The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance

  • William E. Baker
  • James M. Sinkula


Although a large body of research theoretically asserts a positive relationship between market orientation and organizational performance, fewer empirical studies demonstrate it using multiple and varied organizational performance measures. Additionally, a series of recent studies have theoretically proposed, but not empirically demonstrated, that a firm’s learning orientation is likely to indirectly affect organizational performance by improving the quality of its market-oriented behaviors and directly influence organizational performance by facilitating the type of generative learning that leads to innovations in products, procedures, and systems. This empirical study supports all of these specific contentions and the more global notion that higher order learning processes may be critical in creating a sustainable competitive advantage in the firm.


  1. Aaker, David A. 1988.Strategic Market Management. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, Leona S. and Stephen G. West. 1991.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, James C. 1987. “An Approach for Confirmatory Measurement and Structural Equation Modeling of Organizational Properties.”Management Science 33 (April): 525–541.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, Jonlee and Daniel C. Smith. 1996. “In Search of the Marketing Imagination: Factors Affecting the Creativity of Marketing Programs for Mature Products.”Journal of Marketing Research 23 (May): 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Argyris, Chris and Donald A. Schön. 1978.Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong, J. Scott and Terry S. Overton (1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (August): 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bagozzi, Richard P. and Lynn W. Phillips. 1982. “Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal.”Administrative Science Quarterly 27 (September): 459–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. — and Youjae Yi. 1989. “On the Use of Structural Equation Models in Experimental Designs.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (August): 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bain, Joe S. 1959.Industrial Organization. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Bateson, Gregory. 1972.Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  11. Bentler, Peter M. and Chih-Ping Cho. 1988. “Practical Issues in Structural Modeling.” InCommon Problems/Proper Solutions: Avoiding Error in Quantitative Research. Ed. J. Scott Long. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 161–192.Google Scholar
  12. Bettis, R. A. and C. K. Prahalad. 1995. “The Dominant Logic: Retrospective and Extension.”Strategic Management Journal 16:5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boulding, William and Richard Staelin. 1990. “Environment, Market Share, and Market Power.”Management Science 36 (October): 1160–1177.Google Scholar
  14. Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs.”Journal of Marketing Research 16 (February): 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Day, George S. 1977. “Diagnosing the Product Porfolio.”Journal of Marketing 41 (April): 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. —. 1984.Strategic Market Planning. New York: West.Google Scholar
  17. — 1991. “Learning About Markets.” Marketing Science Institute Report Number 91-117. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. — 1994a. “Continuous Learning About Markets.”California Management Review 36 (Summer): 9–31.Google Scholar
  19. — 1994b. “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Geus, Arie P. 1988. “Planning as Learning.”Harvard Business Review 66 (March–April): 70–74.Google Scholar
  21. Deshpande, Rohit, John U. Farley, and Frederick E. Webster. 1993. “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 57 (January): 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dess, G. G. and R. B. Robinson. 1984. “Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures: The Case of the Privately-Held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit.”Strategic Management Journal 5 (July–September): 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dickson, Peter R. 1996. “The Static and Dynamic Mechanics of Competition: A Comment on Hunt and Morgan’s Comparative Advantage Theory.”Journal of Marketing 60 (October): 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dougherty, Deborah. 1989. “Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation.” Marketing Science Institute Report No. 89-114. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  25. Finney, J. W., R. E. Mitchell, R. C. Cronkite, and R. H. Moos. 1984. “Methodological Issues in Estimating Main and Interactive Effects: Examples From Coping/Social Support and Stress Field.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior 25:85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Foster, Richard N. 1986. “Timing Technological Transitions.” InTechnology in the Modern Corporation. Ed. Mel Horwitch. New York Pergamon.Google Scholar
  27. Frazier, Gary L. and Walfried M. Lassar. 1996. “Determinants of Distribution Intensity.”Journal of Marketing 60 (October): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Galer, Graham and Kees van der Heijden. 1992. “The Learning Organization: How Planners Create Organizational Learning.”Marketing Intelligence and Planning 10 (6): 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garvin, David A. 1993. “Building a Learning Organization.”Harvard Business Review 71 (July–August): 78–91.Google Scholar
