Skip to main content
Log in

Double jeopardy in television program choice

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Double jeopardy is a phenomenon in which a brand with a low market share not only has fewer customers, but these customers are not very brand loyal. This note reports the results of a study designed to investigate the occurrence of this double jeopardy phenomenon in television program choice. Survey data show that double jeopardy is especially prevalent in television programs that directly compete with each other. Double jeopardy in television program choice may be the consequence of asymmetry in awareness of television programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barwise, Patrick T. 1986. “Repeat-Viewing of Prime-Time US Programs.”Journal of Advertising Research 28 (August): 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Patrick T. and Andrew S.C. Ehrenberg. 1987. “The Liking and Viewing of Regular TV Series.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (June): 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, Subodh and Richard J. Fox. 1992. “Double Jeopardy and Triple Jeopardy in Retail Store Choice.” Working paper. University of Georgia.

  • Castleberry, Stephen B. and Andrew S.C. Ehrenberg. 1990. “Brand Usage: A Factor in Consumer Behavior.”Marketing Research 2 (June): 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, Richard A. and Donald G. Morrison. 1989. “A Brand Switching Model with Implications for Marketing Strategy.”Marketing Science 8 (Winter): 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, Andrew S.C., Gerald J. Goodhardt, and T. Patrick Barwise. 1990. “Double Jeopardy Revisited.”Journal of Marketing 54 (July): 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keng, Kau Ah and Andrew S.C. Ehrenberg. 1984. “Patterns of Store Choice.”Journal of Marketing Research 21 (November): 399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Dean and Keith P. Johnson. 1991. “Differences in the Consumption of Traditional Broadcast and VCR Movie Rentals.”Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 35 (Spring): 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, William N. 1963.Formal Theories of Mass Behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj, S.P. 1985. “Striking a Balance Between Brand Popularity and Brand Loyalty.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Winter): 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, Jonathan B. 1989. “VCR Viewing Patterns.”Journal of Advertising Research 29 (May): 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, N. R. and R. Dunn. 1984. “Stochastic Panel-Data Models of Urban Shopping Behavior.”Environment and Planning A 16 (May): 629–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He received his M.S. in Management Science and Ph.D. in Marketing from the University of Texas at Austin. His work in the areas of research methodology, comparative and outdoor advertising, and Hispanic consumer research have appeared in several marketing and advertising journals includingMarketing Science, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Advertising, Journal of Advertising Research, Psychology and Marketing, andMarketing Letters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donthu, N. Double jeopardy in television program choice. JAMS 22, 180–185 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394222007

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394222007

Keywords

Navigation