Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits

  • Isabelle Maignan
  • O. C. Ferrell
  • G. Tomas M. Hult


The article explores the nature of corporate citizenship and its relevance for marketing practitioners and academic researchers. Specifically, a conceptualization and operationalization of corporate citizenship are first proposed. Then, an empirical investigation conducted in two independent samples examines whether components of an organization’s culture affect the level of commitment to corporate citizenship and whether corporate citizenship is conducive to business benefits. Survey results suggest that market-oriented cultures as well as humanistic cultures lead to proactive corporate citizenship, which in turn is associated with improved levels of employee commitment, customer loyalty, and business performance. The results point to corporate citizenship as a potentially fruitful business practice both in terms of internal and external marketing.


Corporate Social Responsibility Business Ethic Market Orientation Corporate Social Performance Business Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abbott, Walter F. and Joseph R. Monsen. 1979. “On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility.”Academy of Management Journal 22 (3): 501–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. “Amway.” 1997.Forbes, January 13, S56.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, James C. 1987. “An Approach for Confirmatory Measurement and Structural Equation Modeling of Organizational Properties.”Management Science 33 (April): 525–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. — and David W. Gerbing. 1988. “Some Methods for Respecifying Measurement Models to Obtain Unidimensional Construct Measurement.”Journal of Marketing Research 19 (November): 453–460.Google Scholar
  5. Armstrong, J. Scott and Terry S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Non-Response Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (August): 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aupperle, Kenneth E., Archie B. Carroll, and John D. Hatfield. 1985. “An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability.”Academy of Management Journal 28 (2): 446–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bagozzi, Richard P. and Lynn W. Phillips. 1982. “Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal.”Administrative Science Quarterly 27 (September): 459–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. — and Yaoujae Yi. 1988. “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (2): 74–94.Google Scholar
  9. Barney, Jay. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.”Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belch, George E. 1981. “An Examination of Comparative and Non-Comparative Television Commercials: The Effects of Claim Variation and Repetition on Cognitive Response and Message Acceptance.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (August): 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bentler, Peter M. and Chih-Ping Cho. 1988. “Practical Issues in Structural Modeling.” InCommon Problems/Proper Solutions: Avoiding Error in Quantitative Research. Ed. J. Scott Long. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 161–192.Google Scholar
  12. Berry, Leonard L. 1995. “Relationship Marketing of Services—Growing Interest, Emerging Perspectives.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (4): 236–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bollen, Kenneth A. 1989.Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Bragdon, J. H., Jr. and J. T. Marlin. 1979. “Is Pollution Profitable?”Risk Management 19 (4): 9–18.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, Tom J. and Peter A. Dacin. 1997. “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses.”Journal of Marketing 61 (January): 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burke, Lee and Jeanne M. Logdson. 1996. “How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off.”Long Range Planning 29 (4): 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carroll, Archie B. 1979. “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance.”Academy of Management Review 4 (4): 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. — 1991. “Corporate Social Performance Measurement: A Comment on Methods for Evaluating an Elusive Construct.”Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 12: 385–401.Google Scholar
  19. Churchill, Milbert A. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs.”Journal of Marketing Research 16 (February): 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clarkson, Max B. E. 1988. “Corporate Social Performance in Canada, 1976–1986.”Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 10: 241–265.Google Scholar
  21. — 1991. “Defining, Evaluating, and Managing Corporate Social Performance: The Stakeholder Management Model.”Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 12: 331–358.Google Scholar
  22. — 1995. “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance.”Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cochran, Philip L. and Robert A. Wood. 1984. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance.”Academy of Management Journal 27: 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cooke, Robert A. and Denise M. Rousseau. 1988. “Behavioral Norms and Expectations: A Quantitative Approach to the Assessment of Organizational Culture.”Group and Organization Studies 13 (3): 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. — and Elmer H. Burack. 1989. “Organizational Culture and Human Resource Management.” InOrganizational Culture Inventory Leader’s Guide. Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics, Appendix 3.1–3.36.Google Scholar
  26. — and Janet L. Hartmann. 1989. “Interpreting the Cultural Styles Measured by the OCI.” InOrganizational Culture Inventory Leader’s Guide. Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics, 23–48.Google Scholar
