Skip to main content
Log in

Industry-Based Medical Information in Europe: Practices and Customer Expectations

  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pharmaceutical companies’ medical information services are well established in Europe. They are responsible for providing information about a company’s medicines to health care professionals and to the company’s marketing, sales, and other staff. Although terminology, roles, and responsibilities differ from country to country (and from company to company), there are many similarities.

The aim of this article is to give a brief overview of medical information services in Europe. Although both of us are based in the United Kingdom, we have extensive contact with our colleagues in mainland Europe. Our comments are based on our own experience and on what we have learned from our colleagues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries’ Associations. European Code of Practice for the Promotion of Medicines. Brussels: EFPIA; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority. Code of Practice for the Pharmaceutical Industry. London: Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith R. What clinical information do doctors need? Br Med J. 1996;313:1062–1068.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wyatt J. Use and sources of medical knowledge. Lancet. 1991;338:1368–1373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stinson ER, Mueller DA. Survey of health professionals’ information habits and needs. JAMA. 1980;243:140–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Robson AS, Blake J, Chandler R, et al. Medical information services in the pharmaceutical industry: a survey of pharmacists’ views with recommendations. Pharmaceut J. 1996;256:864–866.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shaughnessy AF, Slawson DC. Pharmaceutical representatives. Effective if used with caution. Br Med J. 1996;312:1494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Association of Information Officers in the Pharmaceutical Industry. AIOPl guidelines on standards for medical information departments 1999. http://www.aiopi.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leighton S. Drug information pharmacists survey of pharmaceutical industry medical information services. Abstract presented to the 26th UK Drug Information Conference, June 29-July 1, 2000, Cardiff, Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Healy EM, Kaitin KI. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products’ centralized procedure for product approval: Current status. Drug Inf J. 1999;33:969–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Riggins JL, Ferguson KJ, Gorham E. Globalizing medical information services at Eli Lilly and Company. Drug Inf J. 1999;33:515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Robson A, Bandle E, Ince J. Medinfolink: a practical approach to knowledge management at SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals. In: Online Information 99, Proceedings. Oxford: Learned Information Europe Ltd; 1999: 87–191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Robson Cbiol, MIBiol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robson, A.S., Robson, D. Industry-Based Medical Information in Europe: Practices and Customer Expectations. Ther Innov Regul Sci 34, 1089–1095 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150003400414

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150003400414

Key Words

Navigation