  30. Gatignon, Hubert and Jean-Marc Xuereb. 1997. “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance.”Journal of Marketing Research 34 (February): 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gerbing, David W. and James C. Anderson. 1988. “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (May): 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hedberg, Bo. 1981. “How Organizations Learn and Unlearn.” InHandbook of Organizational Design. Eds. Paul C. Nystrom and William H. Starbuck. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–27.Google Scholar
  33. Heide, Jan B. 1994. “Interorganizational Governance in Marketing channels.”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huber, George P. 1991. “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures.”Organization Science 2 (February): 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hunt, Shelby D. and Robert M. Morgan. 1996. “The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions.”Journal of Marketing 60 (October): 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jacobson, Robert. 1992. “The ‘Austrian’ School of Strategy.”Academy of Management Review 17 (October): 782–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. — and David A. Aaker. 1987. “The Strategic Role of Product Quality.”Journal of Marketing 51 (October): 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 57 (July): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1990. “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications.”Journal of Marketing 54 (April): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ——, and Ajith Kumar. 1993. “MARKOR: A Measure of Market Orientation.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (November): 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee, S., J. F. Courtney, Jr., and R. M. O’Keefe. 1992. “A System for Organizational Learning Using Cognitive Maps.”OMEGA International Journal of Management Science 20 (Spring): 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moorman, Christine. 1995. “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (September): 318–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. — and Anne S. Miner. 1997. “The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity.”Journal of Marketing Research 34 (February): 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. — and —. 1998. “The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Performance Development.”Journal of Marketing 62 (July): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Narver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater. 1990. “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability.”Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nystrom, P. C. and W. Starbuck. 1984. “To Avoid Organizational Crises, Unlearn.”Organizational Dynamics 13 (Spring): 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pedhazur, Elazar J. 1982.Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  48. Porac, Joseph F. and Howard Thomas. 1990. “Taxonomic Mental Models in Competitor Definition.”Academy of management Review 15 (2): 224–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sackmann, Sonja A. 1991.Cultural Knowledge in Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Scherer, F. M. 1980.Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  51. Senge, Peter M. 1990.The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  52. — 1992. “Mental Models.”Planning Review 20 (March–April): 4–10, 44.Google Scholar
  53. Shaw, Robert B. and Dennis N. T. Perkins. 1991. “Teaching Organizations to Learn.”Organization Development Journal 9 (Winter): 1–12.Google Scholar
  54. Sinkula, James M. 1994. “Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning.”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. —, William Baker, and Thomas G. Noordewier. 1997. “A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge and Behavior.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (Fall): 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Slater, Stanley F. and John C. Narver. 1994. “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. — and —. 1995. “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization.”Journal of Marketing 59 (July): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith, K. W. and M. S. Sasaki. 1979. “Decreasing Multicollinearity: A Method for Models with Multiplicative Functions.”Sociological Methods and Research 8:35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stata, Ray. 1992. “Management Innovation.”Executive Excellence 9 (June): 8–9.Google Scholar
  60. Tobin, Daniel R. 1993.Re-educating the Corporation: Foundations for the Learning Organization. Essex Junction, VT: Oliver Wright.Google Scholar
  61. Von Hippel, Eric. 1988.The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Walker, Orville C. and Robert W. Ruekert. 1987. “Marketing’s Role in the Implementation of Business Strategies: A Critical Review and Conceptual Framework.”Journal of Marketing 51 (July): 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. West, Stephen G., Irwin Sandler, David R. Pillow, Louise Baca, and Joanne C. Gersten. 1991. “The Use of Structural Equation Modeling in Generative Research: Toward the Design of a Preventive Intervention for Bereaved Children.”American Journal of Community Psychology 19 (Fall): 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • William E. Baker
    • 1
  • James M. Sinkula
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VermontVermontUSA

Personalised recommendations