Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between family communication and consumer activities of adolescents: An exploratory study

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses a multitrait, multi-informant approach to examine the relationships between family communication and adolescent involvement in consumer activity using two measures of family communication, one that measures the general quality of communication between parents and adolescents, and another that measures the frequency of consumption-specific communication between parents and adolescents. In addition, the perceptions of mothers, fathers, and adolescents are used in the analysis. Findings show that the two communication constructs are conceptually distinct. Positive relationships between the communication constructs and adolescents’ consumer activities are found; however, the presence of significant relationships depends on which individual family members’ or family member dyads’ perceptions are used in the analysis. On the basis of the findings, several suggestions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bames, Howard L. and David H. Olson. 1982. “Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale”. InFamily Inventories: Inventories Used in a National Survey of Families Across the Family Life Cycle. Eds. David H. Olson, H. I. McCubbin, H. Barnes, A. Larsen, M. Muxen, and M. Wilson. St. Paul: University of Minnesota, Family Social Science, 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and David H. Olson. 1985. “Parent-Adolescent Communication and the Circumplex Model”Child Development 56:438–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Jacob E. and Leon Mann. 1990. “The Relationship Between Family Structure and Process Variables and Adolescent Decision Making.”Journal of Adolescence 13:25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Walter. 1967.Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald T. and Donald W. Fiske. 1959. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix.”Psychological Bulletin 56(2): 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Eamest Q. 1969. “Adolescent Socialization.” InHandbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Ed. David A. Goslin. Chicago: Rand McNally, 821–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Gilbert A. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Construct.”Journal of Marketing Research 16:64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and George P. Moschis. 1979. “Television and Interpersonal Influences on Adolescent Consumer Learning.”Journal of Consumer Research 6 (June): 23–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Neil M., Orville C. Walker, Jr., and Gilbert A. Churchill, Jr. 1975. “Expectation-Specific Measures of the Intersender Conflict and Role Ambiguity Experienced by Industrial Salesmen.”Journal of Business Research 3 (2): 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxman, Ellen R., Patriya S. Tansuhaj, and Karin M. Ekstrom. 1989a. “Adolescents’ Influence in Family Purchase Decisions: A Socialization Perspective.”Journal of Business Research 18: 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—,and—, and Karin M. Ekstrom. 1989b. “Family Members’ Perceptions of Adolescents’ Influence in Family Decision Making.”Journal of Consumer Research 15:482–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossbart, Sanford, Les Carlson, and Ann Walsh. 1991. “Consumer Socialization and Frequency of Shopping With Children.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19 (3): 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Lawrence A. Crosby. 1984. “Understanding the Bases of Parental Concern and Reaction to Children’s Food Advertising”.Journal of Marketing 48 (Summer): 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotevant, Harold D. and Catherine R. Cooper. 1985. “Patterns of Interaction in Family Relationships and the Development of Identity exploration in Adolescence.”Child Development 56:415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascarenhas, Oswald A. J. and Mary A. Higby. 1993. “Peer, Parent, and Media Influences in Teen Apparel Shopping”.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 21 (Winter): 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masselam, Venus S., Robert F. Marcus, and Clayton L. Stunkard. 1990. “Parent-Adolescent Communication, Family Functioning, and School Performance”.Adolescence 25 (99): 725–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, Jack M. and Steven H. Chaffee. 1972. “The Construction of Social Reality”. InThe Social Influence Process. Ed. J. T. Tedeschi. Chicago: Aldine, 50–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, Jack M. and Steven H. Chaffee. 1979. “Guiding Perspective of a Loose Collaboration”. Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism, Houston, TX.

  • Meadowcroft, J. 1985. “Family Communication Patterns and Political Development: The Child’s Role”.Communication Research 13:603–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Roy L. and George P. Moschis. 1981. “The Effects of Family Communication and Mass Media Use on Adolescent Consumer Learning.”Journal of Communication 31 (Fall): 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Lowndes F. Stephens. 1975. “Some Communication and Demographic Determinants of Adolescent Consumer Learning.”Journal of Consumer Research 2 (September): 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschis, George P. 1978Acquisition of the Consumer Role by Adolescents. Atlanta: Georgia State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1985. “The Role of Family Communication in Consumer Socialization of Children and Adolescents.”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (March): 898–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Gilbert A. Churchill. 1978. “Consumer Socialization: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.”Journal of Consumer Research 15 (November): 599–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschis, George P. and Linda G. Mitchell. 1986. “Television Advertising and Interpersonal Influences on Teenagers’ Participation in Family Consumer Decisions”. InAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13. Ed. R. J. Lutz. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 181–186.

  • — and Roy L. Moore 1978a. “An Analysis of the Acquisition of Some Consumer Competencies Among Adolescents.”Journal of Consumer Affairs 12 (Winter): 276–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • —and—. 1978b. “Family Communication and Consumer Socialization.” InAdvances for Consumer Research, Vol. 6. Ed. William L. Wilkie. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 359–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • —and—. 1979. “Mass Media and Personal Influences on Adolescent Consumer Learning.” InDevelopments in Marketing Science, Vol. 2 Eds. Howard S. Gitlow and Edward W. Wheatley. Greenvale, NY: Academy of Marketing Science, 126–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and Ruth B. Smith. 1983. “The Impact of Family Communication on Adolescent Consumer Socialization.” InAdvances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11. Ed. Thomas C. Kinnear. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 314–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, T. M. 1953. “An Approach to the Study of Communicative Acts.”Psychological Review 60:393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noller, Patricia and Stephen Bagi. 1985. “Parent-Adolescent Communication.”Journal of Adolescence 8:125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Victor J. Callan. 1990. “Adolescents’ Perceptions of the Nature of Their Communication With Parents.”Journal of Youth and Adolescence 19 (4): 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, Jum C. and Ira H. Bernstein. 1994.Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palan, Kay M. and Robert E. Wilkes. 1997. “Adolescent-Parent Interaction in Family Decision Making.”Journal of Consumer Research 24 (2): 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Gary W. and Boyd C. Rollins. 1987. “Parent-Child Socialization.” InHandbook of Marriage and Family. Eds. M. B. Sussman and S. K. Steinmetz. New York, NY: Plenum, 471–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, L. David. 1988. “Family Communication Patterns and the Flow of Information in the Family.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education on Journalism and Mass Communication, Portland, OR.

  • —. 1991. “Family Communication Patterns: An Epistemic Analysis and Conceptual Reinterpretation.”Communication Research 18 (4): 548–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Scott. 1974. “Consumer Socialization.”Journal of Consumer Research 1 (September): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Daniel B. Wackman. 1971. “Family and Media Influences on Adolescent Consumer Learning.”American Behavioral Scientist 14 (January–February): 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and E. Wartella. 1977.How Children Learn to Buy: The Development of Consumer Information Processing Skills. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J. and J. Smollar. 1985.Adolescent Relations with Mothers, Fathers, and Friends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Kay M. Palan is an assistant professor of marketing at the College of Business at Iowa State University. The received her Ph.D. from Texas Tech University. Her research interests include consumer decision-making, adolescent influence in family decision-making, gender effects on consumption and advertising, and philosophy-of-science issues. Her work has appeared in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Consumer Research, andPsychology & Marketing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palan, K.M. Relationships between family communication and consumer activities of adolescents: An exploratory study. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 26, 338–349 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398264006

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398264006

Keywords

Navigation