  27. Davidson, W. N. and D. L. Worrell. 1990. “A Comparison and Test of the Use of Accounting and Stock Market Data in Relating Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance.”Akron Business and Economic Review 21: 7–19.Google Scholar
  28. Day, George S. 1994a. “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organization.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. — 1994b. “Continuous Learning About Markets.”California Management Review 36 (Summer): 9–31.Google Scholar
  30. — and Robin Wensley. 1988. “Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority.”Journal of Marketing 52 (April): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Deshpandé, Rohit, John U. Farley, and Frederick E. Webster, Jr. 1993. “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 54 (January): 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. — and Frederick E. Webster. 1989. “Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining the Research Agenda.”Journal of Marketing 53 (January): 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dick, Alan S. and Kunal Basu. 1994. “Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22 (2): 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Donaldson, Thomas and Lee E. Preston. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Drumwright, Minette E. 1994. “Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fornell, Claes and David F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (February): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Friedman, Milton. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.”New York Times Magazine, September 13, 122–126.Google Scholar
  38. Furse, David H., Girish N. Punj, and David W. Stewart. 1984. “A Typology of Individual Search Strategies Among Purchasers of New Automobiles.”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (March): 417–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gatignon, Hubert and Jean-Marc Xuereb. 1997. “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance.”Journal of Marketing Research 34 (February): 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. George, William R. and Leonard L. Berry. 1981. “Guidelines for Advertising Services.”Business Horizons 24 (July/August):52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gerbing, David W. and James C. Anderson. 1992. “Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models.”Sociological Methods and Research 21 (2): 132–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gilly, Mary C. and Mary Wolfinbarger. 1998. “Advertising’s Internal Audience.”Journal of Marketing 62 (1): 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goodpaster, K. E. 1991. “Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis.”Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1): 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Graves, Samuel B. and Sandra A. Waddock. 1994. “Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance.”Academy of Management Journal 37 (5): 1034–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Griffin, Jennifer J. and John F. Mahon. 1997. “The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate.”Business and Society 36 (1): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hunt, Shelby D. and Lawrence B. Chonko. 1984. “Marketing and Machiavellism.”Journal of Marketing 48 (Summer): 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hurley, Robert F. and G. Tomas M. Hult. 1998. “Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination.”Journal of Marketing 62 (3): 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jacoby, Jacob and David B. Kyner. 1973. “Brand Loyalty Versus Repeat Purchase Behavior.”Journal of Marketing Research 10 (February): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 57 (July): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jones, Del. 1997. “Good Works, Good Business.”USA Today April 25, 1B.Google Scholar
  51. Jones, Thomas M. 1995. “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics.”Academy of Management Review 20 (2): 404–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jöreskog, Karl G. and Dag Sörbom. 1993.LISREL 8: A Guide to the Program and Applications. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
  53. Keller, Kevin Lane. 1993. “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity.”Journal of Marketing 57 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kilman, R. H. and M. J. Saxton. 1983.The Kilman-Saxton Culture-Gap Survey. Pittsburgh: Organizational Design Consultants.Google Scholar
  55. Lewin, Arie Y., Tomoaki Sakano, Carroll U. Stevens, and Bart Victor. 1995. “Corporate Citizenship in Japan: Survey From Japanese Firms.”Journal of Business Ethics 14 (2): 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McDonald, Roderick P. and Herbert W. Marsh. 1990. “Choosing a Multivariate Model: Noncentrality and Goodness of Fit.”Psychological Bulletin 107 (2): 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McGuire, Jean B., Alison Sundgren, and Thomas Schneeweis. 1988. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance.”Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Menon, Ajay and Anil Menon. 1997. “Enviropreneurial Marketing Strategy: The Emergence of Corporate Environmentalism as Market Strategy.”Journal of Marketing 61 (January): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Miller, William H. 1996. “Citizenship That’s Hard to Ignore.”Industry Week (September 2): 21–24.Google Scholar
  60. Moorman, Christine. 1995. “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (August): 318–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Moskowitz, Milton. 1972. “Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks.”Business and Society Review 1 (Spring): 72–75.Google Scholar
