tolerance regions—the continuous case. Ann Math Stat. 1947;18:529–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nickens DJ. Using tolerance limits to evaluate laboratory data. Drug Inf J. 1998;32(1):261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilks SS. Determination of sample sizes for setting tolerance limits. Ann Math Stat. 1941;12:91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Food and Drug Administration. Draft Guideline on Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials. FDA Federal Register, 1997: vol. 62 no. 90, 25712–25726.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gillespie JA, Srinivasan R. Distribution-free simultaneous outer and inner tolerance limits for screening and descriptive purposes. Comm Stat-Theory Methods. 1994;23(5): 1357–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Petzold.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petzold, M. A Comparative Study of Some Approaches for Estimating Tolerance Limits. Ther Innov Regul Sci 35, 1013–1018 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150103500340

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150103500340

Key Words

Navigation