  62. Mowday, R., L. Porter, and S. Steers. 1979. “The Measurement of Organizational Commitment.”Journal of Vocational Behavior 14: 224–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mullen, Jennifer. 1997. “Performance-Based Corporate Philanthropy: How ‘Giving Smart’ Can Further Corporate Goals.”Public Relations Quarterly (Summer): 42–48.Google Scholar
  64. Narver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater. 1990. “The Effect of Market Orientation on Business Profitability.”Journal of Marketing (October): 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. O’Reilly, Charles III and Jennifer Chatman. 1986. “Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior.”Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (3): 492–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pinkston, Tammie S. and Archie B. Carroll. 1994. “Corporate Citizenship Perspectives and Foreign Direct Investment in the U.S.”Journal of Business Ethics 13: 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Preston, L. E. 1978. “Analyzing Corporate Social Performance: Methods and Results.”Journal of Contemporary Business 7: 135–149.Google Scholar
  68. Pritchard, Robert D. and Bernard W. Karasick 1973. “The Effects of Organizational Climate on Managerial Job Performance and Job Satisfaction.”Organizational Behavior and Humane Performance 9: 126–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reynolds, Paul D. 1986. “Organizational Culture as Related to Industry, Position, and Performance: A Preliminary Report.”Journal of Management Studies 23 (3): 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Samiee, Saeed and Kendall Roth. 1992. “The Influence of Global Marketing Standardization on Performance.”Journal of Marketing 56 (April): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schein, Edgar H. 1984. “Coming to a New Awareness of Organizational Culture.”Sloan Management Review (Winter): 3–16.Google Scholar
  72. Singhapakdi, Anusorn, Kenneth Kraft, Scott J. Vitell, and Kumar C. Rallapalli. 1995. “The Perceived Importance of Ethics and Social Responsibility on Organizational Effectiveness: A Survey of Marketers.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (1): 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Slater, Stanley F. and John C. Narver. 1994. “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Smith, Craig. 1996. “Corporate Citizens and Their Critics.”New York Times, September 8, 11.Google Scholar
  75. Spencer, B. A. and G. S. Taylor. 1987. “A Within and Between Analysis of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance.”Akron Business and Economic Review 18: 7–18.Google Scholar
  76. Spicer, B. H. 1980. “Market Risk, Accounting Data and Companies’ Pollution Control Records.”Journal of Business, Finance, and Accounting 5: 67–83.Google Scholar
  77. Stanwick, Peter A. and Sarah D. Stanwick. 1998. “The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination.”Journal of Business Ethics 17: 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Strand, Rich. 1983. “A Systems Paradigm of Organizational Adaptations to the Social Environment.”Academy of Management Review 8 (1): 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tellis, Gerard J. 1988. “Advertising Exposure, Loyalty, and Brand Purchase: A Two-Stage Model of Choice.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (May): 134–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Thomas, Aniysa S. and Roy L. Simerly. 1995. “Internal Determinants of Corporate Social Performance: The Role of Top Managers.”Academy of Management Journal Best Paper Proceedings. Ed. Doroty P. Moore. Madison, WI: Omnipress, 411–415.Google Scholar
  81. Turban, Daniel B. and Daniel W. Greening. 1996. “Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees.”Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vance, Stanley C. 1975. “Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks?”Management Review 64 (8): 19–24.Google Scholar
  83. Varadarajan, P. Rajan and Anil Menon. 1988. “Cause-related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy.”Journal of Marketing 52 (July): 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Victor, Bart and John B. Cullen. 1987. “A Theory and Measurement of Ethical Climate in Organizations.” InResearch in Corporate Social Performance and Policy. Eds. Barnett A. Greenberg and Danny N. Bellenger. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 477–481.Google Scholar
  85. — and —. 1988. “The Organizational Bases of Work Climates.”Administrative Science Quarterly (March): 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Waddock, Sandra E. and Samuel B. Graves. 1997. “The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link.”Strategic Management Journal 18 (4): 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wartick, Steven L. and Philip L. Cochran. 1985. “The Evolution of the Corpomate Social Performance Model.”Academy of Management Review 10 (4): 758–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wokutch, Richard E. and Elizabeth W. McKinney. 1991. “Behavioral and Perceptual Measures of Corporate Social Performance.”Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 12: 309–330.Google Scholar
  89. Wood, Donna. 1991. “Corporate Social Performance Revisited.”Academy of Management Review 16 (4): 691–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Xenikou, Athena and Adrian Furnham. 1996. “A Correlational and Factor Analytic Study of Four Questionnaire Measures of Organizational Culture.”Human Relations 49 (3): 349–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabelle Maignan
    • 1
  • O. C. Ferrell
    • 2
  • G. Tomas M. Hult
    • 3
  1. 1.University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Colorado State UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Florida State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations